Talk:Bangladesh: Difference between revisions
Manipulateus (talk | contribs) |
Manipulateus (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 114: | Line 114: | ||
:::::::I request both of you to stop directly editing for the moment. Let us deescalate the situation. Can you guys tell what are you trying to achieve? May be other can lend a hand too. [[User:Aditya Kabir|<span style="font-family: Kristen ITC; color: deeppink;">Aditya</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Aditya Kabir|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Aditya Kabir|contribs]])</sup> 14:17, 8 April 2018 (UTC) |
:::::::I request both of you to stop directly editing for the moment. Let us deescalate the situation. Can you guys tell what are you trying to achieve? May be other can lend a hand too. [[User:Aditya Kabir|<span style="font-family: Kristen ITC; color: deeppink;">Aditya</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Aditya Kabir|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Aditya Kabir|contribs]])</sup> 14:17, 8 April 2018 (UTC) |
||
:::::::: Is there any rule in Wikipedia that allows representation of editors from varying opinions? For example if I feel most editors in Bangladesh article support Bengali nationalism and pro India opinions that minimizes the difference between Bangladesh and West Bengal instead of Bangladesh nationalism that is inclusive of Sylhetis, Chittagonians and other Bengali-Assamese Muslims (see also my talk page for my arguments) |
:::::::: Is there any rule in Wikipedia that allows representation of editors from varying opinions? For example if I feel most editors in Bangladesh article support Bengali nationalism and pro India opinions that minimizes the difference between Bangladesh and West Bengal instead of Bangladesh nationalism that is inclusive of Sylhetis, Chittagonians and other Bengali-Assamese Muslims (see also my talk page for my arguments) and I cannot reach a concensus with them even after citing sources but know the article is not neutral (an undue weight given to Bengalis and the insignificance afforded to other ethnicities in the top section; check my edits in the history logs), what should I do? I am talking about the representation in terms of content not background of editors (that would be discrimination and also because I am aware that it would not make any sense for example even an Indian editor could promote pro Pakistan content or an Indian editor could promote pro India content while making it appear that a Pakistani is pretending to be Indian to put the blame on Indian editors).--[[User:Manipulateus|Manipulateus]] ([[User talk:Manipulateus|talk]]) 16:48, 10 April 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:07, 10 April 2018
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bangladesh article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 91 days |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Bangladesh is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 14, 2006. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on 22 dates. [show]
March 26, 2004, November 13, 2004, December 16, 2004, March 26, 2005, December 16, 2005, March 26, 2006, December 16, 2006, March 26, 2007, December 16, 2007, March 26, 2008, December 16, 2008, March 26, 2009, December 16, 2009, March 26, 2010, December 16, 2010, March 26, 2011, March 26, 2012, March 26, 2013, March 26, 2014, March 26, 2015, March 26, 2016, and March 26, 2017 |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bangladesh article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
Template:Outline of knowledge coverage
Guild of Copy Editors | ||||
|
Broken link for citation 104
I tried following the link for citation 104 "The climate refugee challenge". The link appears to be broken. I believe the correct URL is: https://reliefweb.int/report/bangladesh/climate-refugee-challenge
Please change the link to citation 104 to https://reliefweb.int/report/bangladesh/climate-refugee-challenge
Semi-protected edit request on 4 January 2018
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Largest city is not Chitagong. --194.88.228.86 (talk) 09:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC) 194.88.228.86 (talk) 09:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
$751billion PPP (32nd) $273billion nominal (44th) Omer Roxy (talk) 23:04, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Drives on the right
People in Bangladesh drive on the right. The information is wrong Ryu tsui sen (talk) 12:29, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 23 February 2018
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The capital city and the largest city of Bangladesh is Dhaka and not Brahmanbaria. Fahmymalaysia (talk) 06:48, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Fixed. Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 07:32, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 5 April 2018
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Article says Bangladesh is 14th in Corruption Perceptions Index while it's 145th. It's an important mistake and needs editing. Drq123 (talk) 10:27, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
Edit war between Manipulateus and Vivaan65
