User talk:KingJeff1970: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 725: Line 725:


Check to see that less reliable sources aren't being used in place of more reliable ones? [[Talk:Fur_trade_in_Montana#Date_of_sale_of_the_Rocky_Mountain_Fur_Company]] I don't want to get into the position where I am caring more about this article than the people who did most of the work on it. [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|<font color="purple">(talk)</font>]]</sup> 02:47, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Check to see that less reliable sources aren't being used in place of more reliable ones? [[Talk:Fur_trade_in_Montana#Date_of_sale_of_the_Rocky_Mountain_Fur_Company]] I don't want to get into the position where I am caring more about this article than the people who did most of the work on it. [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|<font color="purple">(talk)</font>]]</sup> 02:47, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

:Congrats, you've met your first WP troll. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AFur_trade_in_Montana&type=revision&diff=687848937&oldid=687841629 You handled it] far better than I would have ;-). [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|<font color="purple">(talk)</font>]]</sup> 18:58, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:58, 28 October 2015

Welcome!

Hello, KingJeff1970, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Montanabw(talk) 05:04, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Saw your recent edits. Feel free to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Montana and any others that interest you. Montanabw(talk) 21:07, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, KingJeff1970, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Tbennert (talk) 02:57, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Welcome

So glad you could join us this Saturday! Above is a template with some links you may find of interest. Rjensen and Mike Cline are also available for questions. Jump in and start making some edits and you'll have the hang of it quickly. Looking forward to seeing your contributions!--Tbennert (talk) 02:57, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New article on Merrill G. Burlingame

Jeff, I've just moved the article on Merrill G. Burlingame into the mainspace. You might want to try your hand at working on the section re the Montana Historical Society. You may have more access to sources re this than I did. Thanks --Mike Cline (talk) 13:44, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see what I can find, Mike. I'm sure we have a vertical file on him that is likely to have some good sources. I'm a huge Burlingame fan so this will be great, and, yes, I know I'm a nerd. --KingJeff1970 (talk) 19:23, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Opportunity to improve Wikipedia Skills

Jeff, the article Montana Vigilantes has been significantly expanded over the last week and is now a Good Article Nominee. If you want to tackle the review, just follow the instructions at WP:GAN. Reviewing article at GAN is very good practice in learning the ins and outs of WP. Just be sure to start the review before someone beats you to it. --Mike Cline (talk) 19:58, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, like me! (No worries Mike, I have other fish to fry!) Montanabw(talk) 23:07, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Jeff, the Legobot just notified me on my talk that the GAN for Vigilantes failed, yet you've made no comments yet. Not sure what's going on. --Mike Cline (talk) 20:56, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


That was my error. I thought it silly and a WP:FORK to move the article to a more complicated title, so I moved it back. Didn't realize that Mike had put it up for GA under the new name. Montanabw(talk) 21:25, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Montana Vigilantes GAN review

Jeff, I think I've covered all the issues raised in the review. Let me know if there is anything else I should correct. Thanks. A good review that forced me to do some digging. --Mike Cline (talk) 14:06, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sandboxes

Hey there, just fixed your sandbox so it doesn't redirect to your new article (which, by the way, you ought to submit to WP:DYK. Ping me if you need help doing so). I also popped in a couple helpful tags that keep sandboxes from being indexed by webcrawlers and bots (I had a sandbox where I forgot to put the noindex tag start showing up in Google searches long before it was ready!) and another one with the disclaimer that it's a workspace. Just toss the tags before the article goes live, or better yet, create a sandbox with your proposed article title, which you can then delete later when the article moves to mainspace (as I am currently doing with User:Montanabw/Kenneth and Sarah Ramsey. As always, just revert anything I do that isn't working for you. I also pinged you on the talk page of someone who is making a lot of edits to the Denise Juneau article as a potential person who might be able to help that user do a better job of editing. Montanabw(talk)

