Talk:Relativity priority dispute
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Relativity priority dispute article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Relativity priority dispute article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
Physics: Relativity / History C‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||||||||
|
History of Science C‑class | ||||||||||
|
Older Archives
Individual archive files:
- Dec 2005 – Feb 2006
- 11 Feb 2006 – 27 Feb 2006
- 27 Feb 2006 – 3 Mar 2006
- 3 Mar 2006 – 10 Mar 2006
- 11 Mar 2006 – 21 Sep 2006
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Relativity priority dispute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060627211005/http://www.americanscientist.org:80/template/AssetDetail/assetid/49611?&print=yes to http://www.americanscientist.org/template/AssetDetail/assetid/49611?&print=yes
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:48, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
- Link okay, but author or work not mentioned in article. - DVdm (talk) 09:08, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Claim
There is a long debate about Hilbert's possible claiming priority. He might well have had priority, whatever he claimed.
- C-Class physics articles
- Low-importance physics articles
- C-Class physics articles of Low-importance
- C-Class relativity articles
- Relativity articles
- C-Class physics history articles
- Physics history articles
- C-Class history of science articles
- Unknown-importance history of science articles
- WikiProject History of Science articles