This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Bangladesh is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Asia, which aims to improve the quality and status of all South Asia-related articles. For more information, please visit the Project page.South AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject South AsiaTemplate:WikiProject South AsiaSouth Asia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CountriesWikipedia:WikiProject CountriesTemplate:WikiProject Countriescountry articles
This article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 7 September 2017.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Article says Bangladesh is 14th in Corruption Perceptions Index while it's 145th. It's an important mistake and needs editing. Drq123 (talk) 10:27, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not done as 14th is clearly stated here - Arjayay (talk) 12:53, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Edit war between Manipulateus and Vivaan65
Vivaan65 has notified me of the edit war with Manipulateus. From user contribs it appears both of them are relatively new to Wikipedia English (less than 100 edits and first edit being in this year). While looking at edit logs, it appears both of them yelling at each other and accusing one another of vandalism. In my opinion both of their edits are constructive, while both of them showing bit of knack towards POV pushing. I have made an edit to restore what I think would be more balanced version of this article. @Vivaan65: and @Manipulateus:, please work together to improve the article and avoid edit warring. Both of you have violated WP:3RR already. So, for any further disagreements, please take a moment to talk here before redoing and reverting edits. --nafSadhdidsay 14:18, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Let's settles the differences here first. Before that I am not going to accept a biased Bengalis only Bangladesh in the top section. --Manipulateus (talk) 14:39, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Also Vivaan65 has not been constructive anyone checking the logs can see he's been making unconstructive reverts that promotes a biased account of Bangladesh against the sources that I cited. --Manipulateus (talk) 14:59, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
See above, @Manipulateus. I have mentioned both of you and Vivaan65. Both of you had been warned for the 3RR violation yesterday. According to long held convention, when in dispute, and a discussion is ongoing, the article is kept in pre-dispute version. Please do not exacerbate. --nafSadhdidsay 15:18, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Aditya Kabir:, @Tarif Ezaz: Please help improve this Bangladesh article. Go though history of this article get some idea. I have already violated 3PR with Manipulateus.--Vivaan65 (talk) 07:53, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I request both of you to stop directly editing for the moment. Let us deescalate the situation. Can you guys tell what are you trying to achieve? May be other can lend a hand too. Aditya(talk • contribs) 14:17, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Is there any rule in Wikipedia that allows representation of editors from varying opinions? For example if I feel most editors in Bangladesh article support Bengali nationalism and pro India opinions that minimizes the difference between Bangladesh and West Bengal instead of Bangladesh nationalism that is inclusive of Sylhetis, Chittagonians and other Bengali-Assamese Muslims (see also my talk page for my arguments) and and I cannot reach a concensus with them even after citing sources but know the article is not neutral, what should I do? I am talking about the representation in terms of content not background of editors (that would be discrimination and also because I am aware that it would not make any sense for example even an Indian editor could promote pro Pakistan content or an Indian editor could promote pro India content while making it appear that a Pakistani is pretending to be Indian to put the blame on Indian editors).--Manipulateus (talk) 16:48, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]