ANZAC Mounted Division: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
clean up, merged duplicate refs (tag "Powles 12"), dashes in year ranges, ISBN format using AWB
reinsert notable campaign and battles in infobox per Template. Without this information readers may not know when and where the division served
Line 25: Line 25:
|identification_symbol_label=Tactical formation sign
|identification_symbol_label=Tactical formation sign
<!-- Culture and history -->
<!-- Culture and history -->
|battles=[[First World War]]<br />
|battles=[[First World War]]
*[[Sinai and Palestine Campaign]]
⚫
[[Egyptian Revolution of 1919]]<br /><small>See [[ANZAC Mounted Division#Battles|battles section]]<br />for more information</small>
:[[Battle of Romani]]
:[[Southern Palestine Offensive]]
:[[Third Transjordan attack]]
⚫
*[[Egyptian Revolution of 1919]]<br /><small>See [[ANZAC Mounted Division#Battles|battles section]]<br />for more information</small>
}}
}}


Revision as of 22:56, 25 December 2013

Australian and New Zealand Mounted Division
Men of the division watering their horses at the foot of Mount Zion, January 1918.
Active16 March 1916 – 30 June 1919
CountryAustralia
New Zealand
Great Britain
Allegiance British Empire
BranchArmy
TypeMounted infantry
Horse artillery
RoleManoeuvre warfare
SizeDivision
Part ofI ANZAC Corps
Desert Column
Desert Mounted Corps
XX Corps
EngagementsFirst World War
Battle of Romani
Southern Palestine Offensive
Third Transjordan attack
Commanders
(1916–17)Harry Chauvel
(1917–18)Edward Chaytor
(1918–19)Granville Ryrie
Insignia
Tactical formation sign

The Australian and New Zealand Mounted Division was a mounted infantry division of the British Empire during the First World War. The division was raised in March 1916 and was assigned to the I ANZAC Corps. On establishment, it consisted of four brigades comprising three Australian light horse and one New Zealand mounted rifles, supported by British horse artillery. In 1917, one of the Australian brigades was replaced by a British yeomanry brigade. After April 1917, the standard order of battle was reduced to two Australian brigades and one New Zealand brigade, although the Imperial Camel Corps Brigade and other British mounted brigades were temporarily attached several times during operations.

The division had two wartime commanders; the first (1916–1917) was the Australian Major-General Harry Chauvel, who had commanded the 1st Light Horse Brigade at Gallipoli. When Chauvel was promoted to command the Desert Column – of which the division was part – he was replaced by the New Zealander Major-General Edward Chaytor from the New Zealand Mounted Rifles Brigade, who remained in command for the rest of the war. Post-war, Brigadier-General Granville Ryrie commanded the division from December 1918 until it was disbanded in June 1919.

After serving dismounted in the Australian and New Zealand Army Corps (ANZAC) during the Gallipoli campaign, the light horse and mounted rifles brigades became part of the British Empire's Egyptian Expeditionary Force. They briefly served with the I ANZAC Corps, and subsequently served under the command of Eastern Force for most of 1916. The division served under Desert Column from the end of 1916 until mid-1917, when the column was expanded and renamed the Desert Mounted Corps. The division fought and won all the major battles across the Sinai Peninsula during 1916, and the following year it fought from Gaza to Jerusalem in southern Palestine. In 1918, it took part in the Jordan Valley operations and the advance to Amman and Ziza, when the division formed the main part of Chaytor's Force – which captured 10,300 men from the Turkish Fourth Army.[nb 1]

Variations in division's name

The division is variously referred to in sources as the Australian and New Zealand Mounted Division,[2] (abbreviated to the A. & N. Z. Mounted Division),[3] the ANZAC Mounted Division,[4] and the Anzac Mounted Division by the Australian and New Zealand histories of the campaign.[5][6]

Formation history

Further information: Military history of Australia during World War I and The ANZAC acronym
Harry Chauvel at Gallipoli, before being appointed commander of the division.

Prior to formation, units that would form the division's brigades served as part of the Force in Egypt from December 1914,[7] and then in the Gallipoli Campaign.[8] At Gallipoli, the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Light Horse Brigades served dismounted with the New Zealand and Australian Division from May to December 1915, taking part in the Battle of the Nek.[9][10] The brigades consisted of three regiments, each with an establishment of twenty-five officers and 497 other ranks serving in three squadrons, of six troops.[11][nb 2] The New Zealand Mounted Rifles Brigade also served at Gallipoli before returning to Egypt where the ANZAC Mounted Division was formed in March 1916;[13] it was the first mounted or cavalry division to serve with the Egyptian Expeditionary Force (EEF).[14] Not all the division's troops came from Australia and New Zealand; the artillery units, with 18-pounders,[15][nb 3] and the Divisional Ammunition Column were provided by the British Royal Horse Artillery from the Territorial Force. The brigade's four batteries were each allocated to a fighting brigade.[nb 4] The 1st Light Horse Brigade had the Leicestershire Battery; the 2nd Light Horse Brigade, the Ayrshire Battery; the 3rd Light Horse Brigade, the Inverness-shire Battery, and the Somerset Battery was attached to the New Zealand Mounted Rifles Brigade.[19] To replace the 3rd Light Horse Brigade, which had been assigned to the Imperial Mounted Division in January 1917, the British 22nd Mounted Brigade joined the division from February to July 1917.[20] Serving alongside them were several smaller support units, which included an engineer field squadron, a signal squadron, and a divisional train.[15][21]

The first General Officer Commanding (GOC) Major-General Harry Chauvel, appointed 16 March,[13] was promoted from brigade commander, although he temporarily commanded the 1st Australian Division for a short period at Gallipoli. His Chief-of Staff was Lieutenant-Colonel John Gilbert Browne of 14th (King's) Hussars, a professional from the British Army who had fought in the Second Boer War and with the British Cavalry Division, on the Western Front in the early stages of the war. The rest of the division's staff were selected on merit for their service at Gallipoli. The same process was applied to select the brigade staff, and regimental and squadron officers – most of whom had seen prior service at Gallipoli or in the Second Boer War.[22]

Order of battle

Australian light horse unit at Alexandria Egypt
Commanders
1st Light Horse Brigade (1st Brigade)
2nd Light Horse Brigade (2nd Brigade)
New Zealand Mounted Rifles Brigade (NZ Brigade)
British 18-pounders as used by the division during the battle of Romani
XVIII Brigade, Royal Horse Artillery (T.F.)
13-pounder guns
ANZAC Mounted Division Engineers
  • 1st Field Squadron
  • 1st Signal Squadron
ANZAC Mounted Division Medical Services
  • 1st Light Horse Field Ambulance
  • 2nd Light Horse Field Ambulance
  • New Zealand Mounted Field Ambulance
  • 7th Sanitary Section
ANZAC Mounted Division Train
  • 32nd Australian Army Service Corps Company
  • 33rd Australian Army Service Corps Company
  • 34th Australian Army Service Corps Company
  • 5th New Zealand Army Service Corps Company
  • 26th Depot Supply Unit
ANZAC Mounted Division Veterinary Services
  • 6th Mobile Veterinary Section
  • 7th Mobile Veterinary Section
  • 2nd New Zealand Mobile Veterinary Section

[23][24][25]

Service history

Sinai

Further information: Battle of Romani, Battle of Magdhaba, and Battle of Rafa

On raising, the division was assigned to the I ANZAC Corps, which was defending No 2 Section of the Suez Canal. On 15 March, the ANZAC Mounted Division relieved the 1st Australian Division on the front line.[19] Members of the division carried out their first offensive action with the Jifjafa raid between 11 and 14 April 1916, resulting in the campaign's first Australian death.[26][27] Later the same month, the 2nd and the NZ Brigades were moved into the Sinai Desert in response to the defeat at Katia of the 5th Mounted Brigade.[28][29] By the end of the month, the division had been established around Romani in the Sinai.[30] Here the brigade machine-gun squadrons were formed; each had eight officers and 222 other ranks,[12] with twelve Maxim guns carried on pack horses. These replaced the two guns that had previously been part of each regiment's establishment. In their place, the regiments were issued with three Lewis guns; these were replaced the following year by twelve Hotchkiss machine-guns.[31]

Australian Light Horsemen exercising their horses in the Mediterranean 1916. Note rifles were slung over the shoulder and not carried in a rifle scabbard.

