Before voicing your opinion about how "slow" everything is, please read:
Huggle/No you can't have instant reverts.

Huggle not broken

A unified account seems to fix the problem. I went to Special:MergeAccount and after I could get in Huggle. --CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 18:21, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of other stuff is broken as well. For example, blocking. Calvin 1998 ^(t·c) 19:51, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Archives

Index

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6
Archive 7	Archive 8	Archive 9
Archive 10	Archive 11	Archive 12
Archive 13	Archive 14	Archive 15
Archive 16	Archive 17	Archive 18
Archive 19	Archive 20	Archive 21
Archive 22	Archive 23

This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by when more than 1 section is present.

Skip to the bottom

Before voicing your opinion about how "slow" everything is, please read:
Huggle/No you can't have instant reverts.

Huggle not broken

A unified account seems to fix the problem. I went to Special:MergeAccount and after I could get in Huggle. --CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 18:21, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of other stuff is broken as well. For example, blocking. Calvin 1998 ^(t·c) 19:51, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Archives

Index

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6
Archive 7	Archive 8	Archive 9
Archive 10	Archive 11	Archive 12
Archive 13	Archive 14	Archive 15
Archive 16	Archive 17	Archive 18
Archive 19	Archive 20	Archive 21
Archive 22	Archive 23

This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by when more than 1 section is present.

Template loop detected: Wikipedia talk:Huggle/Changes

Feedback

Open in browser

Resolved

– This is fixed in the next version ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 10:55, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

When you press the 'O' key to open the dif in the browser, it sometimes (as in: in one of two attempts) opens it twice.

Also, opening the page in browser is handled inconsistently: pressing 'O' opens it in the default browser, right-clicking on a link and selecting "open in new window" opens it in Internet Explorer. (There should be some way to select which browser Huggle uses.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 17:28, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this, sorry for the slow response. We will add it to out list and see what we can do about it! ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 16:55, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is fixed in the next version [= https://code.google.com/p/huggle/issues/detail?id=199#c1 ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 17:11, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New pages feed

The "new pages" lists don't seem to work properly: the filtered list returns nothing, and the unfiltered one apparently only returns pages created by whitelisted users. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 13:35, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto here. The only thing that I get is new talk pages created by LaraBot and redirects and articles created by whitelisted users. Usb10 ^Connected? 14:56, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for this :) We will add it to our list of stuff to check and try and fix ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 16:55, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As a trial, I ran Huggle on English Wikipedia from cca 14:30 to 14:40 CET. During that time "Filtered new pages" returned nothing, and of the pages in the "All new pages" only one was in article space (Sadler Rogers). Special:NewPages reports the following pages created during that period of time: Inmote, Sadler Rogers, Amstar, No Cause for Concern, Sheldon Axler; of these, Inmote and Amstar were obvious candidates for speedy deletion. (Their creator made his first edit today, and wasn't on the whitelist. On the other hand, the creator of Sadler Rogers wasn't on the whitelist, either.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 14:10, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

it does not work with irc feed only, I will try to do something with that but it does not affect other wikis. Petrb (talk) 15:32, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I tried without IRC feed (I guess it takes all from the API) and it fetched the new pages perfectly, without any delay (at least on eswiki) maybe the bug is with the regex to parse the RC-bot on IRC. -- Màñüé£†¹5 ^talk 15:57, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Whitelist question

Resolved

– --·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 10:55, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why wouldn't I be on the whitelist? Not seeing my name there leads me to wonder.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 16:33, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you have to have had one or more of your edits approved by someone using Huggle for you to be automatically added to the whitelist. I have manually added your name. -down load ׀ sign! 19:10, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for doing that. Cheers,
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 22:54, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArgumentOutOfRangeException

Resolved

– Added to our todo list ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 10:55, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArgumentOutOfRangeException: Value of '-1' is not valid for 'Value'. 'Value' should be between 'minimum' and 'maximum'. Parameter name: Value

  at System.Windows.Forms.ScrollBar.set_Value(Int32 value)
  at Huggle.Main.DrawQueues()
  at Huggle.Processing.ProcessNewEdit(Edit Edit)
  at Huggle.Processing.ProcessRcEdit(Match Match)
  at Huggle.Processing.ProcessRc(String Result)
  at Huggle.Requests.RcApiRequest.Done()
  at Huggle.Requests.Request.ThreadDone()
  at Huggle.Misc.CallbackInvoke(Object TargetObject)

