Talk:Pratas Island
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pratas Island article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Reference
should an e-mail address be in the article as a reference? Jjjsixsix 05:52, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
- No. I do think responding to this five years after it's asked is slightly silly, but the answer is still no. Sven Manguard Talk 05:22, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Copied Content
Much of the content is copied from http://vm.nthu.edu.tw. I'm too lazy to do anything about it, of course, but I'm posting that. 207.224.49.221 (talk) 15:00, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Why not Dongsha?
Both the administrating state (ROC) and the disputing state (PRC) agree that these islands are called the Dongsha Islands. Even before this romanization, they agreed to call it Tung-sha. So, why doesn't our article treat it as normal Chinese territory to which our WP:PINYIN naming conventions apply? A google search for both "Pratas islands"[1] and "Dongsha islands"[2] (even with the former getting a boost by including pre-pinyin sources for which the opposing name Tung sha is not counted) shows the latter is 4x more common. I was kind of confused when I came about this article, because it's talked about in the context of the South China Sea, where there are non-Chinese claimants who have non-Chinese names for the islands. The current title is misleading because it implies there is some non-Chinese claimant. I don't think a move to "Dongsha" would be controversial with the reasoning I presented above, so I don't think there's a need to file a formal move request. But, I will leave some time for people to respond and discuss before I move. Shrigley (talk) 15:39, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- I agree with you. --Danielinblue (talk) 07:22, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- I agree with you too. --2.245.105.0 (talk) 00:48, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Pratas Islands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051215083030/http://www.laserbase.com.tw:80/bq9p/qth.htm to http://www.laserbase.com.tw/bq9p/qth.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:49, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Pratas Islands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://issuu.com/hnsa/docs/ss-242_bluegill_part2?mode=a_p
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130313174059/http://vm.nthu.edu.tw/southsea/english.travel3_3.htm to http://vm.nthu.edu.tw/southsea/english.travel3_3.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.laserbase.com.tw/bq9p/qth.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130313174002/http://vm.nthu.edu.tw/southsea/english.travel3.htm to http://vm.nthu.edu.tw/southsea/english.travel3.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130313174051/http://vm.nthu.edu.tw/southsea/english.travel3_2.htm to http://vm.nthu.edu.tw/southsea/english.travel3_2.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130313174059/http://vm.nthu.edu.tw/southsea/english.travel3_3.htm to http://vm.nthu.edu.tw/southsea/english.travel3_3.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:29, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
People's Republic of China (PRC)'s claim to these islands are illegitimate
These are islands are both officially claimed and controlled as sovereign national territories of the Republic of China (Taiwan), the People's Republic of China's attempted claim is officially and legally illegitimate and not recognized by the United Nations or any other country in the world, especially since the P.R. of China officially and effectively lost their island claims in the United Nations Hague Tribunal ruling:
2.) http://www.latimes.com/world/asia/la-fg-south-china-sea-ruling-20160712-snap-story.html
- Start-Class China-related articles
- Mid-importance China-related articles
- Start-Class China-related articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject China articles
- Start-Class Taiwan articles
- Low-importance Taiwan articles
- WikiProject Taiwan articles
- Start-Class Islands articles
- WikiProject Islands articles
- Wikipedia controversial topics