User talk:Sfs90

Second round for Haitian Senate

Hi Since 1/3 of the Senate will be elected in October for the first round and the second round will take place in January 2017, I propose is renaming "Haitian parliamentary election, 2015-16" in "Haitian parliamentary election, 2015-17" or to create an article on the two rounds of the Senate vote. --Panam2014 (talk) 10:59, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's done. --Panam2014 (talk) 18: 57, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Telenorte, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Calama and Julio Martínez. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Christian Democratic Team of the Spanish State, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democratic Left. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited National Democratic Agreement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Thayer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:40, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valdivia's Deutsche Zeitung

Please read WP:PROD. Anybody (including IPs and article creators themselves) can remove a PROD and it should then not be placed back. Doing so repeatedly is disruptive. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 14:50, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited National Democratic Party (Chile), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1973 coup d'etat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Liberal Progressive Party (Spain), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent Liberal Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

changes made on cds peoples party

Good afternoon about a week ago you made changes on the cds people's party page. I had noticed a mistake and decided to correct it. You changed this information back to what it previously was which was information back from 2004 that did not have much to do with the topic. Thank you for your understanding — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deportivo2016 (talk • contribs) 03:37, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PDECAT/PDECat and PDPC/PDC

On the PDECAT issue, ok, I won't engage on endless edit warring on this. PDECAT may surely lead to confusion (because "P", "D" and "E" stand for their own words, whereas "CAT" doesn't). PDECAT and PDECat have been used interchangeably, and here in Wikipedia we're not required to strictly abide for a party's registered name in a template (the UK's Conservative Party registered name is Conservative and Unionist Party, but its template uses just "Conservative"). However, the party is new and still in the process of forming itself, with the name itself being a rather rushed one after their previous one was cancelled, and with it now seeking a logo (which may or not may change how the acronym is spelled). Since there are no new elections expected anytime soon, we can still wait for seeing what the most-commonly used form of the name is.

For PDPC/PDC I don't agree. There are options for both of them, but you currently can't claim what the Ministry of the Interior says because the coalition is not registered anymore. Both are valid, but PDC is more consistent with how the coalition was spelled ("Pacte Democratic per Catalunya", not "Pacte Democratic Per Catalunya").[1]. It's also more consistent with its successor's spelling, CDC. Impru20 (talk) 18:36, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More: In Google, for Book searching pdc "pacte democratic per catalunya" gives you 36 results, whereas pdpc "pacte democratic per catalunya" gives you only 2 results. On a normal Google search, pdc pacte democratic per catalunya gives you 3,290 results, whereas pdpc pacte democratic per catalunya gives you only 152. It's pretty obvious which one is more common and widely used. Impru20 (talk) 18:41, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So, of course, I'm not saying that "PDPC" is wrong, but that "PDC" is more correct in this case. I'd have chosen "PDPC" if finally the original name for PDECAT had remained, to prevent confusion, but it's no longer the case now and the coalition was obviously much more widely known and shown in sources as "PDC" than "PDPC". ;) Impru20 (talk) 18:45, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sfs90. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2015 Illapel earthquake

I noticed that you moved the page 2015 Illapel earthquake to 2015 Coquimbo earthquake by copying and pasting material. Per Wikipedia:Moving a page, this is not the proper way to move a page. At the top of every page is a "Move" button which should be used instead. That will work in cases where there is either no redirect at the new title or where the redirect has no edits. This will not work in this situation, however, because neither of those conditions are met. That aside, why did you move the page? What is your rationale? At this point, you must initiate a move request if you think the current title is problematic for whatever reason. Thanks. Dustin (talk) 05:38, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

