Jump to content

User talk:AngusWOOF

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Titusthecat (talk | contribs) at 11:15, 16 September 2019 (→‎Please review my draft.: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please re-review my draft

Hey AngusWOOF, I have edited this article/draft to the best of my ability to make it neutral and to provide reliable resources. If there is anything you can edit to improve the article please go ahead. Or if you have any suggestions please let me know. Thank you.

Please see the comments on Draft:Muhammad Qasim ibn Abdul Karim. I need all the non-English references to be clarified as shown in the first reference. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 15:31, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

pursuing afd

Hi Angus, can you help me pursue AFD on this article The Rules of Survival, thank you so much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.69.245.1 (talk) 09:26, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

126.69.245.1, I don't think there's enough to AFD this. See the talk page for that article. I just added a bunch of references that could be included. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 14:37, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Youpik added various sources of citations to back-up the trend of social e-commerce which is trending now

please review youpik again.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Youpik

i have furnished more information

please review youpik again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benawitan (talkcontribs) 11:24, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Benawitan, it still reads like an advertisement for the company. Please rewrite and provide other sources besides the website. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 14:41, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


updated again https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Youpik — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benawitan (talkcontribs) 05:38, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Benawitan, this was deleted for being too promotional / advertising. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 15:36, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Youpik with citations

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Youpik

backup with citations. please review — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benawitan (talkcontribs) 01:27, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Benawitan, this was still considered advertising and was deleted by WP:G11 AngusWOOF (barksniff) 21:39, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Lightricks

Wondering if you would be able to review this page. You actually made an edit to it after it was submitted for review. It was submitted 2 weeks ago and is still waiting. If not, fair enough. I understand. Thanks. MaskedSinger (talk) 14:46, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if you saw this. Know there are over 4,500 pages awaiting review but this was has received work from a senior editor so is now in a much better position to be reviewed. Frustrating as it was rejected extremely quickly but now that it's good to go, it's just sitting there. MaskedSinger (talk) 18:34, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
MaskedSinger, you could ask that editor if they are willing to approve their own AFC. Otherwise any AFC review can take a look. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 18:32, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
AngusWOOF, don't think he wants to. What about you? MaskedSinger (talk) 19:10, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
MaskedSinger, it looks like ‎Samwalton9 has accepted the article. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 19:54, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
AngusWOOFYep! She sure did :D MaskedSinger (talk) 19:58, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Naijapals

Hello, I noticed you haven't approved the articles I started on Naijapals due to insufficient references, which is understandable. However, I need to point out that collation of references for Nigerian music sites is very tedious and difficult due to the manner which these kind of activities are covered in Nigeria. This perhaps is also the reason why most entries in "Nigerian Music Websites" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Nigerian_music_websites are not heavily referenced. One the standard of notability, Naijapals should at least have an entry that can be built upon, as it is more significant than the entries on currently in the Nigerian Music Websites category, giving its age, footprint and overall coverage. The references that I used in the article are also independent and very reliable, example is IT realms, which is published by a Not-For-Profit writer, Remmy Nweke - https://icannwiki.org/Remmy_Nweke and other source at Hiphophead.ng. Generally, I believe the type of coverage on this subject might not bear too much online links, but is extremely significant that lack of it will represent an important knowledge gap that is required to be available on Wiki.

If you can use Nigerian websites that have Wikipedia articles here or major Nigerian newspapers and journals, then stick with those. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 18:50, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Character lists

