Jump to content

Talk:Super Princess Peach

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sarujo (talk | contribs) at 01:27, 19 April 2020 (→‎I don't think this is true). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Former good articleSuper Princess Peach was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 11, 2006Good article nomineeListed
August 6, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article
WikiProject iconVideo games: Nintendo B‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Nintendo task force.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Hmmm...

It is 'Perry' not 'Parry', I amde the change because I own the game and know therefore.

Also more than 3/4 of these bosses are fake:

"""===Bosses===


I have removed them therefore and may return to input correct ones later.

Cheats

I think wikipedia is not a CHEAT site!

I would recommend to delete the "Perry" Site. Robendo

Due to April 2006?

What's with the end of the article? What happened in April 2006? OmnipotentEntity 18:30, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what it was meant to say, but since the game had already come out everywhere but Europe by april 2006, it seems to be gibberish. I'll tweak that sentence to remove the date unless anyone can think of a reason not to. Actually, upon further investigation (Google search) I can't find anything about any koopaling sprites in spp other than another wikipedia article. Is there a source for it? Corbo 12:59, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SPP Morton

Here is the link to where the sprites were ripped: http://mfgg.taloncrossing.com/index.php?showtopic=97954&hl=peach —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.166.202.27 (talkcontribs) .

GA review

This is almost ready for GA, and, as such, I've put it on hold. The only major issue is the list craziness; the largely unnecessary bulleted lists desperately need to be converted to prose. The list of characters could probably be deleted, to boot; important characters will be mentioned in the plot summary, and unimportant characters don't need to be mentioned at all. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 05:24, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I broke the character list down and renamed it "voices" (simlar to how Super Mario 64 has it). You deleted the Mario references section. Is there any other list that needs to be revised? Hbdragon88 18:58, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
All of the bulleted lists could easily be converted to prose, and really should. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 19:02, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am passing the article through to GA on the basis that the concerns that prompted the hold have been addressed and any remaining issues do not preclude promotion. Eluchil404 09:48, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

lol

hmm Vibe island and a Vibe Scepter... anyone else notice the sexual innuendo here?... or am i just dirty? HarveyDanger 01:19, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

=| You're just dirty. Metathesiophobia 12:52, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that's kind of gross dude. (I'm assuming that you're a dude.) If it wasn't a social issue, you should probably keep it out of the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.247.244.120 (talk) 21:30, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just look at the ending screen!! The text doesn't bring anything to your mind does it?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.249.81.36 (talk) 18:49, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good article review

I've listed this on WP:GA/R due to perceived problems with this article. hbdragon88 22:15, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been delisted. The discussion, now in archive, can be found here. Once the article has been brought up to standards, it may be renominated at WP:GAC. Regards, Lara♥Love 17:02, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this is true

"It is the first game to feature Princess Peach as the main playable character." What about Super Mario 2? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Barababa (talkcontribs) 07:23, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Main playable character. 75.129.74.37 (talk) 01:22, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And she was a main playable character in Super Mario 2. Sarujo (talk) 01:27, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]