User talk:Praxidicae

This user wishes she was back in Turks and Caicos
But this in no way affects Chrissymad's ability to respond. She just wants everyone to know.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29

Slimzinaminor

Hi Chrissymad. I recently left a contested deletion talk ( I think it's called ) for the article Tyrone Jefferson. I'm new at creating articles and just want to make sure I'm doing it right. Can you please see the item there and help me validate things? user:SlimzinaminorSlimzinaminor (talk) 12:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Psssst....category requests for protection...

....Pending changes does no work on category pages. Cheers. Lectonar (talk) 13:58, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I didn't even think about that in my haste to stop this persistent LTA. Thanks, @Lectonar:! Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:59, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome; I just hope the semi-protection will not stop bots from auto-adding foreign language links or such...Lectonar (talk) 14:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Lectonar: unfortunately seconds after the block for that last IP, another one started. :( Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

How do i change the image in wikipedia? The CB400SF wiki is using an outdated picture. Danialsalehin (talk) 19:44, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Premi O Premi

It looks as though you got your report of the sockpuppetry in first and mine duplicates yours. Unfortunately, I was expecting that this would happen, that is, that there would be sockpuppetry. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:51, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Daniel A. Norman

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Daniel A. Norman. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shakeyanorman (talk • contribs) 05:58, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Block

My sincere apologies for two things: first, for the block, and second, for not telling you about it. I did intend to post a message here telling you about it and apologising, but I was so involved in following a rather complex sockpuppetry case that I forgot about it. You posted a speedy deletion tag on a page, giving the reason as creation by a blocked editor in defiance of a block. I checked it out and found that you were right, so I decided to block the editor, but instead of clicking on the block link for that editor I clicked on the block link for you, which was right next to the other one in the administrative history of the page. I wish it were possible to actually delete the block log, but I'm afraid it isn't.

By the way, who is jgs? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:45, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was just joking with you! :P JGS is the creator. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I did realise that you had taken it in a humorous spirit, as your message to me was clearly joky, and not the angry "How dare you abuse your administrative power against me you member of the evil cabal of rouge administrators" kind of thing one gets from editors who are really annoyed by things like this. However, I still think I should have done you the courtesy of telling you and offering my apology before yo found out for yourself. Oh well... The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the club! We have our own special infobox:

This user has been the victim
of an unintentional block.

--NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NeilN ONE OF US! Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 23:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that is one bizarre scene! --NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Synexis Biodefense Systems

Looking at it some, it seems that a company representative created the page at the behest of another group working with them(who state they are "documentarians"). They explain why they feel the page should not be deleted on the talk page- though where they are so closely working together this seems like it could be meatpuppetry. 331dot (talk) 19:26, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: Sometimes I wonder if my eyes are going to get stuck like this from constant eye-rolling at some of these contested deletion reasons. XD Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I totally understand. :) 331dot (talk) 19:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What is fault with my article

You are discouraging the emerging article writers by repeatedly complaining . What fault did you find in my article? Can u explain y?Continue your skill of scolding and aniinhsnipimh Edson Frainlar (talk) 20:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Edson Frainlar - The question starts off in flawed but understandable English and becomes incomprehensible. Have you considered contributing to the Wikipedia in a language in which you are proficient? Robert McClenon (talk) 21:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete what?

Hello, you just sent me a notice not to delete the speedy deletion from article but I didn't create the article. I read that you can help with making the article better. Could you give me a hand, I won't be a cotton-headed ninny muggins! :) Vaznylon (talk) 00:49, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Catcreekcitycouncil

I think your comment here might be in the incorrect section... I posted in the checkuser/admin section by mistake and moved mine afterward... but I figured I'd leave yours for you to judge. :) Home Lander (talk) 20:46, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, with these sorts of rampages, SPIs can get messy sometimes. It looks to have calmed down now, though... GAB^gab 20:48, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops! Thanks! Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:49, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I added this one from the log (note "lion" in the name) but not sure if it is connected yet. Home Lander (talk) 20:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, well