Is there a rule against or do you have consensus to remove those character lists? --SacredDragonX (talk) 22:30, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there's been consensus since last year, in fact, that's why the article is repeatedly protected. See the talk page. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 22:51, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
which talk page? link? --SacredDragonX (talk) 06:12, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Talk:Universal_Studios_Hollywood#Characters. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 11:23, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
that's one other person from a year ago, and a second person speaking some gibberish I can't make out. That's not exactly what I would call "consensus". However, I do agree that the character lists are pretty poor content, and will try to get more opinions through WP:EAR --SacredDragonX (talk) 07:11, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
SacredDragonX, it's pretty poor consensus as listed, but other editors have chimed in to enforce it as it's one of those indiscriminate lists that can't be maintained. The sourcing provided was mainly fan pages or actual visits to the park. I can't remember if Universal Studios Hollywood itself maintained such an official list and if it did, it didn't mark officially when characters were added or removed. The current one is just brief [1] and not comprehensive. If you want to just add some of the current ones and not a full list, I would be okay with that and having it reference the official website. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 14:00, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
SacredDragonX, I added my comments to that thread. Hope that helps explain my stance. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 15:32, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So it's been a while and no one's responded, so i guess no one really cares. Wanted to get your opinion on whether this section should just be removed entirely, and if we should do the same for Japan and Florida. Thanks. --SacredDragonX (talk) 19:48, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SacredDragonX, I think it should be summarized and trimmed down to the characters on actual websites and that have been talked about in sources. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 19:55, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Madara Uchiha draft

Just found two more sources involving reviews where they praised Madara's debut in the anime here and here. I guess I'll add them once the article is created.Tintor2 (talk) 23:21, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tintor2, you can add them to the article. I'm waiting for the redirect to clear before I move the article. Oh, and if you are interested in doing AFC reviews, you can visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation and pick up the helper script WP:AFCH. I actually spend more time there than I do with WP:ANIME these days. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 23:53, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Added other sources I found more. I think that while it needs some work, the reception section is good enough when comparing it with Nagato or Itachi.Tintor2 (talk) 01:21, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Tintor2, thanks again. I feel a lot better about approving it when it has those sources to back it up for notability. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 01:27, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Added another. The coverage of the character's reception is pretty good as I think it surpassed Itachi's article. I tried rearranging some sections per introduction, background with Hashirama Senju, and his role in the series. I also added a source about his English actor but finding the Japanese actor info seems harder.Tintor2 (talk) 20:53, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
How does this work? Whenever I created articles I never went through an AFD or something like that. I think there is enough balance of inuniverse and real world information to make it an appealing article that just needs to tide up some prose issues from reception. I already discussed with the user what's the best image to use in the infobox as Kishimoto did one in color that cover most of his body.Tintor2 (talk) 00:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Now that I check it, the more reviews we make the more chances Madara's draft will be checked earlier? Do I have to become a participant for this?Tintor2 (talk) 00:10, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Tintor2, I'm waiting for the redirect to be cleared out, then I can move it. In the meantime, I marked it as under review, but you can keep fixing it up (don't worry too much about under review notice for now). AngusWOOF (barksniff) 00:16, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Change username

Hello, I need some help changing my username and creating a page. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Honorablesculpturesinc (talkcontribs) 18:20, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Honorablesculpturesinc, there's a link on your talk page that will take you to a form where you can request a new username. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 18:31, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page watcher) Honorablesculpturesinc, the simplest way to change your username is probably to go to Wikipedia:Changing username/Simple, click the blue bar there, and fill in the name you want to use and your reason for requesting the change. You should probably do this fairly quickly, as your present username is pretty inappropriate. You will of course need to avoid making edits relating to topics where you have a conflict of interest, most obviously Austin Weishel. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:49, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Battle for Dream Island

What isn’t it notable? Its popular! Can’t you see? There is even a book based on the series so why isn’t it notable? Esaïe Prickett (talk) 05:49, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rainbow Bridge

I put the Rainbow Bridge (Literature) Section in the established article on Rainbow Bridge. Thanks.

The established article is a disambiguation page so it doesn't really fit there. Can you check whether the literature refers to the rainbow bridge as the equivalent of the bifrost (norse mythology) or the pets version, or is it literally a bridge that is made out of a rainbow? AngusWOOF (barksniff) 17:31, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

un-welcome 'blockage/declined' to draft version of """our next year's local election info" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:2020_Hyndburn_Borough_Council_election

Hello ANGUS,

I have been maintaining each-and-every annual/local borough council election page, for HYNDBURN (Lancashire), for more-than-a-decade & counting.

On election-day itself / every 1st Thursday in May / I am in regular contact with the officials at my local council office, to get the official/final results for each electoral ward (I've previously made the mistake of 'copying down whatever the local press [hurredly] mistypes into their LIVE REPORTING blogs) --- which isn't a problem, as I MYSELF ONCE-TWICE-THRICE stood as a Candidate myself, and in short *** THEY KNOW ME ***

Usually, a week/fortnight/month or so, after the current election ha concluded, I dig up "the results from the previous 3-yr-old election" - I copy n paste into into a draft version of NEXT YEARS election-page, I revise the layout to match whatever NEWER "pips & whistles" have been used to jazz-up THIS year's [template >>> and retro spectively apply those SAME "pips & whistles" to the earlier-previous-3yr-older wiki page, to maintain a STANDARD look-n-feel]

THIS YEAR - however, was the very FIRST AND ONLY TIME, that a singular/random/anonymous person has chosen to ACTIVELY BLOCK the publication of my/our/LOCAL-Hyndburn-2020-Next-Standard-Election-Cycle, wiki-page.

      • This is also "MY FIRST TIME", taking up an [issue] with somebody else across the wikipedia-platform ... ... ...


FYI - the very first HYNDBURN-LOCAL-BOROUGH WIKI-PAGE was based on a copy of our (geographcally) neighbouring BURNLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL wiki page .... over the MANY YEARS SINCE, the "HYNDBURN TEMPLATE" has SIGNIFICANTLY ***EVOLVED***, whereas if you browser the Burnely equivalent - you will see that THEY HAVE NOT !

I myself "only tend to the LOCAL BOROUGH COUNCIL / Lowest Tier of Elections" , I DO NOT *mess about with Lancs-County-Council-WIDE wiki-pages (which cover the WHOLE of the Northwest, once every FOURTH YEAR), I only tend to the "1/3rd or seats UP for election, across years 1-2-3 of that SAME 4-year cycle".


FYI - "I" stood in RISHTON-2012 as a Local Ward Council Candidate, was asked to stand as a Lancs-County-Council Candidate in 2013 and stood again as a RISHTON-2014 as a Local Ward Council Candidate ..... I didn't actually get voted IN - however, RISHTON Residents 'still' refer to me as "Councillor Warren".

Respectfully (ANGUS), can you PLEASE remove your objection to the [LIVE] publication of - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:2020_Hyndburn_Borough_Council_election

NB: EVERY PERSON NAMED "Is the SAME person who WON that exact same seat, 3-years again, and who is STILL sitting/acting as a Local Borough Councillor in HYNDBURN and who --- assuming that they don't DROP OUT AT THE LAST MINUTE / OR SIMPLY DROP DEAD / --- they are also the presumptive nominees for re-election, to those SAME SEATS, come MAY-2020 .... a fact that remains UNCHANGED, since one-day-immediately after the previous MAY-2019-Elections results are 'called'.

Typically, it is only "exactly one calendar month, before the election day" after the final DEADLINE for "last minute entries for New Challengers, Independents, or Public-Notices of a sitting-councillor choosing to STEP DOWN - letting some 'unknown' Candidate's name to 'suddenly appear' on the ballot --- at which time "I" immediately TWEAK THIS "DRAFT PAGE" ACCORDINGLY ---- othwerwise, 9-times-outta-10, its the same old faces&names/time after time.

(ANGUS) "Thankyou for your consideration" ...

Regards Mr. Warren Lee Melia, B.Sc.(Hons) - HYNDBURN, Lancashire - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warrenlm (talkcontribs) 14:00, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

At this point the event is still too early to be of any use. There aren't even any opposing candidates who have filed registration. No independent news articles have talked about 2020 election yet. As soon as those are getting filled in, then that would be the appropriate time to introduce the article into mainspace. Otherwise it's WP:CRYSTAL. There isn't even any indication that the incumbents are going to rerun. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 17:28, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I started a thread at Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(events)#How_soon_can_someone_post_about_the_next_election? AngusWOOF (barksniff) 19:37, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There's the list with characters, but it's not complete and they don't have their description yet, and a plot. Can you do it with a full translation from ja.wikipedia? Thank you very much. --95.248.236.31 07:34, 4 September 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.248.236.31 (talk) [reply]

95.248.236.31, I would just list the main characters and scrap the minor ones. You can use Google translate tool if you need to get descriptions from JA as a starting point. For the Napoleon ones, you can just list the main, and then have a paragraph where they reference historical figures, except Napoleon probably is a main assuming the title. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 18:46, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
95.248.236.31, if you do translate from JA Wikipeida, I suggest you add {{Translated page}} to the talk page. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 19:52, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, I don't have time to do it. For Orpheus, you can fin more details in english here. Please, can you help me? Thank you. --87.4.157.99 06:51, 5 September 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.4.157.99 (talk) [reply]

Review

182.54.155.2, please go into further detail on the criticism of the book. Add the reviews in a Reception section and the authors (and newspapers) who critiqued the work. That it sold well at a book fair doesn't mean much unless that was a particular book award. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 17:59, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@AngusWOOF: Thanks but the summaries part section I added review link, can I change it to reception and add more info?? and I didn’t found any criticism on this book so how can I add criticism?182.54.155.2 (talk) 18:39, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
182.54.155.2, I would move the critiques to the Reception section and describe what different writers have thought of his work. (writer1 of magazine1 liked that (criticism1) but thought (criticism1b) ) There should be some balance as to what they thought about the writing. The summary can just be the summary of his book. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 18:44, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@AngusWOOF: I found three review which I added in summaries one is from author, one is from espn cricinfo and other is from Ittefaq newspaper. But I don't understand how to write reception. And there have found two sources Where Mashrafe criticism his team mate and coach 1, 2. But I don't understand how to write it, if you have time please write the reception and criticism part from this sources it will be nice to me as I am a beginner. 182.54.155.2 (talk) 19:59, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
182.54.155.2, I had a sample statement in my previous reply. As for the two sources, that is more pointing out that he criticized his former coaches/teammates/etc, which could go in summary, but what we need is an independent book critic to discuss what he or she thought of the book. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 20:06, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@AngusWOOF: Who's thought?? Mashrafe?? See this link 1. In summaries section there have review but I can not understand how to write as I am not native english.182.54.155.2 (talk) 20:17, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
182.54.155.2, a comment by Mashrafe isn't really a book review. It might be good to explain whether Mashrafe had a role in the biography, whether he did exclusive interviews with the author, or got to influence what got written about him. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 20:26, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@AngusWOOF: can you now check it 182.54.155.2 (talk) 08:10, 5 September 2019 (UTC) AngusWOOF Hlw I added review can you check it now. and can I add his team mates and coach whatever express their feelings on the book lunching occasion in new section 'Book lunching ceremony' just like- “Mahmudullah narrated an interesting anecdote dating back to 2009 after Mashrafe took over as the captain of the Bangladesh cricket team. Mahmudullah recalled how Mashrafe handed over an envelope to each of the players containing inspirational messages and mentioning team’s expectations from them.” & “Tamim Iqbal chose the occasion to thank the captain for supporting him after he was devastated by the widespread criticism during 2015 World Cup.” link182.54.155.2 (talk) 19:54, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
182.54.155.2, your reviews section reads like taglines from the website. It should be reformatted in prose and should be neutral. Include things the critics liked and disliked about the biography. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 19:57, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@AngusWOOF: Can you neutral it and fix this in prose. I don't know how to neutral it.Thanks 182.54.155.2 (talk) 20:00, 5 September 2019 (UTC) @AngusWOOF: hlw please help me can you change review section to reception and if you write one reception I will write the next two link which is bengali. Please help me I am not an expert to write it neutral way. I don't found anyone to help me out.182.54.155.2 (talk) 14:05, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
To convert to prose, you write it like how I previously listed. Example: AngusWOOF in an article for Wikipedia wrote that the biography "was quite informative but seemed disconnected from the subject because the author didn't even talk to the subject." I don't know Bengali, but you need to list the author's names. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 16:18, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@AngusWOOF: there have an english link ESPNCricinfo Mohammad islam review if you add one reception then i will add others two, if you can please help me.Thanks for your time182.54.155.2 (talk) 16:30, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@AngusWOOF:Sorry but can you review it now please I added reception. And fix if any issue found.Thanks 182.54.155.3 (talk) 04:35, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@AngusWOOF: apologise to you for disturb. Can you review now brother. 182.54.155.3 (talk) 17:20, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
182.54.155.2, another editor has reviewed and accepted the article. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 15:41, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please, can you create this page, linked here? For a detailed plot the video is here. Source: Ningyo. Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.4.157.99 (talk) 07:00, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • This IP has been going round the site randomly asking editors to create pages various pages for them. Their reason is that [they] don't have time. Nor do I. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:48, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
87.4.157.99, please visit Wikipedia:Requested articles and put your request there. If it's an anime film you can go to Wikipedia:Requested articles/Japan/Anime and Manga and try to add it there as well. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 20:00, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AngusWOOF, Hello! I have made your suggested corrections to the draft Draft:Dwellers (film) in regards to citing sources properly. Let me know if there is anything else I can do to help get the article ready. Thank you so much! Thatguy1987 (talk) 14:45, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thatguy1987, thanks, that's helpful. Do you have more mainstream reliable sources that acknowledge the trailer has been made and that filming has completed. The ones posted seem like random blogs that might not be authoritative. Something like Bleeding Cool would be better, and, of course Variety (magazine). AngusWOOF (barksniff) 20:01, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Winx Club character

Hi AngusWOOF and sorry to bother you with a long message. I know you've helped out with issues on the List of Winx Club characters page when I was cleaning it up and adding references, so I was wondering if you had the time to weigh in on this discussion. It's a long thread so I'll recap:

When I was sourcing both the main article and the character list, I thought this was a pretty simple statement to source, that the character Roxy joined the Winx Club for the fourth season (as the seventh fairy, after Aisha, to join). I found a lot of sources directly from the show's production companies that specified this: "new entry in the Club", " "Roxy the seventh fairy", "seventh fairy...Roxy will join the Winx group", "Roxy the new Winx fairy", "joins the Club", etc. However, the user Coolak seems to think that Roxy did not join the Club, with their reasoning being that the 2019 version of the website no longer shows Roxy (the same website did feature her during her season) and that there is a sentence on the site that says "Roxy and the Winx" (the same section says "Bloom and the Winx", so I'm not sure how they came to this conclusion).

Even though I've asked many times to continue discussing on the talk page, my newer posts there have been ignored. Since this started in April, I've only wanted a calm/civil discussion to resolve any misunderstandings, but it's been getting a little out of control. Thanks so much. Lagoona Blue (talk) 14:56, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If it's gotten to the level of edit wars by random IPs then maybe it needs page protection. When I last checked the official website when Season 7 and 8 were active, as well as when World of Winx was broadcast, Roxy had never been given the usual main characters treatment, but if you have older official website material that did list her officially as a main character, then you can cite that and that would help keep her listed in the main characters. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 20:04, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the reply, and yes, the 2009-2010 version of the website featured her in the main group at the tops of all pages. Her WinxClub.com bio from back then also called her a new entry in the Club, which is in addition to all the sources I linked above that called her the seventh fairy to join. I'll look into possibly requesting a page protection too. Lagoona Blue (talk) 01:21, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting song titles

Hey, AngusWOOF, this is a minor issue but I'm not sure how to format Japanese song titles. Japanese song titles are complicated because they don't have international titles. Which of these would be more acceptable?

  1. "Into the Daylight (Hikari Sasu Hou e) (into the daylight~ヒカリ射す方へ~)" (transliterated + original title under quotations)
  2. "Into the Daylight (Hikari Sasu Hou e)" (into the daylight~ヒカリ射す方へ~) (transliterated title in quotations only)
  3. "Into the Daylight (ヒカリ射す方へ)" (with MOS:JAPAN in mind regarding tildes, and imitating how songs in Korean are formatted)

lullabying (talk) 20:38, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

lullabying, is that for an article or a song list? AngusWOOF (barksniff) 20:50, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
lullabying, I would go with the second option since we usually transliterate Japanese only titles. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 20:53, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the feedback. I was working on Sweets (band) and was adding the track listing in the albums under a toggle. I did notice that by using the tracklisting template, it formats the songs to option #1 though (see Hito Shizuku as an example). lullabying (talk) 20:59, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Track listings can vary. I looked at Ikimono-gakari's discography and each album article's song list is slightly different whether they include Nihongo names with the Kanji or not. But most Japanese titles go by the transliteration AngusWOOF (barksniff) 21:10, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You can move the kanji and translation to the notes section if it is a track listing, see DNA (Koda Kumi album) for another way to list it. I might go with these newer versions, unless they have a lot of supporting notes like (feat. AngusWOOF). AngusWOOF (barksniff) 23:24, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cellemetry Data Services - Please review changes that were suggested

I believe I made the changes as you suggested and added the link to three references. The last review was March 17th. Can you please let me know if there is anything else standing in the way of getting this published?

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by CSYguy (talkcontribs)

CSYguy, the intro reads like it's going to be some essay, and should be rewritten to just present what it is. Is it a service? A company? A technology? Please see MOS:LEAD AngusWOOF (barksniff) 16:55, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please Help!

Hi! I saw you decline the page I was trying to create on wikipedia! Ok, Im new on this and I have honestly any idea of how it works and how to have it done! I just know this: The text I add is the text we used on our website which its explain and describe the Lost on You project! The media links are not build by us. Because our hard work and the importance of what we do all those magazines have talked about us. Is not the rolling stone but the person who doesn't know the magazines I mention then have quite a very small knowledge about electronic music.

Lost on You ( the record label) is a project created to help children from poor countries, and since we started in january 2018 we have been donating all the income from our music sales to help children around the world.

This may feel as a promotional page but isn't a promotional page! Our project deserves to have a page here cause each time you write Lost on You all you get is LP song!

I will ask you please to have a search about the project to understand it and to please help us to have a page here.

You are actually the second person who have said its feels like a promotional page but if you guys cant understand our purpose then I don't know what to say.

Help us to spread our mission.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayorgeneraljm (talkcontribs) 17:44, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mayorgeneraljm, please read WP:ADVOCACY and WP:COI. The cause or organization needs to be described in a neutral tone. It needs to be referenced by external sources not connected to the subject. Also, as you are connected to the subject, you can do only very limited edits as you have a direct conflict of interest. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 18:08, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
AngusWOOF How can I do that? I don't have anyone to write it for me. Could you please do it? All the external sources I used on the references are well known music magazines on the music industry that have written about the project. If you have a look to our web our facebook you will see what Lost on You does.
You can make a request over at WP:REQUEST, and list three (WP:THREE) secondary reliable sources that best represent the organization. Or you can rewrite just a short draft that references those sources only, but it has to be completely neutral. No advertising. No "we" stuff. No saying how it is a great organization. It should also be allowed to be criticized (see WP:PROUD). AngusWOOF (barksniff) 20:54, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Rona Altrows

