Talk:Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War/Archive 2) (bot |
→Revert, why: new section |
||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
|indexhere=yes |
|indexhere=yes |
||
}} |
}} |
||
== Revert, why == |
|||
200,000 is the commonly cited number, a simple search of the literature shows that. Accusations of falsifying quotations are as usual, pure bullshit, there are no quotations there. [[User:Darkness Shines|Darkness Shines]] ([[User talk:Darkness Shines|talk]]) 16:14, 9 May 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:14, 9 May 2014
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 20 days |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 20 days |
Revert, why
200,000 is the commonly cited number, a simple search of the literature shows that. Accusations of falsifying quotations are as usual, pure bullshit, there are no quotations there. Darkness Shines (talk) 16:14, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Wikipedia good articles
- History good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- GA-Class Human rights articles
- Low-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- GA-Class South Asian military history articles
- South Asian military history task force articles
- GA-Class Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles
- GA-Class Women's History articles
- Low-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
- GA-Class Bangladesh articles
- High-importance Bangladesh articles
- WikiProject Bangladesh articles
- GA-Class Pakistan articles
- Mid-importance Pakistan articles
- WikiProject Pakistani history articles
- WikiProject Pakistan articles
- GA-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- GA-Class India articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class Indian history articles
- Mid-importance Indian history articles
- GA-Class Indian history articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Indian history articles
- WikiProject India articles
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors