Talk:Gnossiennes

	Classical music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
	This article is supported by Compositions task force.

Nomination

{{Nomstable|Gnossienne|68376497}} --Francis Schonken 10:56, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

{{Certstabletrue|Francis Schonken}}
See Wikipedia talk:Stable versions#Testing --Francis Schonken 10:56, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
{{Certstablefalse|Badlydrawnjeff}} - as a test case, this is a poor one. No images in this diff, the style and prose are not easily read to someone with a music background, and I can only imagine what it might look like to someone lacking one. These issues would have further problems given that any "stable version" would result in more eyes looking at the article and making changes and expansions. --badlydrawnjeff talk 12:09, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Date and time are more intuitive than version number. Septentrionalis 16:00, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gnossienne No 1 Recording

Whoever recorded this, would you mind taking out the shuffling and alarm clock? Tha'd be nice. Other than that, good job on that run through.

--75.82.118.21 01:15, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the recording is quite bad. I suggest uploading the Lang Lang recording instead?

Also, when that recording is uploaded, it might be a good idea to add that to the Media section in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_Satie —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.254.93.131 (talk) 22:46, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the recording, as it is horrible in just about every way -- sorry to be blunt. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.252.79.163 (talk) 03:02, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uses in popular culture

One of the first three Gnossiennes was used in an episode of True Blood from season 2 - the episode that introduced the Dallas Vampires. Hope somebody can fill in the details. 130.88.156.220 (talk) 14:50, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm curious: What purpose does this list serve? These are some of the best-known solo piano works in history, so a list of times it was used as background music in movies and television could surely go on to be much longer than the article itself. Shall we add a section to the Beatles article listing "Supermarket locations where Beatles songs have been played" ;)? I think that, if this list is kept, it should be restricted to examples where the music figured into the work as more than a passing part of the soundtrack. --98.216.50.36 (talk) 13:55, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure it's Gnossienne No3 and not No1 that is used in Revolver by Guy Ritchie.

No. 7

Does anyone know where there is information about the discovery of number 7?
Ulmanor (talk) 03:14, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

Father Goose moved page Gnossiennes (Satie) to Gnossienne over redirect: "no disambiguation necessary, and no plural, per WP:NC".

I can live without the disambiguation. But this is about a group of pieces collectively named Gnossiennes. It is not about the general history, features and form of a "gnossienne" - because there are no history, features or form, because Satie invented the title for a series of pieces. He may not have intended them to be considered as a unified set like the Chopin preludes, but this article is still about all of them as a group rather than about any single one of them. If it were about a single one, that would have to come with a number.

I can't see what part of WP:NC is relevant to this issue. I suggest this be moved to Gnossiennes.-- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 13:26, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. pablo 13:46, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian (talk) 11:05, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gnossienne → Gnossiennes – Subject is inherently plural - see related Gymnopédies, another undiscussed and inappropriate page move by the same editor Andy Dingley (talk) 11:08, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Could someone also please revive the discussion at Talk:Ogive (music) to get its article moved to Ogives. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:01, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Deor (talk) 14:59, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.