Jump to content

User talk:David.moreno72

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Benonaji (talk | contribs) at 16:27, 12 October 2017 (→‎approval: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This editor is a Senior Editor III and is entitled to display this Rhodium Editor Star.

Welcome to Wikipedia, FAQ, Wikiquette, Be nice, and Talk page guidelines.

  • Please leave your message at the bottom of this page, for example, by clicking "new section" at the top. Then put new text under the old text.
  • If you came here because I reverted your unsourced change, cite your reliable references in the article you edited.
  • If you came here because I added a CSD to your page, take your dispute to the talk page of the article.
  • If you came here because I reverted your vandalism and you vandalise this page also, you will be reported.
  • Please remember that I am not perfect and I do make mistakes.

10:17:20, 13 September 2017 review of submission by 122.177.8.255


Dear Sir , I have aded some sitations and refrences please review and approved

07:50:47, 15 September 2017 review of submission by Jalaj websparrows



I have added some new references, the name is also associated with the Ghayal Once Again movie and some names have been associated in the seriol but the link which they have linked in them is coming inactive.

05:08:43, 25 September 2017 review of submission by Jonreillythr


indicated imdb could not be use as source. should i use studio search which is oficial database for media industry or omit the imdb citations?

Accepting My submission.

you declined my submission of creating my sandbox. Why was it declined? Now how can I create my sandbox whick will be accepted?

Pranav shinde

who is Pranav Shinde

Husenpur

Whats wrong in my Article. I think you only decline the all articles. when you satisfy. according to you every this is doubtful and wrong article. Kshatriya1995 (talk) 04:33, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

05:17:10, 5 October 2017 review of submission by Michael Lloyd-White 1



Hi David, Im relatively new to this What do i need to do to fix the article World Kindness USA?

13:26:26, 7 October 2017 review of submission by OxanaSelekhova


Dear David

you reject my article for the third time . it is not just about forward contracts its about a new crypto currency. May I ask you for a favour to consider it again while I input more appropriate referencing ? I am trying to do my best for the Wikipedia and after spending some time working on it, I got a message from you – do not resubmit ? Would you please consider it again ?

Forward contracts is not a crypto currency - its commodities etc...

This is your message : ===Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Forward contract instead.

Hi @OxanaSelekhova:
Lets have a look at your references
[1], The Ethereum BlockChain Explorer, API and Analytics Platform
[2], Cryptocurrency Exchanges / Markets List
[3]Cryptocurrency Exchanges Are Increasingly Roiled by Hackings and Chaos
[4] A forward contract is a private agreement between two parties giving the buyer an obligation to purchase an asset (and the seller an obligation to sell an asset) at a set price at a future point in time
[5], Cryptocurrency calculator & converter
[6], limitations for purchasing and using LAT in USA, dated July 25, 2017
1 is the Ethereum API, not about LATO.
2 is an Exchange list, not about LATO.
3 is about Cryptocurrency Exchanges, not about LATO.
4 is about a forward contracts, not about LATO.
5 is a calculator, not about LATO.
6 is about LAT's, not about LATO.
It really is very simple. The references have to be about the topic, not something else. Any further questions are to be directed to WP:AFCHD. Thank you David.moreno72 13:39, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
I notice you have reviewed a bunch of AfC drafts. Thanks for reducing the backlog.  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 05:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 08:54:21, 8 October 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by OxanaSelekhova


OS 08:54, 8 October 2017 (UTC) Hei David you state different reasons. To decline After I worked on references You said it's an advertisement And before you stated that it's about Forward contracts I am really confused How can I improve it ? To be published

Hi @OxanaSelekhova:. To improve the article it has to be about Liquidity Asset Token, not about a broker. Given that it's a relatively new concept, it is probably WP:TOOSOON. Also, given that your account is a single purpose, it is highly likely that there is an undisclosed conflict of interest. It is highly unlikely that your ad will be published. All further questions are to be directed to the help page. End of conversation. David.moreno72 09:06, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

