Jump to content

User talk:Jim1138

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Trout this user
4
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2601:188:1:aea0:9c72:d001:b02e:25b8 (talk) at 23:30, 7 February 2017. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.



    FYI

    Hi, regarding some changes made to Bebe Rexha article. Recently some of her true information were changed incorrectly. First the youtube video's name is: "Bebe Rexha talking about being Albanian and songwriting (Ebro Darden Interview)"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S96rcOmHgcM not "being Serbian" ( "Serbian" was certainly added by a Serb just to piss off Albanians...it happens always), second, Bebe Rexha is from Albanian descent and talks about it in every interview, she never considers herself just American, that why adding Albanian descent is important. Third, the 2 links provided as sources about her parents descent are in contradiction with each other, one said both her parents are from Dibra and one other said one from Dibra and the other from Gostivar... that's why I added a new link who supports the info that both her parents are from Diber in Albania. The new link is a video of Bebe's visit and concert in Tirana, Albania, when she says that both her parents are from Diber in Albania and that she's proud to be Albanian (shqiptare).

    Thanks.

    Dear Jim,

    Thanks for the tip. Indeed, I am new to the wikipedia edit and wasn't fully tuned into the edit protocol and didn't elaborate on the reasons for my edit. Kindly note that ALL my edits are legitimate ones today and were meant to be reflected. I'll revert to the article in question and add reasons for each of edit for clarity.

    UNCONSTRUCTIVE EDITS

    Sorry for the unconstructive edits, i' m drunk and stupid but I will never vandalize again. Again sorry.2600:387:4:803:0:0:0:8F (talk)

    The Dick King Edit

    @Jim1138: I was the one who switched the two paragraphs under "The Voortrekkers." This was simply so that the bit made more sense. I did say so on the talk page of that article

    Please stop GGDT

    I am removing this because of the program's request. It IS NOT destructive editing. Please respect the wishes of the organization. Thank you.

    January 2017

    Hi Jim1138, the content removal was not erroneous in nature and I had previously described why the content was removed in the summary but had to open a new tab because the article was edited as I was making the corrections. The information removed was either redundant in nature or outright false and lacked proper citation.

    Hello! i am Eva Chantava and i just wanted to add in my bio the teams i have played!by deleting what was written i did it by mistake! thanks for your message by the way!have a good night! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eva chantava (talkcontribs) 03:03, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Sagamore of the Wabash citation

    My friend and I just received our awards tonight at a surprise meeting so there isn't anything to source other than we have our awards. When it is published in a newspaper, would that be appropriate as a source to link? If I sound like I have no clue, I don't, this was a total surprise honor and putting our names on the official Wiki page makes it even better as we never would have imagined we would receive this award.


    Thank you for your help,

    Beth Michaels

    PS Should I also create and account to do all this?

    2602:306:3BC2:4F90:154E:A03B:149A:C9A4 (talk) 06:31, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia requires that content be wp:verifiable - it must be published by wp:reliable sources (RS). See help:referencing for beginners and help:footnotes. If it's not published by RS, it shouldn't be in Wikipedia. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 06:35, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Cameroon page

    Hey, I deleted it on purpose. I am re-writing the entire page. I am starting from scratch since the last one was poorly written was little to no resources. A fully written article will be done by morning. However, I will try to start using the edit summary. Thanks for the feedback. — Preceding unsigned comment added by QueenWil (talkcontribs) 06:46, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    I got a response for ya! If you have NOTHING to substantiate your Pro-Jew stance about a guy that I know damn well would never do something unless it's spoken about from the man himself, then don't put that nonsense on his page. It's crap and you know it's crap!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.18.2.157 (talk) 12:39, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Toombul District Cricket Club

    Hi Jim, My recent edit to the Toombul District Cricket Club page doesn't need a citation or reference because I'm on the executive committee at Toombul, and the information I updated doesn't have a publicly available reference to be linked to. Also, I deleted the club song section because we discussed it as a committee and decided we don't want the lyrics publicly available.

    unconstructive edit

    I made those changes because the content was subjective, possibly misrepresentative, or unsourced.

    Northnj1994 (talk) 00:50, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    The Pro Wrestling Report Summary

    Hi Jim
       I called My 24 in October 2016 and asked them about Pro Wrestling Report and they told me that The producers decided not to run the show no more. Pro Wrestling Report came on My 24 Saturday Night at 10:00 pm after Ring of Honor Wrestling,Pro Wrestling Report stopped showing on My 24 in October,November,December 2016 to present because the producers decided not to run the show no more.
    

    I want an Article to be semi-protected as soon as possible due to various anonymous edits made for publicity purposes!

    This is the Article https://hi.wikipedia.org/s/al4o Regrads MumbaikarLaunda (talk) 09:41, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Please Reply ASAP

    @Jim1138: Well If You Could not do that, I will wait for a hindi admin to do it. I have another request, I want the same page to be created in English and uploaded to en.wikipedia named: Syed Aman Mian Sharma, he is notable, he is an Indian Child Actor, this article is already on him https://hi.wikipedia.org/s/al4o but the problem is that it is in hindi. I can Give you more than 25 references and i have also made source code for it so you only have to create the article and add or remove points that i have already made. If You are ok. We can talk further. This is one of the 29 references i can give you - Read This http://www.fuzionproductions.com/sony-tvs-upcoming-show-peshwa-bajiraos-syed-aman-mian-speaks-character-show/ Regards MumbaikarLaunda (talk) 09:53, 20 January 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MumbaikarLaunda (talkcontribs)

    @MumbaikarLaunda: I am not much of an editor. You probably have a better handle on English than I. You might machine-translate on https://translate.google.com/ add it to your sandbox. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 10:09, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Jim1138: I have added it to my sandbox here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MumbaikarLaunda/sandbox) Please create the article as soon as possible. Thanks MumbaikarLaunda (talk) 10:15, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    The Mousetrap

    Give it a rest. You're the one whose edits are unconstructive and disrespectful. 124.149.10.245 (talk) 10:31, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Speedy deletion declined: Andrew Kaggia

    Hello Jim1138. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Andrew Kaggia, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: His works have been positively received on a global scale, is an assertion of significance or importance . Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 12:08, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Just an FYI: Andrew Kaggia was created and moved by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vineetpl7. Thanks for all your work! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 22:36, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Hey the only reason I did that was just trying to figure out how Wikipedia works. I'm sorry if I caused any trouble — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.6.4.139 (talk) 23:22, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Overlooked explanations

    Regarding [1], please check for edit summaries before calling an edit “unexplained.” —67.14.236.50 (talk) 00:26, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    The cited sources do not verify the claims, so I replaced them with more feasibly verifiable claims. Please see the article’s Talk page. And please explain the accusation of “whitewashing.” —67.14.236.50 (talk) 00:32, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Removing critical comments. It would appear wp:ANI is next. Jim1138 (talk) 00:33, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I rephrased critical comments to make them more verifiable. Please point out a criticism I removed and failed to replace. —67.14.236.50 (talk) 00:35, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    You must be Barnett. Nice wp:Wikilawyering Jim1138 (talk) 00:37, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I’ll counter your link with WP:AGF and WP:NPA. Try reading the previous discussions and checking your sources. —67.14.236.50 (talk) 00:42, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    And actually, try reading what my edit actually did. It sounds like you think I did nothing more than remove content. —67.14.236.50 (talk) 00:46, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    My change

    I agree that the subject was well researched and highly accurate. My goal wasn't to paint a rosy picture of the university, but to simply be fair to it. Many other universities have had similar issues and don't have their own dedicated sections for it on Wikipedia. I assure you my intentions are not to vandalize or hide anything from the public. I just found this information to be a little unnecessary on a main university page. Even if I can't make this change, I appreciate your dedication to keeping this website as accurate as possible. Garywalker (talk) 06:11, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Garywalker: I have seen a number of university articles on Wikipedia with similar issues. Cheating, plagiarism, rape, racism, etc. Just because such content is missing from a few doesn't mean they have to be removed from other articles. You could add a wp:request for comment template to the talk page. Also, please feel free to add such content to other articles. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:24, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    conversation

    Why you deleted my editing without verifying these.

    Anik chakra siu (talk) 10:53, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    

    conversation

    Why you deleted my editing. Anik chakra siu (talk) 10:54, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Can you help?

    Hi, thanks for written me. I want to upload a picture for Brooke Candy page cause of that page hasn't any picture. Can you upload a proper picture to Brooke Candy page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yungozz (talkcontribs) 11:34, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Mötley Crüe

    Hello. I merely corrected this band name by adding the umläute with which it is normally spelled. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.167.133.226 (talk) 12:37, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    I will point out that our article on the band includes the umlauts, and looks to have been stable there since 2002. There’s nothing “unconstructive” about it. —67.14.236.50 (talk) 17:16, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    thanks for letting me know! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.237.81.245 (talk) 13:41, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    A barnstar for you!

    The Original Barnstar
    Jim! Hey there, thanks for re-flagging the Rev. John Davies article for Speedy deletion, it was the earlier version that I had created and now needs to be binned. I've since created a far better one and could also use help to manage that. Don't be afraid to get in there and chop away. Or even put in a contents section... thing.

    Cheers, Ian Iantheluke (talk) 04:40, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Stay out of it.

    You don't know what's really going on Rrtugdt HDTV (talk) 07:49, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Rrtugdt HDTV: If you can prove it, don't do it on Wikipedia, send the proof to the New York Times. Wikipedia does not accept original content. Jim1138 (talk) 07:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Please do not revert Supreme Genghis Khan. Just let it be.

    Supreme Genghis Khan will react worse if you revert his edits. It is best to block him first, then revert and delete. Shoot first and ask questions later. SamWaIton9 (talk) 08:47, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Make it so... Jim1138 (talk) 08:51, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Your message re "my" Castro edit

    I never made an edit to the Castro entry. Security issue with Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:387:2:811:0:0:0:63 (talk) 16:37, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Latur District edit

    Hi Jim1138, I am Ozgilliath. I deleted the second paragraph from Climate section of the article Latur District because it was repeated. The content of the first and the second paragraph was similar therefore I thought that it would be ok to remove the second paragraph. You can contact me my talk page. Ozgilliath (talk) 17:59, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Ozgilliath: No problem. I admit, I should have noticed the duplicate paragraph below. Please leave an wp:edit summary so that it is easier to understand your change. Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 21:45, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    group is NOt a living person. neither is a state or superstate, be it eu, europe or the third reich — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.198.231.42 (talk) 08:32, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Jack Ma's famous speech on January 19, 2017

    Here's the information you requested.

    http://finance.yahoo.com/news/chinese-billionaire-jack-ma-says-190745392.html

    Now you can restore same.

    Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:6000:C400:57F:5977:9CD:4D74 (talk) 08:59, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    January 2017

    Hi, Jim1138. I saw you left me a message on my talk page that my contribution did not appear constructive. It is highly controversial if Megalia is actually promoting women rights or not, as the site is based on radical feminism and most of the users are expressing misandry. To make sure that the site is based on radical feminism would more neutrally and also clearly explain about this website. Therefore, the fact that Megalia is website which is born from and pursuing radical feminism is more important than you think, as this fact distinguishes the site with normal feminism activists' website.

    I'll revert it again. Thanks. Thatpower —Preceding undated comment added 13:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Thatpower: Regarding Megalia, there seems to be much on misandry and male genital mutilation in the article. Yet, when I looked at it using a rather poor Google translation, there does not seem to be much at all on these topics. That would suggest that much of the article is wp:UNDUE and should be removed. The Wikipedia article should reflect on what is going on on the website, not what their detractors want. Would you agree that most of the content of Megalia is not about mutilation of men's genitals or how to damage or destroy men? For instance, if most of the subject matter is about getting equal rights, then it might more appropriately be classified as a feminist website. Just curious. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 02:38, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

    Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 184.145.42.19 (talk) 17:46, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Carrie Lam criticism

    Is there a reason that you're trying to censor a recent item that has been clearly documented in the news?

    It's a bit sad when the reasons provided for each undo has been remedied and yet you can't come up with more specific explanation other than "rv as good as is" - if you require more information on both incidents, I'm happy to supply

    That someone doesn't know how to buy toilet paper is not a notable event. Unless, that is, one wants to humiliate them. Would that be your purpose here? Jim1138 (talk) 05:57, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Someone not knowing how to buy toilet paper may not be a notable event on the actual event, but as someone who insist they understand fully the conditions of the working and poor population of her city - whilst demonstrating that she did not know how to buy a train ticket or buy toilet paper is an issue. Same as adultery isn't a notable event if you or I did it; but in becomes a notable even when a Politician or a public personality does it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.148.69.141 (talk) 06:01, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Concluding that doesn't know how to buy toilet paper is doesn't understand people is wp:synthesis and should not be added to Wikipedia. BTW: Please sign your talk with four tildes: "~~~~" 06:05, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

    Carrie Lam criticism - updated by whom?

    Jim1138 - thank you for your service in maintaining stability and image for our public servants for the Hong Kong S.A.R. The previous edits have been detected as part of an public IP scan and has been edited to ensure National safety continues. We thank you for your assistance and will closely monitor your future edits to ensure damaging IP are identified.


    To Jim

    抹大拉馬利亞,是作蠱作法族群。 在二千年前,在 古墓 及 家中 使用一種黑色類似潛意識前驅物的魔法, 對 約書亞・本・約瑟夫行惡事。 Magdalene was a witchcraft and superstitious practices ethnic group. Two thousand year ago, they did evil to Yeshua ben Joseph with a kind of dark magic of subconscious precursor alike.

    聖經在古墓的經文: Scripture on tombstone in Bible:

    耶穌問她:「婦人,你為甚麼哭呢?你在找誰?」 這句話,彷彿不認識她,實則因為耶穌警覺到了她的舉動。 但後來還是不查她的犯罪舉動。因為神國的 神 不認為她的作蠱行為舉動會有什麼影響力,因此覺得沒有什麼。

    Jesus asked her, “Miss, why are you crying? Whom are you looking for?” It seemed like Jesus did not know her, but in fact, her action aroused his vigilance. Still no criminal behaviors were found later, since God in Kingdom took her witchcraft action as a matter of slight consequence.

    後來持續不查的原因,是因為她將該類似潛意識前驅物的黑魔,放置在相關人及天空存有的身上,並讓他們不知道這件事。

    The reason why they did not investigate the event was that she hid the truth she had done this dark magic on relative individuals and space beings without realizing it.

    2014 年8 月,她對我行作法作蠱之事,儘管我並不認識她。

    In August 2014, she did witchcraft to Ching Yueh Tsai though she did not know her.