MorganKevinJ^(talk) 01:01, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this. I will add it to our TODO list ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 16:55, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection

Resolved

– Fixed in 2.1.1 / now ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 10:55, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In new Huggle, I still can't request page protection. It lets me fill in the boxes, lets me submit but then comes up "format of request page unknown". Totally confused! Is this supposed to be fixed now?--5 albert square (talk) 01:36, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Twinkle is having similar problems with page protection. (For example, see discussion here.) It may be better, for now, to make requests manually at WP:RFPP. — Spike Toronto 05:59, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks will be fixed ~~in 2.1.1~~ immediately Petrb (talk) 12:04, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Try now. Petrb (talk) 12:48, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Difference between this and Huggle

Resolved

What are the major differences between your fork of Huggle and the official version? Logan _Talk^{Contributions} 15:36, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The difference is that previous one is no longer developed as far as gurch told me if we want to continue development we need to reestablish dev team. This one will have several improvements if you have any suggestions just say! (if you want to add some features and so or report bugs) Petrb (talk) 16:30, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am currently working on stability improvements and fixing bugs which were reported. Petrb (talk) 16:33, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Will it have Mac compatibility? ~Nerdy Science Dude 17:41, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's written in vb, but if some mac devs join the team then you could ask them. I would like to make it cross platform, there is already uhuggle maybe it's sources could be used.Petrb (talk) 18:04, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gurch may no longer be developing HG, but I understand that others have taken it on (User:Sidonuke, ~~User:Mike Rosoft~~, User:The Wordsmith, etc.). Why would you not use your efforts to make the existing one — the one that has been rolled out to hundreds of Wikipedians — a better, more stable, more powerful, anti-vandalism tool? Why not work on perfecting version 0.9.11 and rolling out a perfected version 0.9.12 instead, especially since all the documentation already exists for HG as opposed to HG2? Thanks! —Spike Toronto 02:47, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Are you not required to obtain approval of HG2 from the Bot Approvals Group before publishing it? Or, have you already? Thanks! —Spike Toronto 02:49, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No as gurch told me the development was stopped so there is no one currently developing previous versions I wanted to help but he told me that old huggle is no longer developed, concerning bot approvement old huggle had some? Petrb (talk) 09:20, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If anyone who is now working on previous huggle wants to get developer access to svn, I would grant it to them but I've seen no evidence from trackers that someone worked on previous version since 0.9.11 which is old several months. I am not trying to overtake this project from previous developers if anyone wanted to join they can Petrb (talk) 09:40, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I’m still curious about my other question, Petrb: Why start a brand new Huggle instead of putting your considerable and tremendous efforts into creating a prefected 0.9.12 of the existing Huggle, especially since all of its underlying infrastructure already exists? — Spike Toronto 21:31, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just read my answer, developement was stopped it's not possible, huggle 2 is next version of huggle, it's not brand new I can't just release next version for huggle there is no possibility to gain access to it's project pages on google - it was canceled Petrb (talk) 21:44, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Would it not be easier if we could continue development in the google code project? I see that nothing major has changed really just some people have continued where others have left. I think keeping everything together would defiantly have its benefits in the long term ·Add§hore·^{Talk To Me!} 18:17, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you really believe that it would be better to continue with old pages, I think we could if we kept current versioning, that mean next version 2.0.3 would switch back to huggle 1 config locations, configs would be updated and users of previous versions (0.9) would easily upgraded to 2.0.3 just with regular update of huggle it would use previous location of configs so no one would have troubles, users who switched to 2 would see no difference and users of version 1 would automatically updated, so no one would be affected, I know it may not be best way but it's most friendly and easy to hg users, question is if the development in the future should be done on google or sf. I am sorry for bringing more chaos to this, I really did not know that there is someone who still have dev access to repositories of hg 1. Petrb (talk) 19:08, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should defiantly keep HG2 running for now. We need to update the repo of HG1 to reflect the changes that you have made to the code but keep it 'branded' as plain old huggle. Once the old repo has been updated we could then release the new version being at a guess 2.0.3. We could then advice users of HG2 to move back to HG development would continue :) Sound good? ·Add§hore· ^{Talk ToMe!} 19:17, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What I meant was that we could use huggle pages for HG2, I have no troubles with changing 1 to 2 dunno why it should be problem, I will try to describe it step by step :),

