Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Englandtransport (talk | contribs) at 07:49, 27 November 2012. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Rollback

(add requestview requests)


I've reverted a lot of vandalism in my day, and I believe I have demonstrated my ability to revert with appropriate care and dedication to merit the trust implicit in granting my request. Sjb0926 (talk) 18:34, 23 September 2011 (UTC) Sjb0926 (talk) 17:55, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Acalamari 18:11, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Sjb0926 (talk) 01:44, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there! Rollback makes reverting stuff so much easier... Many a time I encounter persistent vandalisers... This feature would help me a lot. Please consider and thanks! :) (I have Twinkle and it offers similar functions, but some times it does not show.) Bonkers The Clown (Nonsensical Babble) 12:31, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Acalamari 18:11, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The majority of my edits to Wikipedia have been to revert vandalism and to warn vandalizing users. I understand Huggle has an expanded toolset in comparison to Twinkle, which I currently use, and that use of Huggle requires rollback permission. I would like to be able to use said tools to combat vandalism. Thanks. Jonathanfu (talk) 08:45, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Acalamari 18:11, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
To counter vandals and spammers. —indopug (talk) 15:23, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Acalamari 18:11, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
To use STiki and make assisting in anti-vandalism efforts easier. Wywin (talk) 17:37, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Acalamari 18:11, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I was considering using igloo just as an alternative to Twinkle that I'm currently using. Interlude 65 (Push to talk) 05:02, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Acalamari 18:11, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've been reverting vandalism for a little while now and I found myself in need of extra tools to revert faster. With this, I'd also like to be available to more tools, such as Huggle and Stiki, that only comes with rollback. I think that I have shown to be responsible enough for this extra right on wikipedia. Thanks. HairTalk 17:36, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Acalamari 18:11, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
My alternate account for public computers. Not sure what policy is regarding accepting these, but if it's okay for me to have my rights copied over, I'd like it. Thanks! gwickwire | Leave a message 03:38, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneTom Morris (talk) 17:13, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm contributing on many film articles at the moment, and many of the blockbuster film articles are prone to vandalism. Many attacks come in series of edits which can only be undone manually and individually, without the rollback tool. Undoing multiple edits manually is tiresome, and sometimes sneaky vandalism slip through, so I want to be able to rollback without relying on other users. Anthonydraco (talk) 06:10, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:01, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I often remove vandalism from my own choice of articles. However it gets fussy when you have to go back to the old revision and remove vandalism by copy-paste. So this feature will help me a lot. Months back I requested for this feature but my request was declined as I was not yet qualified for it. So I followed every instruction provided by my fellow Wikipedians using this feature and I think I have shown my ability to remove vandalism from articles with care. Please consider (and sorry for any mistake I may have committed unknowingly). Thank you so much. Tamravidhir (Jiva is Shiva!) 06:54, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:02, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't revert vandalism a whole lot but I would like for my occasional reverts to be consistent and I think some specialised tools would help. Right now I do most of those things manually. Stalwart111 05:39, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
For quick vandalism removal, as well as quick removal of unsourced content and other additions not adhering to other Wikipedia policies — JJJ (talk) 05:57, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have been on Wikipedia for quite a long time so I know what to do Englandtransport (talk) 07:49, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]