Jump to content

User talk:Princeneil

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Princeneil (talk | contribs) at 18:26, 31 December 2013 (→Your edits). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Asif's theory of relative mechanics was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Happysailor (Talk) 23:56, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Mechanics of pendulum

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Mechanics of pendulum. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Pendulum (mathematics). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Pendulum (mathematics) - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Salih (talk) 17:36, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of General theory of motion in three dimensions

The article General theory of motion in three dimensions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Original research

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jimmy Pitt talk 14:06, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Biography of Asif ali leghari

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Biography of Asif ali leghari requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Theo10011 (talk) 18:48, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Abrar's laws

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Abrar's laws requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Vanadus (talk | contribs) 05:56, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Asif's theory of relative mechanics

The article Asif's theory of relative mechanics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

original research

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] (talk · contribs) 10:22, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Proposed deletion notify, you may be blocked from editing. Monty845 16:46, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Asif's theory of Relative Mechanics

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Asif's theory of Relative Mechanics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Monty845 16:50, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Asif's General theory motion in three dimensions

The article Asif's General theory motion in three dimensions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Original Research, No reliable sources, No indication that the theory is Notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Monty845 16:57, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Asif's theory of charge energy equivalence

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Asif's theory of charge energy equivalence, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Rorshacma (talk) 16:38, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Asif's theory of charge energy equivalence

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Asif's theory of charge energy equivalence, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ben Ben (talk) 10:52, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Asif's theory of charge energy equivalence

The article Asif's theory of charge energy equivalence has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not the place to publish original research

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnCD (talk) 11:02, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Mr Asif, please read Wikipedia:No original research, one of our fundamental content policies, which includes:

    "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to premiere such a discovery."

Wikipedia is not for what you are trying to do. JohnCD (talk) 11:02, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Eclipsed   (talk)   (COI Declaration)   13:52, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Asif's theory of charge energy equivalence

The article Asif's theory of charge energy equivalence has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not for original research WP:NOR.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ben Ben (talk) 14:13, 1 April 2012 (UTC) {{unblock|Dear Sir, I am not violating any rule I just want to upload Wikipedia article on my published research work in scientific International Journals with good sources, I am not uploading are making article on my original unpublished research. My research is published in International Scientific Journals.. I came here for that purpose, but when I uploaded article , you have directly blocked my account. I am agree and I apologize that I created multiple accounts, I am sorry for that but my intention is not to break or violate Wikipedia policy. I hope you will help me to unblock my account. kindly unblock me, then I will only use this account for further correspondence and I will not violate any policy, but please also help me that how can I transfer my copyrights to Wikipedia so that Wikipedia can use my research material that is published in different Scientific Journals and Books? I am waiting, Thanks}}[[User:Princeneil|Princeneil]] ([[User talk:Princeneil#top|talk]]) 11:50, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Eclipsed   (talk)   (COI Declaration)   14:14, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Asif's theory of charge energy equivalence for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asif's theory of charge energy equivalence is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asif's theory of charge energy equivalence until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. bonadea contributions talk 14:24, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Asif's theory of charge energy equivalence

A tag has been placed on Asif's theory of charge energy equivalence, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

it is an article about a non-eligible subject which has been repeatedly recreated and deleted under various titles, as seen on the creator's user talk page.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. bonadea contributions talk 14:26, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard.Template:Z45 bonadea contributions talk 14:30, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Dear Princeneil, please read the information given to you in the many notices above. The article(s) you have created cannot be "fixed" or improved to be appropriate for Wikipedia, because all Wikipedia articles must be about notable subjects, and must be based on reliable secondary sources. --bonadea contributions talk 15:06, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Asif's theory of Relativity

