Talk:Chili Line: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:30, 24 July 2018

United States: Colorado / New Mexico C‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Colorado portal This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to improve, create, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the New section tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!
	New Mexico portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Mexico.

Trains Start‑class Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Chili Line appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 December 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the name of the Chili Line has been attributed to its freight and the gastronomy of its patrons?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/December.

Wikipedia

Name change?

An editor recently changed the name, without discussion, from Chili Line to Chili line. When I lived there, I'd always seen the name capitalized (as are most named train lines). Three of the four references we cite give the name (in caps) as the Chili Line. So I think we need to discuss this proposal. My inclination would be to keep the original name: Chili Line. --Pete Tillman (talk) 03:52, 29 May 2018 (UTC), former area resident.[reply]

I agree. It is a proper noun, derived from a casual expression. A cursory check of the sources can support this idea. Synchronism (talk) 07:21, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to boldly revert the title change soon. The common name, being a name of a specific thing, is indisputably a proper noun. But, of course, if anyone out there wishes to discuss that then they have had ample opportunity to do so. Their lack of objection or defense of the assertion that this article's topic is an ordinary, common noun is noted. The consensus at present is to revert.Synchronism (talk) 14:47, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Imma pontificate upon this further. One could say that it is a proper name as opposed to a noun, in a strict (somewhat pedantic?) sense. Nonetheless, it is the name used by reliable sources. And it is a bit jarring to my eyes personally (and I am no fan of extraneous punctuation). I think this would be analogous to changing Silk Road to Silk road, and the attendant ambiguities associated with that are similar to this case.Synchronism (talk) 17:08, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be a proper name/noun; it's not descriptive like "the Fooville–Bartown line". But just FYI, the Proper name (philosophy) concept has nothing to do with capitalization on Wikipedia; only Proper name (linguistics) does. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 21:25, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. And agreed. I noticed that are, indeed many other examples of unnecessary capitalization among railroad pages and that there has been a lot of discussion. Thanks for clueing me in!Synchronism (talk) 13:30, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 :::Imma pontificate upon this further. One could say that it is a proper ''name'' as opposed to a ''noun'', in a strict (somewhat pedantic?) sense. Nonetheless, it is the name used by reliable sources. And it is a bit jarring to my eyes personally (and I am no fan of extraneous punctuation). I think this would be analogous to changing Silk Road to Silk road, and the attendant ambiguities associated with that are similar to this case.[[User:Synchronism|Synchronism]] ([[User talk:Synchronism|talk]]) 17:08, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
 ::::This seems to be a proper name/noun; it's not descriptive like "the Fooville–Bartown line".  But just FYI, the [[Proper name (philosophy)]] concept has nothing to do with capitalization on Wikipedia; only [[Proper name (linguistics)]] does. <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family:'Trebuchet MS'"> — [[User:SMcCandlish|'''SMcCandlish''']] [[User talk:SMcCandlish|☏]] [[Special:Contributions/SMcCandlish|¢]] 😼 </span> 21:25, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
+Noted. And agreed. I noticed that are, indeed many other examples of unnecessary capitalization among railroad pages and that there has been a lot of discussion. Thanks for clueing me in![[User:Synchronism|Synchronism]] ([[User talk:Synchronism|talk]]) 13:30, 24 July 2018 (UTC)