On 19 July, Brigadier-General Chaytor was in a reconnaissance aircraft located between 8-9,000 Turkish soldiers approaching the division's prepared positions.[30] By 3 August, this number had increased to around 18,000 infantrymen with artillery support.[32][nb 5] The following Battle of Romani was the division's first major victory.[34] Days later, however, the division was defeated at Bir el Abd.[35]

In September, the division was involved in an unsuccessful surprise attack at Mazar, Template:Convert/spell east of Romani. They were discovered en route by German aircraft and the assault, following their orders, became a "reconnaissance in force". Although the attack failed, it persuaded Turkish commanders to evacuate the position two days later.[36] On 11 November, the division was ordered to move east towards Masaid and El Arish on the coast. The division entered the latter on 21 December to find the Turkish garrison had withdrawn.[37] The next day, Lieutenant-General Philip Chetwode, commanding the Desert Column, ordered Chauvel – supported by the Imperial Camel Corps Brigade (ICCB) – to attack Magdhaba.[38] Travelling overnight, most of the division was in position by dawn 23 December. Using the additional strength of the camel brigade, and at times fighting hand to hand, Chauvel's attack on Magdhaba was the division's second victory. Turkish casualties were ninety-seven dead, 300 wounded and 1,282 prisoners, while Chauvel's were twenty-three dead and 124 wounded.[39][nb 6]

On 8 January 1917, the division, still with the ICCB under command, continued the advance towards the pre-war Egypt-Palestine border at Rafa.[41] They moved Template:Convert/spell from El Arish to Rafa overnight and by 07:00 they were ready for the assault to begin. The Battle of Rafa, although harder fought, became the division's third victory. Total casualties were seventy-one dead and 415 wounded for the division and the 5th Mounted Brigade who were also involved. Against this, Turkish casualties were 200 dead, 168 wounded and 1,434 prisoners.[42]

Gaza

Further information: First Battle of Gaza and Second Battle of Gaza
Lighthorseman, horse, and their equipment

In February 1917, just before the division moved forward to take part in the battle for Gaza, the British 22nd Mounted Brigade – a yeomanry brigade from the Territorial Force – joined the division.[43] The first reconnaissance of the Turkish position at Gaza was carried out by the 3rd Light Horse Brigade on 25 March. The rest of the Desert Column moved forward that night. British intelligence had estimated that Gaza garrison comprised around 4,000 troops, with their nearest reinforcements Template:Convert/spell away. In fact they had around 15,000 troops based within Template:Convert/spell of Gaza.[44] The division's objective was to circle the town to the east and provide a screen against a counter-attack from the north.[45] At 02:30 on 26 March, the division moved out; by 06:00, ground fog – which had covered the infantry and mounted advance – lifted and they were discovered by a Turkish patrol. The division's nearest troops charged the Turks and came upon an airfield where two German aircraft took off, turned and attacked the mounted troops. The division responded; one squadron per regiment dismounted and returned fire. By sunrise, the division was behind the Turkish lines and engaged in several skirmishes. During the light horse advance to the coast north of Gaza, the Turkish GOC responsible for the Gaza defences was taken prisoner.[46] The 53rd (Welsh) Division had been responsible for the attack on the town; by 13:00, they had not made much progress and were held down by strong defences. The ANZAC Mounted Division was ordered at 15:15 to prepare for a dismounted assault. Chauvel completed his concentration within an hour. Then, fighting hand to hand and using their bayonets, the division reached the outskirts of the town. The NZ and the 2nd Brigades entered the town from the north and west. At 18:00, Lieutenant-General Charles Macpherson Dobell, GOC Eastern Force, and Chetwode agreed to call off the attack due to the perceived lack of progress, the approaching Turkish reinforcements and impending nightfall.[47][48] According to Gullett, the error in that decision can perhaps be demonstrated by the lack of any Turkish intervention to the division's regrouping and withdrawal back to their own lines.[49] At 21:30, the Turkish reinforcements were still several miles away; one group confronted by the 3rd Brigade immediately stopped advancing. In Chetwode's post-action report, he says that the time taken for the division to regroup was caused by them retrieving their wounded from inside Gaza.[50] British wireless operators intercepted a Turkish Army message from Gaza, timed at 19:45, reporting that their position had been lost.[51]

The failure at Gaza resulted in the Turkish Army building a Template:Convert/spell long defence line between Gaza and Beersheba, defended by between 20–25,000 troops.[52] Dobell's plan for the second battle required his infantry to assault Gaza itself while the mounted forces would operate on their right flank, force the Turkish troops towards Beersheba, hinder the movement of reinforcements from there to Gaza and prepare to pursue any retreating Turkish forces.[53][nb 7]

Preliminary manoeuvring began on 16 April and the main attack would start the next day. At 02:00, the division was in position at Shellal.[55] Reconnaissance patrols convinced Chauvel they would be unable to breakthrough the Ottoman line without infantry support. The main infantry battle began at 07:15 on 19 April following a two-hour bombardment, with the division deployed to attack Sausage Ridge on the extreme right of the three British infantry division's assault at Gaza.[56] The division suffered severe casualties during the infantry attacks while it was comparatively inactive during the day. However during the previous night of 18/19 April, Chauvel – under orders not to make a dismounted attack – moved towards the Hareira Redoubt to protect the army's right.[57] In the morning of 19 April, the 1st and 3rd Brigades advanced without opposition. However by mid-afternoon they were confronted by around 1,000 Turkish cavalrymen, whom they fought off with rifle, machine-gun and artillery fire. By 20 April, the attack had halted in a decisive victory for the Turkish forces. The attack cost the British 5,900 casualties, but only 105 of those were from the division – [58] the fewest of any involved.[59][nb 8]

The second GOC Major-General Edward Chaytor

This second failure resulted in the recall of Murray and the appointment of General Edmund Allenby to command the EEF. Chauvel had been promoted to command the Desert Column. He was replaced as GOC by Chaytor from the NZ Brigade.[60] Other changes resulted in the division losing the 3rd Light Horse Brigade to the new Imperial Mounted Division. The Yeomanry Mounted Division was also raised at the same time.[61] This enabled the three divisions to rotate monthly from the front line to resting, to carry out training.[62] During May, the 1st Brigade and divisional engineers were involved in a raid on the Turkish railway line south of Beersheba, while the other two brigades moved forward in support.[63]

Beersheba

Further information: Battle of Beersheba, Battle of Tel el Khuweilfe, and Battle of Hareira and Sheria

On 24 October, the 2nd Brigade moved forward to Asluj to screen the advance of the ANZAC Mounted and the Australian Mounted Divisions.[64] On 31 October, Beersheba was captured after a series of infantry and mounted attacks. The 1st and the NZ Brigades made a combined attack on Tel el Saba. At 15:00 the same day, the New Zealanders were in position to carry out a bayonet charge, capturing 132 prisoners and four machine-guns while the retreating Turkish soldiers were engaged by the 1st Brigade. Chaytor's troops were now in possession of Tel el Saba and the 2nd Brigade at Sakati had cut the Hebron road during the morning.[65][66] At 15:30, orders were issued for the final assault on Beersheba; the 1st Brigade was tasked with capturing a line from a prominent mound outside to the Beersheba mosque.[67] Beersheba was finally taken following a mounted charge by the 4th Light Horse Brigade.[68]