Well, well. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:11, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like a male admin has blocked him (as an asexual Martian administrator should have, for that matter). Robert McClenon (talk) 01:12, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fastest way to get yourself blocked and all your pages nuked (instead of waiting for the AIV and CSD patrols) is to post something like that. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:21, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure how I feel...he complimented and insulted me at the same time. I guess I'll just take my tan legs to the beach! Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 01:36, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Pezzin family

Actually, according to WP:BLANKING, he is allowed to remove those notices from his user talk page. He's never asked to be unblocked so there is no declined unblock request that cannot be removed. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:12, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I reverted my edit once I realized it didn't apply to this. Sorry! Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:15, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Diabedia

Hello, Praxidicae. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Diabedia.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Home Lander (talk) 17:37, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sock-hunting tools

[1] and [2]. Happy hunting! GAB^gab 20:32, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thank you for your kind words about my article!

Scratchn1989 (talk) 00:51, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

!Scratchn1989

Chrissymad, please stop deleting my article that I am substantially proud of and I believe is of acceptable quality for Wikipedia. It is essential that this article not be deleted as DJ Bomer is a notable personality and it is important that information about him be available online to users all over the world. Please keep this article. If you have problems with it, fix it! Please don't just delete it; instead make improvements - because that is what Wikipedia is about! Let's all work together to create the best article we can!! Thank you for your understanding Jamesm72e4 (talk) 01:06, 14 February 2017 (UTC)Scratchn1989[reply]

Hi, which user are you, Scratchn1989 or Jamesm72e4? In any case, I am all about fixing articles that need it however I can't manufacture notability - which is something this article is totally lacking in and I can find no independent reliable sources that would remotely establish notability. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 01:08, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: "Peters band" wiki page. Someone has been posting information that is before the courts. The defendants cannot rebuke any statements made and that have not been proven. It appears the article is to smear the defendants. there is no historical information, just information that pertains to the case. I deleted most of it and replaced with a link to "online shaming". The page has been reverted back to its original for which I thank you. 2b0o1b7 (talk) 03:48, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CER

RE: CER. I specifically added that disambiguation to the page because after reading I could find no sources for it. There are other terms on that page that have no internal articles. I've emailed a trusted friend who told me it was a thing, not just some BBC made up term, and I've posted on Twitter to ask someone with a deeper background in the subject to make an article. The fact it does not yet have a Wikipedia page shocked me, but because I've used references the general visitor can get a general high-level idea from the linked article, which is why I referenced it. I Believe it fulfils your first point.

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for

If you remove it again OFC I'll cease, but really I'd prefer it if this could be escalated as I believe it is an exceptional circumstance. LewisCowles1986 (talk) 17:29, 16 February 2017 (UTC) LewisCowles1986[reply]

@LewisCowles1986: The issue is that external refs and links do not belong on a DAB as a DAB is essentially for navigation. If it's not covered in an article or not an article itself, it does not belong on a DAB. Please see MOS:DAB for more details. I have already reverted the last edit, so please do not add it back. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:33, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Chrissymad: I'm just getting used to Wikipedia, but the application of the rules seem arbitrary in this context. There are other red links on that page. Judging from the article you've linked with the MOS:DAB, it seems you are suggesting an article would need to exist first, which seems less than ideal and not in keeping with the very page I've edited and edits I've made. I Still don't agree that the link doesn't belong on a DAB it is a disambiguation, but I will respect that you clearly have more seniority and it will waste both our time for us to get in a reversion cycle. Could you please let me know how to escalate this or what can be done to feature the valid disambiguation for CER? LewisCowles1986 (talk) 18:27, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@LewisCowles1986: Disambiguation pages are not for content but for easy navigation to relevant content. Disambiguation pages aren't for defining anything that might exist but for what already exists on Wikipedia. As far as the redlinks go - redlinks aren't prohibited on DABs but can be used when a relevant blue link links to it, in this case Biometric discusses CER. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:29, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Eddie Rodriguez

You had my page "Eddie Rodriguez (Adam Apple)" deleted. Please don't do that again, it is for an approved Information Technology project at UWF. The context is approved by the individual.

@Adam Apple 2015: Wikipedia requires notability and verifiability. That article was neither and it was not encyclopedic. Additionally, please do not edit at the top of talk pages and make sure you sign your edits with four tildes. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:38, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Ashmit.bansal

Looks like we were tripping over each other on catching the speedy removal. I cautioned, went to re-add the CSD, noticed you'd done it, then noticed you'd added a uw-speedy3 for the same event I'd just added uw-speedy2. In the interest of being fair I've removed the level 3. Given that he's been using a sock too I'm pretty sure a level 3 will be required soon. Regards, Cabayi (talk) 13:13, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Cabayi: Seems were both pretty speedy with those speedy deleters ;) As far as the warning, considering it's already been deleted once + the socking + removal of the tags, I felt a level 3 was warranted. In any case, it's at SPI now anyway :3 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ashmit.bansal. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:15, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ken Sibanda

Please state your reasons why you feel Ken Sibanda should be deleted I thought your edits were vandalism96.225.51.35 (talk) 18:08, 19 February 2017 (UTC)?[reply]

@96.225.51.35: As you've been told before, the subject doesn't satisfy notability and has been deleted several times via AfD, speedily deleted as sock creations, denied at deletion review. The way to go about creating an article that has been salted is to request it and not to sock... Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:11, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And as you know from before, the subject was discussed ten years ago and a lot has changed. I think you are going about this the wrong way. If you want to wage a war against the subject you have to find other avenues. I do not agree that is subject was not notable ten years ago, he is not notable now. Please stop with whats looking as a racist attempt to stop creation of this page. This issue has already gone as far as the Foundation itself, and I think you should look at the references before fighting.

Samantharabin618 (talk) 18:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sock blocked. Article now at Draft:Ken Sibanda as it contained some changes from deleted version. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:25, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Grace YuYe Wan

Hey Chrissymad

I am a different person editor Jerrymistake. I am not same as person as Gracewan 2016 and Bradlay2016. Bradlay2016 is creating different Grace Wan. I am creaing Grace Yu Ye Wan. Grace Wan and Grace Yu Ye Wan both have same names, but its different person. In the world there were thousands of same name person can call "Grace" and lots of people can have first and last name is "Grace Wan." For example I heard lots of same common names is "Chris", "John", etc. but is different person. I am creating with articles and this articles talks about a real living person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mistakejerry (talk • contribs) 19:43, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Mistakejerry: Both were about the same person and contained links to the same IMDB page, so I think you may be mistaken that they were writing about another Grace Wan. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:57, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No Chrissymad its different names. There lots of Grace Wan popular names. There ia Grace Wang, Grace Wong, Grace Chan, Grace Lam, etc. Grace Yuye Wan- Grace is first name, Yuye is middle name, Wan is last name. I am writing about another person Grace Yuye Wan. Grace Yuye Wan have two imdb websites because one is her real imdb, the other one is just backup website. Please do not delete Grace Yuye Wan on Wikipedia. It is real person. I believe is real. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mistakejerry (talk • contribs) 20:21, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There may be many Grace Wans (and variations thereof) in the world, but you are writing about the same Grace Wan that was deleted at AfD. The only difference is that you're giving her middle name, which makes no difference on Wikipedia. I must warn you that we can very, very easily see that the two articles are about the same person, so trying to claim that you're writing about a completely different person is seen as lying. Things like this are frequently very easy to uncover, so there's no point in saying that you're writing about a different person. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 02:22, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shut up Chrissymad you are not a real person i can say like that to. Who are you? What kind of title you are? Why you don't like hate on And don't believw Grace Wan. I told you Grace Wan is very well known famous star celebrity. She is good person. She is real person. You get out if yoi are not related to Wikipedia users.