: The problem is that we need a "reliable source" to say what happened to it. We can't include our own observations on that. If you know of a source, please tell us. Personally I don't think this article ever had a right to exist. [[User:Zero0000|Zero]]<sup><small>[[User_talk:Zero0000|talk]]</small></sup> 04:31, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
: The problem is that we need a "reliable source" to say what happened to it. We can't include our own observations on that. If you know of a source, please tell us. Personally I don't think this article ever had a right to exist. [[User:Zero0000|Zero]]<sup><small>[[User_talk:Zero0000|talk]]</small></sup> 04:31, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
==Delete==
This article should be deleted. There's plenty of verifiable information online to bring the legitimacy of the "group" into question as a sham invented and operated by a single person who happened to have knowledge of SEO and how to trick media outlets into covering him as though he was a large organization... who then took donations from people for personal enrichment. It makes Wikipedia look like basic rubes covering this like a legit group. [[User:Iggy pop goes the weasel|Iggy pop goes the weasel]] ([[User talk:Iggy pop goes the weasel|talk]]) 22:32, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Revision as of 22:32, 25 December 2021
This article was nominated for deletion on 19 October 2016. The result of the discussion was no consensus.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
The last thing on JIDF's web page was almost four years ago and basically says "we won't tell you what we are doing but give us money anyway". It seems to me that it has morphed from trivial activist group (probably the work of one or two people) into a scam. Zerotalk 12:23, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Past tense verbiage, yet no citations on end of activity?
This article is written in the past tense and claims the JIDF is a "was", yet there is no explanation as to what supposedly happened to it. This should be discussed as if the JIDF is no longer operational, that is worth noting, and if if it is, the wording of this article would be a dishonest description.
The problem is that we need a "reliable source" to say what happened to it. We can't include our own observations on that. If you know of a source, please tell us. Personally I don't think this article ever had a right to exist. Zerotalk 04:31, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete
This article should be deleted. There's plenty of verifiable information online to bring the legitimacy of the "group" into question as a sham invented and operated by a single person who happened to have knowledge of SEO and how to trick media outlets into covering him as though he was a large organization... who then took donations from people for personal enrichment. It makes Wikipedia look like basic rubes covering this like a legit group. Iggy pop goes the weasel (talk) 22:32, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