On 1 November, the division was ordered to push the 1st and the NZ Brigades further north of Beersheba towards Tel el Khuweilfe while the 2nd Brigade moved towards Dhaheriye. The troops moving north skirmished with Ottoman cavalry then occupied a position between the Makhrune well and Towal Abu Jerwal, capturing four machine-guns and 180 prisoners.[69] Overnight, the 1st Brigade was ordered towards Tel el Khuweilfe, moving between the 2nd Brigade on their right and the 7th Mounted Brigade to the left. When they reached the British line they relieved the yeomanry and at 11:00 they fought off a counter-attack by two Turkish infantry companies. They remained in the line until 16:00 when the 53rd (Welsh) Division and the 5th Mounted Brigade relieved them. During the two days of fighting, water was in short supply and each brigade was relieved in turn to march back Template:Convert/spell to water. This continued until 5 November when the 2nd Brigade and NZ Brigade's were ordered back to Beersheba.[70] By 7 November, the 1st and 2nd Brigades were located to the west of Sheria and the NZ Brigade remained temporarily attached to the 53rd (Welsh) Division, which was still fighting at Khuweilfe. Later that day, during the breakthrough of the old Gaza to Beersheba line, the ANZAC Mounted Division advanced to Ameida where the 1st Brigade captured an ammunition supply train, a field hospital, a large quantity of stores and 391 prisoners. At 12:30, news of the fall of Gaza reached Chaytor and he was ordered towards Jemmameh, to cut off the retreating Turkish forces, capturing the village of Dilakh in the process. Here the 2nd Brigade was ordered to attack; the 5th LHR galloped the Template:Convert/spell through exploding shells to capture part of the village, which they held through the night. The guns shelling them were located nearby; at dawn the following day they secured the rest of the village and captured the guns. Chaytor's plans to advance depended on the Australian Mounted Division moving up to join them, but by 16:30 they were still engaged in fighting at the at Hareira and Sheria and their horses had not been watered for some time.[71] Early on 8 November, the 2nd Brigade occupied a line from the Nejile mound to the Wadi Hesi and an hour later the 7th Mounted Brigade – still attached to the division – arrived as reinforcements. As the division advanced, they saw retreating Ottoman soldiers and at 15:00 the 1st Brigade captured Jemmameh and its water supply. Positioned beyond the village, the 5th LHR and 7th LHR were attacked by between 5,000 and 7,000 men, supported by artillery. The attack lasted the remainder of the day but petered out overnight.[72] By the evening of 8 November, all the Turkish positions on the Gaza-Beersheba line had been captured and the Turkish Army was withdrawing northwards.[73]

Judean plain

Further information: Battle of Mughar Ridge and Battle of Ayun Kara
large columns of horses in an arid, hilly landscape
Horses queue for water at Jemmameh 8 November 1917

After watering their horses overnight on 8/9 November, the division was the only mounted force ready to move by morning. At 06:00, Chaytor ordered the advance onto the Judean plain; the 1st Brigade on the left rode towards Simsim and the 2nd Brigade on the right towards Bureir, with the 7th Mounted Brigade as reserve. Several large groups of Turkish soldiers were captured without resistance; however during the day, opposition increased as the two withdrawing Turkish armies became more organised. In the face of machine-gun and artillery fire the village of Bureir, along with two howitzers and stores, were captured. Continuing their advance, the 2nd Brigade bypassed Huleikat and headed towards Kaukabah, capturing 110 wagons and 390 prisoners. Having outdistanced their lines of communication, the brigade waited in the village under shellfire for three hours for their supply trains to reach them. Then, sighting a convoy at Kustine, the brigade galloped through machine-gun and artillery fire to capture another 100 wagons and 300 prisoners. Turkish artillery opened fire on them but the brigade was ordered to hold its ground. Just after dark. part of the 7th LHR was attacked by Turkish infantry; a Turkish speaking light horse officer convinced them they were surrounded and 230 men surrendered. Brigadier-General Granville Ryrie, GOC 2nd Brigade, was conscious of his troops exposed position and ordered a withdrawal to Es Suafir el Gharbiye, during which they skirmished with Turkish infantry and captured another four howitzers at Ebdis.[74] On 10 November, the 2nd Brigade was relieved by the 75th Division and moved to Hamame on the coast for three days rest.[75]

On the other flank, at 09:00, the 1st Brigade entered Bureir unopposed and continued on, arriving at Mejdel at 14:00 and capturing 164 prisoners. Beit Duras was held in strength so the 1st Brigade headed for the coast, stopping for the night south of Esdud. On 10 November, they moved on Esdud – the ancient Ashdod – opposed by Turkish cavalry to the north and east of the town. By 10:00, they had secured the Esdud stone bridge over the Wadi Sukereir in front of the village. However they were confronted by a strong Turkish defence line stretching from Beit Duras to El Butani el Gharbiye and to the mouth of the Wadi Sukereir. Not having the numbers to break the line, the brigade dug in to wait for the infantry to catch up.[76] On 11 November, the 1st Brigade left Esdud to secure the area along the Wadi Sukereir between the bridge and the sea. They subsequently located an ample supply of fresh water and a beach suitable for landing supplies from the sea. The 2nd LHR advanced towards the bridge, while the 1st LHR moved to the left and at Burka they established a line of defence along the Wadi el Khubb facing north-east. Under fire, the 2nd LHR crossed the bridge and gradually forced the Turkish rearguard back. By nightfall, they had occupied the Tel el Murre mound and established a substantial bridgehead over the Sukereir at the Esdud bridge towards Burkha.[77]

New Zealand Brigade headquarters outside Jaffa

On 12 November, infantry from the 156th (Scottish Rifles) Brigade attacked Burkha – with the 1st LHR and 2nd LHR in support to their left – using their machine-guns to enfialde the Turkish rearguard trenches. The next day, the 1st and the NZ Brigades followed behind the Yeomanry Mounted Division, supporting their advance on Yebna to reach the mouth of the Wadi Rubin.[78] On 14 November, the division resumed their advance. The New Zealanders on the left headed towards Jaffa, reaching the Wadi Hanein before meeting any opposition. The 1st Brigade, on the right, headed towards Ramleh; they reached Deiran unopposed but saw Turkish troops heading towards the NZ Brigade. At 12:00, the New Zealanders were engaged with German machine-gun and rifle fire from a strongly defended line at Ayun Kara. During the following Battle of Ayun Kara, the WMR put in a bayonet charge, capturing two machine-guns and killing twenty defenders. The AMR to their left could not break through the German rearguard, which was being rapidly reinforced. While they were being shelled at 14:30, the regiment was attacked by 1,500 troops. The AMR commanding officer requested urgent reinforcements and a squadron from the WMR was sent to assist. By 16:00, the Turkish rearguard had advanced close enough for a bayonet and grenade charge, which the AMR managed to hold, forcing the attackers to withdraw leaving 162 dead and a large number of wounded behind. New Zealand casualties were twenty-one dead and eighty-eight wounded.[79]

On 15 November, the division's reconnaissance patrols reported the way ahead was clear. They resumed their advance led by the 1st Brigade, which reached Ramleh at 11:00 unopposed.[80] The 1st LHR moved ahead to reach Lydda Template:Convert/spell further north, where reports of Turkish soldiers nearby were received. Lieutenant-Colonel Cecil Granville in command ordered two troops to investigate, and forty troopers rode out to locate them and charged a hostile column while under artillery and machine-gun fire. They captured four machine-guns, 297 Turkish and two German soldiers, and sustained one dead and six wounded.[81] On their left, the NZ Brigade reached Rishon LeZion and continued towards Jaffa but was ordered to halt a few miles short of the port by EEF GHQ. The following morning, the WMR was ordered to send reconnaissance patrols towards Jaffa. Meeting no resistance, the patrols rode into the city, which had been evacuated; Chaytor told Allenby that the city had been taken. Other reconnaissance patrols were sent to the River Auju, which was found to be Template:Convert/spell wide and up to Template:Convert/spell deep. Three crossing points were found; a shallow ford near the river mouth, a second crossing near a dam over a bridge at Khurbet Hadra, and a third crossing was located at a watermill beside Jerisheh. On the opposite bank Turkish infantry could be clearly seen digging defences.[82]

River Auja

Further information: Battle of Jerusalem (1917)
Position of EEF at 18:00 on 19 November

