Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer
Appearance
Reviewer/Article Feedback Reviewer
- TDFan2006 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I have spend time looking through articles' history. I have also looked through some new pages. I think Review rights will be great for me. TDFan2006 (talk) 13:42, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- Not done. You've made many constructive edits, but I don't see much experience dealing with the sorts of policy issues reviewers need to be familiar with. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:39, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- CammieD (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- With 118 edits in 1 week, She Definitely deserves this! TitusFox 08:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) - Editor has only been on Wikipedia for ~2 weeks and has edited only 3 or 4 articles for a total of <500 edits. This editor definitely needs more time to really grasp Wikipedia policy, which may also include reference formatting, etc. Perhaps in a few months, he/she will be ready for a tool like reviewer. Sportsguy17 (T • C) 03:22, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- Not done, per Sportsguy essentially. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:41, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) - Editor has only been on Wikipedia for ~2 weeks and has edited only 3 or 4 articles for a total of <500 edits. This editor definitely needs more time to really grasp Wikipedia policy, which may also include reference formatting, etc. Perhaps in a few months, he/she will be ready for a tool like reviewer. Sportsguy17 (T • C) 03:22, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- DePeeper (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I have been on Wikipedia for a few months now, and focus on the NYC Subway heavily. Recently, I have been seeing irrelevant undos on certain stations and see it as vandalism. With this title, I can review the entire system to make sure that the information provided is 100% accurate. I also did some minor edits on the Subway services, now I work on stations. DePeeper (talk) 01:45, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Not done. Please read the relevant documentation pages—reviewer rights only affect pages under pending changes protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:42, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- Makyen (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I routinely review edits made to pages on my watchlist for criteria essentially the same as is in place for pending changes. Some of the pages I watch are protected by pending changes. I would like to be able to review edits on those pages. — Makyen (talk) 04:02, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- Sagaciousphil (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- A few articles on my watch list are protected under pending changes, so I think it may be easier if I had this permission. SagaciousPhil - Chat 10:56, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- Jmcw37 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I believe I have been on Wikipedia long enough to be trusted with this right. Thank you! jmcw (talk) 13:52, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: - An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request.
- Done. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:45, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you! jmcw (talk) 21:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- Done. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:45, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: - An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request.
- Wikiuser13 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- My username was changed from Ujjwal234goel to Wikiuser13, so please note that I was registered on 17 April 2013 Wikiuser13 (talk | contribs) 17:41, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- Meters (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- Recently I had to leave obvious vandalism in an article because it had been given some level of protection (possibly pending revision) immediately after the vandalism. I was unable to undo the vandalism without Reviewer permission because of the subsequent edit. It seems to be an odd situation, and possibly a bug, but that's why I'd like the Reviewer permission. I have been able to undo or revert vandalism under pending revision in previous cases. Meters (talk) 19:34, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- Done. I don't think that's how PC is supposed to work; you might want to raise the issue at WP:VPT. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:48, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- Boomur (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- i do a lot of work with vandalism, test edits, etc. through patrolling RC as well as use of the rollback right and occasionally STiki. although i do not watch or otherwise track any pages that use the pending changes feature, i'd be more than happy to stop by Special:PendingChanges once in a while to help clear up the log. ~ Boomur [☎] 15:57, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
- Theworldgymnast1 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- Reason for requesting Reviewer rights theworldgymnast1 (talk) 17:13, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
I am forever reverting vandalism, creating pages and giving feedback. I feel becoming a reviewer would benefit myself and Wikipedia.