Talk:Night Riviera

Trains: in UK / Passenger trains C‑class Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	April 13 2006

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Passenger trains task force.

Cornwall C‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:

Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Night Riviera.

Would it be more accurate to say that it one of three remaining sleepers, as there are two Caledonian Sleepers - the Highland and the Lowland?--Tivedshambo (talk) 15:31, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Style

Currently this page looks dreadfully like a timetable, which wikipedia is not. Please see User:Mangoe/Wikipedia is not a timetable. Emoscopes ^Talk 12:21, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Number of sleeper services

This article states that this is one of three sleeper services. The Caledonian Sleeper article says it is one of two. This is inconsistent can we resolve this and update the erroneous article. Wilmot1 21:40, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Night Rivera is either one of two (Rivera + Caledonian) or three (Riveria + Highlander + Lowlander), or six (Rivera + Fort William + Inverness + Aberdeen + Glasgow + Edinburgh), ...depending on how to count. Take your pick! —Sladen (talk) 21:16, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barbie paint job

Sometime between October 2007 and March 2008 the Night Rivera stock finally got a repaint into Barbie colours, seemingly as a follow-on to the general HST Mk3 refurbishment. eg. 2008-03-01 dated picture. First report I can find is of one sleeper in the rake having received its repaint as of 2007-10-19. —Sladen (talk) 21:13, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:GreatWesternLogo.png

The image Image:GreatWesternLogo.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:40, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Time

So how long does the journey take? The article doesn't say (unless I missed it). A check on thetrainline.co.uk shows that the journey takes five hours during the day and eight hours at night; why the difference? Does the sleeper train go slower, or is the route more tortuous? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 20:15, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sleeper trains go slower to give the passengers a chance ...to sleep! —Sladen (talk) 03:04, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Facilities

Do we really need to list the available facilities on the train here? It seems to read like an advert to me. ZoeL (talk) 08:03, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Probably not. They amy be appropriate in WikiTravel but are probably in contravention of WP:NOTGUIDE that states Wiki is not a travel guide. Geof Sheppard (talk) 12:50, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Route

The removal of the geo. corordinates, in my mind, reduces the usefulness of this page. They allowed a user to switch to Google or Bing and see all the stations laid out in their geographical context. This is exactly what the {{kml}} was designed for: inside a section with a list or table of features. Geof Sheppard (talk) 12:50, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Right, but this is not "a list", or "a table of features". It is a route template diagram. A map. A map that is currently swamped by lots numbers that are not immediately usable, except via clicking in some other box, lower down the page. If coordinates really need to be in the article then it would be preferable to find another location to hide them out of the way. At the moment it distracts from the core purpose of the route map.

Wikipedia is about creating high-quality articles that stand on their own. If this article is printed, then the numbers cease to be useful because the (separate, hidden) {{kml}} link (hidden linking to the separate website does not work when printed). If a person wishes to find out the coordinates of the Penzance railway station, then the coordinates are already contained within that article. Simply duplicating information contained elsewhere merely introduces maintenance issues. —Sladen (talk) 21:04, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved this disucussion to the WikiProject UK Railways Talk Page as this has implications for many articles. Geof Sheppard (talk) 13:52, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Great Western Railway

Since the Night Riviera sleeper is part of the current extended franchise and is likely to be part of the new franchise, would it not make more sense to merge this page in with Great Western Railway thanksbutnothanks 20:16, 12 December 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Devonexpressbus (talk • contribs)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Night Riviera. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090829214915/http://www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk:80/Content.aspx?id=1555 to http://www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/Content.aspx?id=1555

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:19, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Logo

Non-free content unacceptable use point 17 states:

The following is a non-exhaustive list of examples where non-free content may not be used outside of the noted exceptions…

17. The logo of an entity used for identification of one of its child entities, when the child entity lacks their own branding. Specific child entity logos remain acceptable.

So in a nutshell, the GWR logo can only be used on the GWR article and not child articles such as this. The only logo that should be used on this article is a Night Rivera specific one. Geeuuare (talk) 23:45, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no specific Night Riviera logo, and the old FGW logo was suitable enough for this page for several years, so what's changed? 86.183.182.67 (talk) 01:19, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Geeuuare user (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) concise reason e.g. vandalised 3rd warning, malicious talking behind back, rude comment, not listening to helpful advice, please see comments above 86.183.182.67 (talk) 01:33, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]