Judicial review: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

24 February 2024

28 December 2023

20 December 2023

9 November 2023

11 October 2023

10 October 2023

28 September 2023

18 September 2023

5 July 2023

19 March 2023

13 March 2023

9 March 2023

8 March 2023

6 February 2023

26 January 2023

8 January 2023

16 December 2022

7 December 2022

19 August 2022

11 July 2022

1 July 2022

27 June 2022

24 June 2022

14 June 2022

25 May 2022

8 May 2022

6 May 2022

21 January 2022

14 January 2022

13 January 2022

29 December 2021

  • curprev 17:5717:57, 29 December 2021Talpedia talk contribs 32,476 bytes +560 →‎top: Add a discussuion of "natural law" / procedural fairness and ultra vires. The source I use for this kinda sucks for comparative law. I found this book Delaney and Dixon 978 1 78811 059 4 that might make a better source for a bunch of this. undo Tag: Visual edit
  • curprev 17:3217:32, 29 December 2021Talpedia talk contribs 31,916 bytes +295 →‎top: in UK laws a whole bunch of judicial review is to do with controlling the actions of fairly autonomous organs of the states (e.g. immigration authorities, tax authorities, organizations that decide what should and should not be investigated by the police). These are often referred to as administrative functions (and the acts of the judiciary to control such functions as administrative law). I think things might be different in the states. undo Tag: Visual edit

23 December 2021

22 November 2021

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)