    2015 年,2016年,以及之前,她將黑魔法放置在人類身上,使用我被她作蠱作法所盜取的身體能量體,控制人類身體及天空存有靈魂體,編造製造假故事假消息。甚至一度改寫了google 相關文字及聖經內容。

    In 2015, 2016 and before, she did dark magic on human beings and took my body as intermediary to control human bodies and soul of space beings and fudged false stories or wrong information. Besides, she rewrote texts and contents available on Google and even on Bible ONCE.

    在二千年後的今天,其作蠱作法已擴及整個天空,因為使用黑魔做法,就是傷害天父的身體,導致天父身體嚴重受損。

    Today, after two thousand years, the witchcraft is extended to the whole sky and does harm to Heavenly Father’s body badly.

    因為這樣的前驅物不為人所識,是來自上界神國具有神力,但先前不為人所知。 若非她真的傷害了人類存有並真實操控人類存有,實在很難讓人相信這樣的人存在。

    This kind of precursor is unknown previous. It will be difficult to convince people that there is such a bad person exist unless she did hurt human beings practically. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Irene Tsai (talkcontribs) 06:18, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Quite a story. Jim1138 (talk) 07:24, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Dippin Dots and Sean Spicer

    Citation Needed: http://www.npr.org/2017/01/23/511278562/dippin-dots-beef-puts-white-house-press-secretary-on-the-spot — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.93.250.141 (talk) 08:02, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    this is ajay verma

    i have edited (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ram_Murti_Verma) this page because the information you have given in the Controversy is compeletly wrong .the murder case was on (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rammurti_Singh_Verma) ram murtisingh verma. you may check from here (http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/murder-accused-strongman-and-friend-of-the-poor/) . you may also contact local police station for more deteil. Ram Murti Verma and Ram Murti Singh verma are two different people — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajayverma3641 (talkcontribs) 10:07, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Ajayverma3641: It looks like the police can't make up their mind. Perhaps you should summarize the whole thing? Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 10:26, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Edit to Dr. Abdulqadir as sufi's page

    @Jim1138: Hello Jim,

    I made note that the edited information on Dr. Abdalqadir As-sufi's page was removed because it did not have even one viable citation, the references were non-existent and therefore Wikipedia does not have substantial evidence to make such claims. I hope this helps.

    99.173.49.146 (talk) 03:02, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    First, the articles are still there, just under a different URL. I replaced the URLs with the new one in Abdalqadir as-Sufi. Second, even if they were permenently gone, WP:KDL (keep dead links) applies. The links were added about 2013, plenty of time to verify they were valid. So, removal would not be valid under the references begin 404. Please try to repair wp:linkrot next time rather than simply deleting? Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 05:00, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Sikhism and Sikh Names (articles)

    Hi! I'm so sorry, I've only just received the message that my edits from last year on the Sikhism page are technically vandalism since I didn't cite my sources. For that particular page, I believe I only changed the section about vegetarianism, where it was incorrectly stated that Sikhs eat "halal" despite the religion only allowing full vegetarianism. Unfortunately, I just edited another article on "Sikh Names" before I noticed this message, where I had clarified the naming process, as well as pointing out the cultural and religious differences on the issue.

    As for my credentials, I studied verses and hymns from the Guru Granth Sahib for 6 years.

    I'm genuinely terribly sorry, I didn't mean to change anything that I wasn't supposed to and I only meant to clarify certain sections of the article. If you need to re-edit anything that I added, I completely understand that you are within rights to.

    I apologize for any concerns this might have caused you,

    Thank you 184.65.116.153 (talk) 06:11, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    List of Indian Government Agencies

    @Jim1138: Hey Jim, Thanks for your message the reason for the removal of the Subheading "Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs" was because the ministry was merged with the Ministry of External Affairs in 2016. The reason for deletion of the subheading Ministry of Home Affairs was because it was already present in the page a few lines below Achyuthan Sriram (talk) 06:46, 26 January 2017 (UTC)Achyuthan Sriram[reply]

    @Achyuthan Sriram: Please use an wp:edit summary Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 07:13, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Sikhism (article)

    Sorry, just to clarify again now that I've had the chance to look over the article. All the issues I have are in the "Prohibitions in Sikhism" section.

    1) Nihangs don't ever use cannabis. Sikhism prohibits the use of drugs or "nashians" according to the Rehet Maryada. Despite being a more natural drug, I've never heard of a single Nihang that uses cannabis (we're progressive, but not that progressive).

    2) "Puja" refers to the Hindu service for marriage; the Sikh official term for this is "Anand Karaj" which relates to the union of a (baptized) couple in the eyes of god (they have to sit in front of the Guru Granth Sahib and listen to "lavans", which are instructions about marriage and unity and whatever).

    3) It's actually very common for Sikhs to go to College or University in order to learn Granthi Studies to be a Giani (priest); they generally learn the historical events surrounding the hymns and they analyze the verses - the curriculum may include learning fluent Sanskrit, Farsi, and Urdu as well.

    4) Meat is never served as langar. In some countries (based on the major dominant culture), the typical roti/dhaal langar is changed; for example, in some temples (gurdwaras) in Singapore, they serve noodles - however, these noodles will be vegetarian and only vegetarian. This is because Sikhs are vegetarian, meaning no meat whatsoever, not even halal.

    I'm sorry, but this is the point that I needed changed the most. Some Sikhs (and ALL baptized Sikhs) are vegetarian (no meat, no eggs, no fish), and I just really wanted to clear up the misconception.

    5) Also, "Akhand Kirtani Jathai" is not a conservative sect (actually, there aren't any sects in Sikhism) - they are just a group of musical performers that compose/sing poetry about events in Sikh history in gurdwaras, kinda like gospel in churches.

    I know that this might not seem like credible information at all, it's just really hard to find accurate sources since nobody even knows about Sikhism, much less writes proper articles on it (the only ones I can think of are Basics of Sikhi and Sikhnet, but they aren't exactly articles). I feel like this should be common knowledge, but I guess not all people have had the same access to religious education that I have had.

    I'm so sorry again,

    Thank you for your time. 184.65.116.153 (talk) 07:04, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Replied on editor's talk page Jim1138 (talk) 07:25, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Daly Babay

    Please, do not undo my edits. If I am moving incorrectly then please you do it the correct way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.212.233.32 (talk) 08:35, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    I do not see any "move" button so please help me. I may break codes so please do it yourself. --216.212.233.32 (talk) 08:38, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    "Unconstructive edits"

    @Jim1138: Hi Jim. I believe the disambiguation page for Justin Wells (with links to Justin Wells (Musician and Justin Wells (American Football) is correct. Am I mistaken?

    Best, Cross33 (talk) 01:09, 27 January 2017 (UTC)cross33[reply]

    @Cross33: What you were doing to Justin Wells is referred to as "page hijacking". The page topic exists and it is likely there are multiple links to that page. So, changing its topic is not a good idea. You could either use a {{for}} if there is only one other Justin Wells. If more than two, create a disambiguation page such as Justin Wells (disambiguation). Please read wp:disambiguation for the proper option to use. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 01:18, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Mulvaney

    Everything I added is sourced....please be more specific on what doesn't have a source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.195.72.217 (talk) 01:16, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Oh my thank you so much! that really was a mistake!! i didnt think i deleted the whole thing. so sorry! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vblahato (talkcontribs) 04:01, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    hi you are wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.88.132.165 (talk) 04:16, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    what

    stop deleting my stuff — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.56.21.40 (talk) 04:49, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Rape In India

    @Jim1138:

    I removed the section because I found it inadequate as per Wikipedia standards that I'm used to. Subsequently I decided it was a bad idea and restored the content on my own as well and added all the template messages for cleanup - I hope you have the time to go through the clean up recommendations I've made and iron out some unnecessary edits I may have made. I've been a wiki user since 2005 but this is the first time I'm making edits at this level, so I'd appreciate a leg up.

    Methedunker (talk) 05:27, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Sikhism

    Hi! Thank you for your reply. I definitely agree with the idea that followers of all religions (Sikhism included) tend to cherry pick ideas from their religious texts, or practice a variation of their faith. I just meant to point out the differentiation between the cultural aspect and what is promoted within the lines of scripture themselves; for example, while it is common for non-baptized Sikhs to eat meat, there are legitimate verses from the religious text that specifically address how eating any meat is considered to be "a sin" - however, I guess there are some people out there that do interpret the text as permitting "halal" meat. It's just the first time I've seen a minority view (that holds less religious and cultural convention) as being accepted as the general rule for all Sikhs. I guess it's sorta comparable to saying that although the scripture might literally say that a Sikh should not cut their hair (it does), a cultural view in some remote area interprets this as 'a Sikh is permitted to cut their hair once every other month' (hypothetical example) and then that generalization of all Sikhs were written onto an article about Sikhism (which then leads to the misunderstanding that Sikhism permits cutting one's hair every other month).

    I swear, I'm trying to stay as objective as possible - Sikhism isn't that well known of a religion and I just really didn't want to create more misinformation, regardless of one's opinions of it.

      I do completely understand your point, though. I'm really sorry to have bothered you - I promise that this is the last message!
    

    (I'm guessing this whole replying thing must get pretty tiring)

    Thank you again for your time, 184.65.116.153 (talk) 05:59, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    thanks for fixing Sutherland page

    Hi Jim1138,

    thankyou for noticing and fixing the Sutherland railway station page - yes, the removed content was a mistake.

    Edgar Searle (talk) 07:06, 27 January 2017 (UTC)Edgar.[reply]

    Caution

    The warnings you recently posted on User talk:70.97.96.239 were a bit problematic. The edits referred to were not vandalism. The edits did have problems and needed "fixing", but were certainly not vandalism. Please be careful with the "vandalism" accusations. Thanks for your good work around here. Vsmith (talk) 13:34, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Vsmith: Thanks for the note. I really appreciate feedback.
    Something very strange seemed to be happening with that IP. 70.97.96.239 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) was doing rapid-fire edits to articles, making 17 edits in 37 minutes to unrelated articles. This included six? fully formatted references. This would seem to be some kind of prepared edits, some fast copy/paste, some kind of bot test, or maybe the anon is a fast reader/organizer/typist and I'm getting old. The followup edit to Child, Food industry, and AirPods complicates the first hypotheses. Other then Bethel and Puyallup high schools are about 12 miles apart and the IP geolocates to Northwestern University in Washington which is about 40 miles from Puyallup, I don't see any connect between articles. The edits listed below are in order of the first edit. Diffs include all edits by the anon.
    1. diff Canyon High School (Anaheim, California) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Unreferenced and reverted by another.
    2. diff Bethel High School (Spanaway, Washington) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) No refs, just changing "boys and girls" to "men and women" Another reverted this.
    3. diff Puyallup High School (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) A few minor corrections.
    4. diff Transhumanism (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Unreferenced and reverted by another.
    5. diff 12th man (football) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Unreferenced and reverted by me.
    6. diff Pinterest (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) A few minor correction. No refs.
    7. diff Latrodectus (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) The IP changed "male black widow spider" to "black male widow spider" which I find rather racist.
    8. Bethel High School second edit w/ cite web
    9. diff Telepathy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Formatted ref added. Reverted by another "clickbait".
    10. diff Aleutian Islands (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Formatted ref added. Current edit.
    11. diff AirPods (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Formatted ref added. I reverted as "didn't belong in the lede".
    12. diff Child (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Formatted ref added.
    13. diff Food industry (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Formatted ref added.
    14. Child second edit - sentence added.
    15. Food industry second edit - simple change.
    16. AirPods second edit - simple change.
    17. diff Lung (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Formatted ref added.
    • The references were all different sites. Fox, Cnet, Yahoo news, BBC, LA Times, collective-evolution.com
    Pardon my lack of AGF, but this seems very suspicious. What do you think, Vsmith? Thanks again. Jim1138 (talk) 01:01, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Strange indeed - I really don't know ... either a group effort (in a computer lab) or someone prepared a bunch of edits (offline?) and then did the rapid fire edits. Vsmith (talk) 01:26, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    If they were prepared, I wouldn't think the updates. Also, why were the refs added only at the end? Jim1138 (talk) 02:12, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Enra Group

    Hi Jim1138,

    I noticed that you deleted the Enra Group wikipedia page. Would it be possible to have a conversation around why I think it should be there? I think it is notable due to your “sustained” criterion, it has had repeated coverage over 3 years in Sunday Times as a notable high-growth UK business (Fast Track 100 + 1 year in Profit Track 100 and an expected 2nd years in the latest edition of Profit Track 100).

    That’s an independent measure from a major UK news source that considers Enra Group's performance to be “notable” for a sustained period of time. The links are included in the article.

    Thanks,

    Xazxda (talk) 17:20, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Xazxda: I didn't delete it, I only suggested it be deleted. An wp:administrator reviewed my suggestion, the article, and then deleted it. I do not remember the specifics on the article. It was likely it was either that it did not appear to meet wp:notability or it was worded in a wp:promotional manner. See wp:NOTPROMOTION, wp:policy, and wp:manual of style. I would suggest you review the previous pages and look at similar organizations to get an idea how to write an article. You might also use wp:article for creation and/or create it in your sandbox. (link at the top of every page while you are logged in). Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 23:36, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi Jim

    The article was citing no credible source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:2C6:4503:DE44:DD29:9FB0:F530:D8C6 (talk) 07:23, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    18 red dots?!

    Thought for a second someone had been mass-reverting some changes, then I see my talkpage history! Thanks for looking at that - much appreicated. Lugnuts Precious bodily fluids 08:42, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    You are welcome. What goes around, comes around. BTW: How come I don't have a fan club like yours? Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 08:50, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Battle of Vukovar

    I need to edit almost all text in the artical because it is untrue. I am a first time on wiki so how can I do it? I have sources — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shommy123 (talkcontribs) 10:49, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    proof that BHUTTO family belongs to ARAINS not to RAJPOOTS..

    Mr. Jim I want to assure you that bhutto family is from arain tribe, because arains entered in sindh in 712 A.D. with MUHAMMAD BIN QASIM. Arains are from arbian roots and also landlords in punjab and sindh. As Benazir bhutto claims it while interview in 2005. She is claiming that her forefathers belongs to arabs.But RAJPOOTS are a Non-muslim family.And Muslims including peoples of Arain tribe defeat RAJA DAHAR (from Rajpoot family).see it on youtube, here is the prove.............https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vz3W1DcZvNs .......and for full video.......https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFYJuYuMjYc&t=78s — Preceding unsigned comment added by Choudrhy Muhammad Ahmad (talkcontribs) 10:55, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Molecular Beam Epitaxy edit

    Molecular Beam Epitaxy

    You added back my removal of the 2009 sentence about it being the first oxide growth. "In 2009, molecular beam epitaxy has been used to deposit oxide materials for advanced electronic, magnetic and optical applications. For these purposes, MBE systems have to be modified to incorporate oxygen sources.[2]"

    This claim is implies that the included reference is the first time MBE was used with oxide materials. It is not the first time.