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Asif's theory of Relativity, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Madhuric 10:27, 2 April 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Madhuric (talk • contribs)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Solomon7968 (talk) 10:29, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 10:35, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|Dear Sir, I am not violating any rule I just want to upload Wikipedia article on my published research work in scientific International Journals with good sources, I am not uploading are making article on my original unpublished research. My research is published in International Scientific Journals.. I came here for that purpose, but when I uploaded article , you have directly blocked my account. I am agree and I apologize that I created multiple accounts, I am sorry for that but my intention is not to break or violate Wikipedia policy. I hope you will help me to unblock my account. kindly unblock me, then I will only use this account for further correspondence and I will not violate any policy, but please also help me that how can I transfer my copyrights to Wikipedia so that Wikipedia can use my research material that is published in different Scientific Journals and Books? I am waiting, Thanks}}[[User:Princeneil|Princeneil]] ([[User talk:Princeneil#top|talk]]) 11:49, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[[User:Princeneil|Princeneil]] ([[User talk:Princeneil#top|talk]]) 11:48, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Frank blatt for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Solomon7968 (talk) 05:34, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|Dear Sir, I am not violating any rule I just want to upload Wikipedia article on my published research work in scientific International Journals with good sources, I am not uploading are making article on my original unpublished research. My research is published in International Scientific Journals.. I came here for that purpose, but when I uploaded article , you have directly blocked my account. I am agree and I apologize that I created multiple accounts, I am sorry for that but my intention is not to break or violate Wikipedia policy. I hope you will help me to unblock my account. kindly unblock me, then I will only use this account for further correspondence and I will not violate any policy, but please also help me that how can I transfer my copyrights to Wikipedia so that Wikipedia can use my research material that is published in different Scientific Journals and Books? I am waiting, Thanks}}[[User:Princeneil|Princeneil]] ([[User talk:Princeneil#top|talk]]) 11:50, 31 December 2013 (UTC) {{unblock|Dear sir, I am not talking about my previous article which was not published before and you were right that original research is not acceptable in Wikipedia, but I am talking about my new research work which has been well published in different International journals and Books, I being author of that research want to make Wikipedia article on them, I retain all the copyrights of my research, I want to transfer to Wikipedia under their desired License policy so that Wikipedia can use my well published research work, you are not trying to consider my actual problem sir. Kindly unblock me and I promise I will never use any other account further more, you kindly unblock this account and give me proper way so that I can properly create Wikipedia article on my published research. I know I have made violations but I was unaware at that time that how could I create my Wikipedia article, but now I don't want to make any violation I want to creat article according to Wikipedia policy without using multiple account. Kindly consider my unblock request sir Princeneil (talk) 16:00, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Asif, you have now been blocked on, I believe, all of your accounts, and I am not certain if you understand why. Certainly the fact that you have persisted in creating further accounts and making the same basic error suggests that you do not.

Whether you intend to come back here to attempt unblock I do not know; if you do not then clearly you will not see this message. But, in case you do:

I will accept that you have some expertise in quantum theory, although I would leave it to a greater editor than I to assess the detailed merit of your various submissions. But what has caused the greatest problem is your insistence on labelling your submissions as "Asif's theory". If you wish to be unblocked you must learn about original research guidelines here. Any theory which is claimed to be that of the article author is, by definition here, original research and hence inadmissable. If you can understand this, and I appreciate that English is not your first language, then it is essential that you indicate your understanding and acceptance in your next unblock request. I am trying to help you here.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:34, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Princeneil (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Sir, I am not violating any rule I just want to upload Wikipedia article on my published research work in scientific International Journals with good sources, I am not uploading are making article on my original unpublished research. My research is published in International Scientific Journals.. I came here for that purpose, but when I uploaded article , you have directly blocked my account. I am agree and I apologize that I created multiple accounts, I am sorry for that but my intention is not to break or violate Wikipedia policy. I hope you will help me to unblock my account. kindly unblock me, then I will only use this account for further correspondence and I will not violate any policy, but please also help me that how can I transfer my copyrights to Wikipedia so that Wikipedia can use my research material that is published in different Scientific Journals and Books? I am waiting, Thanks

Decline reason:

You say you're not violating any rules but you are. You are violating policies on original research and what is acceptable on our pages. You are also using multiple accounts which violates our sockpuppetry policy. There is no reason to unblock this account at this time. only (talk) 12:27, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dear sir, I am not talking about my previous article which was not published before and you were right that original research is not acceptable in Wikipedia, but I am talking about my new research work which has been well published in different International journals and Books, I being author of that research want to make Wikipedia article on them, I retain all the copyrights of my research, I want to transfer to Wikipedia under their desired License policy so that Wikipedia can use my well published research work, you are not trying to consider my actual problem sir. Kindly unblock me and I promise I will never use any other account further more, you kindly unblock this account and give me proper way so that I can properly create Wikipedia article on my published research. I'm waiting sir.Princeneil (talk) 14:56, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You say: "Kindly unblock me and I promise I will never use any other account further more". You shouldn't be doing it in the first place. This isn't a "if you do this, I'll do this" situation here. only (talk) 15:02, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

