Wikipedia:WikiProject Integrity
This is a WikiProject, an area for focused collaboration among Wikipedians. New participants are welcome; please feel free to participate!
|
Overview
What we do
This project is to discuss, raise awareness of, and hopefully address issues regarding paid editing on Wikipedia, in which people are compensated to create and edit Wikipedia articles (background: [1][2][3][4]).
Who we are
Editors who are troubled to some degree by the presence of paid agents on the Wikipedia.
- Some of are are opposed to paid agents editing the Wikipedia at all, recognizing that this occurs anyway and that prohibiting would only drive it completely underground, but that this is either a net positive or worth the cost, overall.
- Some of us are concerned about paid agents editing the Wikipedia (at least in some cases), but feel that banning it completely would only drive it underground, and this is not an improvement. Instead, paid agents should self-identify, follow Bright Line, be watched closely, and perhaps be subject to other controls.
- Others of us have other or more nuanced views. However, editors who believe that paid agents are an overall net positive to the Wikipedia might consider instead working with WikiProject Cooperation, which takes more of a welcoming-and-helping stance toward paid agents. (Editors are of course invited to belong to both WikiProjects.)
What is a "paid agent"?
Editors who are 1) editing the Wikipedia for pay (on an contract or as part of their salaried duties) and 2) editing the Wikipedia at the behest of someone else (a boss or client).
The following cases are not considered paid agents, and not considered problematical, for the purposes of this project:
- Anyone writing on their own initiative, with no direct material compensation or expectation of personal gain, even if they are technically "on the clock" somewhere. In particular, academics writing in their field of expertise (or any field), even if they are technically doing this during normal work hours and using university equipment most always qualify for this exemption.
- Participants in the Wikipedia:GLAM (Galleries, Libraries, Archives, Museums) initiative, even if paid for editing the Wikipedia. And in most (but not necessarily all) cases, editors being paid by academic grants to contribute to the Wikipedia.
- Editing by employees of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Anyone else who is editing the Wikipedia for pay, and editing at the behest of another person, is possibly or at least potentially a problematic paid agent (even if working for a non-profit entity).
Notes
Wikipedia:Paid advocacy (WP:PAID) is currently a guideline, and suggested policy currently under discussion, as a clarification on Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI). See also plain and simple COI help, as discussed on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cooperation/Paid Editor Help.
Founding principles
See Principles.
Goals
- Collect material regarding paid editing on Wikipedia. A lot is written on this subject and we need to keep some of it as an easily available collective memory. Editors are encouraged to contribute links to outside articles, internal discussions and pages, and other material in the appropriate sections at the bottom of this page.
- Develop strategies for better control of paid advocacy on Wikipedia. And/or, develop strategies for the elimination or banning of paid advocacy on Wikipedia.
- Advocate for the better control of paid advocacy on Wikipedia. And/or, advocate for the elimination or banning of paid advocacy on Wikipedia.
- Identify, watch, publicize, and, as needed, correct articles for which third parties are known to have engaged persons to edit in return for compensation.
- Title
WikiProject Integrity (formerly WikiProject Paid Advocacy Watch)
- Parentage
None; this is a top-level Wikiproject.
- Related Wikiprojects
- Subprojects
None.
Coordination IRC channel
#wikipedia-en-paw on irc.freenode.net
News and alerts
Alerts
Articles to be checked and corrected (if required)
This list is incomplete; you can help by adding missing items. |
- The Art Institutes - EDMC employee is restructuring the article and selecting which legal issues are presented with another "Barnstar" editor. Negative information is being deleted.
- U.S. Corrugated - Subject of a discussion on AN/I.
- Corporate Representatives for Ethical Wikipedia Engagement — created by member of the group Ocaasi, then largely edited thereon after by, with other members Silver seren and Fred Bauder; also participating heavily in the deletion discussion
- Hydraulic fracturing - this is a hot topic because of the lucrative nature of the business and the yet unknown environmental consequences. There has been paid advocacy on this page previously and there is the potential for it to occur again.
- Websense
Jill Kenton - The subject of this article recently contracted for paid editing on the article, as noted here: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jill_Kenton. JoeSperrazza (talk) 14:45, 10 April 2012 (UTC)- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jill_Kenton&diff=487743783&oldid=487620997 – The article has been redirected to the newly-created Rigby & Peller article. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 15:37, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
- Zappos - My company was contacted by a guy who offered to rewrite my companys Wikipedia article. He said he had been paid to rewrite the Zappos article. SPU whistelblower (talk) 12:45, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Asure Software - Has twice had the original content replaced by a bland corporate bio. First time by a username which is identical to the name of Asure's VP of marketing, and the second time from an IP address that appears to be registered to the company.
- continued editing, thus time under company name; I blocked, and removed the advertising. Needs further watching. DGG ( talk ) 05:29, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
- Adam Kluger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (deleted twice), Kluger Agency (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (redirected) and The Kluger Agency (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - Ongoing removal of sourced content from The Kluger Agency#Controversy and Product placement#Music and recording industries. Repeated re-creation of promotional text using various WP:SPA's and IP's, edit pattern also touches various individual musician articles, the Musicians Institute and a pair of high schools which Adam Kluger supposedly once attended.
- keywordrenewals (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (original creator of three promotional pages, not currently in use)
- 66.202.128.4 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and 69.84.115.46 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (not currently in use)
- 74.51.231.242 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), 72.28.222.70 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and 67.88.44.147 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) removing content from The Kluger Agency in August 2012.
- Shahs227 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) attempting to re-create the deleted Adam Kluger promotional article through WP:AFC in August 2012 and adding a non-free logo to The Kluger Agency by uploading it to commons: with bogus PD and OTRS licence tags. 66.102.83.61 (talk) 13:59, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Other alerts
- Solicitation on Elance for multiple Wikipedia articles. Proposed articles have questionable notability.72.37.242.21 (talk) 00:29, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
- Paid editor hired on Elance for entrepreneur/author Tim Levy. Listing states the he wants "Wikipedia entries about me, my books and various cool projects.
- This guy on Elance specializes in paid advocacy, so it would be helpful if his username could be found. This user was formerly User:WizardlyWho, as well as sockpuppeting under other accounts. See: Administrators' noticeboard discussion and Check User results.
Project news
- New name, moved from Paid Advocacy Watch.
Articles tagged as part of this project
Talk pages that include the template of the Integrity project may be viewed at Category:WikiProject Integrity articles.
Tasks
- We're in the process of investigating the phenomena of paid advocacy generally, so the list links to helpful internal or external material and so forth continues to be built.
- Check articles on the Alerts list, and either remove them (if they're OK) or adopt them.
- Additions to the Registry are welcome and needed. Editors are invited to add themselves if they qualify.
- (Add other tasks here, or suggest below.)
See Tasks discussion section on talkpage
- Herostratus (talk) 19:22, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- Ebikeguy (talk) 21:03, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- Wikid77 (talk) 08:51, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
- Cavarrone (talk) 09:35, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
- Phearson (talk) 20:56, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
- Cullen328 Let's discuss it 00:51, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Mistress Selina Kyle (Α⇔Ω ¦ ⇒✉) 14:18, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- DGG ( talk ) with the exception that I do not support the second goal, and in fact oppose any such restrictions. 05:46, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
- Buster Seven Talk 07:50, 21 February 2012 (UTC) There is a correlative connection to paid political operatives.
- Jay Tepper (talk) 19:49, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
- BusterD (talk) 18:15, 27 February 2012 (UTC); Also a good idea!
- Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
- Writegeist (talk) 23:48, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
- Carrite (talk) 17:14, 12 March 2012 (UTC) - I favor requirements for formal declaration of paid editors and coordinated supervision and inspection of their work. Your goals may differ.