While the main effort of the EEF headed north-west towards Jerusalem, by 20 November the division had established a line of observation posts along the River Auja a few miles north of Jaffa, stretching from Nalin at its eastern end, through Budrus and El Yehudiyeh, then along higher ground south of the Sheik Abu ex Zeitun mound and to the coast. When the 54th (East Anglian) Division and the ICCB arrived, the 1st Brigade was sent to the rear to rest at Yebna. The next day, the NZ Brigade was relieved by the 161st (Essex) Brigade, but remained near the front ready for an assault on the river crossings. During this time, mounted patrols advanced to the three crossings and the nearby villages but met with strong resistance. On 24 November, following a bombardment of the Turkish defensive line, the CMR forced a crossing at the river mouth ford, defeated a small party of Turkish soldiers and occupied Sheikh Muannis.[83][84] They were followed across by the WMR, which moved through the CMR to capture the Khurbet Hadrah bridge. Once the bridge was secured, they were relieved by an infantry battalion, which took over the defences while a squadron of the CMR guarded the ford and the AMR advanced in front of the infantry holding the bridge. At dawn on 25 November, a Turkish force of around 1,000 men attacked the AMR, which was forced to withdraw back to the infantry positions. At the same time, the CMR counter-attacked the Turkish right but the determined Turkish attackers forced the NZ Brigade and infantry back across the Auja.[85][86] On 27 November, further Turkish advances forced the 4th (ANZAC) Battalion ICCB and the 2nd Brigade back from their position on the right. Over the next few days, trench raids were carried out by both sides, lasting until 7 December when the division handed over their sector of the front to the 52nd (Lowland) Division. The 1st and 2nd Brigades were withdrawn to the rear but the NZ Brigade remained at the front in reserve.[87][88]

Jericho

Further information: Capture of Jericho
3rd Light Horse Regiment outside Bethlehem

In February 1918, the division – less the 2nd Brigade – was attached to the XX Corps for the advance into the Jordan Valley. Holding the right flank from Bethlehem eastwards, they were tasked with the advance across the Judean Hills and down into the valley of the Dead Sea. They were to outflank any Turkish defenders confronting the British infantry and capture Jericho.[89]

The British advance started on 14 February; five days later the division was established at El Muntar, Template:Convert/spell west of the Dead Sea. Early on 20 February, the NZ Brigade conducted dismounted assaults on the hills Jebel el Kahmum and Tubk el Kaneiterah east of Bethlehem. Both hills were heavily defended and covered by artillery and machine-guns.[90] They found the going heavy and the Turkish defenders did not pull back until the hills were outflanked by the 60th (London) Division. Just after 14:00, the ANZAC and London Divisions were closing in on the Jordan Valley when a troop from the 1st LHR reached the valley floor. They were soon followed by the remainder of the 1st Brigade, with orders to advance north to the Wadi Jofet Zeben. Plans were formed for a joint attack on Nebi Musa, but the Turkish defenders withdrew that night. Instead the 1st Brigade headed for Jericho, and at 08:00 the 3rd LHR entered the town virtually unopposed. The brigade pushed on towards the River Jordan and the bridge at Ghoraniye, and by nightfall the two brigades' and the division's artillery were positioned around the bridge. They were relieved the next day by the infantry and arrived back at Bethlehem in the early hours of 23 February.[91][92] The division left the AMR, with a subsection of machine guns and an artillery battery – under command of the 60th Division – behind in the Jordan Valley in a strong position where the road from Jerusalem falls into the valley.[93][94][95]

Amman raid

Further information: Amman raid

The division's next operation was a raid on the village of Amman, Template:Convert/spell east-north-east of Jericho. The division, with the ICCB under command, would carry out the raid supported by the 60th (London) Division.[96] Heavy rain delayed the raid for several days but by 20 March, the weather improved and the level of the flooded River Jordan dropped. On 22 March, the infantry forced a crossing of the river at a ford at Hajla. At 04:00 the next morning, the AMR crossed the river, turned north and attacked the rear of the Turkish troops defending the crossing at Ghoraniye. By midday, they had secured the crossing and captured four machine-guns and sixty-eight prisoners.[97]

New Zealand Mounted Rifles crossing the River Jordan

The rest of the division crossed the river during the night. The 1st Brigade, providing flank protection for 60th Division, was sent north to locate the track to Es Salt,[98] which is Template:Convert/spell north-east of Jericho but at an altitude 3,940 feet (1,200 m) higher.[99] The 2nd Brigade, leading the rest of the force, advanced to Amman in the east.[100] At 11:00, several hundred Turkish cavalry were sighted east of the 2nd Brigade. The GOC Ryrie and the 6th LHR attempted to cut them off but they escaped in the rugged terrain. At 15:00, the brigade regrouped and set out for the Hekr spring on the plain. Finding the tracks unsuitable for wheeled transport, the division's artillery and supply train had to remain behind. This caused a delay while essential stores were transferred to camels. The advance resumed at 21:30; at times the men had to dismount and lead their mounts along the tracks. At 02:00 on 25 March, heavy rain again began to fall.[101] The first troops reached Ain el Hekr at 04:00 and waited for the rest of the division to arrive, and at 19:30 the 2nd Brigade moved out again. Even on the plain progress was slow, the camels slipped in the rain and the wet conditions forced the horsemen to slow down to keep the force together. Just before dawn, the 7th LHR leading met up with the NZ Brigade, which had travelled independently via Shunet Nimrin. The NZ Brigade's route had been easier than that used by the main force, but was still not suitable for wheeled transport.[102] Chaytor, aware that his men had not rested for three days and nights, postponed the assault for twenty-four hours.[103] Soon after observing a Turkish convoy in the distance, the 5th LHR was ordered to attack. The convoy of nineteen lorries, three cars, one armoured car and several other vehicles was captured along with twelve prisoners. Another patrol from the 6th LHR captured sixty-one prisoners at Suweile.[102][nb 9]

On the night of 26 March, Chaytor decided to cut the railway lines north and south of Amman to prevent any escape or reinforcement by rail. The NZ Brigadedestroyed a section of rail Template:Convert/spell long to the south. The 2nd Brigade was confronted by Turkish cavalry and could not reach the northern rail line. Early on 27 March the division set out for Amman, supported by a four-gun lightweight mountain artillery battery from the ICCB.[104][nb 10] In Amman, the Turkish Army had 4,000 infantry in well-constructed defences dug in along the heights, looking down on the division. Supported by fifteen artillery pieces and machine-guns, the NZ Brigade to the right were to cross the Wadi Amman and assault the hills between Amman and the railway station. The 1st and 2nd Battalions, ICCB would assault Amman from the front while the 2nd Brigade to their left would circle around north and approach Amman from the rear. The NZ Brigade met with heavy machine-gun fire and were not in position to attack until 15:00. The 2nd Brigade dismounted just under Template:Convert/spell from Amman and approached on foot. Advancing through shell and machine-gun fire, the brigade reached within six hundred yards (550 m) of the village before they were forced to withdraw. It was the same with the camel battalions; in the face of heavy machine-gun fire they were also stopped. On the right, the NZ Brigade's attack also failed, and during the afternoon they observed a train arriving from the south, which a prisoner confirmed contained 300 reinforcements. During that night, the NZ Brigade had to defend against Turkish bayonet charges.[106][107]

The Imperial Camel Corps Brigade artillery battery that supported the division at Amman

While this was going on, at 15:00 the WMR and the 4th (ANZAC) Battalion ICCB were destroying Template:Convert/spell of railway line and several culverts to the south-east.[108] That night, the 5th LHR was sent Template:Convert/spell north of Amman to destroy a railway bridge. Amman was now cut off from reinforcements by rail but the previous day's fighting convinced Chaytor that his force was not strong enough to take Amman alone.[109] To their north the 1st Brigade and 60th (London) Division had captured Es Salt and were defending it against counter-attacks. The GOC 60th Division ordered the 181st (2/6th London) Brigade and two batteries of mountain guns to Amman, but they did not arrive until early on 28 March. Now reinforced, Chaytor decided to attack again. The assault began at 13:00 and was again defeated by heavy gunfire.[110][111] On 29 March, having repaired the railway track, a train of Turkish reinforcement arrived at Amman from the north. Chaytor was again ordered to take Amman and decided to try a night attack. At 02:00 on 30 March, the division attacked and had some early success, but by 10:00 it was clear the attack was a failure. Soon after 14:00, it was decided to call off the battle and return across the Jordan.[112]

The division's casualties, including the ICCB, were heavy – 128 dead, 551 wounded and fifty-five missing, which was 248 more than those of the much larger 60th Division.[113][nb 11] The division captured 615 prisoners, ten machine-guns, two field kitchens, twenty-six lorries, five cars, several horse-drawn wagons and the New Zealanders captured an aeroplane. During the battle, the division fired over 587,000 rounds of small arms ammunition (SAA).[115] The riflemen only carried 230 rounds of ammunition, while every Hotchkiss machine-gun had 3,100 ready rounds and the guns in the machine-gun squadrons 5,000 each.[116] At the time, the Division Train only carried 120,000 rounds of SAA per brigade, 84,000 rounds for the machine-guns and 12,000 rifle rounds per regiment.[117][nb 12]

Ghoraniye bridge-head

On 2 April, Chaytor was given command of the Jordan Valley defences,[115] consisting of the division, the ICCB, two batteries of 4.5-inch howitzers and two heavier 60-pounders. The 1st Brigade, with the 5th LHR attached, was established on the east bank of the Jordan. The ICCB, with the 6th LHR and 7th LHR attached, was strung out at Abu Tellul and along the Wadi Mellahah. Daily the defenders saw Turkish patrols but were not attacked, and the division spent their days digging trenches, stringing barbed wire and sitting machine-guns.[118] The NZ Brigade was further west on the plain between Jericho and the Jordan.[119]

The 5th Light Horse Regiment defending the Ghoraniye bridge-head

Then on 11 April the crossings at Ghoraniye and Musallabeh were attacked by a large Turkish force.[120] At Ghoraniye a patrol from the 2nd LHR discovered a Turkish unit of around 100 men, on the left bank of the Wadi Nimrin at 04:30. By dawn there were 1,000 infantrymen approaching, in waves about 600 yards (550 m) long, on both sides of the wadi.[121] They got to within 100 yards (91 m) of the barbed wire defences before the division's guns opened fire. By now the Turkish force was estimated at 2,000 men. At 13:00 Brigadier-General Charles Frederick Cox GOC 1st Brigade ordered the 1st LHR and 3rd LHR to ride out and encircle them. But their strength, in men and machine-guns, was such that the mounted troopers could not approach them. Sporadic firing continued all night but by 04:00 12 April the Turkish force had withdrawn.[122] Turkish casualties were fifty-one dead, 550 wounded and ninety unwounded prisoners. The brigade had seven dead and seventeen wounded.[123]

At Musallabeh to the north at 04:30 the crossing was subjected to a heavy artillery barrage, with infantry following close behind. At 05:00 the barrage lifted and the Turkish infantry attack the outnumbered ICCB, and attached light horse regiments. For the next three hours at close quarters a fire fight ensued, at times the Turkish soldiers were close enough that the Australians threw stones at them to save ammunition. At 08:00 the attack petered out, but the defenders were still subjected to sniper and artillery fire. They tried another attack in the afternoon but that again failed, and they withdrew leaving 170 dead behind. The ICCB and light horse casualties were eighteen dead and twenty-seven wounded.[124][nb 13]

Es Salt raid

Further information: Raid on Es Salt
German prisoners taken during the raid escorted by the ANZAC Mounted Division and the Imperial Service Cavalry Brigade.

On 18 April, the division crossed the Jordan to attack the Turkish troops at Shunet Nimrin and the nearby foot-hills. Their orders were "to inflict losses on the enemy and to convey the impression that we are about to advance again to Amman".[126] The brigades, supported by artillery and armoured cars, were confronted by strong Turkish defences and that night withdrew back across the river. The incursion was ordered by Allenby; the result was the Turkish sending reinforcements to the area and strengthening their defences.[126]

Two days later, Chaytor received orders for another raid across the Jordan on Shunet Nimrin and Es Salt.[127] This time, commanded by the Desert Mounted Corps,[125] the division would be joined by the 60th Division, the Australian Mounted Division, the ICCB, the Imperial Service Cavalry Brigade and the Imperial Service Infantry Brigade.[128] The division, less 2nd Brigade, was to support the 60th Division in a minor role.[129] The force crossed the River Jordan overnight on 29/30 April.[130] The division, now under command of 60th Division, set out for Shunet Nimrin. The infantry carried out several assaults but could not break the Turkish position. Major-General John Shea GOC 60th Division had intended to use the ANZAC brigades on his flanks, but they were prevented from getting forward by the terrain. All except a squadron from the 6th LHR were attached to the 179th (2/4th London) Brigade.[131]

Elsewhere, the force was involved in heavy fighting against strong Turkish defences; during a counter-attack it lost more than two batteries of artillery, which was captured by the advancing Turkish soldiers.[132] On 1 May, 60th Division was supposed to attack Shunet Nimrin again but failures elsewhere caused the assault to be cancelled. Instead, the Australian Mounted Division positioned itself to attack Shunet Nimrin from the rear. To assist them, the 1st Brigade was sent to cut off any retreat from there northwards. The Australian attack faltered, partly in response to Turkish successes in the west, and by 20:00 they were still stationary. Another assault by 60th Division at 02:00 on 2 May also failed; by now the British position was turning more to defence than attack. In the three days since crossing the Jordan, the force had been in an almost continuous fight and no supplies had come forward. On 3 May, yet another attack by 60th Division failed and the ANZAC Division covering the flanks were confronted by growing numbers of Turkish troops. At 16:00 on 3 May, with an acceptance of the need to save his command, Chauvel ordered a withdrawal back over the Jordan.[133] The last unit to cross back across the Jordan was the NZ Brigade, leaving the AMR and the WMR as the east bank guard force.[134]

The operation failed in its objectives, only resulting in the capture of 1,000 prisoners. Casualties for the two Australian divisions were comparability light at fifty dead and 310 wounded, and the 60th Division had 1,116 casualties.[135]

Jordan Valley

New Zealand Brigade patrol in the Jordan Valley.

In normal times, no one lived in the Jordan Valley during the warmer months of the year; the residents of Jericho left the village for the cooler hills. The residents said it was impossible for Europeans to live there after April.[134] To prevent the Turkish Army from re-occupying the valley, Allenby had to keep a defence force in place.[136] To that end, the division was given the southern sector, which included Ghoraniye and the Dead Sea, to defend. The division was reinforced by the Imperial Service Cavalry Brigade and the 181st (2/6th London) Brigade.[137] The infantry were positioned east of the Jordan, defending the Ghoraniye bridge-head.[138] There was little daylight activity during this time and patrols would normally be sent out at night. Often before returning in the morning, they encountered Turkish cavalry trying to reach the Jordan to water their horses. To relieve the monotony brigades were sent, in turn, to rest at Bethlehem and were given leave in Jerusalem.[139] During this time, the division conducted training camps for non-commissioned officers, Hotchkiss machine-gunners and signallers, and all ranks took part in general military training.[140] However, the troops left in the valley were being decimated with "malaria and other diseases".[141]

In June, the 1st Brigade had just finished their rest period at Bethlehem and replaced the 4th Light Horse Brigade at the Musallabeh sector. The brigade deployed with two regiments forward and one in reserve at the Wadi el Auja.[142] By early July, they had 3rd LHR on the left, 2nd LHR on the right and the 1st LHR in reserve. Because of illness and a lack of replacements, the 3rd LHR had only 210 men available and the other regiments were in a similar condition. Since they arrived, the brigade had been subjected to Turkish shelling. Activity then increased to such an extent that a Turkish attack was expected at any time.[143] In preparation, extra water and ammunition – enough for two days – was cached in the defence posts.[143] On 13 April, Turkish artillery fire on the brigades' positions increased and that night, movement could be head at the barbed wire defence line. At 01:00 on 14 April, the forward troops reported that the enemy appeared to be massing, and later a "strong body of troops" about 1,000 yards (910 m) to their front. Lieutenant-Colonel George John Bell, commanding 3rd LHR asked for a protective artillery barrage in front of his position. The Turkish responded with shelling of their own, which lifted at 02:30. In the quiet, the regiment heard some commands shouted in German. Then the Turkish artillery laid down another one-hour barrage. When that lifted, around 1,000 troops attacked the brigade's forward defences in what became known as the battle of Abu Tellul. In the 2nd LHR sector, some forward posts were withdrawn to safer areas. Regimental headquarters was overrun and other positions surrounded. Other troops were overrun but regained their posts by counter-attacking. Further west, a position held by the regimental adjutant, a signals officer, grooms, batmen and signallers, was all that remained between the attacking Germans and the division's artillery batteries. Troops were then withdrawn to a trench line below a crest so the attacking Germans coming over the skyline were easily targeted and the brigade held off the attack for the next hour.[144]