Vivaan65 has notified me of the edit war with Manipulateus. From user contribs it appears both of them are relatively new to Wikipedia English (less than 100 edits and first edit being in this year). While looking at edit logs, it appears both of them yelling at each other and accusing one another of vandalism. In my opinion both of their edits are constructive, while both of them showing bit of knack towards POV pushing. I have made an edit to restore what I think would be more balanced version of this article. @Vivaan65: and @Manipulateus:, please work together to improve the article and avoid edit warring. Both of you have violated WP:3RR already. So, for any further disagreements, please take a moment to talk here before redoing and reverting edits. --nafSadh did say 14:18, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- Let's settles the differences here first. Before that I am not going to accept a biased Bengalis only Bangladesh in the top section. --Manipulateus (talk) 14:39, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- Also Vivaan65 has not been constructive anyone checking the logs can see he's been making unconstructive reverts that promotes a biased account of Bangladesh against the sources that I cited. --Manipulateus (talk) 14:59, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- See above, @Manipulateus. I have mentioned both of you and Vivaan65. Both of you had been warned for the 3RR violation yesterday. According to long held convention, when in dispute, and a discussion is ongoing, the article is kept in pre-dispute version. Please do not exacerbate. --nafSadh did say 15:18, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- Do you have multiple accounts Nafsadh ? Just asking. --Manipulateus (talk) 18:40, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- Why you ask? Also see this: User:Nafsadh/Doppelgangers. --nafSadh did say 18:53, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Aditya Kabir:, @Tarif Ezaz: Please help improve this Bangladesh article. Go though history of this article get some idea. I have already violated 3PR with Manipulateus.--Vivaan65 (talk) 07:53, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- Why you ask? Also see this: User:Nafsadh/Doppelgangers. --nafSadh did say 18:53, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- Do you have multiple accounts Nafsadh ? Just asking. --Manipulateus (talk) 18:40, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- See above, @Manipulateus. I have mentioned both of you and Vivaan65. Both of you had been warned for the 3RR violation yesterday. According to long held convention, when in dispute, and a discussion is ongoing, the article is kept in pre-dispute version. Please do not exacerbate. --nafSadh did say 15:18, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- Also Vivaan65 has not been constructive anyone checking the logs can see he's been making unconstructive reverts that promotes a biased account of Bangladesh against the sources that I cited. --Manipulateus (talk) 14:59, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- Is there any rule in Wikipedia that allows representation of editors from varying opinions? For example if I feel most editors in Bangladesh article support Bengali nationalism and pro India opinions that minimizes the difference between Bangladesh and West Bengal instead of Bangladesh nationalism that is inclusive of Sylhetis, Chittagonians and other Bengali-Assamese Muslims (see also my talk page for my arguments) and I cannot reach a concensus with them even after citing sources but know the article is not neutral (an undue weight given to Bengalis and the insignificance afforded to other ethnicities in the top section; check my edits in the history logs), what should I do? I am talking about the representation in terms of content not background of editors (that would be discrimination and also because I am aware that it would not make any sense for example even an Indian editor could promote pro Pakistan content or an Indian editor could promote pro India content while making it appear that a Pakistani is pretending to be Indian to put the blame on Indian editors).--Manipulateus (talk) 16:48, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- Wikipedia former featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- Old requests for peer review
- Selected anniversaries (March 2004)
- Selected anniversaries (November 2004)
- Selected anniversaries (December 2004)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2005)
- Selected anniversaries (December 2005)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2006)
- Selected anniversaries (December 2006)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2007)
- Selected anniversaries (December 2007)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2008)
- Selected anniversaries (December 2008)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2009)
- Selected anniversaries (December 2009)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2010)
- Selected anniversaries (December 2010)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2011)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2012)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2013)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2014)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2015)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2016)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2017)
- B-Class Bangladesh articles
- Top-importance Bangladesh articles
- Help of History Workgroup of Bangladesh needed
- Help of Geography Workgroup of Bangladesh needed
- WikiProject Bangladesh articles
- B-Class South Asia articles
- Top-importance South Asia articles
- South Asia articles
- B-Class Asia articles
- Top-importance Asia articles
- WikiProject Asia articles
- WikiProject templates with unknown parameters
- B-Class country articles
- WikiProject Countries articles
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors