Category:B-Class Indigenous peoples of North America articles
Administrators: Please do not delete this category as empty! This category may be empty occasionally or even most of the time. |
FA | A | GA | B | C | Start | Stub | FL | List | Category | NA | ??? |
31 | 1 | 132 | 695 | 2,468 | 6,081 | 4,118 | 1 | 233 | 3,524 | 1,043 | 266 |
- Parent WikiProject: Wikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America,
This page categorizes pages using assessment grades, through built-in transclusion from {{NorthAmNative}}.
Information on Grading Scheme
Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
FA | The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.[under discussion] | Cleopatra (as of June 2018) |
FL | The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. | List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
A | The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
GA | The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019) |
B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Psychology (as of January 2024) |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Wing (as of June 2018) |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Ball (as of September 2014) |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014) |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of literary movements |
Note: We have non standard grades (as well as those listed above) for merge, delete, AfD etc., see Codes and meanings.
For a list of articles so classified, see: quality log and quality statistics.
Pages in category "B-Class Indigenous peoples of North America articles"
The following 200 pages are in this category, out of approximately 695 total. This list may not reflect recent changes.
(previous page) (next page)O
- Talk:Occupation of Alcatraz
- Talk:Benjamin O'Fallon
- Talk:Ojibwe
- Talk:Ojibwe language
- Talk:Ojibwe phonology
- Talk:Ojibwe religion
- Talk:Ojibwe writing systems
- Talk:Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta
- Talk:Old Owl
- Talk:Earl Old Person
- Talk:Old Stone Fort (Tennessee)
- Talk:Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe
- Talk:Olympia, Washington
- Talk:Ontario Minamata disease
- Talk:Oorang Indians
- Talk:Oregon boundary dispute
- Talk:Oregon Treaty
- Talk:Oto-Manguean languages
- Talk:Owl Woman
P
- Talk:Painted Bluff
- Talk:Paleo-Indians
- Talk:Pamunkey
- Talk:Panton, Leslie & Company
- Talk:Cynthia Ann Parker
- Talk:Deborah Parker
- Talk:Ely S. Parker
- Talk:Parkin Archeological State Park
- Talk:Rosa Parks
- Talk:Pastia people
- Talk:Pawnee people
- Talk:Ali Peek
- Talk:Pemmican War
- Talk:Peopling of the Americas
- Talk:Pequot War
- Talk:Petroform
- Talk:Peyote
- Talk:Joan Phillip
- Talk:Susan La Flesche Picotte
- Talk:Pidgin Delaware
- Talk:Bemus Pierce
- Talk:Lori Piestewa
- Talk:Pinson Mounds
- Talk:Piomingo
- Talk:Pisquetomen
- Talk:Peter Pitchlynn
- Talk:Plains and Sierra Miwok
- Talk:Rachel Plummer
- Talk:Pocahontas
- Talk:Margaret Poisal
- Talk:Margaret Pokiak-Fenton
- Talk:Pomo
- Talk:Pontiac (Odawa leader)
- Talk:Annie Pootoogook
- Talk:Population history of the Indigenous peoples of the Americas
- Talk:Potomac Creek, 44ST2
- Talk:John Wesley Powell
- Talk:Powhatan
- Talk:Powhatan (Native American leader)
- Talk:Powwow
- Talk:Praying Indians of Natick
- Talk:Prehistoric agriculture in the Southwestern United States
- Talk:Prehistoric agriculture on the Great Plains
- Talk:Prehistory of Ohio
- Talk:Prehistory of West Virginia
- Talk:Pretendian
- Talk:Carey Price
- Talk:Protohistory of West Virginia
- Talk:Amache Prowers
- Talk:Pueblo II Period
- Talk:Pueblo III Period
- Talk:Pueblo pottery
- Talk:Pulque
R
- Talk:Racism against Native Americans in the United States
- Talk:Raid on Godfrey Ranch
- Talk:Rama language
- Talk:Ravens in Native American mythology
- Talk:Reconstruction Treaties
- Talk:Sarah Rector
- Talk:Red Cloud
- Talk:James Allen Red Dog
- Talk:Red Horn
- Talk:Wendy Red Star
- Talk:REDress Project
- Talk:Bill Reid
- Talk:Religious views on smoking
- Talk:Republic of Lakotah proposal
- Talk:Reservation poverty
- Talk:Robbie Robertson
- Talk:Alexander Robinson (chief)
- Talk:Rockaway Quarry
- Talk:Will Rogers
- Talk:Rome, Georgia
- Talk:Wendy Rose
- Talk:John Ross (Cherokee chief)
- Talk:Mary Jane Ross
- Talk:Round Valley Settler Massacres of 1856–1859
- Talk:Royal Proclamation of 1763
- Talk:Russell Cave National Monument
S
- Talk:Juan Sabeata
- Talk:Sacagawea
- Talk:Bernardino de Sahagún
- Talk:Saint Joseph's Mission (Williams Lake)
- Talk:Buffy Sainte-Marie
- Talk:Kelvin Sampson
- Talk:Sand Creek massacre
- Talk:Sandia Pueblo
- Talk:Edward Sapir
- Talk:Sassoonan
- Talk:Saucunk
- Talk:Savage Conversations
- Talk:Henry Schoolcraft
- Talk:Second Seminole War
- Talk:Kathryn Dyakanoff Seller
- Talk:Seminole
- Talk:Seminole burning
- Talk:Seminole Tribe of Florida
- Talk:Serpent Mound
- Talk:Seuvarits Utes
- Talk:Shamokin (village)
- Talk:Shannopin's Town
- Talk:Sharp v. Murphy
- Talk:Shasta Dam
- Talk:Shawnee
- Talk:Shawsheen
- Talk:Shiprock
- Talk:Siege of Detroit
- Talk:Siege of Pueblo de Taos
- Talk:Sinews of Survival
- Talk:Sinixt
- Talk:Sioux
- Talk:Sisters in Spirit
- Talk:Slavery in New France
- Talk:Slavery in the United States
- Talk:Jaune Quick-to-See Smith
- Talk:Snana
- Talk:Murder of Shirley Soosay
- Talk:Soul food
- Talk:Southern Athabaskan languages
- Talk:Spanish peace treaties with the Comanche
- Talk:Spider Grandmother
- Talk:Spirit Lake Massacre
- Talk:Sports teams named Redskins
- Talk:Ernest Spybuck
- Talk:Squamish culture
- Talk:Squamish people
- Talk:St. Lawrence Iroquoians
- Talk:Standing Bear
- Talk:Status of First Nations treaties in British Columbia
- Talk:Stereotypes of Indigenous peoples of Canada and the United States
- Talk:Stó꞉lō
- Talk:Stop Line 3 protests
- Talk:Nipo Strongheart
- Talk:Sts'Ailes people
- Talk:Sullivan Expedition
- Talk:Sun Dance
- Talk:Madonna Swan
- Talk:Sweet Grass (Cree chief)
- Talk:Roxanne Swentzell
T
- Talk:Tahquitz (spirit)
- Talk:Taíno
- Talk:Tallassee (Cherokee town)
- Talk:Maria Tallchief
- Talk:John and Elizabeth Tallman
- Talk:Tamaqua (Lenape chief)
- Talk:Tanana Athabaskans
- Talk:Tanasi
- Talk:Tecumseh's War
- Talk:Kateri Tekakwitha
- Talk:Tellico Blockhouse
- Talk:Tenskwatawa
- Talk:Texas–Indian wars
- Talk:The Pawnee capture of the Cheyenne Sacred Arrows
- Talk:The Round House (novel)
- Talk:Florence Owens Thompson
- Talk:William Clyde Thompson
- Talk:Timucua language
- Talk:Tohono Oʼodham
- Talk:Tohono Oʼodham Nation
- Talk:Tomotley
- Talk:Tongva
- Talk:Taqulittuq
- Talk:Toqua (Tennessee)
- Talk:Totem pole
- Talk:Totonac
- Talk:Touch the Clouds
- Talk:Tracks (novel)
- Talk:Trail of Tears
- Talk:Treaty of Bosque Redondo
- Talk:Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek
- Talk:Treaty of Old Crossing
- Talk:Treaty of Point Elliott
- Talk:Treaty of Pontotoc Creek
- Talk:Tribal-state compact
- Talk:Trinchera Cave Archeological District
- Talk:Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada
- Talk:Tunica people