Jump to content

User talk:50.9.109.170

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 50.9.109.170 (talk) at 18:38, 18 October 2011 (→Frank Pavone: why dont you report your self? for reverting sourced material?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sudetenland, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to West Side Boys with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. My76Strat talk 07:47, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at West Side Boys with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. My76Strat talk 07:48, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at West Side Boys with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. My76Strat talk 07:49, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to West Side Boys. My76Strat talk 07:50, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 07:52, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Please frefrain from removing sourced information as you did with Cheney Mason. If you wish to make amendments of this nature, please use the discussion page first and obtain a consensus. Thank you. Evlekis (Евлекис) 12:57, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive; until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Evlekis (Евлекис) 12:59, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from personal attacks as I know what "peder" means. Do not admonish other users as to what they can and cannot revert. The change appears fundemental and it removes sourced information, to that end you must use the discussion page. Evlekis (Евлекис) 13:01, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cheney Mason, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Final warning Evlekis (Евлекис) 13:04, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Evlekis. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. Please don't insult other editors, even if you think they are right. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 21:41, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Frank Pavone with this edit, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 20:28, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Frank Pavone. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Referring to your remark "go patronize someone else". My remark about your "darling" comment was meant to let you know that this kind of attitude is generally not a good idea, as it tends to generate irritation among the people you have to collaborate with. As you said, time to move on. Keep cool and don't automatically mistake friendly advice for patronising. DVdm (talk) 08:08, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Audrey Hepburn. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MarnetteD | Talk 02:46, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

maybe in colorado. 50.9.109.170 (talk) 03:42, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Audrey Hepburn. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. MarnetteD | Talk 04:47, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on Frank Pavone. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

  1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. MarnetteD | Talk 20:50, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. MarnetteD | Talk 20:50, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Pavone

You're in violation of WP:3RR. Please do not revert again or you will be blocked. NYyankees51 (talk) 22:50, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

you are the one who is reverting sourced material! reverting such a revert is not under 3RR!

50.9.109.170 (talk) 23:51, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A suspension is different than a suspension from extra-diocesan activity. The source says he was suspended from work outside the diocese, not that he was flat out suspended. NYyankees51 (talk) 02:47, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
no need to play with the words. He was suspended. Thats a fact! From where and by whom is secondary. Suspension it is.

50.9.109.170 (talk) 04:42, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

After your fifth revert in 23 hours, I have reported you to WP:AN3. Please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:50.9.109.170 reported by User:NYyankees51 (Result: ). Thanks, NYyankees51 (talk) 13:45, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

you can report all you want. such a reverts of sourced material is considered vandalism.so my reverts does not apply under 3RR

50.9.109.170 (talk) 18:38, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:50.9.109.170&oldid=456225820"