- I'd be interested if this stopped sitting in userspace. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ Contrib. 18:08, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Better? --Mistress Selina Kyle (Α⇔Ω ¦ ⇒✉) 15:03, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 20:52, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- --Deathlaser talk 19:38, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
- --Orange Mike | Talk 14:37, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
- a13ean (talk) 15:34, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
- Factseducado I don't think the paid editors are going away so I'd prefer they be regulated.
- KC9TV 06:30, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
- TOW talk 06:07, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- gtajaxoxo ©® 14:00, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
- Gigs (talk) 16:23, 31 October 2012 (UTC) With the caveat that I do not agree with the goals as currently described above.
- Andrew327 06:06, 25 March 2013 (UTC) This will be an increasingly important topic for Wikipedia to address as it continues to mature and stabilize with age.
- Coretheapple (talk) 14:07, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
- Logical Cowboy (talk) 00:49, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Subpages
Templates
Templates
- WikiProject Integrity (for article talk page)
Integrity | ||||
|
- COIN usage templates
{{Connected contributor}} - for article talk page
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
{{COI}} - for article page
A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. |
Userbox
Project userbox:
{{User:UBX/INTEGRITY}}
This user is a member of the Integrity Project |
Alternate project userbox, based on an earlier version:
{{User:UBX/PAIDWATCH}}
This user is a member of the Paid Advocacy Watch Project (WP:PAIDWATCH) |
Project barnstar
Suitable for awarding to anyone who has made a material contribution to the project's goals. (Improvement by better artist welcome.)
Links
Internal links
|
|
- Category:Articles with a promotional tone
- 2013 summary on the German Wikipedia (in English) on their discussions re paid editing, which have been extensive
Archives
- Jimbo's talk page, January 2012, re paid editing
- Jimbo's talk page, January 2012, re Bell Pottinger
- ANI, January 2012, regarding whether it's proper to bring pressure to bear against third-party entities paying for Wikipedia edits
- ANI, December 2011, regarding Association of Global Automakers.
External links
General
- Why astroturfing exposes your business to legal risk (hint: because it’s illegal), Text 100 Global Public Relations
- Public Relations Society of America (PRSA) Member Code of Ethics
- Ethical Guidance for Public Relations Practitioners, Public Relations Society of America (PRSA)
- MIT Technology Review article about "crowdturfing"
Pertaining specifically to paid editing of Wikipedia
Not sure about this. On the one hand, some of these links provides a kind of one-stop shop for people looking for ways to influence Wikipedia or sign on with entities that are. On the other hand, forewarned is forearmed. It's no good to blunder about in ignorance. It makes sense to us to have materials collected that would be helpful to Wikipedians wishing to consider and discuss this phenomenon.
- Wikipedia for Marketers: The Last Word, David King, 13th February 2012 — Article encouraging ethical editing on Wikipedia.
- CREWE (Corporate Representatives for Ethical Wikipedia Engagement) Facebook page CREWE was created on January 5 2011; as of January 12 2011 it had 105 members on Facebook. Widely acknowledged as a pressure group in support of paid advocacy, paid editing and paid political operatives.
- "An Open Letter to Jimmy Wales and Wikipedia" on Where the Fisherman Ain't, Phil Gomes's blog
- Post on John O'Dwyer' blog re CREWE (January 2012)
- Edelman, a PR firm. According to their Wikipedia article they're world's largest independently owned public relations firm. They apparently consult with clients on their Wikipedia image, we don't have details at this time (there's this podcast.) A number of Edelman employes are CREWE members, and CREWE was founded by Phil Gomes, an Edelman employee.
- The Wikipedian, a blog by William Buetler (Wikipedia editor WWB and, as a paid agent, WWB Too.) The Blog just discusses Wikipedia generally (and well, too) rather than paid editing per se.
- "Grande Guide to Wikipedia" by the marketing firm Eloqa, written by Mr Buetler (according to this) or at least partly (according to this.)
- Wiki Experts Not sure of what their deal is, but they apparently advise clients re Wikipedia placement,
- Waggener Edstrom, a PR firm. Their article is here. Where they fit in is not clear, but according to this they've had involvement with Wikipedia.
