User talk:Courcelles

E-mail is also available, feel free to use it as necessary or desired.

This page is archived by MiszaBot III 60 hours after the last timestamp. If your discussion was archived before it was complete, feel free to go retrieve it.
I have no real system of where to reply, the orange bar exists for a reason, after all. If you're here to leave a talkback notice, thank you, but by all the gods and saints please make sure it is timestamped.

New messages at the bottom, please. It is very, very easy to never see things that are put at the top, unless yours is the only message in the morning. Courcelles

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60
61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70
71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80
81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90
91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100
101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110
111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120
121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130
131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140
141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150
151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by .

Request for opinion

I would like to request your opinion WT:GAN. Thanks and cheers. Jessy _(talk) ^(contribs) • 00:57, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Sources on Vera Caslavska.

Courcelles,if these sources are ok woth you i will repost the information soon.

She scored 2 perfect scores of 10 in event finals at the 1967 European Championships ( Source :Gymnastics,edited by Peter Tatlow,1979,p.143,ISBN 0 7111 0004 7).

Between 1964-68 Caslavska won 19 individual gold medals in the major championships ( World,European,Olympics)compared with 7 for all Soviet gymnasts during this time. (Source : Illustrated History of Gymnastics,John Goodbody,1982,pages 122-125,ISBN 0 09 143350 9).

She won the 1968 Olympic All-Around title with the highest received score up to that time ( Source : Complete Book of Gymnastics,David Hunn,1978,p.30,ISBN 0706356721).

Her win by 1.4 points remains the largest winning margin in Olympic,World,World Cup or European All-Around Championships for women. ( Sources : International Gymnast magazines,British Gymnast magazines,Illustrated History of Gymnastics,Olympics.org).

Olympics : Gorokhovskaya 0.84 Latynina 0.3 Latynina 0.335 Caslavska 0.566 Caslavska 1.4 Turischeva 0.15 Comaneci 0.6 Davydova 0.075 Retton 0.05 Shushunova 0.025 Gutsu 0.012 Podkopayeva 0.18 Amanar 0.051 Patterson 0.176 Liukin 0.6

World Cup Turischeva 0.6 Filatova 0.5 Filatova 0.3 Zakharova 0.15 Zakharova 0.1 Yurchenko/Bicherova 0.1 Shushunova 0.125 Lysenko 0.013

World Championships Rudiko 0.570 Latynina 1.132 Latynina 0.298 Caslavska 0.201 Turischeva 0.6 Turischeva 0.8 Mukhina 0.15 Kim 0.275 Bicherova 0.325 Yurchenko 0.35 Omelianchik/Shushunova 0.338. Dobre 0.163 Boginskaya 0.038 Zmeskal 0.112 Miller 0.007 Miller 0.038 Podkopayeva 0.118 Khorkina 0.049 Olaru 0.069 Khorkina 0.312 Khorkina 0.188 Memmel 0.001 Ferrari 0.275 Johnson 1.25 Sloan 0.05 Mustafina 1.034.

European Championships Latynina 0.667 Kot 0.66 Latynina 0.3 Bilic 0.101 Caslavska 0.701 Caslavska 0.432 Janz 0.55 Lazakovich/Turischeva 0.55 Turischeva 0.45 Comaneci 0.35 Comaneci 0.35 Comaneci 0.6 Gnauck 0.3 Bicherova 0.05 Shushunova 0.175 Silivas 0.3 Boginskaya 0.013 Boginskaya 0.237 Gutsu 0.077 Gogean 0.169 Podkopayeva 0.099 Khorkina 0.232 Khorkina 0.125 Khorkina 0.05 Kozich 0.05 Debauve 0.024 Ferrari 1.175 Semenova 0.05 Olymfacts (talk) 15:54, 5 April 2011 (UTC) olymfacts.[reply]

Those three books are rather old, but there's nothing there that would change with later performances, and they look reliable. Thanks for looking for good sources! Courcelles 08:47, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI#Proposed restrictions

Hi Courcelles. You have closed several ban requests at WP:AN. Would you close a proposed restrictions section at ANI? See WP:ANI#Proposed restrictions and the request at WP:ANI#Requesting closure. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:51, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If it's not closed when I get online this afternoon, I'll dig into it. Courcelles 08:45, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I've added a timestamp to the thread so it won't be prematurely archived. Cunard (talk) 22:41, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A gentle reminder that you've forgotten to close the thread. If you don't have time to do so, I'll try to find another admin to close it. Cunard (talk) 07:26, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have a look, right now. Courcelles 13:20, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Cunard, you'll have to find someone else- after an hour's reading, I decided to comment instead of close. Courcelles 14:50, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah I didn't realise Cunard had made this request; I'd made a similar request of EdJohnston earlier today. :S Still, I appreciated the comment you made there and mumbled why I usually don't mention blocks explicitly [1]. Ncmvocalist (talk) 18:01, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, Courcelles. I've asked ErrantX (talk · contribs) to close it. Cunard (talk) 23:25, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

It seems that I've "un-retired" for now. :) Thanks for your help on the Wendy Starland article re. that new edit review feature; it seems that semi-protection wasn't quite enough to stop the very strange edits to the article. I went ahead and reverted the last change which sliced more than 5K off the article and I left polite word with the user who did so. I figured that if I was going to help out with that article, I'd better do so as an active contributor once more. Thanks again and take care. Regards, --PMDrive1061 (talk) 20:03, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

replied on your talk page, I have no intention of reverting your reversion, but you have engaged in wheel warring. Courcelles 03:20, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for alerting me to that fact. I didn't reactivate my e-mail so I had no way to contact you offsite. To make a long story short, the subject is concerned because of some legal action she's engaged in and asked she asked me to restore the full protection. I did so with no malice or warring intended and I really had no intention of returning to active duty other than as a favor to her. I'd considered a limited return anyway less the vandal-slaying that drove me nuts to begin with, but at a later date. I'll set it right and I hope this settles the matter. I have no intention of overstepping my bounds. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:52, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, all set. The user who alerted me to your concern also reminded me of the folks at WP:OTRS. They are far better equipped to handle the situation and it'll keep me from unintentionally wheel warring or other naughty bits. My immediate plans for the article are to get rid of the outdated links and continue to clean it up as my schedule allows in the hopes that it won't have so much content removed. Thanks for the slap on the wrist. Really. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 04:17, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect. Please set the protection at any level you see fit. You'd be doing her and I a favor and no, you didn't come on too strong based on my unfortunate use of the word "vandalism." Many, many thanks for your diligence and no offense taken.

PMDrive1061 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

FLC for Huskies of Honor

Hello. I have an open featured list candidacy for Huskies of Honor that has gone several days without receiving any comments. I was wondering if you would be willing to take a look? You can find the FLC review page here. –Grondemar 00:07, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sure... tomorrow. Courcelles 00:17, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, no rush. Thanks! –Grondemar 04:25, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mail

Hello, Courcelles. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.