24 horas al día

Good evening!, I can understand all you said me, and i value all your effort, but that is not the proper way to move a page, and your argument is not valid, Why?, belive me they aren't the same show, they can share a main brand, but they are totally different, as example ITN (a british news company) as 24 horas in Chile, they do 5 News (of Channel 5), Channel 4 News (of Channel 4) and ITV News (from ITV), that is amazing because only BBC One has an independient news programme, maybe they had the same production, but at end they are different. Other example is BBC News (A cable channel, and too a producer of news programmes of BBC), for example they produce BBC News at Six, BBC News at Five, BBC News at Ten and all have different pages. I hope that you understood what I wanted to say, it is better have all separated that all tangled, and disagreements are resolved through consensus-based discussion, not by tightly sticking to rules and procedures. We are all brothers, ¿Why we fight?, better don't destroy others work, and help me to create nice contents. Have happy holidays! If u have a problem or a concern, say me, I'm here always. Finally a big thank, for take care of Chilean based contents! I appreciate you ChocolateCherryNight (talk) 23:36, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If u want to make a big change as u want, u should make a proposal into Talk page, not here, and resolve it by consensus-based discussion, sorry that's all, you and i, we aren't Wikipedia God's, there are others users, talk there. --ChocolateCherryNight (talk) 23:46, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

24 horas al día

Please, can you stop to censorship Wikipedia. Please don't make that type of editions. At this point go to Wikipedia:Guide to deletion. Remember: The purpose of the discussion page is to achieve consensus upon a course of action. Individuals will express strong opinions and may even "vote". To the extent that voting occurs, the votes are merely a means to gauge the degree of consensus reached so far. Manuel.21 (talk) 23:57, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pregunta

Yo sé que en general te disgusta casi cualquier aporte que hago, y ten la seguridad que al igual que en Wikipedia en español dejaré de colaborar en artículos sobre Chile en inglés. Pero tengo mi duda sobre el revertir el template de shortname del PPD, que al menos en inglés no se entiende que quiere decir y que todos los demás templates usan nombres abreviados y no acrónimos. Ni siquiera diste una explicación sobre la razón para la reversión antes de hacerlo. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 03:10, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removing BLP Prod from Aryane Steinkopf

Hi. I removed the BLP Prod tag from Aryane Steinkopf because there are many Portuguese-language sources available about this person. I added some where I was able to confirm what they mean using Google Translate, but I hope someone with more fluency in Portuguese will be able to add more. If you're still concerned about the article feel free to AfD it. Thanks. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 08:08, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Primarias 2017 Chile

Hola. ¿No crees que sería mejor tener un sólo artículo para las primarias presidenciales de 2017, como se hizo en 2013? Así se puede tener una tabla con los resultados de ambas primarias y comparar. Además, no creo que ambos artículos sean de una extensión tal que justifique separarlos. Saludos. Pristino (talk) 19:28, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Standard used on these templates do not include indirect elections"

Hi Have you got a source ? --Panam2014 (talk) 13:19, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There wouldn't be a source for this. It's a long-standing consensus amongst editors that has been in place for at least 10 years I'd say. If you want evidence of other editors being aware of it, here are some: [2][3][4][5][6] Cheers, Number 5 7 13:22, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That prove anything. There are no rule. --Panam2014 (talk) 13:25, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating templates for deletion

Please be aware that you cannot nominate templates for deletion at AfD; I have closed your deletion discussion for this reason. Please use WP:TfD instead when nominating templates for deletion. Thank you. SkyWarrior 18:50, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Similarly, WP:RFD is the location for redirects that you would like deleted. Please do not turn redirects into articles purely for the sake of attempting to game the system and get the pages deleted out of process. Primefac (talk) 19:19, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sfs90. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, United Conservative Party

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, United Conservative Party. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – United Conservative Party (disambiguation). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at United Conservative Party (disambiguation). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 01:43, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

United Conservative Party

I disagree with your move and I will likely request that it be moved back. Please reply on my talk page. Me-123567-Me (talk) 03:47, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is a move discussion started at Talk:United Conservative Party. Me-123567-Me (talk) 17:22, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of United Conservative Party (Canada)

A tag has been placed on United Conservative Party (Canada) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Legacypac (talk) 07:32, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

United Conservative Party (Canada) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect United Conservative Party (Canada). Since you had some involvement with the United Conservative Party (Canada) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 08:02, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Haitian general election, 1988

Just a quick query on the parties of the presidential candidates – you have Lysias Verret down as representing the Party of the National Rally. However, according to your source, the party was not recognised until 1995... Any idea whether Verret was actually a PARAN candidate? Number 5 7 22:09, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Hello. Help expanded article by Maureen Wroblewitz from [7]. Thanks you.Kim Mai 13 (talk) 03:20, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]