User talk:Ktrimi991

Welcome!

Hello, Ktrimi991, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Reference errors on 27 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Italian invasion of Albania page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Albanian Kingdom (1939–43) into Italian invasion of Albania. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 21:01, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Source interpretation

Hello,

I noticed the article about Battle of Ulqin. Thank you for creation of the article on this topic.

In this article you wrote:

• "The battle however sparked a debate in Europe which raised the question regarding the Albanian question"

You supported this assertion with two citations. I checked both of them, and I could not find that any of them support the above assertion. They actually almost do not mention the battle of Ulcinj, nor they give it the kind of importance presented in the above sentence. Will you please be so kind to present quotes from two sources you used to cite above assertion.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 19:54, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for removing (diff) assertion you added based on the misinterpretation of two sources. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:00, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

There was no misinterpretation, I have found one single ref but when writing article I placed two other sources by mistake. I will find the ref again and add assertion. During this time I thought it is better to have text removed than tagged with "citation needed". I hope you don't have any problem with it. Ktrimi991 (talk) 18:51, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Of course not. Everybody make mistakes. Gezuar.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 14:45, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Te gjithe te mirat Antidiskriminator! Ktrimi991 (talk) 14:51, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Copyright violation

Your addition to Albanian nobility was detected by a bot as being a copyright violation. Please don't add copyright material to this wiki, not even temporarily. — Diannaa (talk) 16:46, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

I have already removed it! Ktrimi991 (talk) 15:16, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

New section

Telling you that Elsie is a renowned Albanologist and a WP:RS is not an "inappropriate summary". Your WP:IDONTLIKE removal of sourced content will be reported if it persists. 23 editor (talk) 17:19, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

23 editor Your summary was inappropriate because you didn't explained removal of my source about Vrake and didn't mentioned that my edit was not a "removal" but a recontruction of text. In this case Elsie falls in WP:Fringe theory which is is an idea or viewpoint held by a small group of supporters, in this case only one supporter vs many others. By the way, if there is "disagreement" between scholars why don't you present additional sources? Removal of sourced content is not allowed, the same thing can be said for adding fringe POV. Ktrimi991 (talk) 17:25, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Elsie is not fringe. He is the world's foremost Albanologist. If anyone knows anything about Albanian culture, folklore, literature and art it's him. Your edit did indeed entail the removal of content and wasn't a mere "restructuring". You've removed the fact that the subject was born into a family of Serbo-Croatian speakers and that the village of Vrake was Serb-populated at the time the subject taught there, as described by the very-reliable Elsie (as opposed to your own unsourced, talk-page WP:OR claims).

Also, how did you know to "alert" me to see you had replied to my comment? Have you used Wikipedia before? 23 editor (talk) 17:34, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

23 editor Haha now you are accusing me of being a sock. I created my Albanian account some four years ago. I have been part of WikiProjects in Albania such as [1] and [2] among others. I have met some Albanian Wikipedians who have explained me many things about this place. I assure you I know Wikipedia much better than you. Regarding Elsie I said what I had to say, now I am waiting you to present additional sources. Please try to find them as soon as possible because the next day I will edit may be weeks later. Ktrimi991 (talk) 17:46, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

I can use Hotcat and TW. Does this make me a sock? Albanian Wikimedians forgot to speak me about this problem. Maybe someone else can help me, maybe you! Ktrimi991 (talk) 17:51, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Born to an Orthodox Christian family in which Serbo-Croatian was the dominant language. Template:En icon

Migjeni was born into a family of Slavic origin which had settled in the city towards the second half of the nineteenth century. Template:Sq icon

Need more?