    A quick search shows, http://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.1593832 And, there are likely older references.

    It feels like the reference was included by someone for self-serving purposes.

    A general sentence on the kinds of molecular / atomic sources have been used would be more helpful. Skddp (talk) 22:38, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    dr.abdalqadir as sufi

    My apologies I just read your message now, will check the new links you have posted. If those sources are non-existentthen how can Wikipedia still keep this up?

    99.173.49.146 (talk) 02:01, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    we do not want information put up without permission from family pleae show respect, the only people who know the man is his family and we decide what can be written. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Londonengland2017 (talkcontribs) 08:01, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    A barnstar for you!

    The Original Barnstar
    For correct without condescending Nipun 2002 (talk) 09:07, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you! Jim1138 (talk) 09:08, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello Jim1138 Previously, the layout of the image caused the page to glitch. The image was put previously such that some parts of the references was printed above the image. I wanted to fix this by transferring the image to a new topic and changing the layout. Sorry for any misunderstanding :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nipun 2002 (talkcontribs) 08:53, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Here's the image: thumb As you can see, the image causes the glitch So I tried to fix it by removing the image form one of the subtopics and transfer it to the next to fix the glitch. Hope you understand :) Nipun 2002 (talk) 08:57, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Nipun 2002: You can use wp:template {{clear}} which will force a rearrangement. Also, putting it on the right side of the page may help. It often depends on the browser's width. I'll make a test. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:00, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Jim1138: Yeah sure, good luck with that. Thanks for pointing out my mistake (for not stating what I changed). Cheers :) Nipun 2002 (talk) 09:04, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Jim1138: And I forgot, the image is in the wrong topic too Nipun 2002 (talk) 09:05, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Nipun 2002: Images can generate havoc with formatting. Change the browser width and chaos ensues. I'll leave it up to you. I would suggest removing the "350px" per image policy wp:images (or something around there) Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:08, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Jim1138: Hey there! I'll keep it as it is. Well, you removed the 350 pixel attribute for me from the image. No worries. Thanks :) Nipun 2002 (talk) 09:43, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Nipun 2002: I understand, but have not experienced, that setting the image can cause problems for some browsers. Especially mobile. Thanks for your work! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:48, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Jim...this page is about Au basketball - not Bama or UAB...in a series that is only 19 games long a 4-game win streak is indeed significant - the longest win streak in series history...yes UAB leads the series 10-9 BUT they have not won a game since 1997! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vulcan1812 (talkcontribs) 00:05, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Vulcan1812: What article are you referring to? I do a lot of random editing. Jim1138 (talk) 00:20, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    I'm referring to the "Auburn Basketball" page...did you graduate from uab or alabama? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vulcan1812 (talkcontribs) 05:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Vulcan1812: Neither. I don't watch sports and couldn't name a basketball player. It the rivalry that intense? My revert here was because the IP didn't explain the removal. I do wp:RCP. I see the IP doesn't leave wp:edit summaries when deleting stuff. If you want something removed or left, I would suggest discussing it on Talk:Auburn Tigers men's basketball. See wp:talk page guidelines Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:05, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Independent clause

    Hi, I noticed you reverted my edit at Independent clause and pointed out my edit was disruptive on my talk page. The source I picked was reliable and I was adding additional information to the page (there's barely anything on it). I was wondering why you felt my edit was disruptive. 99.252.156.13 (talk) 03:25, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Question

    Hi, I'm wondering if you know what the protocol is if you suspect one editor is using multiple IP addresses to edit the same articles. I've read over Wikipedia:Sock puppetry and it seems to deal more with named accounts rather than IP addresses. I think that all of these IP addresses are being used by the same person:

    I left messages requesting this user to register an account, but I haven't received a response. These generally seem like good faith and productive edits, but it concerns me that one individual appears to be using multiple accounts. Thanks for any thoughts you may have. Marquardtika (talk) 16:24, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Marquardtika: Some IPs are more dynamic than others. Might be using a coffee shop or other public wifi. The red flag is when the IP is blocked and then edits with another IP. That would be grounds for a range block or wp:DENY Another block-worthy issue is the IP impersonating multiple people to sway opinion on AfDs or talk pages. At first glance, it appears that IP list is editing entirely different articles. I don't see any obvious problem. None have block history. Any other problems that you see with these IPs? (BTW: if you use {{userlinks|205.251.68.91}} That will list most info). Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 21:28, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Got it, thanks! And thanks also for the userlinks tip. Marquardtika (talk) 21:31, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Michael Jeter

    @Jim1138: Thanks for your note. I am not a prolific editor on Wikipedia, but I have been making edits, from time to time, for many years, certainly over a decade.

    One of the many good things about Wikipedia is that there is no single arbiter of what information is useful. Granted, things can fall into disarray if nobody ever reverts anyone else's edits, but I would advise restraint when taking such actions. The fact that a phrase is not written the way that you would write it (or the fact that it exists at all) is not necessarily grounds for you to remove it.

    It is not uncommon for artists who have won top awards in multiple discplines (Oscar/Grammy/Tony/Emmy, mostly) to be referred to as "Tony and Emmy Award-winning." Mr Jeter's Tony award was an enormous accomplishment in his career and, to the extent that the Emmy is mentioned in his introduction, it makes sense that the Tony would be mentioned there as well. You could also argue that his awards might not be mentioned at all, but as you know, there are a variety of editorial styles represented on Wikipedia in this regard. Editorial styles are subjective, of course.

    Just as I was entitled to change the page in a way that seemed, to me, to be useful, you are certainly entitled to change the page in a way that you believe makes the page even better. But to simply revert an edit, because you would not have made that particular edit... that goes beyond what I think it reasonable oversight. It discourages community participation in the project. Perhaps that is your goal. But it has been the effect. I am now less likely to throw in my extremely-occasional two cents next time I see information that I think might be useful.

    Oh, and I realize "If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox" is just boilerplate, but obviously what I was doing was not experimentation. It was a perfectly reasonable, good-faith edit. And that sentence is a bit patronizing. I don't edit much, but I do know the difference between a real edit and playing around.

