Jump to content

User talk:Scheunemann.joshua

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Scheunemann.joshua (talk | contribs) at 01:52, 13 December 2011 (→‎Yes). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

December 2011

Your recent editing history at Death of Caylee Anthony shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 23:11, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Scheunemann.joshua, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 23:13, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

I have blanked your user page. It was in violation of our policy on living persons. Please take some time to make yourself familiar with that policy. Thanks. Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 23:13, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Dr.K.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 23:21, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have blanked your user page again. Please do not restore that material, or I'll have to report it. Thanks. Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 23:29, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Death of Caylee Anthony. Jim1138 (talk) 00:07, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Dr.K. λogosπraxis 00:17, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You MUST NOT remove other users' comments from talk pages, and particularly not from important project discussion pages such as WP:ANI, as you did in this edit. If you remove, or alter, another users' post again, or disrupt the discussion on that page, you will be blocked without further notice. -- Finlay McWalterჷTalk 00:29, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 31 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. If you have more you wish to say at ANI, you can post it here, and someone will transfer it over for you. LadyofShalott 00:30, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Scheunemann.joshua (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

good faith adding I am a newbie and I wanted to make a great contribution to wikipeadia

Decline reason:

Please don't take us for fools. You're quite obviously not a new user, as your prompt addition of twinkle demonstrates. You misused a user page as an obvious BLP-volating attack page. You abused several wikipedians. You removed a section of WP:ANI. Finlay McWalterჷTalk 00:40, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Not to mention this. Consider yourself fortunate your block isn't indefinite, clearly LadyofShalott is more generous than I am--Jac16888 Talk 00:41, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think it should be made clear that if the behavior that prompted the blocking is resumed, the next block will be more severe, possibly indefinite. LadyofShalott 00:45, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
However only a newbie would think they could get away with that sort of behaviour - you'd think. Well we'll see what happens in 31 hours time. Rich Farmbrough, 00:47, 13 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]

I've restored all the warnings that were blanked, See WP:BLANKING...

"A number of important matters may not be removed by the user—they are part of the wider community's processes:
Sanctions that are currently in effect, including relevant information about a currently active block or ban where an unblock is being requested, declined unblock requests, ArbCom-imposed edit restrictions, and confirmed sockpuppetry related notices"

The warnings are clearly "relevant information about a currently active block or ban" -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 00:46, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not to mention this. I'm sorry, but being a newcomer does not excuse you from lashing out at others; it's common human etiquette, not to mention common sense, professor. –MuZemike 00:48, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Scheunemann.joshua (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was wondering what the tw after the undo of what I posted and so I added it I want to become an reviewer one day

Decline reason:

Unblock not requested, and reasons for block not addressed -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 01:14, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A final warning: you may not remove the block notice, warnings pertaining to it, or declined unblock requests, as you did so here. I've restored this material; if you remove it again, or alter it, I'll alter the protection level on your page to prevent you from doing so. -- Finlay McWalterჷTalk 01:13, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

UNBLOCK ME

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Scheunemann.joshua (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

sorry about the last unblock request, I was trying to say to the person who first looked at my unblock request that I was just seeing what the Tw thing after an edit history post, also I just was learning for I am truely a new Wikipedia editor. I was just trying to add to the great collection on Wikipedia, I am trying to prove to my teachers that wikipeadia is a great source by show them that I am one of the editors of wikipedia and how it is good edits that happen thank you --Joshua Scheunemann PhD (talk) 01:37, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=sorry about the last unblock request, I was trying to say to the person who first looked at my unblock request that I was just seeing what the Tw thing after an edit history post, also I just was learning for I am truely a new Wikipedia editor. I was just trying to add to the great collection on Wikipedia, I am trying to prove to my teachers that wikipeadia is a great source by show them that I am one of the editors of wikipedia and how it is good edits that happen thank you --[[User:Scheunemann.joshua|Joshua Scheunemann PhD]] ([[User talk:Scheunemann.joshua#top|talk]]) 01:37, 13 December 2011 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=sorry about the last unblock request, I was trying to say to the person who first looked at my unblock request that I was just seeing what the Tw thing after an edit history post, also I just was learning for I am truely a new Wikipedia editor. I was just trying to add to the great collection on Wikipedia, I am trying to prove to my teachers that wikipeadia is a great source by show them that I am one of the editors of wikipedia and how it is good edits that happen thank you --[[User:Scheunemann.joshua|Joshua Scheunemann PhD]] ([[User talk:Scheunemann.joshua#top|talk]]) 01:37, 13 December 2011 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=sorry about the last unblock request, I was trying to say to the person who first looked at my unblock request that I was just seeing what the Tw thing after an edit history post, also I just was learning for I am truely a new Wikipedia editor. I was just trying to add to the great collection on Wikipedia, I am trying to prove to my teachers that wikipeadia is a great source by show them that I am one of the editors of wikipedia and how it is good edits that happen thank you --[[User:Scheunemann.joshua|Joshua Scheunemann PhD]] ([[User talk:Scheunemann.joshua#top|talk]]) 01:37, 13 December 2011 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Scheunemann.joshua&oldid=465561688"