Talk:Race (human categorization): Difference between revisions
PaleoNeonate (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
::<small>— [[User:Essentially Dave|Essentially Dave]] ([[User talk:Essentially Dave|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Essentially Dave|contribs]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. </small> |
::<small>— [[User:Essentially Dave|Essentially Dave]] ([[User talk:Essentially Dave|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Essentially Dave|contribs]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. </small> |
||
:::Sources please, this is not a [[WP:FORUM]]. —[[User:PaleoNeonate|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#44a;text-shadow:2px 2px 3px DimGray;">Paleo</span>]][[User talk:PaleoNeonate|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#272;text-shadow:2px 2px 3px DimGray;">Neonate</span>]] – 13:05, 10 June 2019 (UTC) |
:::Sources please, this is not a [[WP:FORUM]]. —[[User:PaleoNeonate|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#44a;text-shadow:2px 2px 3px DimGray;">Paleo</span>]][[User talk:PaleoNeonate|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#272;text-shadow:2px 2px 3px DimGray;">Neonate</span>]] – 13:05, 10 June 2019 (UTC) |
||
::::You want me to provide sources for something literally nobody thinks? The strawman constructor has the burden to show his opponents think what he accuses them of, which he won't be able to. [[User:Essentially Dave|Essentially Dave]] ([[User talk:Essentially Dave|talk]]) 13:30, 10 June 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:30, 10 June 2019
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Race (human categorization) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Race (human categorization) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour, which is a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully. |
Arbitration Ruling on Race and Intelligence The article Race (human categorization), along with other articles relating to the area of conflict (namely, the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour, broadly construed), is currently subject to active arbitration remedies, described in a 2010 Arbitration Committee case where the articulated principles included:
If you are a new editor, or an editor unfamiliar with the situation, please follow the above guidelines. You may also wish to review the full arbitration case page. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. |
Race (human categorization) is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed. | |||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 26, 2004. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Former featured article |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Index |
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Race (human categorization). Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Race (human categorization) at the Reference desk. |
France
3.3.3 (France) appears to be copying the cited article word-for-word. The article is also rather outdated, from 2001, (before immigration surged in Europe) and claims France to be about 5% non-white, despite there being no official statistics on race in France (while estimates put it at around or over 15%; the country being 7-9% muslim alone). Its comparison to the United States also rather lacks relevance. I would say to remove the section since there is already one on the European Union.
Also, the phrase "non-European and non-white" seems to denote 'European' as a demonym referencing ethnicity, not nationality, as if those deemed 'non-white' cannot be European? Are non-whites in France not French/European? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:186:4301:20E:3598:8DE7:5C:28D0 (talk) 20:42, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Just noting that this complaint was addressed by Doug Weller on January 27th with this edit. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 17:37, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Just noting that Von Clown was a sock of the racist Mikemikev
Who left me, using an IP with an obscene talk page message yesterday.[1] Lovely guy. Doug Weller talk 09:43, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
More recent research shows natural differences in race
More recent genetic research shows that we can now predict geographic ancestry almost with 100% accuracy: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1893020/#bib1
This is not to say that race is not a social construct (as almost anything is, including color shades), but it is an important point to add. This confirms that it is false that we might select inter-population genetic samples which are more genetically similar than intra-population samples, as was, and is still widely disseminated.
There are clear differences between our apparent selection of races, both empirically and genetically. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weagesdf (talk • contribs) 23:57, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- Per the source's abstract:
...Phenotypes controlled by a dozen or fewer loci can therefore be expected to show substantial overlap between human populations. This provides empirical justification for caution when using population labels in biomedical settings, with broad implications for personalized medicine, pharmacogenetics, and the meaning of race.
- And in the last paragraph:
The fact that, given enough genetic data, individuals can be correctly assigned to their populations of origin is compatible with the observation that most human genetic variation is found within populations, not between them. It is also compatible with our finding that, even when the most distinct populations are considered and hundreds of loci are used, individuals are frequently more similar to members of other populations than to members of their own population. Thus, caution should be used when using geographic or genetic ancestry to make inferences about individual phenotypes.
- Grayfell (talk) 01:38, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
- Everyone knows that races overlap on traits. Who is this supposed to be arguing against? There are average differences though right? Some differences even tend towards fixation. Is this supposed to be refuting some imaginary race realist that thinks races are 100% homogeneous? Essentially Dave (talk) 13:00, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- — Essentially Dave (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Sources please, this is not a WP:FORUM. —PaleoNeonate – 13:05, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- You want me to provide sources for something literally nobody thinks? The strawman constructor has the burden to show his opponents think what he accuses them of, which he won't be able to. Essentially Dave (talk) 13:30, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Sources please, this is not a WP:FORUM. —PaleoNeonate – 13:05, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Wikipedia former featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- B-Class sociology articles
- Top-importance sociology articles
- B-Class Anthropology articles
- High-importance Anthropology articles
- B-Class Ethnic groups articles
- Top-importance Ethnic groups articles
- WikiProject Ethnic groups articles
- B-Class politics articles
- Top-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Unassessed culture articles
- Unknown-importance culture articles
- WikiProject Culture articles