User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 99

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< User talk:NawlinWiki

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by NawlinWiki (talk | contribs) at 23:43, 7 August 2015 (reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Please sign your comments by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ).

Wondering why your pages were speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Do you want to move a page that I've move-protected? Discuss the move first on the article's talk page. If there's a consensus for the move, let me know and I'll unlock the page.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

User:Migosyrtrill

Hi Nawlin. Please peruse Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Migosyrn. We are dealing with a troll. If you proceeding to block his socks, my suggestion is WP:DENY and block without message. He is very bent. Optakeover(Talk) 15:31, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • I see that now, thanks. Talk page blocked, and I've made an edit filter adjustment that may help. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:34, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, AFLG Investments Private Equity...

...has been recreated. —George8211 / T 16:12, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nawlin

Suggested changes re Fireplace on Talk page, what do you think? Sorry about charging in, new to this — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pat232323 (talk • contribs) 17:20, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks, that's how you do it. I've responded on that talk page. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:01, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

APPSeCONNECT page creation

Hi Nawlin Wiki,

I have been creating the page for APPSeCONNECT but during editing, I have published the page. Is saving a page publishes it online ? I was trying to modify the page by removing contents and giving citations but it has been deleted now.

Can you please help me on how to proceed ? Abhi2434 (talk) 18:11, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Insync page deletion

Hi Nawlin,

I have just noticed that the page Insync is also been deleted. I have created the page without any advertisement and tried to put citation. Can you please remove the deleting tag, and let me know what should I need to edit to make that page active.

Please help me. Abhi2434 (talk) 18:37, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Davidson Jr.

HI i've been trying to create one of my idols wikipedia but you keep deleting it why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elvisdamien (talk • contribs) 01:07, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hiromi Tango wikipedia page

Hi -- I was asked by Hiromi Tango to create a wikipedia page, after someone else had tried and it was deleted. We just spent the last couple of hours creating content that was sourced from Hiromi's website, hiromitango.com, most of which I have edited personally over the years. We got a message that it was deleted due to copyright infringement on materials on the Sullivan Strumpf website, who represent her. Ironically, the Sullivan Strumpf website uses written material that we have generated for Hiromi's personal website. How can we resolve this? 161.184.224.39 (talk) 01:37, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Wikipedia articles need to be supported by independent sources, see WP:RS, not by the subject's own website or that of her agents. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:19, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

River + Wolf speedy deletion -

Hi NawlinWiki, Regarding the speedy deletion of the "river + wolf" page, I worked very closely with 2 wiki pages of similar companies in the same field (1st)(2nd), in order to write according to the wiki rules. Can you guide me what were the parts that were not suitable in the page? how can I edit this subject so it will be approved? Thanks! shkd109.65.181.206 (talk) 17:11, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Speedy deletion of page "The Hit House"

