User talk:Omer Canon

Welcome

Hello, Omer Canon, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Sasquatch t|c 06:33, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: History of Coffee (August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CAPTAIN MEDUSA was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at History of coffee instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:History of Coffee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:History of Coffee, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 18:13, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Omer Canon! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 18:13, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Production, costs, and pricing

Having a quick look at the draft revealed several 'url value' reference-error msgs. These turned out to be malformatted links to Wikipedia pages. Unfortunately Wikipedia cannot be used as a reference per WP:UGC. I have tagged where the refs have been removed as 'citation needed'. I have not gone as far as rejecting the draft as it otherwise seems OK. Would suggest that replacement refs be added ASAP as it could be reviewed by another AfC participant at any time. Eagleash (talk) 06:36, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For sure I will replace those references. After replacing them what should I do to get it published? Here I mean to say that which indication will let the editro know that this is ready to be reviewed and published? Thanks for your help again Omer Canon (talk) 06:43, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Any update on this? Omer Canon (talk) 09:52, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As stated at the help desk, the page is awaiting review (see the grey / brown notice at the top of the page). There are over 4,500 articles awaiting review and it can take 6 – 8 weeks. Please be patient. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 10:12, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:History of Coffee has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:History of Coffee. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:59, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019: Production, costs, and pricing

Hello, Omer. I notice that you are working on a draft called Draft:Production, costs, and pricing. You mentioned that you found your article's title on the list of requested Wikipedia articles. I thought that was an unusual article request, so I looked back in Wikipedia history to discover how it got onto the list.

It all started back in September, 2006, when an editor (who left Wikipedia in 2008) made this edit to Management. The editor only edited that article one time, and, in my opinion, the edit they made was very awkward. I don't believe they were proposing that an article called production,_costs,_and_pricing should be written. In fact, the word "pricing" was already in the passage they edited.

The reason I have brought all this up is that an article such as your draft will not be accepted for inclusion in Wikipedia. Encyclopedia articles are typically confined to a single topic. To write Draft:Production, costs, and pricing in a useful form, you would have to include all the ways that production, costs and pricing influence one another, which would be a book-length effort. Wikipedia already has Production (economics), Cost and Pricing, which cover their individual subjects at some depth. Imagine trying to write an article called Mass, energy and time. It would be very long and not popular.

I feel rather bad that the automated systems that run Wikipedia set you up to waste your time on an impossible article. It seems to me that the list of requested articles should be reviewed by an actual human from time to time, and a few of those red links erased. Not everything can be a Wikipedia article.--Quisqualis (talk) 02:39, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fish Breeding (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Fishkeeping. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia is not a guide or textbook on such a subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fish Breeding and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fish Breeding, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:43, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dedicated.com (September 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Usedtobecool were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dedicated.com and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dedicated.com, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 09:07, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Dedicated.com

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Dedicated.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Whispering^(t) 12:28, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Dr. Paul Ling Tai has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dr. Paul Ling Tai. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:09, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, All in line external links have been removed.

Omer Canon (talk) 11:14, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]