User talk:Omer Canon

Welcome

Hello, Omer Canon, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Sasquatch t|c 06:33, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: History of Coffee (August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CAPTAIN MEDUSA was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at History of coffee instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:History of Coffee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:History of Coffee, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 18:13, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Omer Canon! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 18:13, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Production, costs, and pricing

Having a quick look at the draft revealed several 'url value' reference-error msgs. These turned out to be malformatted links to Wikipedia pages. Unfortunately Wikipedia cannot be used as a reference per WP:UGC. I have tagged where the refs have been removed as 'citation needed'. I have not gone as far as rejecting the draft as it otherwise seems OK. Would suggest that replacement refs be added ASAP as it could be reviewed by another AfC participant at any time. Eagleash (talk) 06:36, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For sure I will replace those references. After replacing them what should I do to get it published? Here I mean to say that which indication will let the editro know that this is ready to be reviewed and published? Thanks for your help again Omer Canon (talk) 06:43, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Any update on this? Omer Canon (talk) 09:52, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As stated at the help desk, the page is awaiting review (see the grey / brown notice at the top of the page). There are over 4,500 articles awaiting review and it can take 6 – 8 weeks. Please be patient. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 10:12, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:History of Coffee has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:History of Coffee. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:59, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019: Production, costs, and pricing

Hello, Omer. I notice that you are working on a draft called Draft:Production, costs, and pricing. You mentioned that you found your article's title on the list of requested Wikipedia articles. I thought that was an unusual article request, so I looked back in Wikipedia history to discover how it got onto the list.

It all started back in September, 2006, when an editor (who left Wikipedia in 2008) made this edit to Management. The editor only edited that article one time, and, in my opinion, the edit they made was very awkward. I don't believe they were proposing that an article called production,_costs,_and_pricing should be written. In fact, the word "pricing" was already in the passage they edited.

The reason I have brought all this up is that an article such as your draft will not be accepted for inclusion in Wikipedia. Encyclopedia articles are typically confined to a single topic. To write Draft:Production, costs, and pricing in a useful form, you would have to include all the ways that production, costs and pricing influence one another, which would be a book-length effort. Wikipedia already has Production (economics), Cost and Pricing, which cover their individual subjects at some depth. Imagine trying to write an article called Mass, energy and time. It would be very long and not popular.

I feel rather bad that the automated systems that run Wikipedia set you up to waste your time on an impossible article. It seems to me that the list of requested articles should be reviewed by an actual human from time to time, and a few of those red links erased. Not everything can be a Wikipedia article.--Quisqualis (talk) 02:39, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fish Breeding (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Fishkeeping. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia is not a guide or textbook on such a subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fish Breeding and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fish Breeding, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:43, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dedicated.com (September 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Usedtobecool were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dedicated.com and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dedicated.com, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 09:07, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Dedicated.com

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Dedicated.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Whispering^(t) 12:28, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Dr. Paul Ling Tai has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dr. Paul Ling Tai. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:09, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, All in line external links have been removed.

Omer Canon (talk) 11:14, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dedicated.com (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This reads like a company brochure and needs to be neutralized for tone and advertising verbiage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dedicated.com and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dedicated.com, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:15, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

left by William2001 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are too much puffery and promotion in this article. Words like "renowned," "celebrated," "successfully," etc. should be used with caution.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paul Ling Tai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Paul Ling Tai, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

William2001^(talk) 20:11, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Mona Bijoor new picture.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mona Bijoor new picture.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 06:46, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Victoria Karlinsky-Bellini (September 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This person doesn't seem to meet WP criteria for notability. Please add some more details of why they are notable e.g. has she won any awards or published any significant research?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Victoria Karlinsky-Bellini and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Victoria Karlinsky-Bellini, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 11:19, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dedicated.com (September 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dedicated.com and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dedicated.com, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 08:14, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Paul Ling Tai

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Paul Ling Tai, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 08:16, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello, Omer Canon. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See WP:PAID.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

Note particularly: WP:UPE.

