Talk:Facilitated communication: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Hob Gadling (talk | contribs) |
→Where's the neutrality?: Reply |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
:That link does not even contain the word "blind" (or "blinded"). It was not written by competent people who know how to test such things. --[[User:Hob Gadling|Hob Gadling]] ([[User talk:Hob Gadling|talk]]) 06:21, 1 December 2023 (UTC) |
:That link does not even contain the word "blind" (or "blinded"). It was not written by competent people who know how to test such things. --[[User:Hob Gadling|Hob Gadling]] ([[User talk:Hob Gadling|talk]]) 06:21, 1 December 2023 (UTC) |
||
::Why does it matter that the test wasn't blinded (singly or doubly) when what was being tested was not the entire intervention, but just one aspect of it? Please try not to be disingenuous. [[Special:Contributions/80.193.98.150|80.193.98.150]] ([[User talk:80.193.98.150|talk]]) 11:58, 2 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
{{reflist talk}} |
{{reflist talk}} |
Revision as of 11:58, 2 December 2023
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Facilitated communication article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Arbitration Ruling on the Treatment of Pseudoscience In December of 2006 the Arbitration Committee ruled on guidelines for the presentation of topics as pseudoscience in Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience. The final decision was as follows:
|
Where's the neutrality?
In the article about Wikipedia, a claim is made that "Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view." However, this article puts the lie to that assertion because it has a completely anti-FC slant, with absolutely no sources pointing to its veracity as a method of allowing non-speaking autistic people to communicate by typing when variables are controlled,[1] with the majority of sources being around thirty years old. 80.193.98.150 (talk) 14:28, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
- "Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view." does not mean what you pretend it means. It means obeying WP:PSCI, WP:GEVAL, WP:ECREE, and WP:FRINGE. tgeorgescu (talk) 14:46, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
- That link does not even contain the word "blind" (or "blinded"). It was not written by competent people who know how to test such things. --Hob Gadling (talk) 06:21, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
- Why does it matter that the test wasn't blinded (singly or doubly) when what was being tested was not the entire intervention, but just one aspect of it? Please try not to be disingenuous. 80.193.98.150 (talk) 11:58, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- C-Class psychology articles
- Low-importance psychology articles
- WikiProject Psychology articles
- Start-Class Skepticism articles
- Mid-importance Skepticism articles
- WikiProject Skepticism articles
- C-Class Alternative medicine articles
- C-Class Alternative Views articles
- Mid-importance Alternative Views articles
- WikiProject Alternative Views articles
- Start-Class Autism articles
- High-importance Autism articles
- WikiProject Autism articles
- B-Class Disability articles
- WikiProject Disability articles
- Wikipedia controversial topics