Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/March for Life Chicago

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nobody wants to keep this, and there's no agreement that this is closely enough connected to March for Life (Washington, D.C.). to warrant a merger there. Sandstein 09:13, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March for Life Chicago

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Limited coverage in local sources but no WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE. wumbolo ^^^ 20:05, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete & merge Unless there is national coverage of the Chicago march, it should be merged into March for Life (Washington, D.C.). I only see the WP:LEAD as being worth merging.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 23:21, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect is what I mean.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 02:40, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:42, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:42, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I don't understand the "Delete & Merge" from User:TonyTheTiger. Generally, when we merge, we leave the history intact and turn the page into a redirect. The only reasons to do a hard delete of the history is if there's copyvios, WP:BLP issues, etc.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 00:49, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to March for Life (Washington, D.C.). As RoySmith indicated, "delete and merge" is rarely a proper outcome. Wikipedia:Merge and delete indicates that admins should feel free to interpret "Merge and delete" votes as "Merge" votes instead. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:40, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 02:08, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do Not Redirect I don't see this as being related to the Washington DC event any more than Walk for Life West Coast, and none of the references suggest it's related. If there's a general article on American annual pro-life rallies, a redirect there would be fine. With about 5000 attendees last year [1] it's significantly smaller than the San Francisco event. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:44, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Power~enwiki: - could I ask you to clarify what !vote you actually want or whether it's something in the vein of neutral but not redirect? Nosebagbear (talk) 21:08, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a vote. I don't see compelling enough arguments to vote keep or delete, but prefer either to the suggested redirect. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:22, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

delete Fails to meet the GNG and I see no connection to the Washington rally except that they're both pro-life held near the anniversary of Roe v. Wade. If there was a list of such marches I'd support a redirect there, but I couldn't find such a list. Sandals1 (talk) 18:32, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.