Hi NawlinWiki, I would really appreciate it if you would undo the delete of the page "The Hit House", or, alternately, let me know what I can do to change it so it corrects any problems you feel are occurring. To address your issues with it, first of all, I feel like your assertion of "No credible indication of importance" is unfair, as this musical company has created music for some of the biggest blockbuster movies of our time (as indicated in the article), including Disney's "Frozen", "Minions", and a very successful campaign for the Playstation 3 game "Bloodborne". This is supported in a linked article from Daily Variety, as well as Trailermusicweekly.com, both independent and verifiable sources. It is also just a start, with more information coming soon. As far as "Unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-hit-house", it was a mistake for me to add that link, but, if you look in the history of the page, you'll see that that was added after it was flagged in a misguided attempt to assuage the flag of copyright infringement. While there is similar language in both pages, at the end of the day you'll see that they are both simply basic descriptions of the company, and it was not, in fact, copied from it. I will of course be happy to remove that link. Thank you very much in advance and I appreciate your hopefully understanding. Plug81 (talk) 18:53, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Being a vendor (even a music vendor) for notable companies or films does not confer notability - otherwise, we would have articles for every catering company, electric supply company, etc. that ever worked on a notable film. The Trailermusic cite is just the company's list of trailers. The Variety article is about the specific use of a song in a trailer, and is not primarily about The Hit House. Furthermore, the article was promotional (listing the music collections that Hit House offers for sale). NawlinWiki (talk) 20:10, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Being a vendor in and of itself doesn't, you're right, but creating music that goes on to propel the advertising of those movies in trailers (which many publications, such as "Vulture", "The Atlantic", "The Huffington Post", and many others have recently written about being an art form in and of themselves) and commercials that reach and are enjoyed by hundreds of millions of people absolutely signifies notability. And, I'm sorry, but to argue that music serves a similar purpose in people's lives to catering or electricity supply on a film set is, I feel, a quite faulty assertion. You might remember a great meal from the catering table for a few days or even weeks, and lighting can briefly affect your emotional state, but people remember a good song (even a piece of trailer or advertising music, which has attracted a following throughout the world) forever. Also, The Variety article is about a specific song that made it into a trailer because of the work done on it by The Hit House, and the Trailermusic site is, yes, an independently curated list of major movies containing music created by The Hit House. Furthermore, the collections listed are not in fact for sale to the public, so therefore that cannot constitute being promotional by your reasoning. A simple web search or iTunes search will show you that The Hit House has a few select things for sale, but not anything listen on the site. And, finally, there are several other similar pages on Wikipedia, including this one for Immediate Music https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immediate_Music. It is, of course, slightly more fleshed out, but is the exact same concept and type of information. So, overall, I understand how you would have had those initial concerns, but I believe that they are ultimately unfounded and I would appreciate it if you'd please let the page be. Plug81 (talk) 20:57, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Speedy deletion of page "Identix Incorporated"

Hello. Could you please identify exactly what it is about the Identix Incorporated page that justifies a speedy deletion? There is no doubt in my mind that Identix Incorporated is absolutely a piece of history and needs to be added to Wikipedia. It is not only a precursor to L-1 Identity Solutions (a page already long established), but it was a leader in the biometric identification industry. It was a publicly traded company for over 17 years. There are plenty of reliable references to support the addition of the Identix Incoporated page to the Wikipedia site. If you have any specific issues that I can address, I would be more than happy to make edits to the context. But by completely deleting the page, you are single-handedly repressing a very important part of history. Identixfan6 (talk) 12:50, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • The entire thing was written in a promotional, laudatory tone ("Today, Identix products are used around the world..." etc.). See WP:NPOV and WP:SPAM. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:06, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you. Although it's true (they are used around the world), I will edit appropriately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Identixfan6 (talk • contribs) 20:13, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail!

Hello, NawlinWiki. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 07:23, 5 August 2015 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Yunshui 雲水 07:23, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PROD

Sorry about that. Surely you know what happened, I PROD'd just as you moved the page, so Twinkle templated you... anyway I think pages like this should go as a user subpage or in the draftspace as userpages are not intended for drafts. Just my two cents! Best — MusikAnimal talk 16:30, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • I get it, no problem! NawlinWiki (talk) 16:30, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Do you ever use IRC? If you do, mind getting on right now? I'm in the admin room. This is about different matters... — MusikAnimal talk 19:37, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

apex predators

hello, i have been deleting the hyenas and wild dog from the list because they do have predators: big cats. TheFeralCat (talk) 18:20, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Anthony Russian

Hi Nawlin. I was trying to create the AFLG Investments Private equity page, but it kept getting deleted because there wasn't a reference to back up it's importance. There was a news article that talked about our company and our success so far. http://www.bizjournals.com/tampabay/blog/morning-edition/2015/04/quiet-private-equity-firm-expects-brazilian.html. If I include this would that be suffice to keep the page from being taken down? Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthony.russian (talk • contribs) 17:09, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • First, that sort of local business-journal coverage doesn't make a company notable per our standards, see WP:CORP and WP:V. Second, you appear to be writing an article about your own company, which is discouraged, see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:32, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Transatlanick

Hey Nawlin. I'm attempting to create a TimeLine Video wikipedia page, but it was speedy deleted due to the fact that the page "did not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant." I have to strongly disagree, and believe that the page met all of the WP:N guidelines. Broadcast/Digital media is recognized as an art form, and I believe TimeLine Video's extensive list of awards from recognized authorities in the industry meets the criteria for notability. Despite being a newer art form, we still recognize and celebrate award winning advertisements from years passed (think the famous Coca-Cola Hilltop ad from 1971) meaning it is likely that TimeLine Video's notability is not temporary. Transatlanick (talk) 19:01, 6 August 2015 (UTC)Transatlanick[reply]

  • There were only two sources listed for the awards, and one of them expressly stated that they were awards for agencies with limited books of business. I don't see that these are notable awards for purposes of WP:CORP. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:52, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • If it makes the page stronger, i'll go through and reference every single award. Many of them are significant achievements. When I recreate the page, if you still believe it doesn't meet the criteria, I'd appreciate it if you'd nominate it for deletion rather than speedy delete, as I believe there should at least be a discussion that takes place over the issue. With much appreciation for your commitment to improve and moderate the Wikipedia project, I hope you consider this. Transatlanick (talk) 21:47, 6 August 2015 (UTC)Transatlanick[reply]

Akuniyo

Akuniyo seems to have been making some odd edits lately. I notice you've reverted a few. Their behaviour seems to be similar to Stevertigo, who was blocked indefinitely following this ANI discussion. Of particular note are their edits to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents/Stevertigo and Wikipedia:Ratings and rankings system. This looks quite like a sock to me, but I'm unsure whether an ANI post or SPI investigation is most appropriate, and am slightly uncomfortable doing either without hard evidence. Since you've noticed at least some of this person's behaviour, I'm wondering whether you can give me any advice. — Bilorv(talk)(c)(e) 20:01, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Balancing Act TV Show - Speedy Deletion

Hi Nawlin. I just (and I mean JUST) posted a page titled, The Balancing Act TV Show. You noted the use of the word "proud" in the description of their award acquisitions, and I was hoping I would be able to repost once it has been removed. Please advise at User talk:B.Star1516. Thank you!

B.Star1516 (talk) 21:11, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • It's not just the one word. "The entertaining yet informative segments"... "Danielle's vast experience".... and then there's the peppy list of show segments. The whole thing needs to be pared down and written from a neutral point of view. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:13, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bam Barcena Page

Hi Nawlin,

The page for Bam Barcena that I was editing was deleted for not having enough secondary sources. I was in the process of finding more references for the wiki page and was wondering if there was a way to have the page back up again? If not, is there any way to retrieve the information? Thanks!

Catchword branding page deletion

hey there!

I was recently editing the Wikipedia page for catchword branding. I noticed that a few days ago you deleted the page, citing the A7 rule, which is meant to prevent organizations that are not notable from having pages about them. Catchword is a very notable naming agency with offices in Oakland and NYC. You can check out their website at catchwordbranding.com. Was the page deleted because of the edits I made? If so, is it possible to revert the article to a previous version? Sorry if I made a mistake. I'm new to Wikipedia and I was just trying to make their page more up to date. Jrendleman (talk) 01:35, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • The sources cited in the article were about branding in general, and quoted or mentioned Catchword, but were not *about* Catchword. That's not the sort of sourcing needed to show notability. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:21, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism by 2601:601:600:4E4C:24C6:58C8:7FD4:51DA

I need to make an urgent request for User:2601:601:600:4E4C:24C6:58C8:7FD4:51DA to be blocked because he is still vandalizing as of this moment. 2602:306:3357:BA0:14B8:B3F4:8A0:185E (talk) 03:45, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proper warning for AIV

Hi NawlinWiki. You were the last admin to delete a repeatedly created WP:AUTOBIO called K-AL (and a copy K-AL BEATS), created by Variouskal. I took it to AIV but it was declined for insufficient or improper warnings. I thought all the speedy notices, {{uw-autobiography}} and my own custom warning were enough, but apparently I was wrong. Does one always have to follow the level 1-4 warning progression before AIV admins will take action? I can just see this user not stopping, and recreating this article again. Thanks. --Drm310 (talk) 22:36, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Drm. While I don't think the 1-4 progression must always be strictly followed, this user has been given no warning that he might be blocked if he continues. Asking him to stop, as you did, is the equivalent of a level 2 warning. If the user reposts, feel free to give a level 3 or 4 warning (subst:uw-create3 or 4), and to let me know that you did. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 23:43, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NawlinWiki/Archive_99&oldid=675057846"