Jump to content

User talk:Chetvorno

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2601:14d:300:330:ed40:db2a:2c71:3011 (talk) at 02:17, 29 August 2020 (→why do you delete facts ?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

I will reply to comments below on this page, in order to keep the dialog in one place

Reductio Ad Absurdum

@Chetvorno: Chetvorno, this is ridiculous. The content that I put back was there for months. The edit war is the person removing the content! Rstrug (talk)
I think I will take my discussion of this topic to the article Talk page, where everyone interested can participate. --ChetvornoTALK 21:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Divergence theorem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vector (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:08, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Waving?

In this edit, were you thinking of this? SpinningSpark 12:53, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

LOL! Maybe that should be the lead picture on Radio wave. --ChetvornoTALK 18:05, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Link budget (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Amplification
Radio spectrum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Data rate

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tesla coil

Dear Chetvorno. I would like to hear the reason why you are removing the explanation of the resonant transformer. I'm continuously supplying more than hundreds of millions of resonant transformers worldwide. --Neotesla (talk) 01:21, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would rather discuss this on Talk:Tesla coil so other interested editors could get involved. --ChetvornoTALK 17:52, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That is correct. I agree. I added a new section to Talk:Tesla coil#Resonant transformer?. --Neotesla (talk) 23:06, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The recent change in the description of the DRSSTC is not correct. The capacitor charged with DC is the power supply filter capacitor, not the capacitor in series with the primary coil, that is after the switching devices. The power supply and the switches act as an AC voltage source in series with the primary LC circuit. Acmq (talk) 01:10, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!!

Hi Chetvorno, thanks for all you do on Wikipedia, and for all your help at various articles. My you have a wonderful Christmas and a Happy New Year. (and if you don't celebrate Christmas please feel free to take that as a Happy Hanukkah, a great Dhanu Sankranti, a blessed Hatsumode, or whatever holiday you want to insert there.) Zaereth (talk) 08:55, 25 December 2019 (UTC

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Two-way radio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pilot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Response

To your recent comment on my "talk" page, at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:70.89.176.249

70.89.176.249 (talk) 03:21, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nauen Transmitter Station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radiogram (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:01, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Laminating of e.m. cores

"reducing eddy currents were known long before ZBD" So why can't you see any laminating in the patents pictures of earlier pre-ZBD transformer developers? It is a very important question.--Liltender (talk) 20:52, 8 March 2020 (UTC) It seems (according to their patents)clearly, that the earlier trasformer developers did not know about it....--Liltender (talk) 07:35, 9 March 2020 (UTC) I'm still asking you, where are your proofs for these relevations? None of your links can show your statements. Divided iron wires are not equal with laminated iron plates (the real lamination). Only plate form is very effective, iron wires can reduce eddy current only slightly. So the real laminated iron plates (which were effective) were invented by the ZBD team.--Liltender (talk) 22:07, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


I'm still asking you, where are your proofs for these relevations? None of your links can show your statements. Divided iron wires are not equal with laminated iron plates (the real lamination). Only plate form is very effective, iron wires can reduce eddy current only slightly. So the real laminated iron plates (which were effective) were invented by the ZBD team. I'm still can't believe that British or American researcher could really understand electromaginetism in theoretical like the ZBD team understand it. ZBDteam still sold dosens of basic mathematical formulas related to electricity for American or British companies, because the lack of theoretical understanding electrotechnology, thus Americans and British were unable to produce effective electronics products without buying math. formulas in their factories.--Liltender (talk) 12:20, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Liltender: I left a reply to your question on the article's Talk page Talk:War of the currents. Why don't we conduct this discussion on that page, since it concerns the article, and that would give other interested editors a chance to participate? --ChetvornoTALK 21:06, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still waiting for your answer in the War of the currents talkpage!--Liltender (talk) 13:04, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Let's try to keep the discussion on the article's Talk page, so other editors can follow what's going on and participate if they want to. --ChetvornoTALK 17:48, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nikola Tesla page

