Argument from beauty
The argument from beauty (also the aesthetic argument) is an argument for the existence of God.
Proponents
That beauty transcends its physical manifestations and points towards the existence of God is a major theme in the writings of St Augustine. The most important 20th century Christian writer on this was Hans Urs von Balthasar.[1]
John Polkinghorne
Polkinghorne states the argument as follows: "how does it come about that [experiences of beauty] convey to us an encounter with a dimension of reality too profound to be dismissed as merely epiphenomenal froth on the surface of an intrinsically valueless world?... Theistic belief offers an explanation".[2]
Richard Swinburne
Richard Swinburne advocates a variation of this argument:
"God has reason to make a basically beautiful world, although also reason to leave some of the beauty or ugliness of the world within the power of creatures to determine; but he would seem to have overriding reason not to make a basically ugly world beyond the powers of creatures to improve. Hence, if there is a God there is more reason to expect a basically beautiful world than a basically ugly one. A priori, however, there is no particular reason for expecting a basically beautiful rather than a basically ugly world. In consequence, if the world is beautiful, that fact would be evidence for God's existence. For, in this case, if we let k be ‘there is an orderly physical universe’, e be ‘there is a beautiful universe’, and h be ‘there is a God’, P(e/h.k) will be greater than P(e/k)... Few, however, would deny that our universe (apart from its animal and human inhabitants, and aspects subject to their immediate control) has that beauty. Poets and painters and ordinary men down the centuries have long admired the beauty of the orderly procession of the heavenly bodies, the scattering of the galaxies through the heavens (in some ways random, in some ways orderly), and the rocks, sea, and wind interacting on earth, ‘The spacious firmament on high, and all the blue ethereal sky’, the water lapping against ‘the old eternal rocks’, and the plants of the jungle and of temperate climates, contrasting with the desert and the Arctic wastes. Who in his senses would deny that here is beauty in abundance? If we confine ourselves to the argument from the beauty of the inanimate and plant worlds, the argument surely works."[3]
Notes and references
- ^ Stratford Caldecott, An Introduction to Hans Urs von Balthasar.
- ^ Science and Theology SPCK 1998 ISBN 0-281-05176-3 p. 82
- ^ Swinburne, The Existence of God Chapter 6