    In the end, I suppose the ultimate "winner" of this dispute will be whichever of us has more stamina to argue about what is and is not a constructive edit to the late Michael Jeter's page. And I suspect you will come out on top there. So... knock yourself out. These paragraphs of thoughts are probably more involved than I should have gotten. ReadParse (talk) 19:55, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @ReadParse: The odd thing I noticed was that here you changed Butt Nine (play) to Butt Nine (play) which is a wp:redlink. I tried various Google searches and without finding any play. Is there a Butt Nine play? Was this intentional or an accident? Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 21:33, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jim1138: Well that's embarrassing. It turns out that your problem was not with my legitimate edit, but with one that was unintentional. Yowsa. OK, I'll explain. I have this "Butt-to-butt" Chrome extension, which replaces all occurrences of "butt" to "butt", and all occurrences of "my butt" to "my butt". "Butt" is so overused that it's really funny, but it seems that it even happened in the article content that I was editing. So, like I said... super embarrassing. And it reveals that I didn't even preview my change, which is a problem. Ugh, so embarrassing. If you can't tell, I was having a bad day yesterday. Sorry about that. ReadParse (talk) 20:14, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @ReadParse: Did it do it again to your edit here? I cant tell the difference. No problem, I've made lots of errors in my history. BTW: No need to do yo on someone's own talk page, it's automatic. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 22:12, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Yeah, it did it again :) So I turned off the extension just now, so it will leave my post alone. Here's what I wrote: Well that's embarrassing. It turns out that your problem was not with my legitimate edit, but with one that was unintentional. Yowsa. OK, I'll explain. I have this "Cloud-to-butt" Chrome extension, which replaces all occurrences of "cloud" to "butt", and all occurrences of "the cloud" to "my butt". "Cloud" is so overused that it's really funny, but it seems that it even happened in the article content that I was editing. So, like I said... super embarrassing. And it reveals that I didn't even preview my change, which is a problem. Ugh, so embarrassing. If you can't tell, I was having a bad day yesterday. Sorry about that. ReadParse (talk) 03:34, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Got a level 2 warning

    You gave me a level 2 warning for a change I made to United Russia. I was attempting to correct clear vandalism, which I noticed that since my change has not returned. In return for attempting this I got a level 2 warning. That's nice. 2600:8800:A405:7600:DD04:9D3:2B6B:5AA0 (talk) 05:45, 31 January 2017 (UTC)L[reply]

    Replied on editor's talk page. Jim1138 (talk) 07:18, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Windows 10 version history

    Hi.

    In response to your message, I have not removed content from the Windows 10 Version History page. I have switched the changelogs from paragraph to bullet-point format, as many users find it easier to find a certain feature.

    After seeing the multiple mentions of "copyright violation" and plagiarism on the Windows 10 Version History talk page, I have browsed through the Windows 10 Insider blog, and listed new features in my own words.

    Adding helpful content is what Wikipedia is about, and without the list of features, the page is worthless.

    101.98.108.152 (talk) 10:15, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Bacon's cipher reversion

    Hello, I recently made an edit to the Bacon's cipher page. In the 'Baconian cipher example' section the sentence "To encode a message each letter of the plaintext is replaced by a group of five of the letters 'A' or 'B'." is supposed to be part italicised such that it encodes the word 'steganography'. I.e. To encode a message each letter of the plaintext is replaced by a group of five of the letters 'A' or 'B'. If you don't mind, I'll revert your edit so that this the case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.143.37.47 (talk) 10:38, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    reverted one of contributions

    Hello, Jim1138 i made this edit to prevent from spamming the block user who were Striking sockpuppet contributions per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Scorpion293. to stop majority of votes on afd articles hope you don't mind to do so. Bndu2 (talk) 11:48, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Bndu2: How would one know that? All one sees are the strikeouts, it doesn't seem to be indicated as to why. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 11:54, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @Bndu2: My apology. I didn't see your comments. Sorry! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 11:56, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    A new account is now making the same edits the IP's did. It really seems like WP:POINT, WP:BLOCKEVASION by User:Bugmenot123123123 or User:Mdikici4001. Sro23 (talk) 02:16, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Family Court of Australia

    Hi - I have deleted that opening paragraph re the court being 'controversial'. None of the references support the claims being made, and it has obviously been inserted recently by an activist in the area. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.160.126.35 (talk) 04:06, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    A barnstar for you!

    The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
    Thank you for helping me out with that vandal. That was quite a handful. Bel-Shamharoth (talk) 07:26, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @Shamharoth: Thank you for the barnstar! And, you are welcome. It does help to have wp:rollback rights Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:29, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Punjab Assembly ,

    look till now there isnt election done , so first party is till SAD _ BJP named prakash singh badal , AAP is not first party dude . change it . or google it whose CM of Punjab — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.193.216.148 (talk) 09:03, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Help me to create my bio on wikipedia (Juma mkenye kihega (talk) 09:17, 1 February 2017 (UTC))[reply]

    we aren't vandalising

    jim oh little jim, we are only stating facts. we arent vandalising, we are the bry creators

    love from bry creators xoxoxoxoo

    ps. hope we can be buddies in the future — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bry creators (talkcontribs) 10:50, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi Jim,

    I'm still getting the hang of how to provide sources and I have a lot of knowledge of Cole from one of his dancers Matt Mattox and from the booK UNSUNG GENIUS.

    Is it because I deleted the term "dance-training workshop"? I apologize if this is the case, however, those dancers were under contract and they were paid $125 a week (which was a lot back then) so I find the term inaccurate when trying to understand the dance industry in this day and age. I think it's an important distinction too. If you get paid it's called a "company" and hundreds of dance schools (including DANCE MOMS Abby-Lee are calling their student groups a "dance company"!!!

    Peace. I didn't mean any harm,

    Best,

    Liam Burke — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liam Burke (talkcontribs) 08:29, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Sorry if I came off as a bit Blunt

    But feelings don't allow people to change articles based on them. Donald Trump is not a Fascist and does not belong in the category of them — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyno50 (talkcontribs) 11:04, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Kyno50: Irregardless, your comment was not appropriate for Wikipedia. As for DT being a fascist, it depends on who you ask. Jim1138 (talk) 11:14, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Well if we let feelings get in the way then I guess Theresa May is a Nazi. Now I'm not sorry for being blunt — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyno50 (talkcontribs) 23:01, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Your deletion of my edits o the Port Moresby page

    Hello Jim

    I would be grateful if you could clarify what you want me to reference. For instance, I removed the typical white slag of Sir Michael Somare, which provided no source for the statement that the mansion offered him was not as mansionous as he preferred -- my memory is that he told the Australians that as PM of the country, he would make the decision about where and how he lived, not them, a perfectly justified position in my view. Are there other national leaders referred to in Wikipedia so disrespectfully? So where is the source for that and how come it is allowed to remain unedited?

    There never was a "Territory of Papua and New Guinea" except as an administrative instrument -- Papua remained Australian territory until the day of independence, and New Guinea remained United Nations Trust Territory until the day of independence. Their merging into one occurred at independence when the nation of Papua New Guinea was born.

    I was there, a working journalist at the time. 1963-77. Now I am back. 2010-?

    I despaired of the last section; thought I would give it some work some time in the future. The biggest single sport doesn't really get a mention, Rugby League, which references the NRL in Australia. It is so big that Austrlian NRL stars are used in health and road safety promotions. Soccer used to be big but it has dwindled on the vine; cricket was never more than a Papuan aberration. The United States didn't form an oil company, for God's sake, Esso came in.

    the head office of PNG Air gets a mention -- no argument with that -- but it is the small brother. Where is big brother in airline terms, Air Niugini, with domestic flights all over and lots of international destinations? Come on, mate!!!

    So all this unsourced and sometimes where rubbish remains, but my knowledgeable additions get scrubbed?

    I would like to see some justification for this.

    Geoff Heard Greenishhenry (talk) 11:17, 2 February 2017 (UTC)greenishmorpher[reply]

    Yes, edit is correct

    Hi Jim,

    Mark Goodley/david ben pesach

    The edit is factually correct... and very well known since the Dead Sea Scrolls were published. The percentages cited, documents, etc. are all public.

    ....Unless you want to cite and use the entire Old and New Testaments for further evidence...

    If you look at what is written, I don't think anything is controversial in any way.

