Talk:Bruno Giacosa: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)
→‎Plagiarism?: new section
Line 24: Line 24:


Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 19:51, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 19:51, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

== Plagiarism? ==

My attention was drawn to the rather surprising exclamation point in this line: "To this day, Bruno Giacosa cites this wine as his single favorite wine of his entire career!" This may have been copied directly from [https://www.ovidventures.com/brunogiacosa] but in any event, I unfortunately don't have time tonight to really investigate this and correct it fully, but I thought I should raise the issue here immediately. I will be removing a bit of this now, but it really does deserve a careful reading and comparison, and reconstruction if possible with proper attribution. [[User:Jimbo Wales|Jimbo Wales]] ([[User talk:Jimbo Wales|talk]]) 21:27, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:27, 27 November 2023

Single vinyard bottlings

The article states that Giacosa started bottling single vinyard wines from 1976. This is not true, since he bottled Santo Stafano in 1961 and Falletto in 1964. Since then he started bottling single vinyards regularly. See this page and this page. Bertrand77 (talk) 13:09, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, good catch, my typo. The source from Wine News contends Giacosa started single vineyard bottlings (with label designated crus) in 67 not 76, crediting Beppe Colla at Prunotto with being first in 1961. Not sure what to do with the Ken Vastola table site which gives imagery of these bottles that make no cru claim, only that Vastola writes "The winery says..Santo Stefano Vineyard in Neive" and "The winery says..Falletto Vineyard". deMURGH talk 19:53, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bruno Giacosa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:51, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism?

My attention was drawn to the rather surprising exclamation point in this line: "To this day, Bruno Giacosa cites this wine as his single favorite wine of his entire career!" This may have been copied directly from [1] but in any event, I unfortunately don't have time tonight to really investigate this and correct it fully, but I thought I should raise the issue here immediately. I will be removing a bit of this now, but it really does deserve a careful reading and comparison, and reconstruction if possible with proper attribution. Jimbo Wales (talk) 21:27, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]