Hello, B.Bhargava Teja, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
@Kailash29792: Ok, I will go according to your guidelines now onwards but some of the pictures are in better quality than existing so I am using them.
Thank you for co-operating with me Bhargava. Typically, we use posters that have the film's release date, or release season (eg: from Jan 14/Pongal release). Kailash29792(talk)12:51, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for March 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nammina Bantu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telugu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Namaste dear B.Bhargava Teja! Can u make an article about 2008 Telugu film Bank starring Jackie Shroff and find poster? If u make this article, i will be grateful! Thank u! --95.55.104.190 (talk) 15:47, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, B.Bhargava Teja. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Guru Brahma (1986 film), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Hi there, re: this, can you please provide a reference that arrives at the conclusion that Raju Gari Gadhi 2 is a remake of Premam? With all of the plagiarism in Indian cinema, this unsourced assertion sounds a bit like a casual accusation, so it needs to be properly sourced. Without the reference, the content is interpretive and has been removed. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:12, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for October 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Raju Gari Gadhi 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nandu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi there, re: this, we don't regurgitate subjective evaluations as though they were facts. "Blockbuster", "super hit", "hit", "flop", "disaster", "failure" are inappropriate for inclusion in a neutral encyclopedia. Though I know you didn't add this information originally, improving the language of it doesn't help us maintain neutrality. It would be appreciated if you'd please remove these in the future. To put it into perspective, if a popular film reviewer described a film as a "steamping pile of crap", we wouldn't say "the film was declared a steaming pile of crap", because it's heavily weighted language and there are sure to be other opinions worth considering. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:55, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Bhargava, you are erroneously using your user page as a talk page. Discussions belong at User talk:B.Bhargava Teja. Also, you'll notice that most of the discussions on your talk page are nicely organised within sections. Your responses to those discussions belong in the same section, indented underneath the previous comment with colons. Like this:
I'm tired. -- Joe User 10:07, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
:Why are you tired? -- B.Bhargava Teja 10:28, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
::I didn't get enough sleep last night. -- Joe User 10:43, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Being able to talk with people at Wikipedia is a crucial skill. Also, please sign your comments with four tildes, like ~~~~. This will append your signature to the comment after you click save. Your signature contains your name and a time stamp, so editors know who left the comment and when. This is crucial, and it's also very important for the {{ping}} and {{reply to}} templates to function properly. If you don't sign when you leave your comment (like here,) then the ping will not work, even if you come back and sign it. The comment and the signature have to be left at the same time in order for the ping to work. That means you can't go back and change anything either, because that will mess up the ping.
Orphaned non-free image File:Hatim Tai (1990 film).jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Hatim Tai (1990 film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Wikipedia editor Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Hello B.Bhargava Teja: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 16:36, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Babymissfortune. B.Bhargava Teja, thanks for creating Punyavathi!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please improve the sources.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
I wanted to say you that this film was released in 1965 according to IMDb and other sources but you have mentioned it as 1975. Clarify this minor issue. Abishe (talk) 03:18, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Please Bhargava, please stop removing URLs from image files! The "source" field should not include content like "Sri Anurupa Films"; it should contain the actual source from where the image was obtained! Like this! ----Kailash29792(talk)16:00, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
I have removed the Plot section which was a copyvio of this site. Please use your own words and do not copy/paste text from your source. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:32, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.
I created Sabhash Ramudu specially for the Tamil version Sabash Ramu of the film. I included info on the Telugu version as both the versions had the same cast and crew. You have completely removed all information, including the Soundtrack, on the Tamil version from my article. Now the reference is inappropriate because Anandan's book refers only to the Tamil film. @Kailash29792: Please let me know whether it is vandalism or not?--UKSharma3 (User | talk | Contribs) 00:46, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes of course it is. It also counts as negligence and ignorance. I'll try restoring info on the Tamil version, please remind me later in the day since I currently don't have PC access. --Kailash29792(talk)02:04, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Kailash29792. I find that the article has been restored to what it was before his edit. I chose to write the article with the Telugu film title because the Tamil version was, most probably, a dubbed one. I could have titled the article with the Tamil film name and mentioned that it was also made in Telugu. But the Missamma/Missiamma experience taught me to write the main article for the Telugu version when a film was made in Tamil and Telugu. Anyway, all is well that ends well. Thank you once again for your kind help-UKSharma3 (User | talk | Contribs) 08:56, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Earlier today, after your inappropriate cut and paste move from Gangstars to Gang Star (web series and subsequent attempt to merge into Gang Star (web series, I made multiple improvements to Gangstars, which included editing the infobox to make it comply with the template instructions, including cast listed in the sources and listing them per WP:TVCAST, repairing some references and formatting others correctly, moving the image to the name stated by multiple sources, copyeditingthe lead for spelling and grammar and to remove erros etc. Your completely unexplained and unsourced edits restored an older version of the infobox, complete with errors, including incorrect capitalistion, pointing the image to the redirected version, removing the compliant formatting, incorrectly ordering the fields, adding fields that don't exist, and so on. Please be careful when editing so that your edits don't undo valid fixes that were made and please explaine your edits using edit summaries. --AussieLegend (✉) 14:41, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:Hatim Tai (1990 film).jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Hatim Tai (1990 film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hi there, re: this edit from January, where you wrote "The film recorded as Blockbuster at the box office" another reminder that we do not regurgitate subjective declarations. We're not here to decide whether things are "blockbusters" or "hits" or "super hits" or "disasters" or "flops" or "failures". Movies that do poorly at in Rotten Tomatoes' estimation are called "rotten", yet we never include that commentary, because it's not proper encyclopedic tone, and it also places undue emphasis on one opinion. Also, since these words are not quantifiable in any way, they ultimately don't help users understand the content any better, and typically just appear promotional or demotional. Since I previously notified you about this in late 2017, and since I'd prefer not to have to remind you about this again, please avoid subjective labels like this going forward. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:33, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and we don't add indiscriminate crew lists as well. Noteworthy crew would typically be people that we'd list in the infobox. If there were a need to indicate who did the stunts or the choreography, that would be presented in the shape of prose, with proper context to explain why we care: "Stuntman Arjun Smith prepared for the leap between buildings for two months and used a pulley rig to transfer him safely to the other side." "Choreographer Madhuri Jones said that it took six months to train the actors for the ___ dance in the final sequence. 'Some of these moves were very difficult', she said." That sort of thing. Wikipedia in general doesn't care for indiscriminate lists. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:47, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Guru (2017 film) Audio.jpg listed for discussion
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
You need to know that Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. You must not copy and paste text from sources you find on the web into articles as you did in the article Soudamini. I have removed the infringing text, but the material you copied is subject to copyright, as is almost everything on the web, and when creating or expanding articles, you should completely rewrite the information from the source using your own words. This is not the first time you have copied the plot section from the same source into the article. If you continue to violate copyrights, you are likely to be blocked from editing. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:12, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]