1. I would switch paths back
2. Configs of huggle would be updated so they would be compatible with hg2
3. I would test it properly (this may take a day or more)
4. 2.0.3 would be released on google repositories as huggle.exe (not huggle2 as it is now, but internal versioning would be still 2.0.3)
5. Users of previous versions would be notified on update and would automaticaly update to 2.0.3, same would users of 2x huggle

huggle would use previous pages, repositories and everything would be put back while all users would see no big difference. Of course we could release it as 0.9.12 but as I said - we are recreating dev team I see no reason why not to keep v2 numbering as some users already become familiar with that, that is something we can discuss now. Anyway I will need svn access to google code. Petrb (talk) 19:28, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll stop posting on your talk page now and focus the discussion here. I think it would be a better idea if we merge the configs of "huggle2" into the current HG and then release a v1 of huggle with the fixes and additions in place. Then we can start from a clean slate ish. I think to be tidy it would definatly be a good idea to leave huggle with the current huggle configs as I said earlier there are still many more people using huggle1 than huggle2 ·Add§hore·^{Talk To Me!} 19:53, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have uploaded sources, compile and test, it will most possibly work only on english wiki, I am now about to update all other configs, as I said we can make 2.0.3 which would use configs of hg1 it's just a number :) I wanted to make it 2 so it would be less confusing, but it would still use all hg1 pages. Petrb (talk) 20:09, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you have irc could you please come to #huggle2, thanks :) Petrb (talk) 20:15, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So the result is that project will continue on previous page. Petrb (talk) 23:12, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think that this is a good decision, when the time is right (see below.) — Spike Toronto 06:58, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Crashed

Resolved

– False Alarm ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 10:55, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I just tried Huggle2 (the 'testing' version from SourceForge) and it crashed when it says "Updating message files..." Do you know why this is? I added enable:true to my huggle2.css page. Thanks in advance. –Cwenger (talk) 17:41, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi you tried it on test or english WP? what OS do you have, try it on test wiki if it would fail again I am now using last version which was published few hours ago, try that one if you have older. Petrb (talk) 18:35, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New hg must not be in same folder as previous version, try to remove config.txt if the problem still ocur Petrb (talk) 18:54, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

False alarm, it was just a file permissions issue in Windows 7. Working great now--thanks! –CWenger (talk) 22:03, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary suggestion

Resolved

– Done ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 10:55, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I love that Huggle 2 has more descriptive edit summaries. This is a huge win. But could I make one suggestion regarding the most common edit summary? Currently it is(Reverted edits by X identified as unconstructive modifications (HG 2)), but the word "modification" sounds too technical and more importantly, is not the term we use for edits. The edit summary could just as easily read (Reverted edits by X identified as unconstructive (HG 2)) which is shorter, simpler, and still proper English. Regards, Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 19:56, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Version 2.0.1 comes with customizable summaries they are defined in global conf file, I can change it to whatever you want. Petrb (talk) 20:13, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done, if you want feel free to change it Petrb (talk) 20:54, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bugs

Resolved

– fixed and checking ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 10:55, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The two bugs I had reported for the original Huggle still occur in Huggle 2:

If you press "O" to open the edit in a browser, it sometimes opens the page in two panels.
The "All new pages" listing apparently only returns pages created by whitelisted users, and the "Filtered new pages" list yields nothing. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 23:24, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1 - fixed

2 - checking

(try it on test wp with testing hg) Petrb (talk) 05:56, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 16:14, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another edit summary suggestion

Resolved

– Bug Accepted ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 10:55, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Currently when I choose "factual error" as my rationale for reverting, it returns an edit summary of "(error (HG2))". Could we get this changed to "introduction of factual errors (HG2)" or something along that line? Thanks. --Diannaa ^(Talk) 02:17, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And how about "WP:BLP violation (HG2)" instead of "Bio (HG2)" ? Thanks --Diannaa ^(Talk) 02:21, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is a bug, I should rather disable those two till next version is out. Petrb (talk) 08:24, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keeping config folder from previous version