09:36:56, 8 October 2017 review of submission by OxanaSelekhova



David hello again. I did not know that a minor rename will let you think that this is about a different subject that’s because when I had a re submit bottom there was also a subject line and I thought I had to rename it to re -submit, thus I added Latoken word and now you say it’s a different subject. I will eliminate it all over Besides there are many new concepts as cryptocurrencies are relatively new in general Here are some articles you have and I wonder if after all my editing you would consider it again? As its also belongs to this list ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cryptocurrencies Ubiq Zcash Thank You Oxana

Well, I added references. NOW will you review my Draft:Cover Me (Depeche Mode song)? BlindmanJr (talk) 13:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should not remove everything on ganga nagar meerut

Please review the content again Divyenduraj (talk) 17:20, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 06:44:37, 9 October 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Arunprasanth1991


Why my article was not approved?

Arunprasanth1991 (talk) 06:44, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Arunprasanth1991. The reasons were laid down in the red coloured note. You need to read it. Also click onto the links, and read the text of those as well. Thank you David.moreno72 07:55, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

08:09:13, 9 October 2017 review of submission by Nncc1006


Which reference is "dependent"? All of them?? How can they be "independent"? I need some examples. Thank you.

Request on 09:36:20, 9 October 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by MadeforU


Please check i have a create one Article and publish the article


MadeforUSend me a message! 09:36, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Draft:River Hawkins

Two comments on your recent review of Draft:River Hawkins which I reverted:

  1. In general I don't think it's a good idea to review the same draft over and over again; it's better to let someone else take a look at it, too. Firstly, we might miss something that someone else notices, and secondly, we should not act as one-person doorkeepers.
  2. The specific review said the page was an "attack page" or "vandalism". There was no negative content in the draft whatsoever, and while the subject may not be notable, there was no vandalism either. Huon (talk) 13:28, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Prod By DJ Smith

Firstly, it's best to not tell someone that they don't comply WP:COMPETENCE. There's too much of a risk that it might anger them instead of motivating them to be more competent. In the best case scenario, as we've just seen, it does nothing. I was also wondering if, at this point, we should go ahead and MfD this draft. I mean, there are inline citations...technically. They're all DJ Smiths' releases, though. -- I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 01:35, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I dream of horses. Yeah, you're right. It certainly is frustrating when an editor resubmits without reading and/or understanding the notes. As such I am taking a break from AfC reviewing, especially in light of the comments from you and Huon. Go ahead and MfD the article. Let me know and I will add an ivote. I'm going to focus on other things, hopefully not treading on any toes. Thank you David.moreno72 01:50, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women of Rock Oral History Project

I'm a little confused- the sources I listed are reliable, secondary sources, entirely independent from Smith College and the oral history collection. I deliberately excluded any articles or interviews conducted by Smith College. The Women of Rock Oral History Project is a collection of personal and professional biographies documenting the lives of women rock musicians. This is an academic, educational, archival project, housed at a major institution so it is not something that would appear in a major popular rock music publication. These interviews are available to the public and are valuable primary source materials that could greatly serve Wikipedia's gender discrepancy. The project is notable because it is the first of its kind in the country and this is noted in the references I posted- I was being careful about not using promotional language in the text.

I will work on linking the interviewees to their Wikipedia pages.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by TanyaPearson81 (talk • contribs) 14:44, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The poster also asked about Draft:Women of Rock Oral History Project at AfC, it may make sense to centralize discussion there. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:46, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

08:32:15, 12 October 2017 review of submission by LordkayAB


Please I have made corrections to the information provided. I have tried my best to provide credible Ghanaian news websites and credible information or references from Appple Music. Please reconsider and accept my request.

Update @ 10:20am: I have made more corrections please review my page. Hoping and praying you accept it. The sources are accurate and subject has no hand in them. Thank you. 

Please reconsider.

approval

am new on wikipedia what should i do to get my draft approved sirBenonaji (talk) 16:27, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:David.moreno72&oldid=805029111"