Can you please revert the article like in it"s original version, I have noticed that you reverted changes made by user SandroMilosevic but not from Sheldonium — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theonewithreason (talk • contribs) 23:33, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Which version is the original? --ChetvornoTALK 23:36, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The version last made by editor limit-theorem he reverted the changes that were made today but the last version of the article is made by sheldonium, user sheldonium already tried to change the article more than 3 times today without consensus

Telegraphy article

Would you be interested in taking a look at Electrical telegraphy in the United Kingdom? It is currently at Peer Review here. I'm intending to take this to Featured Article status and your comments would be welcome. SpinningSpark 15:11, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Field line construction

Hi. Thx for images and new section in Filed line. I have similar page in wikibooks. I have copied your method . Can you look at it ? Do you see any errors ? Can you expand it ? TIA--Adam majewski (talk) 09:20, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just for fun and maybe an interesting add

If I am reading the Thomas Commerford Martin book right (page 484), Tesla's May 20, 1891 American Institute of Electrical Engineers Columbia College lecture Tesla Coil is sitting right in front of the Egg of Columbus with two smaller earlier versions sitting just to the left. May be something to add to Tesla coil. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 01:47, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Austin transformer, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Choke and Impedance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Answer the question

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:War_of_the_currents#Statement_added_to_article_gives_undue_credit_to_ZBD_for_developing_core_lamination 09:51, 29 March 2020 Thank you!

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Load bank, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Sources on Tesla RfC

Chetvorno Can you please remove Miroslav Cosovic link from the sources. I mean I do understand your point and I agree with you over the nationalistic dispute over Tesla ,but puting Miroslav Cosovic in context is too much. Since the guy is 1. uneducated ,never finished any college 2. The way he writes his books are just unsourced provocations with only goal to make controversy calling historical figures "crazy" "pedophiles" etc. 3. He was only mentioned through very short period of time after that every historian in Region (including Croatia and Serbia) called him ridiculous and 4. If you qoute him ,you could easily qoute me if I would say that "Tesla comes from Mars" since there's no really any weight behind his "books" , other sources you provided show real dispute between goverments, officials and so on ,but this guy doesn't belong here.User:Theonewithreason (Theonewithreason) 22:15, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll think about it, but that was pretty much my point in my comment. In the Internet age people don't just get their information from "respectable" sources approved by historians. There are so many extreme views and crazy false claims such as Cosovic's on all sides in the Balkan nationalist conflict that that justifies keeping Tesla's true ethnicity in the lead. --ChetvornoTALK 10:26, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You are absolutely correct with that,although the level of conflict in Balkan can be divided on official level between goverments ,historians,clergies etc. and common people who are using comments in newspapers to wage their battles (and everyone has their own theory and opinion about everything).Cosovic belongs to latter group, only difference is that he has a platform where he writes his opinion and doesn't allow anybody to be part of discussion. He even attacked some Montenegrin historians over Petrovic Njegos, but like I wrote before doesn't have proper education (or any specific level of education, that's why some people ironically call him Mr. Cosovic occupation unknown)User:Theonewithreason (talk) 10:56, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Load bank (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Power and Cooling system
Lens antenna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Focal point
Very low frequency (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Data rate

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Atomic orbital (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Nucleus
Augusto Righi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Paraffin

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Atomic orbital, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nucleus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Phosphor
added a link pointing to Scintillation
Slot antenna
added a link pointing to Omnidirectional

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:41, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

why do you delete facts ?

odd that you delete facts that contradict your "facts" that are wrong - time to let your ego go and accept that you were wrong

just because facts to not match your knowledge? of a subject, and do not match your narrative and agenda does not mean you should deleted them

I think you should state your beliefs up front, once you admit you are history revisionist, everyone can ignore your work as incomplete

you should really do more research on the subjects you are writing about, you are misleading everyone with your narrative that does not match the facts

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chetvorno&oldid=975532499"