I'm afraid I thought you could just move your sandbox to the main space and call it good. What did I do wrong? How would I avoid that redirect in the future? Next time I start working on an article I suppose I'll start it as a draft with the Article Wizard. Thanks for fixing my sandbox!--KingJeff1970 (talk) 21:33, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You did nothing wrong, it's just a minor fix. They don't explain the setup very well. The WP software always leaves a redirect behind with any move so that anyone else who linked to the old version doesn't lose track of the article when it's moved. It also preserves the edit history from the sandbox. Article Wizard really sucks, in my opinion, plus the submission process is where articles go to die. I start new articles one of three ways:
  1. The fastest method is when I just create a redlink of the title I want click on it and start editing madly; which works for articles where you can whip up a respectable stub within an hour or so and then improve them in dribs and drabs as you go. I just did this with Thumps and Parascaris equorum (the latter is at DYK right now, by the way). Whenever I see a redlink that I think needs an article, it's fast and easy. The only drawback is that new users can't do this at first. I've done some fairly complex article this way ( like Sip 'n Dip Lounge), you just have to make sure the initial stub has a ref or two, or at least use the {{underconstruction}} tag while you are pulling it together and have something big enough to "survive" within about 48 hours.
  2. For more complex articles that will take some time (like the one on the Ramseys that I linked above), and especially if they might have multiple contributors, I create a new sandbox for each. Then, when I DO move the article to mainspace, the edit history goes with it. (See, e.g. the history of Bayern (horse) or Hotel Baxter, both of which were started that way. Look at the older/oldest edits and in the first 50 or so you will probably see an edit summary like "moving article to mainspace"or something. Once I move the article, I blank the old sandbox page and a bot will eventually delete it from the system if it's a totally blank page per Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#G7. This helps others share credit for the project, particularly when you worked on it for quite a while before taking it "live."
  3. For stuff I want to sandbox but don't want to have the edit history dragged over, I use one of my "recycled" sandboxes (I have a Sandbox 1, sandbox 2, etc...), create the article, and then when it's ready to go live, I make a redlink of the title, open it up and copy/ paste my draft into the window. I created John Osborne Varian and Norma Ashby this way. You lose the edit history, but if you are the only one who worked on it, who cares? This used to be the main method I used until s my co-author on Norma's article was irritated that his work didn't get credit with the copy and paste and pointed out to me the handy-dandy method of creating a sandbox with a unique title for each article you incubate in a sandbox.
  4. I next learned that it's a bit awk to keep moving the same sandbox when I created William Robinson Brown. I recycled an old sandbox while writing it, with the awkward result that a previous attempt to work on an article about a Buddhist geshe is now in the edit history of an article about an Arabian horse breeder. I'm still mildly embarrassed about that one!

Hope that helps! Montanabw(talk) 06:33, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fur trade in Montana - Good start

Jeff, you'll note the two tags that another editor placed on your new article Fur Trade in Montana. I don't think the notability tag is relevant and have removed it. This article clearly meets WP:GNG requirements. Additionally, I've listed a variety of additional sources relevant to the topic to back that up. On the "opinion" tag, there's probably some validity there, but all that's required is to incorporate different perspectives into the article. You might what to query the editor who placed the tag to get more insight into why they so think. The article definitely needs a lead section WP:LEAD and some images. Let me know if I can help in anyway. I've corrected a few style issues as well, including the title which should alway be in sentence, not title case. It would also be useful to start linking this article in other relevant articles. Good start. --Mike Cline (talk) 15:28, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing my bonehead titling error, I know better than that. I've always detested using sentence case in library cataloging so I probably did it subconsciously; I thought I was being careful in going live with the article. Oh well, practice, practice, practice... I know the article needs much more work, especially a lead and bringing in more of an Indian perspective. I'll work on those if no one else does it first. I just wanted to get it out there so others could more easily add to it and people could read it. Thanks for whatever help you can offer.--KingJeff1970 (talk) 22:04, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New articles list

Jeff, saw your new articles list. FYI, I've got two of them in the hopper. De Lacy and James Stuart.

De Lacy is just about ready to go, I just need to do some clean up. I've been working on it for the MSU Library. Stuart has a few holes to fill before it goes. Feel free to add to them in my user space if you want. Thanks --Mike Cline (talk) 14:13, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Fur trade in Montana

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:47, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 25 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:50, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pics?

Wondering if you can locate any PD images to add to 1935 Helena earthquake. Montanabw(talk) 21:04, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tools

Hey KingJeff1970, you are now entering the dark realms of vandal patrol. I'm going to give you a heads up to the existence of a handy tool called Wikipedia:Twinkle, which is an incredible time saver, and you also are probably eligible to request Wikipedia:Rollback, which is even faster (though fraught with danger if misused). Very handy. Montanabw(talk) 03:14, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in GLAM: November 2014





Headlines
  • Australia and New Zealand report: ALIA partnership goes countrywide
  • Belgium report: Workshops for collection holders across Europe; Founding event of Wikimedia Belgium; Wiki Loves Monuments in Belgium & Luxembourg; Plantin-Moretus Museum; Edit-a-thon at faculty library in Ghent University; Image donation UGentMemorie; Upcoming activities
  • France report: Wiki Loves Monuments; mass upload; Musée de Bretagne
  • Germany report: Facts, fun and free content
  • Ireland report: Ada Lovelace day in Dublin
  • Italy report: National Library Conference; Wiki Loves Monuments; Archaeological Open Data; BEIC
  • Netherlands report: Video challenge; Wikidata workshop and hackathon; Wikipedia courses in libraries; WWII editathon
  • Norway report: Edit-a-thon far north at the Museum of Nordland (Nordlandsmuseet)
  • Spain report: Picasso, first Galipedia edit-a-thon, course in Biblioteca Reina Sofía and free portraits
  • South Africa report: Wiki Loves GLAMs, Cape Town
  • Sweden report: Use, reuse and contributions back and forth
  • UK report: Medals, maps and multilingual marvels
  • Special story: ORCID identifiers
  • Open Access report: Open proposal: Wikidata for Research; Open Access signalling
  • Tool testing report: Tools for references, images, video, file usage; Popular Pages
  • Calendar: December's GLAM events
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 22:30, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Did you see this one?

Assessments

Don't over-assess importance on WP Montana articles, the default is "low" unless there's a good reason to go higher, and very, very few articles should be top. Montanabw(talk) 19:43, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha. Thanks for the feedback; I shall take it easy. I was cherry-picking to some degree, picking out governors and some other fairly important folks (long-serving Senators and Reps). The criteria on our project page does direct that political figures would typically be mid importance, so I interpreted that the most significant political figures should be high importance. Actually, maybe I will put this up for discussion on the project page for posterity's sake. Let me know what you think... --KingJeff1970 (talk) 02:43, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in GLAM: December 2014





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 11:31, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in GLAM: January 2015





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 05:58, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in GLAM: February 2015





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

This Month in GLAM: March 2015





Headlines


Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

This Month in GLAM: April 2015





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Peer review initiated for Montana Vigilantes

In advance of FAC, a peer review is underway for Wikipedia:Peer review/Montana Vigilantes/archive1 All help appreciated. --Mike Cline (talk) 14:16, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in GLAM: May 2015





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

You are invited to the Great Colorado Wiknic 2015

Who: All Wikipedia and Wikimedia users in Colorado and their families are invited. New users are specifically encouraged to attend.

What: The Great Colorado Wiknic 2015.

When: Sunday afternoon, July 5, 2015, from 12:00 to 4:00 pm MDT.

Where: The Wiknic will be held at our home in Arvada. Please contact Buaidh for further information or assistance.

Please add your username to our Attendees list so we know how many folks to expect. You can subscribe to our Wikimedia Colorado e-mail list to receive notice of future Wikimedia Colorado activities.

Your hosts:  Buaidh  and  BikeSally  15:23, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(You can unsubscribe from future invitations to Wikimedia Colorado events by removing your name from the Wikimedia Colorado event invitation list.)

Wiknic

Don't forget the Colorado Wiknic this Sunday afternoon. We hope to see you there.  Buaidh  16:40, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(You can unsubscribe from future invitations to Wikimedia Colorado events by removing your name from the Wikimedia Colorado event invitation list.)

This Month in GLAM: June 2015





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Reference errors on 14 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Editathon

Hey, just a ping to suggest the best way to organize an event is to look at this: Wikipedia:How_to_run_an_edit-a-thon and also User:Rosiestep/Editathons My thoughts are that we can create a workpage at Wikipedia:GLAM/Montana History (or spelled out title) similar to the one at Wikipedia:GLAM/McGill. However, I think you need to be the one to create it (and decide what to name it) given that the MHS will be sponsoring and such. I can make it pretty once you have the basics. Also look at Wikipedia:Meetup#Procedure_and_advice. I'll also look for articles that already exist and are in desperate need of help that you can add there under a "cleanup" heading: one I've already found is Melrose, Montana. Montanabw(talk) 16:42, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Big thanks for the "boost," and excellent article selection. I'll see if I can devote time to sprucing it up a bit over the next couple days.KingJeff1970 (talk) 15:49, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think a very important thing is to find more articles for improvement, particularly biographies. Easy to link directly! Montanabw(talk) 03:35, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in GLAM: July 2015





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 00:22, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 14 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited! Women in Red World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Leadership

You are invited!World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in LeadershipCome and join us remotely!
World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Leadership
Dates: 7 to 20 September 2015

The Virtual Edit-a-thon, hosted by Women in Red, will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in Leadership to participate. As it is a two-week event, inexperienced participants will be able to draw on the assistance of more experienced editors while creating, translating or improving articles on women who are (or have been) prominent in leadership. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome. RSVP and find more details →here← --Montanabw(talk) 03:47, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in GLAM: August 2015





Headlines


  • UK report: QRpedia AWOL; RSC holds another edit-a-thon
  • Special story: New toolkit on Photo Events documents best practices, strategies and more
  • Open Access report: Wikipedia as an amplyfier; horse face recognition, rhythm perception, fossil rodent teeth
  • Wikidata report: Wikidata this month
  • Calendar: September's GLAM events



Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 15:14, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jeannette Rankin

Can you peek at the photos in the article and maybe point me (and others) to any image collections that are public domain (i.e. published pre-1923)? Seems some iconic images aren't in there. Also, post more links to cool MHS source material! Yay! (I'd suggest posting at Talk:Jeannette Rankin. Montanabw(talk) 18:03, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in GLAM: September 2015





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 01:44, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not my circus...

Check to see that less reliable sources aren't being used in place of more reliable ones? Talk:Fur_trade_in_Montana#Date_of_sale_of_the_Rocky_Mountain_Fur_Company I don't want to get into the position where I am caring more about this article than the people who did most of the work on it. Montanabw(talk) 02:47, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats, you've met your first WP troll. You handled it far better than I would have  ;-). Montanabw(talk) 18:58, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]