– Athaenara ✉ 10:22, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

– Athaenara ✉ 10:22, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Omer Canon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am unable to understand why I have been blocked from Wikipedia? Not even in a single article, I have promoted any person any product or anything else. In fact, I am writing from a neutral viewpoint and there is no intention to promote any person. I have mentioned no links in my articles of any website, product or anything else. It is requested to please unblock my account as I am not promoting anything. My only aim is to become a good Wikipedia editor and that is why I am trying on new topics for approval. My article 'Paul Ling Tai' was recently deleted but I am not able to find even a single promotional thing in it. It was identified in a review that I should remove some words which I did but then again it was deleted. My article on 'dedicated.com' is not getting approved and every time I am getting the same comments regarding notability. There are some articles written by different people which I have referenced. Still, I am not getting a positive response. I do not have any intentions to promote any product or person. I do not write any promotional articles or promotional words in my articles. Please, it's my humble request to unblock my account and please re-consider my articles for approval. I once again appeal that I am not a promoter or advertiser. I am not connected to any subjects of my articles. I just write from a neutral viewpoint. The positive response from your end will be appreciated. ThanksOmer Canon (talk) 04:32, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You don't have to have monetary gain to have a conflict of interest. You say that you are not connected with Dr. Tai and then go on to say how you are connected to him. That, combined with your use of promotional language ("renowned," "celebrated," "successfully," etc.) while saying that you aren't, leads me to think there is either more to this than you are telling, or you are too close to your subjects to see what you are doing incorrectly. Either way, the block should not be removed, and I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:50, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What is your connection to the subjects, such as Dr. Tai, that you have written about? 331dot (talk) 08:06, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @331dot as I have mentioned above that I do not have any connections to any of my articles' subjects. As far as Prof. Tai is concerned, he visited a medical institute where I use to work and I handled his visit and coordination. Due to familiarity, I decided to write about him and asked him for his consent. I do not have any monetary benefits in writing this. Similarly, dedicated.com is a VPS provider company located in the USA where one of my friends work and he asked me if I can write a profile for his company. One again I am not getting any monetary benefit for writing any of the articles.

Because, as I said above that I wanted to become a good contributor and editor of Wikipedia that is why I agreed to write articles for these people. You can also see my initial contributions such as 'History of Coffee', 'Fish Breeding', 'Production/costing/pricing' (this I took from the most wanted list of Wikipedia) articles. These topics have nothing to do with the promotion of anything or have any relation with me as these are very general topics. This proofs that I am not interested in specifically writing for any personality, any company, instead I write for people or company which will allow me to do it. I understand that writing without consent is unethical and of course, I do not have any information about any random personality or company.

It is my humble request once again to review my articles and please approve them as there is no intention at all to promote anything. I have not even used promotional terms, links or any products of any person or company in my articles. Please reconsider your decision and retrieve and approve my articles along with granting me permission to contribute more to Wikipedia.

Hoping a positive response from your end. Thanks.

Omer Canon (talk) 08:39, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if this is your decision then I have nothing to say as you people are the decision-makers and you have all the rights to assume and think on your own. Thanks for your cooperation. But I am highly disappointed.

Omer Canon (talk) 09:08, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to make another request for another administrator to review. 331dot (talk) 11:15, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Production, costs, and pricing (December 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Production, costs, and pricing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Production, costs, and pricing, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 17:34, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Green Marketing

Hello, Omer Canon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Green Marketing".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! ~riley (talk) 08:21, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Holling, Lucille Webster

Hello, Omer Canon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Holling".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:00, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Fish Breeding concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Fish Breeding, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fish Breeding

Hello, Omer Canon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fish Breeding".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:54, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Production, costs, and pricing concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Production, costs, and pricing, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Emotional Marketing

Hello, Omer Canon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Emotional Marketing".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:30, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Production, costs, and pricing

Hello, Omer Canon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Production".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:31, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]