Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 January 11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Target360YT (talk | contribs) at 07:59, 20 January 2017 (Template:Infobox eSports organization). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

January 11

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 January 20 Primefac (talk) 00:13, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 17:45, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Fails WP:NAVBOX as "Hasbro Reconstruction" does not have its own article, nor is it mentioned on any of the pages included within, so not really sure what this is for. Rob Sinden (talk) 16:21, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 17:47, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough links to warrant a navbox. Rob Sinden (talk) 16:07, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:05, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Trivial linking of articles of films starring Prosenjit Chatterjee and "Bollywood Heroine"(s) failing WP:NAVBOX. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:53, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 January 20 Primefac (talk) 00:15, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:05, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NAVBOX suggests that navboxes should be made of coherent subjects and the articles included in them should refer to each other to a reasonable extent. This is a navbox of two actors, Jeet (actor) and Koel Mallick, probably just created by a fan. I doubt we have such navboxes. We do not even keep navboxes of actors. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:54, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 January 20 Primefac (talk) 00:12, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Propose merging Template:Infobox eSports organization with Template:Infobox sports team.
mostly redundant, and it would be nice for more parameters to be supported--Prisencolin (talk) 00:35, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template provides almost identical content to Template:Infobox rugby league club (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) and there seems little point in having two templates providing the same output. Any parameters not in this template could easily be added to the merged template. Nthep (talk)

Would someone be willing to work on this to merge the two and avoid data being lost in a merge. Don't know enough about these myself to attempt it myself though.Fleets (talk) 19:36, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If this goes through I'll do it. Nthep (talk) 20:52, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]