Riflemen form the 3rd Light Horse Regiment

Chaytor, informed of the attack, sent a squadron from the 4th Brigade – which was still close by – to reinforce the position. Cox, commanding 1st Brigade, ordered the 1st LHR – his only reserve – to counter-attack the Germans. At 03:30, one squadron and four machine-guns were sent to reinforce the position at Abu Tellul. At dawn on 14 April, it became clear that the main German assault was centred on Abu Tellul, so two more squadrons were sent to assist them. The reinforcements assembled below the crest, fixed bayonets and counter-attacked the Germans, whom taken by surprise, broke and withdrew to their own trenches. The position at Abu Tellul was now secure but on the other flank in the west, the German attack was progressing. At 08:00, the last reserve squadron counter-attacked there, forcing the Germans back and capturing 100 prisoners. By 09:00, the brigade was back in control of its previous positions and the NZ Brigade moved to sweep clear 1,000 yards (910 m) to their front. The battle cost the Germans 105 dead, and 358 prisoners; another sixty-seven Turkish prisoners were captured. One group of 100 captured German Stormtroopers were armed with forty-two automatic rifles – the German equivalent of the Hotchkiss – almost one between every two men. The brigade casualties were twenty-three dead and forty-six wounded. Ammunition expended by the brigade was 19,000 rifle rounds, 20,000 Hotchkiss and 30,000 machine gun rounds.[145][146]

Chaytor's Force

In September 1918, British intelligence reported that the Turkish Fourth Army, comprising 6,000 infantrymen and 2,000 cavalry with 74 artillery pieces, was east of the Jordan confronting the division.[147] Further south at Ma'an was the 4–6,000-man II Corps.[148] However Allenby planned that the next offensive would take place on the coastal Sharon plain.[149] To accomplish that, the EEF had to realign to the left flank[150] and convince the opposition that the main attack would take place in the Jordan Valley.[151] To allow this to happen, the division remained in the valley as the main component of Chaytor's Force – the division reinforced by 20th (Imperial Service) Infantry Brigade, 38th and 39th Battalions, Royal Fusiliers and 1st and 2nd Battalions, British West Indies Regiment and support troops.[nb 14] Chaytor's Force was responsible for the deception plan.[153] While the EEF moved west, the force built new and larger camps and 15,000 dummy horses. At the same time, the infantry battalions marched around the valley, giving the illusion of a much larger force,[154] and constructed false bridges across the Jordan.[150] Part of Chaytor's orders were to conduct patrols east of the Jordan; if there was evidence of a Turkish withdrawal, they were to head east and north to seize Amman and the Damieh bridge to block the Fourth Army's retreat.[155]

Galloping New Zealand troops in the Jordan Valley

The force was divided to cover the Jordan Valley. The 2nd and 20th (Imperial Service) Brigades held a line between the Dead Sea along the Jordan to the Auja bridgehead. The NZ Brigade and the other four infantry battalions held the line from Auja to Mellahah and Ahu Tellul, while the 1st Brigade was in reserve at Jericho.[156][157] Over the nights of 17–19 September, the divisions' patrols crossed east of the river and were involved in several fire fights with the defenders.[158] During daylight on 19 September, the two West Indian battalions carried out bayonet charges and captured Turkish positions. An attempt by the Royal Fusiliers failed to gain any ground. Throughout the next day, the Turkish defenders fought hard against any attack. On 21 September, the AMR advanced to the north and east towards the Damieh bridge and Mafid Jozele, forcing the Turkish troops to withdraw to their reserve line.[159] On 22 September at 03:30, on the left the NZ Brigade and West Indies battalions had reached the Nablus–Damieh road and reached the Mazar mound an hour later. They next captured El Makhruk along with a large supply dump, seventy vehicles and 724 prisoners – one of which was the GOC of the Turkish 53rd Division. Before daylight, they captured the bridge at Damieh with a dismounted attack during which one of the West Indies companies charged with them.[160][161] The Fourth Army, leaving small rear guards behind, now started to withdraw from the east bank towards Amman, pursued by the 1st Brigade, a West Indian battalion and the Royal Fusiliers battalions. They became involved in several small fights as they tried to turn the Turkish to their front, back towards the river.[162] That night, Chaytor issued orders for a general advance the next day. In the south, the 2nd Brigade's objectives were Kabr Mujahid and the Rame mound. The 20th (Imperial Service) Brigade, the Royal Fusiliers battalions and a light horse squadron would take Shunet Ninirin. The 1st Brigade would capture a crossing on the Jordan at Mafid Jozele, forcing the defenders back into the hills. The NZ Brigade were to gallop to Es Salt followed by the West Indies battalions on foot. The division's artillery, supply train and all wheeled vehicles would travel along the track from Shunet Nimrin to Es Salt.[163]

Chaytor's Force advanced on 23 September; by 04:30, 2nd Brigade had taken their first objective and continued towards Tel er Rame. Before night they had climbed out of the foot hills and onto the plain. The 1st Brigade forced their crossing and were en route to Es Salt. The 20th Brigade captured Shunet Nimrin and also headed towards Es Salt. The only opposition was in the north, where the NZ Brigade were temporarily stopped by a machine-gun post, but by 19:00 they had captured Es Salt along with 312 prisoners, two machine-guns and three artillery pieces.[164] The 1st and NZ Brigades' now advanced on Suweile. The 2nd Brigade had problems negotiating hill tracks – some of which had been blown in front of them – but reached Ain es Sir at midday. By now, except for one battalion of fusiliers, Chaytor's Force was on the plain around Es Salt, advancing on Amman.[165]

To close the trap on the Fourth Army, the AMR sent a squadron overnight on 25 September to destroy the railway line north of Amman.[166] The rest of the division set out at 06:00 for Amman with the 2nd and NZ Brigades leading and the 1st Brigade in reserve.[167] Chaytor, being well aware of the terrain, ordered the division to move slowly and to wait for infantry support before attacking if they encountered a strong position.[165] The NZ Brigade encountered around 200 men and artillery on a ridge position north-west of Amman. The 2nd Brigade moving along the Ain es Sir-Amman road were slowed down by several machine-gun posts, which they over-ran and captured 130 prisoners, three artillery pieces, and four machine-guns.[168] At 11:00, a British aircraft dropped a note for Chaytor reporting that the defenders were leaving their trenches. Chaytor ordered a mounted charge by the CMR, but they were stopped by the terrain and machine-gun fire. For the next two hours, the brigades gradually fought their way closer to Amman.[169] The break through came when the 7th LHR reached within eighty yards (73 m) of the Turkish trenches; they fixed bayonets and charged, capturing 113 prisoners and seven machine-guns. The NZ Brigade from the north-west had advanced close enough, so that when they crossed the Wadi Amman they charged and captured the old citadel and the Amman rail station. Within Amman, the division captured 2,360 prisoners, six artillery pieces and several machine-guns.[170]

Some of the prisoners taken by the 2nd Light Horse Brigade during September 1918

About 120 miles (190 km) to the south, the Turkish II Corps – around 5–6,000 strong – were defending Ma'an from the Arab forces. To hinder their retreat north, the 2nd Brigade was sent to cut the railway line to the south of Amman and the 1st Brigade was sent to capture Wadi el Hammam and its water supplies. The rest of the force prepared a defence line between Shunet Nimrin, Es Salt, and Suweile.[170] On 26 September, 3 LHR captured 100 pro-Turkish Arabs, then reached Ez Zerka where they discovered ninety-five sick or wounded Turkish soldiers and an artillery piece. The next day, the 1st Brigade outflanked Wadi el Hammam and captured 453 prisoners and three machine-guns, and also closed the eastern road north from Ma'an. The next day, 2nd Brigade moved south along the railway line and reached Leban, where a prisoner disclosed that the 6,000-man Ma'am garrison was about Template:Convert/spell to the south. Early on 28 September, the garrison's men were located to the south of Kastal by British aircraft, digging trenches. The 5th LHR was sent to reconnoitre the position, which was surrounded by the Beni Sakhr tribe who were harassing the defenders, galloping around the trenches and firing their guns in the air. Lieutenant-Colonel Donald Charles Cameron commanding 5th LHR approached the Turkish commander about their surrender; The Turkish commander was in agreement but disinclined to relinquish their weapons with the Arab force present.[171][172] When Chaytor was informed of their predicament, he ordered the remainder of the 2nd Brigade south to assist. When Cameron reported to Ryrie – who was commanding the 2nd Brigade – that the situation was becoming critical, he ordered the brigade to gallop, leaving their slower pack horses behind. The brigade arrived just before nightfall,[173] by which time the Turkish had opened fire on the Arabs. Ryrie conferred with the Arab chiefs, who wanted to make a joint assault on the position. Instead, fearing the Arabs' intention if the Turkish surrendered, Ryrie camped inside the Turkish position for the night.[174] The next morning at 08:00, the NZ Brigade arrived and a Turkish force, thirteen artillery pieces, thirty machine-guns, a train with three steam engines and 5,000 men went into captivity. In the nine days since operations started, Chaytor's Force had taken 10,300 prisoners and captured fifty-seven artillery pieces, 132 machine-guns, eleven railway engines and 106 lorries. His casualties were twenty-seven dead, 105 wounded and seven men missing.[175][nb 15]

Disbandment

Parade by the 2nd Light Horse Regiment Brisbane Australia 1919

The next month, the EEF in the west advanced into Syria, where it captured Damascus and then Aleppo.[178] At the end of October, the Armistice of Mudros was agreed between the British and Ottoman Empires.[179] During this time, the division was withdrawn back to Jerusalem and then Richon.[180] At the end of hostilities, sickness caught up with the men and there were 900 "stretcher cases" laid up and several men died of disease.[181] Two regiments, the 7th LHR and the CMR. were selected to be part of the force – commanded by the 28th Division – that occupied the Dardanelles and Constantinople, landing on the Dardanelles peninsula on 5 December.[182][183] In December 1918, Ryrie GOC 2nd Brigade, as a brigadier-general, assumed command of the division.[24] In early 1919, while the division was based around Rafa preparing to return home, a revolt broke out in Egypt. The 1st LHR and 2nd LHR had already sailed for Australia in March,[184] and rest of the division had returned most of their equipment to the stores and were waiting for transport ships to return them home. There were no battles during the revolt, but the division was deployed to counter rioting. Within a month the revolt was over and the embarkation of the division resumed. The 3rd LHR left in May, the NZ Brigade had left by July and the rest of the division had followed by the end of that summer.[184][185][186] The ANZAC Mounted Division officially ceased to exist on 30 June 1919.[187]

Immediately after the war ended, the division's horses were taken to the Imperial Remount Depot at Moascar in Egypt. The riding horses were eventually reissued, when required, to units of the British Empire. The heavier pack and draught horses were now redundant, so these were shipped to France and sold.[188]