I asked you to find additional source for Mesihi of Prishtina. Regarding Migjeni, his origin and native language I don't have doubts we are in the same mind. I didn't remove his origin. I didn't remove his native language too, I just moved it into another paragraph where him going to a Slavic school is also mentioned. Ktrimi991 (talk) 18:01, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Why did you move Jakup Feri? See the talk page.--Zoupan 19:27, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Do the same thing Zoupan. Ktrimi991 (talk) 19:33, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

GHEG VARIANT

WHY DO YOU REVERT, GHEG ALB‑ANI‑AN ? KOFTË SÊË JÊË SHQIPTARË UN KAMÊTË XHETË

ͰΑΘϷΕΝΑΝΑΤΕΣ‑ϒΣ (dôr.) ΗΤϷΑΝΑΝΘΕΣ‑ΟΣ (att.) ͿΗϷΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜƏ Α̃ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔͿƏ ΝΕΜΖΑΓƏ - حطشأنانث يشأعليهوسعلۋ أمنجزهدي نهمزاگ (talk) 10:38, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Une jam shqiptar dhe krenar, ndersa ti duhet te jesh ndonje dreq ose lugat anti-shqiptar qe kerkon percarje. Vetem nje i tille shton dialektin geg aty ku eshte gjuha shqipe qe eshte pa dallime krahinore apo zonale. Shqiptaret dhe shqipja jane nje dhe te pandashem, ndryshe nga cfare kerkon ti te shfaqesh. Njerez te trashe si ti ta shpifin. Ktrimi991 (talk) 11:15, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

UN JAMË QRÊGWË GEG‑ÔN‑ISTÊS SHKUPJAN,
E SǏ TË VAZHDOJSH ME FSHI FJALT ORGINAL (ATTESTAM ME KITAB),
JO FALSIFIKUM PREJ DO TREÐTAR,
KOMUNISTA GLUP, T'ENWERIT THIVIË DÉÉRRË TɕIFUTË ZÔNJA BIRATË TË KURVËSË,
KI ME PÄS PROBLEM ME ALLAHIN & ME ZOTIN… 
TAË DIƩ, SÊ TË NEMA, MÊ MAFIË, MÊ LUTJATË Ê MÊLAKAVË

TOSK ROMAK ƩTɕIPTAR (≡ PTERO PUTRO),
N'ITALIË SHKONIË (TSHATJË Ë KI SHTËPIJËN SHPJUNË)... 

UN JAM ƩɕYPË‑TARË, 
Ë NUK E DU TOSQAR HIN IQ !

Ë TSHAJ SHKA E FSHINË NGUHËN TÊMÊ,
NÃNËS & BÄBËS,
UN VÊTË BAJ SHMOZ MI FSHIË,
MÊ KNAQËSIË

A NITÊ ?
A JO ?

GAZMÊND (KËRCNIM ARBI‑IƩΘË) ARIFI (AL‑TANI) THIRNA DJALI ZENUNIT QARANOS MAQEDÔNË !
NAMUR MARATA JETOJ,
NUKË MA NINË IQ,
KURRË MOSË TË PAVSHAË…
EDHÊ KURRË MOS STË FOLSHNA MÃË
ͰΑΘϷΕΝΑΝΑΤΕΣ‑ϒΣ (dôr.) ΗΤϷΑΝΑΝΘΕΣ‑ΟΣ (att.) ͿΗϷΑΟΛΙΕΥϷΟΛϜƏ Α̃ΜΑΝΓΖΕΔͿƏ ΝΕΜΖΑΓƏ - حطشأنانث يشأعليهوسعلۋ أمنجزهدي نهمزاگ (talk) 12:30, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Duket sa i merakosur je per dialektin geg dhe per cdo vlere tjeter te patjetersueshme te nje populli qe ne menyren me krenare te mundshme ka luftuar per shekuj ndaj krimbash te llojeve te ndryshme, perfshi ata te llojit tend, njerez si puna jote qe beni sikur doni kulturen shqiptare por qe ne fakt thjesh shpini uje ne mullirin e armikut, budallenj me fjale te tjera. Ne vend qe te hiqesh si patriot me mire shkruaj dicka per kulturen shqiptare, per zakonet ose vlerat fetare. Me mire kontribo per dicka me vlere se sa te vish dhe te ngjyrosesh faqen time me lojera fjalesh. Meqe ra fjala o patriot i flakte, o njeri qe beson ne Zot, pse perdor shkronja greko-sllave per te shkruajtur dialektin geg, mos ndoshta te duken me te mira se "shkronjat e Enverit"? Mirembetsh! Ktrimi991 (talk) 13:21, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Univerzitet u Prištini, did not appear constructive and have been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You are NOT allowed to move articles without agreement. Dont do that again Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 11:45, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Familiarise yourself with the English language. You failed to give an explanation for your edit, that's why I undid it. Ktrimi991 (talk) 13:05, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Anastan. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Maja Jezercë without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Albanian name, Maja Jezercë, is derived from the Serbian word jezero. Dont remove it again without consensus on the talk Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 11:48, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Are you serious? I just undid an edit done without explanation. Use talk if know how to do that. Ktrimi991 (talk) 13:05, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Also, you are warned for sending warning without reason. Ktrimi991 (talk) 13:09, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

WP:NPA

Hi,

I noticed your comment (diff) in which you wrote to another editor: assuming you are not mentally disabled.... This comment is serious violation of WP:NPA policy which says "Do not make personal attacks anywhere in Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor." and violation of Wikipedia:Civility which says "editors should always treat each other with consideration and respect." Please be so kind to take a better care in future. Best regards,--Antidiskriminator (talk) 17:40, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Anastan undid my edit without any explanation, just saying I am a nationalist. This was repeated many times. Only someone who has problems with their brain control can do such things. By the way, why don't you advise your patriot to be more careful in the future (I ask just for irony because the reason is clear) Regarding assuming you are not mentally disabled..., considering "mentally disabled" an offense means you are discriminating those who are really mentally disabled. Don't forget your username is Antidiskriminator. I wish you all the best of this world! Ktrimi991 (talk) 15:48, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 18:43, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Ktrimi991, if you insist on using the 'mentally disabled' wording you are risking a block. It would be sensible for you to back away from this insult while there is still time. If you can get this angry people might start to wonder about your neutrality when editing Balkan topics. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 19:46, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 19:31, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Balkan topics are covered by discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBMAC

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Balkans, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 EdJohnston (talk) 15:45, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

After narrowly avoiding a block for personal attacks on 4 September, as of 11 September you are busy edit-warring at Albania. Be aware that you can be banned from editing about Albania or Albanians under the discretionary sanctions if you show no sign of waiting for consensus. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:29, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

EdJohnston An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert. Violations of the rule often attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Fourth reverts just outside the 24-hour period may also be taken as evidence of edit-warring, especially if repeated or combined with other edit-warring behavior. I reverted another editor's edit twice and asked to take their concerns to the talk. Then the editor explained on the talk why they believe Mother Teresa's image should be removed from article. I can't understand why do you see problems here, I am not "busy edit-warring at Albania", I just undid unexplained edit twice. Your comment here, although with aim to help me, was really unhelpful and unpleasant. Thank you, best regards! Ktrimi991 (talk) 17:41, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Kosovo 2015 games

Thanks for this correction. I totally discarded the year 2015 and assumed the event to somehow be in the future still. --OJ (talk) 14:56, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your edit OJ! No one had noticed article needed update expect of you. I try to edit as much as I can during my limited free time and because of this sometimes I make mistakes. That is why Wikipedia needs as many editors as possible, to help and assist each other. Best regards! Ktrimi991 (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Old City Hammam (Mitrovica), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mitrovica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Revert frenzy

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Upper Blateštičko Lake. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Zoupan 22:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of MilosHaran

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, MilosHaran, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 23:33, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

It wasn't created by me. Thanks. Ktrimi991 (talk) 22:40, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ktrimi991. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Edit war

Please note that I am not in any sort of edit war, but am constantly being followed around by a very obsessive and very biased editor (Zoupan), who reverts any of my attempts which try to break away from the Serbian nationalist propaganda that is systematically being spewed on any Montenegro-related articles. Please try to understand the issue before threatening me with suspensions, I've been here for ten years and am well aware of the rules, but will not back down from trying to put facts in articles just because there is an other side which is utterly wrong, but also very loud and persistent. Cheers. Sideshow Bob 07:31, 13 January 2017 (UTC)