This article was rejected in June. I have made changes as requested. This is only my third article created, so I am new to this. Any help you can give me would be much appreciated! Is there something else I can do? Thx, CW — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crown Weasel (talkcontribs) 15:59, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Crown Weasel, it might help to identify WP:THREE articles about the author. Also, it would help if it chronologically explains what the author has written and the subjects or genres. Is the author a children's writer? Fiction writer? Non-fiction? Also any critical reception of the writings can go along with the writing. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 16:52, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of the Spartan Dischords

Hello

I was hoping to provide some additional information that may better suit to express the notability and recognition of the Spartan Dischords

https://books.google.com/books?id=FEjlAAAAMAAJ&pg=PT707&lpg=PT707&dq=spartan+dischords&source=bl&ots=Y2O3wnMPXY&sig=ACfU3U1pIqjzS5oxq59c7QvKvpsMIpZeqg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjinpOHrsnkAhUFWq0KHYl4BCU4FBDoATAIegQICRAB#v=onepage&q=spartan%20dischords&f=false

https://www.mlive.com/entertainment/muskegon/2012/01/msu_spartan_dischords_will_roc.html

http://news.jrn.msu.edu/2018/02/does-pitch-perfect-fall-flat/

https://impact89fm.org/52127/temp-exposure/episode-3-msu-acappella-part-2/

I'm curious as to how the MSU Accafellas received a published page. The Dischords have been an established group for longer, are more notable and have more cited sources.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.249.25.60 (talk) 18:13, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

209.249.25.60 These are all local news and are either routine news announcements or connected to the school. If you want to question the notability for Accafellas, you can do so. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 18:16, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
209.249.25.60, I tagged that Accafellas for notability, but if you think that article should be deleted, you can initiate an AFD on that article. It had one back in 2005 but it was resurrected later in 2007, 2010? AngusWOOF (barksniff) 18:34, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha. There's more I can provide for notability of the Spartan Dischords. I'm doing my best to find all of it within the realms of Wiki guidelines. As for, notability regarding a national presence, much of the information I was gathering came from a Documentary made on the group and further backed up by event sources. Both parts of that documentary are linked on the page already in references. Much of the groups history regarding their notable performances has not been uploaded online but can be found in physical archives due to the age of the group. http://www.casa.org/groups/spartan-dischords — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blochsam (talkcontribs) 18:40, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blochsam, who made the documentary? If it was a news organization outside of MSU, then you could use that as a reference. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 16:02, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 18:22:11, 11 September 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Nawaz369


Knowledge pannel.

Nawazish Hussain (talk) 18:22, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nawazish Hussain, Pandey doesn't meet WP:MUSICBIO as it stands, especially critieria #9 "Has won first, second or third place in a major music competition." He didn't place in the final four. So is there another way he is musically notable? AngusWOOF (barksniff) 18:32, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the help

I just wanted to say thank you for helping me with that Benjamin Tod page. Your notes are helpful and clear. I’ll get it right eventually. vjarizpe (talk) 20:58, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019

Hello AngusWOOF,

Backlog

Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Coordinator

A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.

This month's refresher course

Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired Ballonman, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.

Deletion tags

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.

Paid editing

Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion
  • Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
  • Blank-and-Redirect is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.
Not English
  • A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.
Tools

Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs.

Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.

Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.

DannyS712 bot III is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Manjappada Kerala Blasters FC

I have submitted several time for approval. but you declined, can you help us to improve the article. there are other articles example West Block Blues. they are the fan club of Bengaluru FC But they dont have enough content in their article. How they got approval.KBFCmaneesh (talk) 05:56, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

KBFCmaneesh, you need more external news sources independent of the subject to show notability for the organization. See WP:ORGCRIT and WP:GNG. And please do not keep resubmiting after every little tweak until you have strong enough sources. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 15:43, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 00:58:04, 14 September 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by WolfXCIX


Hi, I would first like to start off by saying thanks for reviewing my article quickly! Whenever I contribute to website like this it takes sometimes the full suggested 8 weeks or even more to hear anything about it, so I appreciate it.

