User talk:Ganeshk: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AppleJuggler (talk | contribs)
Re:Please stop removing project tags
Line 57: Line 57:
Dear Ganesh:
Dear Ganesh:
Please read the following, and provide your comment: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Barnstar_and_award_proposals/New_Proposals#South_Indian_Cinema_and_Music_Barnstar]. Thank you. [[User:AppleJuggler|AppleJuggler]] 15:15, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Please read the following, and provide your comment: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Barnstar_and_award_proposals/New_Proposals#South_Indian_Cinema_and_Music_Barnstar]. Thank you. [[User:AppleJuggler|AppleJuggler]] 15:15, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

== Re:Please stop removing project tags ==

Where is that so-called discussion you talk about. I created South Asia tag to REPLACE India tags in those articles which are NOT about present day India. Tagging Pakistan related articles with Ashok Chakkar and calling the entire region India, which is now completely worng, is outrageous and offensive to the Pakistani Wikipedians. Ashok Chakkar is same as Indian flag and reflects favourism for a relogion, i.e. Hinduism which I think is againdst [[NPOV]]. Now using the map of entire region and saying this article is about India; well it is outright outrageous and completely unacceptable. You as an administrator should stay away from this on going dispute as your Indian background is making you take sides against me. [[User:Szhaider|Szhaider]] 18:30, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:30, 1 December 2006

Ganeshk (talk · contribs · count · logs · email)

Archive
Archives
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
11 | 12 | 13 | 14
Tip of the moment...
The three-revert rule

Many people know that if someone reverts an article more than three times in 24 hours (3RR), they may be blocked to prevent edit warring. But did you know that:

  • Although reverts on different articles do not count towards the limit, different reverts on the same article do count. So if you revert Paragraph A twice and Paragraph B twice in 24 hours, you have made four reverts and may be blocked.
  • If you revert three times, wait for 24 hours and start reverting again, you may be blocked for 'gaming' the rule. The three-revert rule is an electric fence, not an entitlement.
  • Although you cannot be blocked for repeatedly reverting vandalism, many Wikipedians mistake edits for vandalism when they are not. For example, edits that do not respect the neutral point of view policy are not vandalism.

The easiest way to avoid being blocked for reverting is to revert as little as possible and discuss with your fellow editors instead. Some editors limit themselves to one or no reverts a day. Select categories on Wikipedia are limited to 1RR (one revert rule). Those articles will have an edit notice to apprise you of their special status. For 1RR you may only revert one edit in the entire category per 24-hours.

To add this auto-randomizing template to your user page, use {{totd-random}}

from Bishnupriya Manipuri Wiki

Dear Ganesh,

Today you visited Bishnupriya Manipuri Wiki, and left a question for me that how did I translate 5000 Indian Cities in a short time? First of all I would like to thank you and your script. I was trying to contact with you and left a few lines at Ganeshbot/Requests page (22:52, 26 October 2006 (hist) (diff) User:Ganeshbot/Requests (→Requests for template substitution, replacement, or addition)) for your suggestion and help. Since then no response and page also move to archive or deleted.

Anyway, using your script, I created almost 80% of the Indian city within a month. I translate the database file 1 state at a time just using Windows Notepad, Avro Keybord (UniBijoy). I hope I will finish by next week.

I thank you again, and also I thank Ragib (from Bangla + English wiki) for his help and tips.

--Usingha 04:55, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop messaging me

I want you to stop messaging me.That discussion page on my account is my own private page and I dont let people come and tell me how to use it so keep your concerns to yourself please.Nadirali 19:25, 29 November 2006 (UTC)Nadirali[reply]

I might need some help

Wikipedia:Help_desk#Blocking_a_user He's trying to block me.--D-Boy 05:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ok. thanks for the info.--D-Boy 06:03, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Barnstar

Thanks! I plan to grow to as helpful as you are some day :) Thanks again, appreciates. AQu01rius (User • Talk) 07:13, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ganesh. Tamil people has been brought to FAR. Please be there and comment. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 15:42, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I will have a look but geograhical locations do not interest me generally. You are doing great work. Carry on! -- Seejee 00:44, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is interesting...someone's been trying to make those changes for a few days now: Special:Contributions/MichaelWolfgang. When I reverted it the first time, I sent a polite note telling him to take it up on the talk page. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 03:48, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, I didn't realize it had been going on so long. The one I reverted was more elaborate, like the guy's trying to make some sort of POV point that India was a nation long before 1947. Thanks for sending that older diff; if I see something like this again, I'll just go ahead and revert it as simple vandalism. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 04:05, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WP SouthAsia

Why did you block a template which I created and intended to expand? There is no rational point in blocking Template:WP SouthAsia. I want it unblocked and as I have decided to agree to keep current picture for the time being. Szhaider 12:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

South Indian Cinema and Music Award

Dear Ganesh: Please read the following, and provide your comment: [1]. Thank you. AppleJuggler 15:15, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Please stop removing project tags

Where is that so-called discussion you talk about. I created South Asia tag to REPLACE India tags in those articles which are NOT about present day India. Tagging Pakistan related articles with Ashok Chakkar and calling the entire region India, which is now completely worng, is outrageous and offensive to the Pakistani Wikipedians. Ashok Chakkar is same as Indian flag and reflects favourism for a relogion, i.e. Hinduism which I think is againdst NPOV. Now using the map of entire region and saying this article is about India; well it is outright outrageous and completely unacceptable. You as an administrator should stay away from this on going dispute as your Indian background is making you take sides against me. Szhaider 18:30, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]