User talk:N R Pavan Kumar

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

N R Pavan Kumar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please forgive me and im sorry for creating multiple accounts. I dont know how to change the username, so i created new account. So please im very sorry for creating the multiple accounts. Hence i kindly requesting you. Please give me a last chance And please tell me how to change username. N R Pavan Kumar (talk) 08:13, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request —SpacemanSpiff 10:27, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This could account for one of your 20 violations of WP:SOCK. The rest were clearly deliberate attempts to evade your block. Given this, it's likely you aren't eligible for unblock consideration at this time, though another admin will make that determination. As you have previously been told, likely your only path forward is WP:SO which requires zero edits (from any account, not just this account) for at least six months. --Yamla (talk) 11:09, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, Wikipedia is emphatically not for promoting yourself or your app. Please give all of the following links a thorough read: WP:EVADE, WP:PROMO, WP:PROUD, WP:COI, WP:AUTOBIO, WP:GNG, and WP:SPS.

It also does not help that you created two more sockpuppets today. Until you listen to others' feedback, it's unlikely you will be unblocked.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:10, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

N R Pavan Kumar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thank you for your information. Now i understood. I think that i want to change the username, so i did like that.Thank you for your valuable information. One think is that valid source? for Pawan Kumar N R?19:26, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

{Duplicate request —SpacemanSpiff 10:27, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It is requested that edits be made to the following semi-protected articles:

D (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
S (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

N R Pavan Kumar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please forgive me and im sorry for creating multiple accounts.N R Pavan Kumar (talk) 08:37, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your latest sock -- Wiki4u120 (talk · contribs · count)was created after you were told not to create more socks and to wait for six months and apply per WP:SO, so your assurance isn't going to hold up. Any further frivolous requests and your talk page access will also be revoked. In the meantime read WP:SO and wait for six months before applying for an unblock. —SpacemanSpiff 10:27, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

N R Pavan Kumar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

ok thank you:)N R Pavan Kumar (talk) 13:09, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Clearly, you are incapable of keeping your promise to cease sockpuppetry. Note that the 6-month waiting period of WP:SO resets every time you sock.--Jasper Deng (talk) 09:22, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

N R Pavan Kumar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am very sorry for crating multiple account. Because i need to cange username so i did like that. Hence i kindly requesting you to please unblock me I am waiting for 6 months. Please give me a chance.

Decline reason:

This may excuse one of your sockpuppet accounts. You had more than twenty, so that doesn't work. Additionally, it's not true that you've waited six months. Yamla (talk) 15:39, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

N R Pavan Kumar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No, I think in the month of July I got blocked, now December 6 months over I guess. And one more please help me how to change the username please...

Decline reason:

Your block appeal has been reviewed and we are unable to unblock you at this time. However, you may wish to make use of our "standard offer", which provides a route back to editing for users subject to indefinite blocks. The guidelines for the Standard Offer are simple:

1. Wait six months without sockpuppetry. That means no editing the English Wikipedia, under this account or any other, for six months. 2. Promise to avoid the behavior that led to the block/ban. You must show us that you understand what went wrong and know how to keep it from happening again. 3. Don't create any extraordinary reasons for the Wikipedia community to object to a return.

If, at the end of six months, you've adhered to these conditions, you may then request that the community discuss unblocking you.

Please see WP:OFFER for full details about the Standard Offer.

Just Chilling (talk) 21:43, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Break for discussion

This link shows how the math works. You'll still need to convincingly explain your sockpuppetry and how we can trust you'll never again violate WP:SOCK. --Yamla (talk) 16:08, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, 2017-04-01T10:35:26 Favonian (talk | contribs | block) blocked N R Pavan Kumar -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:44, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's not the date of the last sockpuppet. The last one I could easily find was for 2017-07-04. --Yamla (talk) 16:55, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oooohhhh. At least they own that sock. January something it is then. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:23, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I make no comment about your block; but to get a change of name - which you CANNOT do yourself - see WP:RENAME. Of course, you cannot do this while blocked. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 23:25, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

N R Pavan Kumar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me I am waiting for 6 months.

Decline reason:

Your last unblock request was just denied on January 1st. Six months will be July 1st. Please do not post another request to unblock until then. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:17, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

N R Pavan Kumar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

NO on July 4, 2017, I was blocked. So, July 4, 2017, plus 6 months equal to January 4, 2018. since six months I am waiting. Please unblock me. I didn't do any sockpuppet. Please...

Decline reason:

Only one unblock request is required. Multiple requests will not notify anyone - and will not speed the process up in any way. SQL ^{Query me!} 03:44, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

N R Pavan Kumar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

On July 4, 2017, I was blocked. Please unblock me.

Decline reason:

If you would like to review the guide to appealing blocks, and make a request here that addresses the reason for your block - and how you will avoid that behavior in the future I can copy your request to the administrators noticeboard for review by the community. Please note that simply 'It has been 6 months' will not be sufficient for this purpose, and a checkuser will very likely check to see if you have been editing Wikipedia logged out, or with other accounts. Additionally, continuing to make insufficient requests may end in the revocation of your privilege to edit this page. SQL ^{Query me!} 03:48, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. On July 4th 2017 I was blocked. So please unblock me and please give me a chance.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

N R Pavan Kumar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please unblock me and please give me a chance.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= please unblock me and please give me a chance. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= please unblock me and please give me a chance. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= please unblock me and please give me a chance. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Each time you do this, the clock resets. The earliest date you can be unblocked is now 12 July.--Jasper Deng (talk) 07:02, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their autoblock or shared IP address block be lifted:

N R Pavan Kumar (block log • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • user rights management • checkuser (log))

IP address: ... (block log • active blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • unblock • checkuser (log))
Blocking admin: not provided.
Block message:

{{unblock-auto}} is for autoblocked users only.
Do not call this template manually. Please follow these instructions instead.

WARNING: If you were blocked directly then you are using the wrong template and your block will not be reviewed since you have not provided a reason for unblocking. Please use {{unblock | reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} instead.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, or when you need checkuser assistance, please place {{subst:Unblock on hold-notification | 1=N R Pavan Kumar}} on the administrator's talk page. Then replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-auto on hold | 1=not provided | 2=<nowiki>original block message</nowiki> | 3=... | 4= | 5=~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting decline reason here with any specific rationale. If the decline= parameter is omitted, a reason for unblocking will be requested.

{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=... | 2=<nowiki>original block message</nowiki> | 3=not provided | decline=decline reason here ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=... | 2=<nowiki>original block message</nowiki> | 3=not provided | accept=accept reason here ~~~~}}