User talk:Ishita1119

May 2020

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Notre Dame College, Dhaka have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks.Template:Z186 - Arjayay (talk) 11:13, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Adamjee Jute Mills, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:14, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Notre Dame College, Dhaka, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 12:19, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thank you very much. Ishita1119 (talk) 16:13, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I thought they were minor changes. And all the edits I have done, they are not false. By the way, next time I will be more careful. Ishita1119 (talk) 16:14, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Ishita1119! Thank you for your contributions. I am Vinegarymass911 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or place {{helpme}} on your talk page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Since you've shown some interest in editing topics related to Bangladesh, we hope you'll stay and add content to Bangladesh related articles. A number of important articles related to Bangladesh are yet to be created and many of the existing ones are in poor shape. You can help it improve by becoming a regular editor with adhering to the policies of Wikipedia. Consider joining or watchlisting Bangladesh related discussions (for example, Noticeboard for Bangladesh-related topics).

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Vinegarymass911 (talk) 14:50, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal to unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ishita1119 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

caught by an opon proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 144.48.108.234 Place any further information here. Ishita1119

Decline reason:

That IP address is not blocked and you are able to edit. Please do not waste our time like this. Yamla (talk) 10:47, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Steve Dabilz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve Dabilz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Dabilz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ZLEA _T\^C 19:11, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Your addition to Steve Dabilz has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. ZLEA _T\^C 13:01, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ishita1119, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

ZLEA _T\^C 17:20, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of sockpuppetry block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ishita1119. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 23:08, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that her block be reviewed:

Ishita1119 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was unaware of the stockpupetry and thus made this offence. Yes, I have made a mistake, I am solely responsible for that and I am repentant for this now. I vow not to commit such offence again and I wish to contribute to the Wikipedia again.I hope , the administration would kindly lift over the ban and let me contribute to the encyclopedia. I promise not to make such mistakes again

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I was unaware of the stockpupetry and thus made this offence. Yes, I have made a mistake, I am solely responsible for that and I am repentant for this now. I vow not to commit such offence again and I wish to contribute to the Wikipedia again.I hope , the administration would kindly lift over the ban and let me contribute to the encyclopedia. I promise not to make such mistakes again |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was unaware of the stockpupetry and thus made this offence. Yes, I have made a mistake, I am solely responsible for that and I am repentant for this now. I vow not to commit such offence again and I wish to contribute to the Wikipedia again.I hope , the administration would kindly lift over the ban and let me contribute to the encyclopedia. I promise not to make such mistakes again |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was unaware of the stockpupetry and thus made this offence. Yes, I have made a mistake, I am solely responsible for that and I am repentant for this now. I vow not to commit such offence again and I wish to contribute to the Wikipedia again.I hope , the administration would kindly lift over the ban and let me contribute to the encyclopedia. I promise not to make such mistakes again |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}