Resolved

Just a quickie. Can we keep the Config folder from the previous version Huggle 0.9.11? Or do we have to configure from scratch? DVdm (talk) 19:44, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hold on, we are now going to merge huggle and huggle2, configs will be most probably merged with next version Petrb (talk) 20:07, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I have kept a backup of my 0.9-config for safety and gave it a try anyway. Found no problem with the old config. Cheers and keep up the good work. DVdm (talk) 22:04, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bugs

Resolved

– Fixed in 2.1.1 ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 10:55, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In case nobody's noticed before:

I've turned "Confirm multiple reversions of edits by the same user" on and whenever it prompts me, it does it twice

Hope you can fix it sometime soon. Thanks for improving Huggle! Guoguo12 --Talk-- 00:46, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you press revert or revert and warn? Petrb (talk) 07:30, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Revert and warn, although I just press "Q". Guoguo12 --Talk-- 20:27, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Will be fixed in 2.1.1, it really ask twice but not, if you use menu. Petrb (talk) 20:10, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bug

Hey! Little bug in the Testing version, trying to click on a talk page after a revert leads to a error:

NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
   at Huggle.Processing.ProcessHistory(String Result, Page Page)
   at Huggle.Requests.HistoryRequest.ProcessHistoryPart()
   at Huggle.Misc.CallbackInvoke(Object TargetObject)

-- Rich (MTCD)^{Talk Page} 01:12, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rollout/Merger

Resolved

I’ve noticed that there are a number of bugs reported on this page for Huggle2. This suggests to me that it is still very much in beta testing and not ready to completely replace 0.9.11. Yet, I noticed yesterday that there were edits made to the Huggle/Config to prepare for the merger/rollout. Are we jumping the gun a bit? Version 0.9.11 is fairly stable. Should we not wait until HG2 is at least as stable, and been beta tested by a lot more users, before it replaces 0.9.11? Thanks! — Spike Toronto 06:56, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry any change I made to config will not affect you next version will be more stable than 0.9.11. Petrb (talk) 07:05, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Petrb. What’s your timeline for HG2 replacing Version 0.9.11? Thanks again. — Spike Toronto 07:07, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We now do it together with addshore I hope we will fix all stuff in few days, anyway hg 2 does not have more bugs than 0.9.11 those reported bugs are still from previous one, Reported stuff was already fixed. Petrb (talk) 07:32, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bug in queue view

Resolved

– in 2.1.1 ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 10:55, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the description says that it is necessary to copy huggle2 into his own directory. But in this case, huggle2 don't work at dewiki. If it is in the same directory as the old huggle version, all edits are marked as assisted edits (with a star in the icon). ([1]) Greetings,--Inkowik (talk) 18:18, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No please ignore that if you downloaded the last one you don't have to place it to different folder, anyway afer restart it should work versions like 2.0.1 which you probably downloaded is not last. Petrb (talk) 18:27, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi… Huggle2 is now working at dewiki, but there is still the bug Inkowik was talking about. All Edits in the queue look like item 27 in this picture:

Greetings--Spuk968 (talk) 00:45, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not for me. Petrb (talk) 16:33, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, in r2.1.0, all is correct. Thanks! --Inkowik (talk) 17:06, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but for me it's not fixed, all edits are still marked as assisted. What am I doing wrong? Greetings--Spuk968 (talk) 00:23, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The same happens with eswiki, if I use the old config folder all edits are marked as assisted, if I delete the folder I can't use Huggle (can login only to en.wikipedia ru.wikipedia and testwiki) -- Màñüé£†¹5 ^talk 10:04, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am just about release fix be patient, anyway you can use old config.txt to patch this Petrb (talk) 10:07, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~You must add summary to your config with something like HG, you must ask sysop to do that~~ Petrb (talk) 10:12, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed in 2.1.1 Petrb (talk) 10:22, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, it works! -- Màñüé£†¹5 ^talk 11:21, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Testversion Huggle2 and 0.9.11

Hello,
is it possible that I can use Huggle in en.wikipedia again please. I havent change my config, but I can't log in. Thank you (this is my third ask which were archived without any comment). Conny (talk) 18:43, 13 January 2011 (UTC).[reply]

This is not enough, when it happens, why and so. Your config must have enable:true there Petrb (talk) 08:13, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Local config directory

Hi, does Huggle 2.1.0 need the old local config directory from older huggle versions? Here is an user who can't use huggle on dewiki, and he didn't use an older huggle version before. Regards, --Inkowik (talk) 16:56, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome Personal template doesn't auto append signature

Resolved

See this page for an example with 2.1.1.