Battles

1916
1917
1918

References

Footnotes
  1. ^ At the time of the First World War, the modern Turkish state did not exist; it was part of the Ottoman Empire. While the terms have distinct historical meanings, within many English-language sources the term "Turkey" and "Ottoman Empire" are used synonymously, although many academic sources differ in their approaches.[1] The sources used in this article predominately use the term "Turkey".
  2. ^ Powles gives the New Zealand regiments as twenty-four officers and 499 other ranks.[12]
  3. ^ These were replaced by 13 pounders before the Battle of Beersheba.[16]
  4. ^ The basic organic unit of the Royal Artillery was, and is, the battery.[17] An artillery brigade was the basic tactical unit of the British artillery during the First World War and was usually commanded by a Lieutenant-Colonel.[18]
  5. ^ New Zealand History gives the number as 16,000.[33]
  6. ^ New Zealand History gives the number as twenty-two dead.[40]
  7. ^ This battle was the first one after the issue of Hotchkiss Machine-guns to the regiments.[54]
  8. ^ The next lowest numbers of casualties was 345 for the Imperial Camel Corps Brigade. The highest being 2,971 for the 54th (East Anglian) Division.[54]
  9. ^ Powles claims there were nineteen lorries and one car abandoned by the Es Salt garrison fleeing from 60th Division.[103]
  10. ^ Mountain artillery guns had a high angle of fire and were light, easily dismantled, to be carried by man or animal.[105]
  11. ^ Preston gives the casualty total for the whole operation as 1,600 dead, wounded and missing.[114]
  12. ^ Prior to the second battle of Gaza the train carried 250,000 rounds of small arms ammunition per brigade, which was considered a "ridiculous over-large amount".[117]
  13. ^ Powles gives the division's casualties as twenty-six killed and sixty-five wounded, and at a "rough estimate" 2,500 for the Turkish.[125]
  14. ^ Also included was a transport echelon of 300 donkeys, seventeen tractors, thirty-four trucks, five ammunition lorries and fourteen supply lorries.[152]
  15. ^ Preston claims 11,000 prisoners,[176] while Powles' figures are slightly different, listing 10,332 prisoners, 57 artillery pieces, 132 large machine-guns, fifteen smaller machine-guns, eleven railway engines, 106 railway trucks and carriages, and 142 vehicles of all descriptions.[177]
Citations
  1. ^ Fewster, Basarin, Basarin pp.xi–xii
  2. ^ Falls 1930 Vol. 1 p. 156
  3. ^ Bou, p.150
  4. ^ "WWI, Sinai, Palestine and Syria". Australian Army. Retrieved 28 October 2013.
  5. ^ "Official History of Australia in the War of 1914–1918; Volume VII – The Australian Imperial Force in Sinai and Palestine, 1914–1918 (10th edition, 1941) Contents page". Australian War Memorial. Retrieved 29 October 2013.
  6. ^ "The New Zealanders in Sinai and Palestine". Victoria University of Wellington Library. Retrieved 24 November 2013.
  7. ^ "1st Light Horse Regiment". Austrailian War Memorial. Retrieved 29 October 2013.
  8. ^ "5th Light Horse Regiment". Australian War Memorial. Retrieved 29 October 2013.
  9. ^ "1st Light Horse Brigade". Australian War Memorial. Retrieved 14 October 2013.
  10. ^ "2nd Light Horse Brigade". Australian War Memorial. Retrieved 14 October 2013.
  11. ^ Gullett, p.54
  12. ^ a b Powles, p.5
  13. ^ a b Gullett, p.57
  14. ^ Badsey, p.250
  15. ^ a b Powles, p.12
  16. ^ Powles, p.170
  17. ^ "The Royal Artillery". Ministry of Defence (United Kingdom). Retrieved 25 May 2013.
  18. ^ Baker, Chris. "What was an artillery brigade?". The Long, Long Trail. Retrieved 25 May 2013.
  19. ^ a b Gullett, p.68
  20. ^ Perry, pp.51–52
  21. ^ Preston, p.331
  22. ^ Gullett, p.59
  23. ^ Dolev, p.206
  24. ^ a b "Major General the Honourable Sir Granville Ryrie". Australian War Memorial. Retrieved 21 October 2013.
  25. ^ Wilson, Chapter Two (no page numbers)
  26. ^ Gullett, p.71
  27. ^ Gullett, p.72
  28. ^ Gullett, p.89
  29. ^ Powles, p.14
  30. ^ a b Gullett, p.91
  31. ^ Gullett, p.120
  32. ^ Gullett, p.141
  33. ^ "Battle of Romani, Sinai Campaign". New Zealand History. Retrieved 14 October 2013.
  34. ^ Gullett, p.159
  35. ^ "Battle of Romani". The Long Long Trail. Retrieved 27 October 2013.
  36. ^ Gullett, pp.197–199
  37. ^ Gullett, pp.206, 209
  38. ^ Gullett, p.214
  39. ^ Gullett, pp.216–227
  40. ^ "Battle of Magdhaba". New Zealand History. Retrieved 14 October 2013.
  41. ^ Gullett, p.230
  42. ^ Gullett, pp.231–243
  43. ^ Perry, p.51
  44. ^ Gullett, pp.263–265
  45. ^ Powles, p.87
  46. ^ Gullett, pp.266–269
  47. ^ Gullett, pp.271–282
  48. ^ Powles, p.94
  49. ^ Gullett, p.284
  50. ^ Gullett, p.286
  51. ^ Gullett, p.289
  52. ^ Gullett, p.298
  53. ^ Gullett, p.301
  54. ^ a b Gullett, p.325
  55. ^ Gullett, p.303
  56. ^ Gullett, pp.304–316
  57. ^ Gullett, pp.328–329
  58. ^ Gullett, pp.330–334
  59. ^ Powles, p.105
  60. ^ Gullett, p.335
  61. ^ Powles, p.109
  62. ^ Gullett, p.344
  63. ^ Gullett, pp.351–352
  64. ^ Gullett, pp.373–378
  65. ^ Gullett, pp.389–391
  66. ^ Falls 1930 Vol. 2 p. 55
  67. ^ Gullett, p.392
  68. ^ Preston, p.30
  69. ^ Gullett, pp. 408–9, 412
  70. ^ Gullett, pp.415–418
  71. ^ Gullett, pp.437–438
  72. ^ Gullett, pp.439–441
  73. ^ Powles, p.145
  74. ^ Gullett, pp.449–453
  75. ^ Gullett, p.457
  76. ^ Gullett, pp.456–457
  77. ^ Gullett, pp.466–467
  78. ^ Gullett, pp.467–471
  79. ^ Gullett, pp.474–475
  80. ^ Gullett, pp.476–477
  81. ^ Gullett, pp.480–481
  82. ^ Gullett, pp.481–482
  83. ^ Powles, p.161
  84. ^ Gullett, p.497
  85. ^ Powles, p.162
  86. ^ Gullett, p.498
  87. ^ Powles, p.166
  88. ^ Gullett, pp.499–503
  89. ^ Gullett, p.526
  90. ^ Powles, p.176
  91. ^ Gullett, pp.538–541
  92. ^ Powles, p.185
  93. ^ Falls 1930 Vol. 2 p. 309
  94. ^ Moore 1921, p. 103
  95. ^ Powles 1922 p. 184
  96. ^ Powles, p.191
  97. ^ Gullett, pp.552–554
  98. ^ Gullett, p.556
  99. ^ Powles, p.193
  100. ^ Gullett, pp.556–558
  101. ^ Gullett, pp.559–560
  102. ^ a b Gullett, pp.560–563
  103. ^ a b Powles, p.199
  104. ^ Gullett, p.563
  105. ^ Bailey, p.113
  106. ^ Gullett, pp.564–566
  107. ^ Powles, pp.200–201
  108. ^ Powles, p.202
  109. ^ Gullett, p.567
  110. ^ Powles, p.203
  111. ^ Gullett, pp.568–570
  112. ^ Gullett, pp.573–577
  113. ^ Gullett, p.584
  114. ^ Preston, p.151
  115. ^ a b Powles, p.216
  116. ^ Gullett, p.505
  117. ^ a b Preston, p.328
  118. ^ Gullett, p.586
  119. ^ Powles, p.217
  120. ^ Powles, p.218
  121. ^ Gullett, p.588
  122. ^ Gullett, p.590
  123. ^ Gullett, p.591
  124. ^ Gullett, pp.591–592
  125. ^ a b Powles, p.220
  126. ^ a b Gullett, p.596
  127. ^ Gullett, p.599
  128. ^ Preston, pp.154–155
  129. ^ Gullett, pp.601–602
  130. ^ Preston, p.157
  131. ^ Gullett, pp.608–609
  132. ^ Gullett, pp.621–622
  133. ^ Gullett, pp.624–630
  134. ^ a b Powles, p.222
  135. ^ Gullett, p.634
  136. ^ Gullett, p.638
  137. ^ Gullett, p.639
  138. ^ Gullett, p.640
  139. ^ Gullett, pp.646–647
  140. ^ Gullett, p.622
  141. ^ Gullett, p.655
  142. ^ Gullett, p.662
  143. ^ a b Gullett, p.663
  144. ^ Gullett, pp.665–667
  145. ^ Gullett, pp.667–669
  146. ^ Powles, pp.231–232
  147. ^ Gullett, p.681
  148. ^ Preston, p.241
  149. ^ Gullett, p.683
  150. ^ a b Powles, p.234
  151. ^ Gullett, p.685
  152. ^ Perrett, p.36
  153. ^ General Edmund Allenby (4 February 1922). "Supplement to the London Gazette, 4 February 1920" (PDF). London Gazette. Retrieved 29 August 2012.
  154. ^ Gullett, p.686
  155. ^ Gullett, p.690
  156. ^ Powles, p.235
  157. ^ Gullett, pp.713–714
  158. ^ Gullett, p.714
  159. ^ Gullett, pp.715–716
  160. ^ Powles, p.247
  161. ^ Gullett, pp.716–717
  162. ^ Gullett, p.717
  163. ^ Gullett, p.718
  164. ^ Gullett, pp.718–719
  165. ^ a b Gullett, p.719
  166. ^ Powles, p.249
  167. ^ Powles, p.250
  168. ^ Gullett, pp.720–721
  169. ^ Gullett, p.721
  170. ^ a b Gullett, p.723
  171. ^ Powles, pp.254–255
  172. ^ Gullett, pp.724–725
  173. ^ Gullett, pp.725–726
  174. ^ Gullett, p.726
  175. ^ Gullett, p.727
  176. ^ Preston, p.245
  177. ^ Powles, p.257
  178. ^ Gullett, p.776
  179. ^ Gullett, p.779
  180. ^ Gullett, p.780
  181. ^ Gullett, p.781
  182. ^ Gulllett, p.786
  183. ^ Powles, p.263
  184. ^ a b Gullett, p.792
  185. ^ Gullett, p.793
  186. ^ Powles, p.284
  187. ^ "General Staff, Headquarters ANZAC Mounted Division, •AWM4, 1/60/40 – June 1919". Australian War Memorial. Retrieved 23 October 2013.
  188. ^ "They shot the horses – didn't they?". Australian War Memorial. Retrieved 22 October 2013.
Bibliography
Wikimedia Commons has media related to ANZAC Mounted Division.
  • Badsey, Stephen (2008). Doctrine and Reform in the British Cavalry 1880–1918. Birmingham Studies in First World War History. Birmingham: Ashgate Publishing. ISBN 0-7546-6467-8.
  • Bailey, Jonathan B A (2004). Field Artillery and Firepower. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-59114-029-3.
  • Bou, Jean (2009). Light Horse: A History of Australia's Mounted Arm. Australian Army History Series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-19708-2.
  • Dolev, Eran (2007). Allenby's Military Medicine, Life and Death World War I Palestine. Vol. Volume 6 of International Library of Colonial History. London: I.B.Tauris. ISBN 1-84511-290-3. {{cite book}}: |volume= has extra text (help)
  • Fewster, Kevin; Basarin, Vecihi; Basarin, Hatice Hurmuz (2003). Gallipoli: The Turkish Story. Crows Nest, New South Wales: Allen and Unwin. ISBN 1-74114-045-5.
  • Gullett, Henry Somer (1923). The Australian Imperial Force in Sinai and Palestine, 1914–1918. Official History of Australia in the War of 1914–1918. Vol. Volume VII. Sydney: Angus and Robertson. OCLC 59863829. {{cite book}}: |volume= has extra text (help)
  • Perrett, Bryan (1999). Megiddo 1918: The Last Great Cavalry Victory. Oxford: Osprey Publishing. ISBN 978-1-85532-827-3.
  • Perry, F.W. (1992). Order of Battle of Divisions Part 5A. The Divisions of Australia, Canada and New Zealand and Those in East Africa. Newport: Ray Westlake Military Books. ISBN 1-871167-25-6.
  • Powles, C. Guy (1922). The New Zealanders in Sinai and Palestine. Official History New Zealand's Effort in the Great War. Vol. Volume III. Auckland: Whitcombe & Tombs. OCLC 2959465. {{cite book}}: |volume= has extra text (help); Unknown parameter |coauthor= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  • Preston, Richard (1921). The Desert Mounted Corps: An Account of the Cavalry Operations in Palestine and Syria, 1917–1918. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. ISBN 978-1-84734-755-8.
  • Wilson, Graham (2012). Bully Beef and Balderdash, Australian Army History Collection. Big Sky Publishing Series. Newport, New South Wales: Big Sky Publishing. ISBN 1-921941-56-1.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ANZAC_Mounted_Division&oldid=587675935"