my dear you are not getting my point, I swear I will never make any new account and I will only use this account if this account will be unblocked, please do not get my point in wrong way. I want to be contributor in Wikipedia, please do something for me dear Princeneil (talk) 15:32, 31 December 2013 (UTC) Okay if you are not considering my problem, then tell me what should I do now? should I leave Wikipedia? since I have apologize for all of my violation since I were not aware of them at that time. Princeneil (talk) 15:35, 31 December 2013 (UTC) Is there any one who can help me and understand my problem and give me solution, please.Princeneil (talk) 15:47, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Princeneil (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear sir, I am not talking about my previous article which was not published before and you were right that original research is not acceptable in Wikipedia, but I am talking about my new research work which has been well published in different International journals and Books, I being author of that research want to make Wikipedia article on them, I retain all the copyrights of my research, I want to transfer to Wikipedia under their desired License policy so that Wikipedia can use my well published research work, you are not trying to consider my actual problem sir. Kindly unblock me and I promise I will never use any other account further more, you kindly unblock this account and give me proper way so that I can properly create Wikipedia article on my published research. I know I have made many violations and I used different accounts, but I was unaware that how Wikipedia article is created. Now this is my first and original account, I want to use only this account. I don't want to make violation any more, please kindly unblock me

Decline reason:

As far as I can tell, the articles created by your most recent sockpuppets were simply copied and pasted from existing articles or other websites and then attributed to your "theory." Given that you've been doing this for 3 years with over 20 sockpuppet accounts, the "I didn't know how Wikipedia works" argument makes about as much sense as your nonsense articles. Mr.Z-man 16:59, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Princeneil (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear sir, I know the article that I am uploading is copy pasted from websites and journals. It is my own published research which has been published in different research journals and I am not claiming. Because I am the actual author of that published research. I have proofs and copyright agreement form from that websites when my theory was published,here are the links where my research is published. http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jap/pages/v4i3.html

http://www.ijcaonline.org/archives/volume84/number16/14658-2551

if you give me your e-mail, then I will send you that proofs, and I also have certificate of publication of my research work. I want to know that how can I send that rights to Wikipedia so that I can put this work on Wikipedia, I will not put this work as"Asif's theory or law" on wikipedia if you have problem with my name. This is what I want to say, I have read all Wikipedia policies for article creation, this is the actual reason which none of you is understanding now and blocked my account, kindly send me your e-mail I will send you all proofs that this is actually my own published research and kindly accept my unblock request

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Dear sir, I know the article that I am uploading is copy pasted from websites and journals. It is my own published research which has been published in different research journals and I am not claiming. Because I am the actual author of that published research. I have proofs and copyright agreement form from that websites when my theory was published,here are the links where my research is published. http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jap/pages/v4i3.html http://www.ijcaonline.org/archives/volume84/number16/14658-2551 if you give me your e-mail, then I will send you that proofs, and I also have certificate of publication of my research work. I want to know that how can I send that rights to Wikipedia so that I can put this work on Wikipedia, I will not put this work as"Asif's theory or law" on wikipedia if you have problem with my name. This is what I want to say, I have read all Wikipedia policies for article creation, this is the actual reason which none of you is understanding now and blocked my account, kindly send me your e-mail I will send you all proofs that this is actually my own published research and kindly accept my unblock request |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Dear sir, I know the article that I am uploading is copy pasted from websites and journals. It is my own published research which has been published in different research journals and I am not claiming. Because I am the actual author of that published research. I have proofs and copyright agreement form from that websites when my theory was published,here are the links where my research is published. http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jap/pages/v4i3.html http://www.ijcaonline.org/archives/volume84/number16/14658-2551 if you give me your e-mail, then I will send you that proofs, and I also have certificate of publication of my research work. I want to know that how can I send that rights to Wikipedia so that I can put this work on Wikipedia, I will not put this work as"Asif's theory or law" on wikipedia if you have problem with my name. This is what I want to say, I have read all Wikipedia policies for article creation, this is the actual reason which none of you is understanding now and blocked my account, kindly send me your e-mail I will send you all proofs that this is actually my own published research and kindly accept my unblock request |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Dear sir, I know the article that I am uploading is copy pasted from websites and journals. It is my own published research which has been published in different research journals and I am not claiming. Because I am the actual author of that published research. I have proofs and copyright agreement form from that websites when my theory was published,here are the links where my research is published. http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jap/pages/v4i3.html http://www.ijcaonline.org/archives/volume84/number16/14658-2551 if you give me your e-mail, then I will send you that proofs, and I also have certificate of publication of my research work. I want to know that how can I send that rights to Wikipedia so that I can put this work on Wikipedia, I will not put this work as"Asif's theory or law" on wikipedia if you have problem with my name. This is what I want to say, I have read all Wikipedia policies for article creation, this is the actual reason which none of you is understanding now and blocked my account, kindly send me your e-mail I will send you all proofs that this is actually my own published research and kindly accept my unblock request |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Princeneil (talk) 17:59, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Princeneil&oldid=588555836"