Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Callanecc (talk | contribs) at 05:39, 12 April 2014 (noadminbacklog). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Rollback

(add requestview requests)

Sorry, please be aware that unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

Administrator notation templates

This template is used to answer requests for permissions, especially the rollback user right.

::{{subst:RFPR|option}} ~~~~

The second (unnamed) parameter is optional. It can be omitted or used to specify the admin when marking a request as already done or the number of edits when declining due to inexperience.
Result Code Normalized code
 Done ::{{subst:RFPR|d}} ~~~~ ::{{subst:RFPR|done}} ~~~~
 Already done by {{admin|X}} ::{{subst:RFPR|ad|X}} ~~~~ ::{{subst:RFPR|alreadydone|X}} ~~~~
 Revoked ::{{subst:RFPR|r}} ~~~~ ::{{subst:RFPR|revoked}} ~~~~
 Not done ::{{subst:RFPR|nd}} ~~~~ ::{{subst:RFPR|notdone}} ~~~~
 Not done. Please see the notice at the top of this page. With only {{{X}}} edits to the mainspace, I don't think you have sufficient editing experience yet. Take a moment to check out what counter-vandalism is at WP:CVU, and if you decide you'd like to get involved, you can enroll at the Counter Vandalism Academy to learn more. ::{{subst:RFPR|exp|X}} ~~~~ ::{{subst:RFPR|moreedits|X}} ~~~~
 Not done. Please see the notice at the top of this page. I see you just also applied for Pending Changes Reviewer. Let's see how you get on with that first and then we'll take another look again when you've made a few more edits. ::{{subst:RFPR|rvw}} ~~~~ ::{{subst:RFPR|alsorequestedreviewer}} ~~~~
 Not done. Please see the notice at the top of this page. This is not what Rollback is for. Take a moment to read Wikipedia:Rollback and if that's what you would like to do, you can then check out the Counter Vandalism Unit to learn more. ::{{subst:RFPR|nrb}} ~~~~ ::{{subst:RFPR|notrollback}} ~~~~
I have recently begun to participate in recent changes patrol, and have done some anti-vandalism work before that. Rollback will make these tasks much easier. Vanamonde93 (talk) 21:38, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 05:20, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Although I'm still relatively new, I'm already involved in opposing vandalism and would like to download the STiki tool but need rollback rights first. Thanks. GnGn (talk) 07:59, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment)  Comment: Gnorman Gnome, why don't you ask for the STiki right on its talk page? Rollback is not needed to download or use STiki, but only 1000+ edits in article space are required to use it. Epicgenius (talk) 18:54, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: – Ah, I think I should perhaps wait a while as I'm still short of 1000 edits. Thanks very much. GnGn (talk) 07:52, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done I don't think you have enough experience, I've had a look at your contributions and I don't feel that you have enough experience at reverting vandalism and warning users. Please get some experience manually reverting vandalism and warning users, you might like to give the Counter Vandalism Unit Academy. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 05:23, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I am always on the lookout for vandalism and other unconstructive edits, and believe I could make good use of the rollback feature. CrunchySkies (talk) 09:06, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 05:25, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello I'm Adnan, just a Wikipedian. The thing I like to do on the Wiki beside normal contributing (edit, creating..) is stopping vandalism. I hate watching pages getting attacked by users who want just to destroy this wiki. I would give my best in this task. I've have a normal number of edits which is increasing from day to day, every edit needs to be sourced and ready to be published. Hope you grant me these rights, if not now, (maybe I didn't contribute good enough), i'll continue with the good work and try another time. Thanks for understanding. Cheers. Adnan Hz 97 (talk) 23:33, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) User has only 125 mainspace edits as of this post also not much anti-vandal work is seen on recent contribs. TheMesquito (talk) 00:23, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done The number of contributions to article space is too low, and I don't see too much counter-vandalism activity, which is what rollback is primarily for. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 03:31, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to be able to revert unconstructive edits and sometimes revert my own edits more easily Grfr12345 (talk) 02:24, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Please see the notice at the top of this page. With only X edits to mainspace, I don't think you have sufficient editing experience yet. Take a moment to check out what counter-vandalism is at WP:CVU and when you have made 200 or so edits to articles you may wish to enroll at the Counter Vandalism Academy to learn more. You need more experience with articles and with reverting vandalism and warnings. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 05:34, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Been an editor since 2005 and consider myself a WP:RCP editor. Have never been template warned in almost 3,000 edits. Feel I am a trustworthy enough editor not to abuse this right. Antoshi 20:37, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done - @Antoshi: I've had a look through your contributions and I didn't see a lot of evidence of you warning users after you revert their edits, please make sure you do this so that the person you're reverting knows what they're doing wrong. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 05:38, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]