Jump to content

Talk:Knights Templar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 142.163.80.115 (talk) at 23:01, 15 December 2017 (→This article is full of misinformation and disinformation: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Vital article

Featured articleKnights Templar is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 13, 2007.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 5, 2004Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 1, 2007Good article nomineeListed
March 6, 2007WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
April 12, 2007Featured article candidatePromoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on October 13, 2004, October 13, 2005, October 13, 2006, October 13, 2008, October 13, 2009, October 13, 2010, October 13, 2013, and October 13, 2015.
Current status: Featured article


== templar knights ==Patl (talk) 13:32, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Templar knights

The article went to great lengths to give examples to back there claims and the history of the order comes across as being spot on. In my opinion I would recommend this article to anyone wanting to learn about the knights Templar and believe that it is accurate based off the editors in the footnotes. it explains its points with historical evidence and goes into detail in describing things. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.84.52.163 (talk) 02:44, 23 October 2015 (UTC) Patl (talk) 21:12, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Knights Templar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:00, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Knights Templar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:41, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 7 November 2017

Remove the "Entertainment" section at the beginning of the protected article, its an ad for a web site selling playing cards. 95.180.223.203 (talk) 17:19, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is also copyvio, copied directly from the site. Removed. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 17:42, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Original 9 Knights Templar were archaelogists and discovered scrolls beneath the Temple Mount and the Jesus Family Tomb

This article is promoting the old propaganda of 9 knights protecting thousands of Christian pilgrims. That's a mathematical impossibility. The current understanding is that this was a front for them to excavate the Temple Mount and the Jesus Family Tomb upon the highest hill in East Talpiot. They discovered some very important concrete information that conflicted with Roman Catholic dogma. 2601:589:4700:2390:C129:9F7B:16E0:CDCC (talk) 15:58, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That stuff is mentioned in Knights Templar in popular culture. Adam Bishop (talk) 00:44, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article is full of misinformation and disinformation

You'd be better off going to Quora and reading my answers. John Templar.Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Knights_Templar&oldid=815614710"