    ... unless you want to consider the Pope's position, but he and it are on record, TV, etc...

    Best,

    markdg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.169.224.92 (talk) 00:17, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    This was largely believed until the Dead Sea Scrolls (50BCE-200 AD) were discovered and translated, revealing a very different story. 95% of all scroll writing is in Hebrew, including most all "daily" documents including land transfers, sales, material purchases, etc. Only (approx.) 3% of discovered Dead Sea writings are in Aramaic, supposedly those written to gentiles/pagans. 2% were written in Greek, which makes perfect sense as they had been there for 300 years. The Aramaic first came around 730 BC but wasn't understood by Jews until much later (Is 35). (The Romans only came to Judea around 60 BC under Pompei). It is now very clear that the spoken and written daily language of Jews was Hebrew, Not Aramaic. For further evidence and clarification look at the surprising examples from the New Testament, the many examples of Jesus. For example. At the Transfiguration, Jesus Spoke to Moses And Elijah... only one possibility exists, and it's Hebrew not Aramaic. Jesus Spoke and read Isaiah in/at The Temple and Galilee synagogues... and all the people listened And understood... again, only one possibility, Hebrew, Not Aramaic. The minted coins were all in Hebrew, not Aramaic. The people cried out Hosanna, Hebrew, not Aramaic...Paul said that Jesus spoke to him in Hebrew, not Aramaic. So despite Pope Francis's denial that Jesus spoke Hebrew (only Aramaic), there are many many examples to easily prove this belief false. In fact, the evidence strongly suggests that it is very likely that most educated people spoke multiple languages fluently, much like the majority of Europe today. It is commonly excepted that Saul/Paul spoke and wrote in Hebrew, Greek, Aramaic, Syriac, and probably some Latin as well. The evidence and 1st century witnesses state that many of the books of the New Testament were originally written in Hebrew such as Matthew, Hebrews, and Revelations. These "originals" have been lost, likely/probably due to the Temple destruction and deportations of 70 and 132 AD...

    Hi Jim,

    Greetings;

    mark d goodley/david ben pesach

    please note my prior reply...

    ie/Everything written is either common knowledge (New and Old Testaments) or public domain. The percentages, documents, etc. for example have all been in the public domain for decades....with many books on the topic.

    The only possible "rustled feathers" might be the Pope's position... but it was made on world wide TV and cannot hardly be disputed.

    I am somewhat new to Wikipedia, but saw the obvious lack of information and aged position...

    But you know what? Galileo walked up a tower and dropped two balls, forever disproving 2,000 years of teaching, "knowledge", and belief... but you know what the schools continued to teach for 150 years thereafter?

    Your call

    mdg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markdgoodley (talkcontribs) 00:28, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Markdgoodley: See wp:verifiability. It's not my call, it is wp:policy. BTW: It is likely that Galileo didn't do any such experiment. Most likely a thought experiment. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 00:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Gravity's Rainbow

    I won't both adding the sources for the Gravity's Rainbow genres, because it's kind of silly to have citations for some and not for others. (Should we add a cite to prove it's a "historical novel" next?) But if I were to add them, I would demonstrate Slipstream by pointing here: https://w2.eff.org/Misc/Publications/Bruce_Sterling/Catscan_columns/catscan.05 and demonstrate science fiction by pointing...well, maybe immediately to the left, where the entry notes that the book was nominated for a Nebula Award.173.64.74.153 (talk) 05:40, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Elliott Blackstone

    This is my Grandfather and we've tried several times to get his information corrected. One being his birth place. Wikipedia has my great grandfather death place as my grandfather's birth place. My grandfather father Elliott R. Blackstone was born in Aurora, Kane, Illinois, on October 30, 1948. He was a great man and I think his details should be corrected. Especially now that the Compton Riot area that he work with is becoming the first district of it kind in the nation. So I would appreciate to making these corrections. I thought me saying I was fixing my grandfather birth place was adequate enough and if my name is on there it needs to be with the last name Blackstone. Ty ahead of time... Sabrina Blackstone (talk) 06:13, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Ok i am hating this mailing system here. And it's horrible trying to make the simplest of changes. Though it says he grew up there it never states he was born there. As I have heard it from his own lips plus I have our lineage chart going back over 300 yrs that I know of, I would tend to think i know the truth. Especially since for the for the first couple of years Wikipedia didn't even have his named spelled correctly. And since I do talks and activist work in his honor along with my daughter, I know more about him then you will ever know. So if you could just assist me in making the changes properly i would be very greatful. And I'll leave you to do what you know and get back to what I know to do... 07:52, 3 February 2017 (UTC)Sabrina Blackstone (talk)

    Hi, I noticed that a logo fore the World Wide Web didn't exist. So I made one. Was that correct to insert it in the World Wide Web page?

    A Lot (talk) 09:47, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @A Lot: I don't think there is an "official" WWW logo. Please enlighten me on such a logo. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 09:49, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


    @Jim1138: Yes It doesn't exist an official logo, we can say that I am trying to make one.

    The logo it is a visual synthesis of the power of the world wide web. I used the triangle that represents the number three, that it is the creation. It is also the number of the famous "WWW". Into the triangle there is the world connected by the internet. I used a silver background because it reminds to the machines that create the connections and store the data. The outlines are thick to create a better legibility in small reproductions. This is briefly the explanation of the logo. Should I put it in the World Wide page?A Lot (talk) 10:29, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @A Lot: Per wp:verifiability, there needs to be a wp:reliable source stating that it is the official logo. Otherwise, probably not. Sorry. If you want to ask further, please ask at the wp:teahouse. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 10:31, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Removed intentionally

    I removed it intentionally, I want to recheck everything first before posting. Thanks49.77.132.106 (talk) 09:55, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Re: James Shields

    You obviously didn't read my explanation for the last edit. Here it is again. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:You_don't_need_to_cite_that_the_sky_is_blue#Pedantry.2C_and_other_didactic_arguments Are you saying James Shields DIDN'T give up a home run to Bartolo Colon?

    Ramjiramji10111987 (talk) 11:03, 3 February 2017 (UTC) HI JIM Chandigarh is union territory so i want to recorrect by mentioning u.t = union territory .[reply]

    van Amstel

    http://genwiki.nl/limburg/index.php?title=Huyn_van_Merkelbeek — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.40.83.111 (talk) 03:11, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Quetta Gladiators

    Please visit Official Facebook page of Quetta Gladiators details about sponsorship is provided... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 43.224.236.184 (talk) 07:58, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    ramjiramji10111987

    (Ramjiramji10111987 (talk) 08:20, 4 February 2017 (UTC)) i am writing for some company who has running their work since 20 years. so i thought that write about them  (Ramjiramji10111987 (talk) 08:20, 4 February 2017 (UTC)) tell me what should i do at this stage so that i will write some good stuff for other people .Ramjiramji10111987 (talk) 08:20, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    

    hi

    jim? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.203.43.134 (talk) 09:00, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Punjab legislative assembly election, 2017 page

    Dear Jim, I am sorry I removed all the opinion polls that did not have a [number] beside them as I thought they were fake polls. Thank you for restoring. However, I have noticed someone keeps changing the February 2017 poll numbers. If you click the number source link for Feb 2017, it says AAP 63 Inc 43 SAD 11. Someone keeps making it Inc 73 Aap 33 SAD 11. But this is no where on the website. You can navigate the source on your own: http://www.huffingtonpost.in/2017/02/02/huffpost-cvoter-pre-poll-survey-aam-aadmi-party-set-to-win-punj/?utm_hp_ref=in-homepage Punjab is a region in Asia that has been ruled by an oligarchy of two parties whose relatives are intermarried, the Inc and Sad. Every 5 years either one alternates. They play ethnic divisions to divide us, such as different taxes and tuition fees depending on your ethnicity. The new AAP is standing for equality, no more ethnic vs ethnic, it will be poor vs rich. They stand for e-governance (the old parties have been known to steal a lot of funds), and AAP wants to make the budget accessible online, so people can see where the money goes. If you could please monitor people putting incorrect numbers for AAP, which has already won here in Punjab, is leading in exit polls. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.71.199.60 (talk) 09:14, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    A kitten for you!

    It is important to have at least one cat on your talkpage.

    (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 12:00, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Tonya2017

    Reported at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism,[2] blocked two minutes later.[3] --Guy Macon (talk) 01:14, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Varicocele

    There needs to be an emphasis that there are alternative methods for helping with varicocele infertility, pain, anxiety, etc. There is a considerable amount of scientific evidence for this. Instead of deleting the section, you should look into adding to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.108.148.102 (talk) 02:52, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Espresso Martini

    The 'gentleman' in question that is on the other end of this 'war' as you call it has been told that he is vandalizing. And, apparently, he doesn't care. The drink is an IBA drink, the cocktail box template clearly states that such should only use the IBA ingredients, which would include amounts, and the IBA recipe clearly states 'short espresso', nothing else. But, it apparently amuses this person to vandalize specific pages, such as the martini one and the Steuben Glass Works.85.229.51.18 (talk) 13:41, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Miranda Cosgrove Wikipedia

    Quit changing I'm fixing because you idiot our so stupid FYI Miranda still lives in Los Angeles California ifs you blocked me I'm going to files a lawsuit against Wikipedia Kitranda (talk) 01:58, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Actually,I do not want the scientific word.Raphaelchua1107 (talk) 10:07, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Popeye and Son

    The article said that no one will ever have nostalgia for Popeye and Son. Nothing could be further from the truth, for I do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.209.225.229 (talk) 21:08, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi, I dont understand directly why the four provinces are the only in the ones in the world that list their academy squad. The page is already very clogged up and its an unnecessary addition in my opinion. Id like too review alot on the page but havent got around too it as too how to condense it. Kind Regards, Sean. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rugbyrugbychange (talkcontribs) 02:12, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Rugbyrugbychange: I presume this is the "explanation"? It should either go in the wp:edit summary or on talk:Leinster Rugby. I only reverted you as you didn't leave an explanation and I could not see any obvious reason (such as vandalism or erroneous content). It appears that you removed this content before and were reverted. You might want to go through wp:policy and wp:manual of style to get an idea what the content of the page should be. I am not familiar with that subject. BTW: please see wp:talk page guidelines on how to discuss on a talk page. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 05:22, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    In the case of Ebola, a cytokine storm can be thought of as an SOS signal which causes the immune system to launch all of its weapons at once in a desperate kamikaze attack. While this hurts the virus it also leaves behind tons of collateral damage, especially in the blood vessels. Paradoxically, the healthier the immune system the more damage it can do to itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.181.33.57 (talk) 05:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi - You have rest my edits

    hi jim first i must thank you to reset my edit

    i made mistake again can you please reset it again.

    and can you help me i wanna add some references how to add.

    pages in wikipedia are too complicated so i cant understand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dineshlives (talkcontribs) 06:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    First Rain

    I live on campus and what I wrote is the truth. My word is far more credible than yours seeing as to how I live on campus and witness it every time. There was a naked run every quarter last year as well as last quarter and this current quarter. Facts 1212 (talk) 08:39, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    There are no.sources on the first rain. It began by word of mouth to begin with. The quarterly aspect is a full fledged act among a decent percentage of the campus Facts 1212 (talk) 08:41, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    There are no.sources on the first rain. It began by word of mouth to begin with. The quarterly aspect is a full fledged act among a decent percentage of the campus Facts 1212 (talk) 08:41, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Facts 1212: Please realize that your identity here is a string of nine ascii characters: "Facts 1212". I have no idea who you are. And, I don't want to know. Anonymity of editor's identity is an assumption on Wikipedia. That is why you need to follow wp:verifiability and wp:cite a wp:reliable source. Also, please see wp:What Wikipedia is not regarding promotional and soap-boxing. If there are no published sources, the information should not be added as Wikipedia is not a publisher of original content. See wp:original research. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 08:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Disruptive IP

    Hi, this [4] IP adress is constantly undoing my edits. They also are disrupting my talk page. What to do? Possibly a sock? Ktrimi991 (talk) 11:26, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Ktrimi991: I reported the IP to wp:AIV. Do escalate warning levels: i.e. uw-unsourced1, uw-unsourced2, uw-unsourced3, uw-unsourced4, then report to wp:AIV see wp:vandalism Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 11:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    OK! Thank you and have a nice day! Ktrimi991 (talk) 11:32, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ktrimi991: Blocked. A large amount of wp:POV editing. Jim1138 (talk) 11:33, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    It was such a confusing situation! Thank you again! Ktrimi991 (talk) 11:34, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ktrimi991: I think that IP is counting the seconds until he can get back to work. Chip on his shoulder. Jim1138 (talk) 12:02, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Is there any possibility that the IP is the same person with [5]? IP started their editing process a day before TryDeletingMe. They are keen on wars and military of Yugoslavia. The IP vandalised articles I had edited including my talk page one day after I deleted some stuff added by TryDeletingMe. The article was protected and TryDeletingMe failed to keep their stuff in the article [6]. Ktrimi991 (talk) 12:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Requested user to Block

    User:Inangpintor account was created on February 2017 (IP Address: 89.211.131.39) intended to vandalize on Elito Circa ‎page and the InangPintor account also copy/close to Amangpintor. Please visit Special:Contributions/Inangpintor, Special:Contributions/89.211.131.39 and Special:Contributions/LaongLaan three conspiracy..

    Wikipedia:Requests for administrator attention#InangPintor — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArtCulture (talkcontribs) 15:29, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Nice Berlin Melbourne Style Vehicle rampage in Philadelphia Park

    Two Anon IP are deleting this at Portal:Current events/2017 February 6 for no specific reason other than to apparently quash an apparent attempted attack which is not yet been covered by international media. This incident is identical to terrorist attacks with trucks and against pedestrians in Nice, Berlin, and Melbourne, but attacker chose to not kill any victimes and hide his motive by stripping naked and making it appear to be just a mental crisis Bachcell (talk) 07:20, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    • At Rittenhouse Square in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania a man stole a cab, threw off his clothes and careened through the park frightening pedestrians who pulled him out after he crashed the car and was arrested. (WPVI)

    Respected Sir, I don't think the changes made by me were irrelevant. I request you keep those changes on the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.70.132.194 (talk) 16:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi Jim1138. This reversion at Jon F. Vein [7] wasn't made because of an unwillingness to sort through content. To the contrary, I, and to a lesser extent another account, spent some time plucking the unsourced and public relations-style content from the article; I was merely reverting to the last decent version. I write this because I don't want to give the COI account the impression that this is done haphazardly. I've started a discussion at the COI noticeboard. Cheers, 2601:188:1:AEA0:9C72:D001:B02E:25B8 (talk) 23:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]