Jump to content

Talk:Relativity priority dispute

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 195.147.175.160 (talk) at 15:20, 9 October 2017 (Claim: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconPhysics: Relativity / History C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
This article is supported by the relativity task force.
This article is supported by History Taskforce.
WikiProject iconHistory of Science C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 13 September 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

Older Archives

Individual archive files:

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Relativity priority dispute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:48, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Link okay, but author or work not mentioned in article. - DVdm (talk) 09:08, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Claim

There is a long debate about Hilbert's possible claiming priority. He might well have had priority, whatever he claimed.