With my tone, after you said that I think I understood what you were talking about. I think in that last paragraph I made it more an promotional opinion. Which I do usually try to shy away from, but I was corrected in this case.

As with the charting, the only thing I was really able to find was that AllMusic review, as it seems like that's the only readily available professional published review that I could find. I even went through all of Google's 13 pages when looking up "The Blues - B.B. King album review". Of course, there are the user reviews but that's not published and it can fluctuate. And really I didn't want to do it, but the only chart information I could find on it was in that article, as even Billboard's website doesn't go back to 1958 for the Hot 100, only to 1963. You can manually go to 1958, but King's name doesn't appear anywhere, only a hand full of artists do. I am not sure where their "Black Singles" chart history would be, as I can't find that on google either!

I don't HAVE to be the one to do this article, as it's really just my first one and I used the guidelines the best way I thought I could. Would you be able to point me to where I can get more chart information for an album from 1958? I would really appreciate it so we can get it up and running! And if it's not you, should I ask the Help Desk?

Thanks in advance!

WolfXCIX (talk) 00:58, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WolfXCIX, good question. There might be some old music magazines or more likely, newspapers, that might have covered the release. His discography should have that footnote about the Billboard 200 not extending to 200 back then or having all those subcategories. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 02:00, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
WolfXCIX, this is the section that reads like opinion rather than description: "this effort sees more driven usage of a horn section on all of it's selections. The Blues also showcases King's growing talent as a songwriter, focusing more on bolder lyrics and melodies. While this was only the very start of his music career, he showed promise to be held as one of the all-time great blues musicians." If that's what the critic wrote, you should have it quoted as such. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 02:04, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
WolfXCIX, here you go: 4 of 4 stars from Billboard: [2] AngusWOOF (barksniff) 02:11, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft rereview

I have taken up responsibility for this draft and have drastically rewritten and filled in many missing citations. [3] — Preceding unsigned comment added by UseTheWiki (talkcontribs) 06:55, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

UseTheWiki, so why are you still referencing IMDb and other not so reliable sources? How does this person meets WP:MUSICBIO? AngusWOOF (barksniff) 09:26, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
AngusWOOF
IMDb is allowed as a citation as long as it is not part of the user generated review content. The IMDb editor reviewed content such as cast lists are considered reliable.
The subject of the article is mentioned in more than one, nontrivial, independent, and reliable sources. UseTheWiki (talk) 16:16, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
UseTheWiki, no, IMDb cast listings are user-generated and are NOT reliable. Only the WGA credits are. See WP:CITEIMDB AngusWOOF (barksniff) 16:25, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
UseTheWiki, the sources needs to be checked to see if they are random blogs or actual notable reliable sources. They should also not be promotional and not tied to the subject / interviews AngusWOOF (barksniff) 16:26, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
AngusWOOF Sorry, I misunderstood the IMDb accepted uses. Also now that you pointed that out, I only see two reliable sources, and the subject needs multiple more. Thanks for the feedback! UseTheWiki (talk) 02:37, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Move fast and break things dab

I reverted this as the quote is not mentioned in Zuckerberg's article per MOS:DABMENTION AngusWOOF (barksniff) 19:44, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Will you implement any alternative constructive idea so as not to imply to the user that this sentence originated on the cover of Jonathan Taplin's book?--Reseletti (talk) 20:01, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please review my draft.

Hi AngusWOOF. I submitted an article for Phillip Ahn M.D. and i have now edited the draft with more information and references. I am confused why the original comment "seemss like one credit in a videogame is not enough" because I did prior research before submitting and Daniel Pesina has a Wikipedia page and he also is also only known for Mortal Kombat II. I have linked more references and Ahn's photos are even on WikiMedia Commons already.

I am confused how to resubmit an article for review. My apologies if I am doing it incorrectly.

Thank you.