Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nakon (talk | contribs) at 02:40, 14 May 2015 (→‎User:Jaaron95: done). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Pending changes reviewer

(add requestview requests)
I contribute massively to Wikipedia, I love editing and also have recently joined the Teahouse as a host to welcome new users and answer questions from other users, I believe I have more to learn and being able to review edits before submission is the right way to continue and learn even more here TeaLover1996 (talk) 12:47, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([1]). MusikBot talk 12:50, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:56, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
With a good understanding of the policies and guidelines of Wiki about what is right and wrong, about Vandalism (about Rollback), I think I may now be eligible to extend my rights to reviewing pending changes to articles. With a PC reviewer right, I think, I might be able to contribute here a bit more.. Regards --JAaron95 | Talk | Contribs 18:57, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([2]). MusikBot talk 19:00, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Beeblebrox: Recent edits look OK. As you were the declining admin the last time, do you see any issues? Nakon 00:56, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I deliberately do not re-review my own previous declines. Please do whatever you think is appropriate. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:35, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Nakon 02:40, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Everyday, I run into many pending changes edits while recent changes patrolling. While some edits are vandalism, I see mostly good edits that looks good in the article. I feel bad for all those editors whose edits can't be seen, and I want to let their edits be viewable to all editors. Can I have the pending changes right? ABCDEFADtalk to me 21:41, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) You have successfully gained Rollback rights, but I think you should wait a couple of weeks to earn another user right. I don't want to sound rude, but it seems like you may be power hungry. Try the Rollback feature, and than you should come back and re-request pending-changes. However, the final decision is up to an administrator. CookieMonster755 (talk) 20:05, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm interested in expanding what I do on Wikipedia, learning some new things valereee (talk) 14:46, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Mifter (talk) 16:41, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am still quite new so I may not meet some criteria but I believe I can distinguish between a good faith edit and something nonconstructive, and I know that on 50/50s it is required that the reviewing editor do some fact-checking to make sure the version they are saving or approving is the correct revision. I am happy to do this. --Phil Copperman (talk) 19:59, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Thanks for your contributions, but as you note you are still fairly inexperienced. With less than 50 edits to articles you simply don't have enough of a track record to be granted any advanced permisssions. Keep doing manual vandlism patrol and I'm sure a future request will be approved. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:07, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the consideration Beeblebrox, I note all your advice. --Phil Copperman (talk) 21:09, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Reviewing pending changes is another way in which I can help Wikipedia. Worldbruce (talk) 23:43, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Nakon 00:58, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]