- Bell Pottinger Group, a PR firm. According to their article they've had involvement with Wikipedia.
- Here's a 2011 article on some of Bell Pottinger's activities; their Wikipedia involvement is mentioned in passing.
- BBC story on Wikipedia and Bell Pottinger
- A plain old solicitation for paid Wikipedia editors. How typical this sort of thing is we don't know.
- Corruption in Wikiland? Paid PR scandal erupts at Wikipedia 2012 piece by Violet Blue on CNET re Gibraltargate and WMUK trustees
- Now here's a thread at Wikipediocracy, where Greh Kohser investigates and deescribes specific instances of covert paid agents editing Wikiedia. It's Wikipediocracy, so it's not exactly peer-reviewed and may contain libel etc., but quite interesting. FWIW here it is.
Pertaining to the BP contretemps of 2013
- Much Of BP's Wikipedia Page Allegedly Written By Company Employee Arturo Silva HuffPost
- BP accused of rewriting environmental record on Wikipedia CNET
- BP Has Nothing Better to Do Than to Rewrite Its Own Wikipedia Entry BetaBeat (New York Observer)
- BP accused of rewriting Wikipedia records SmartPlanet (CBS Interactive)
- Wikipedia editors accuse BP of rewriting page about itself, CNET reports New Orleans Times-Picayune
- For Over a Year, BP Has Worked Hard to 'Clean Up' Its Wikipedia Pages Motherboard (VICE)
- BP edited its own environmental record on Wikipedia Salon
- Wikipedia: BP-Mitarbeiter schreibt am BP-Eintrag mit Der Spiegel (Template:Language icon)
- BP accused of rewriting environmental record on Wikipedia Parset (Template:Language icon - Parset is an Iranian source)
- BP soll Wikipedia-Einträge manipuliert haben ZDNet Germany (Template:Language icon)
- Report: Did BP help re-write BP's Wikipedia page? WWL AM 870, New Orleans
- BP attempts to polish image on Wikipedia Digitaledge (Excite UK)
- GREENWASH: Wikipedia Editor: ‘Around 44%’ Of BP’s Wikipedia Entry ‘Has Been Written By BP’ All Tech Voices
- La BP riscrive il 44% della propria pagina su Wikipedia: la marea nera arriva in Rete (Fanpage) (Template:Language icon)
- Conflitto su Wikipedia: la British Petroleum si auto-descrive (La Stampa) (Template:Language icon)
- BP liet informatie op Wikipedia vervalsen Het Laatste Nieuws (Belgian) (Template:Language icon)
- Acusan a BP de reescribir su entrada en la Wikipedia Baquia (Spain) (Template:Language icon)
- Big Oil's Wikipedia cleanup: A brand management experiment out of control, a later followup at ZDNet
These are some PR people's takes:
- Wikipedia editors debate role of PR professionals PR Week (paywall)
- Wikipedia considers rules on PR contributions following BP rewrite accusations PR Week
- PR, Wikipedia and BP–a sorry tale CIPR (Chartered Institute of Public Relations) (UK)
- BP’s Use of Wikipedia is Transparent and Beneficial (PulsePoint Group house organ)
Forums:
- reddit thread
- A couple of threads about the matter on Jimbo's talk page: here and here.
Here's a couple of older links (preceding the contretemps) about BP greenwashing in general:
- Recapping on BP's long history of greenwashing Greenpeace (2010)
- BP’s Greenwashing Masked Dangerous ‘Drill, Baby, Drill’ Reality Think Progress (2010)
- Greenwash: BP and the myth of a world 'Beyond Petroleum' The Guardian (2008)
Archives
- Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, an article with considerable involvement from a paid agent of Cracker Barrel (User:WWB Too) underwent peer review here: Wikipedia:Peer review/Cracker Barrel Old Country Store/archive1. It was given Good Article status -- which is not, of course, proof of being a good (fair-minded and unbiased) article.