Exception in 2.1.1

  ArgumentNullException: Hodnota nemůže být NULL.
  Název parametru: input
  v System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex.IsMatch(String input)
  v Huggle.Processing.ProcessEdit(Edit Edit)
  v Huggle.Processing.ProcessContribs(String Result, User User)
  v Huggle.Requests.ContribsRequest.Done()
  v Huggle.Requests.Request.ThreadDone()

Mike Rosoft (talk) 15:29, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mike, are either of Hodnota nemůže být or Název parametru pages you were trying to access? Thanks! — Spike Toronto 22:20, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

error

I got this when i was on Huggle:
InvalidOperationException: Invoke or BeginInvoke cannot be called on a control until the window handle has been created.

  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.MarshaledInvoke(Control caller, Delegate method, Object[] args, Boolean synchronous)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.Invoke(Delegate method, Object[] args)
  at System.Windows.Forms.Control.Invoke(Delegate method)
  at Huggle.UserInfoForm.RefreshData()
  at Huggle.UserInfoForm.GotCount(RequestResult Result)
  at Huggle.Requests.Request.ThreadDone()
  at Huggle.Misc.CallbackInvoke(Object TargetObject)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Breawycker (talk • contribs) 20:03, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Which version of Huggle, Breawycker? — Spike Toronto 22:18, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle running from USB flash drives

I'm a rollbacker of Portuguese Wikipedia and I tested the program in a USB flash drive. The program has worked correctly. Francisco ^{talk contrib} 21:59, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That is good to know anyway configuration is tored on wp so it's very portable though Petrb (talk) 19:27, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Captcha

Captcha will not load properly(error message instead), thus I am currently incapable of using Huggle. Ronk01 talk 23:48, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is the first time...

...that I have ever felt the need to raise an issue with Huggle, in many months of using it. However, I find this latest configuration to be somewhat cumbersome. It doesn't take long until it slows right down and announces Huggle has stopped working properly. Never had this before with any of the previous versions. Orphan Wiki 15:26, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What is your OS? Petrb (talk) 18:07, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Does it happend when you click on next item Petrb (talk) 18:08, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My Operating System is simply MS Windows (Vista). Sometimes clicking next will mess up, (sometimes only a little, but sometimes causing a close-down of HG) and sometimes a revert will take forever and then lead to the whole thing going slow, and eventually having to close. Orphan Wiki 14:30, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Previous version worked better? It was unusable for me on win 7, but there is probably still much to fix Petrb (talk) 19:23, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, no worries, I'll keep on with it. I've used Huggle for a long time, and won't give up on it any time soon. :) Orphan Wiki 20:18, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Does huggle assume that the project namespace is wikipedia?

Does huggle assume that the project namespace is wikipedia? If you try to use huggle on meta it loads the rc feed for the English Wikipedia. This might be the issue since on meta wikipedia:Huggle/Config redirects to the English Wikipedia. MorganKevinJ^(talk) 21:59, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

it's possible? it isn't supposed to be now used on meta. Petrb (talk) 22:31, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle uses "Project" for the project namespace, as it works with all projects. Here's a link to Project:Huggle/Config; it's the same as Wikipedia:Huggle/Config. Here's a link to meta:Project:Huggle/Config; it's the same as meta:Meta/Huggle/Config. Magic. Reach Out to the Truth 00:26, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Advanced" reversion not respecting manual edit summary

In 2.1.1, I twice tried using a manual edit summary from the "Advanced..." reversion dialog, and in both cases my edit summary was not used and the default edit summary (i.e. "Reverted edits by X to last revision by Y") was used instead. This isn't good, as using a default edit summary may give the appearance of a capricious reversion. Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 21:20, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed try it if there were still some troubles let me know Petrb (talk) 08:23, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome Personal template broken in 2.1.2

Resolved

Inserts {{subst:Huggle:welcome-pers}} on page instead of {{subst:Huggle/welcome-pers}} which would be correct.--Gnowor^T_C 07:18, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Exception on update from 2.1.1 to 2.1.2

Today I attempted to run Huggle 2.1.1; it reported that a newer version is available. When I attempted to download it, an exception occurred:

Win32Exception: %1 není platná aplikace typu Win32
v System.Diagnostics.Process.StartWithShellExecuteEx(ProcessStartInfo startInfo)
v System.Diagnostics.Process.Start(ProcessStartInfo startInfo)
v Huggle.UpdateForm.UpdateDone(RequestResult Result)

(The first line means: %1 is not a valid Win32 application.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 18:07, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please try it again I suppose it's problem with download, like the file was not downloaded full. Petrb (talk) 18:11, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I had a similar exception when updating. When I went to the link at WP:HG and downloaded 2.1.2, worked fine. Problem with updating from within Huggle?--Gnowor^T_C 23:42, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Had this same problem on multiple computers—was forced to download manually also. –CWenger (talk) 02:55, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings

Huggle is not giving proper warnings to frequent vandals, I revert/warned an IP three times and no warnings showed up on his talk. Clearly this is a major bug. Ronk01 talk 23:12, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

When this happens, look at the very bottom of Huggle and you will often see Did not warn xx.xxx.xx.x: The user has not edited since their last warning. Or, it might say something to the effect that they were just warned less than 10 seconds ago. In such situations, this is all part of Huggle’s “throttling”. Were there any messages like these? Thanks! — Spike Toronto 02:51, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback

Open in browser

Resolved

– This is fixed in the next version ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 10:55, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

When you press the 'O' key to open the dif in the browser, it sometimes (as in: in one of two attempts) opens it twice.

Also, opening the page in browser is handled inconsistently: pressing 'O' opens it in the default browser, right-clicking on a link and selecting "open in new window" opens it in Internet Explorer. (There should be some way to select which browser Huggle uses.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 17:28, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this, sorry for the slow response. We will add it to out list and see what we can do about it! ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 16:55, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is fixed in the next version [= https://code.google.com/p/huggle/issues/detail?id=199#c1 ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 17:11, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New pages feed

The "new pages" lists don't seem to work properly: the filtered list returns nothing, and the unfiltered one apparently only returns pages created by whitelisted users. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 13:35, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto here. The only thing that I get is new talk pages created by LaraBot and redirects and articles created by whitelisted users. Usb10 ^Connected? 14:56, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for this :) We will add it to our list of stuff to check and try and fix ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 16:55, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As a trial, I ran Huggle on English Wikipedia from cca 14:30 to 14:40 CET. During that time "Filtered new pages" returned nothing, and of the pages in the "All new pages" only one was in article space (Sadler Rogers). Special:NewPages reports the following pages created during that period of time: Inmote, Sadler Rogers, Amstar, No Cause for Concern, Sheldon Axler; of these, Inmote and Amstar were obvious candidates for speedy deletion. (Their creator made his first edit today, and wasn't on the whitelist. On the other hand, the creator of Sadler Rogers wasn't on the whitelist, either.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 14:10, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

it does not work with irc feed only, I will try to do something with that but it does not affect other wikis. Petrb (talk) 15:32, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I tried without IRC feed (I guess it takes all from the API) and it fetched the new pages perfectly, without any delay (at least on eswiki) maybe the bug is with the regex to parse the RC-bot on IRC. -- Màñüé£†¹5 ^talk 15:57, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Whitelist question

Resolved

– --·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 10:55, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why wouldn't I be on the whitelist? Not seeing my name there leads me to wonder.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 16:33, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you have to have had one or more of your edits approved by someone using Huggle for you to be automatically added to the whitelist. I have manually added your name. -down load ׀ sign! 19:10, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for doing that. Cheers,
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 22:54, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArgumentOutOfRangeException

Resolved

– Added to our todo list ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 10:55, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArgumentOutOfRangeException: Value of '-1' is not valid for 'Value'. 'Value' should be between 'minimum' and 'maximum'. Parameter name: Value

  at System.Windows.Forms.ScrollBar.set_Value(Int32 value)
  at Huggle.Main.DrawQueues()
  at Huggle.Processing.ProcessNewEdit(Edit Edit)
  at Huggle.Processing.ProcessRcEdit(Match Match)
  at Huggle.Processing.ProcessRc(String Result)
  at Huggle.Requests.RcApiRequest.Done()
  at Huggle.Requests.Request.ThreadDone()
  at Huggle.Misc.CallbackInvoke(Object TargetObject)