User talk:NuclearWarfare: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 84: Line 84:
== Notice of Appeal ==
== Notice of Appeal ==


Notice of appeal of your topic ban [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Arbitration_enforcement_appeal:_Littleolive_oil here.([[User:Littleolive oil|olive]] ([[User talk:Littleolive oil|talk]]) 23:34, 29 January 2011 (UTC))
Notice of appeal of your topic ban [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Arbitration_enforcement_appeal:_Littleolive_oil here].([[User:Littleolive oil|olive]] ([[User talk:Littleolive oil|talk]]) 23:34, 29 January 2011 (UTC))


== Notice of Appeal ==
== Notice of Appeal ==

Revision as of 23:35, 29 January 2011

Home Talk Email Contributions monobook.js Content Awards Userspace
Notice Wait! Are you here because your article was speedy deleted? Click here before leaving a message to find out why.

POV editing

Hey NW, maybe you can help me with another query. I got carried away after reading the newspaper this morning, and added what is probably a POV term to Zimbabwean Fifth Brigade. See if you can spot it without going through the history. ;) Perhaps you care to tweak the writing--after reading the reference. Certainly some of it is encyclopedic. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 19:53, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a way to refer to the following quote as anything but an atrocity?

She was 12 years old. She said soldiers from the Fifth Brigade, wearing jaunty red berets, came to her village and lined up her family. One soldier slit open her pregnant aunt’s belly with a bayonet and yanked out the baby. She said her grandmother was forced to pound the fetus to a pulp in a mortar and pestle. Her father was made to rape his mother. Her uncles were shot point blank.

I'm not sure what else one could say. NW (Talk) 18:40, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This disturbed me for days. There is no depth to which humans won't sink. Thanks for looking at it. Drmies (talk) 05:50, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template removal

My template Template:Vermont High Schools Division IV was rm because it was unused, which is fine except I didn't get a chance to store it anyplace prior to rm. It takes awhile to recreate these things. IV was on tiny schools that haven't yet had articles created. I will just tuck it away on my computer until the school articles are created and they can use this template. But I need it back for a few minutes to do that. Having said that, there may be schools that have since been created where we forgot to bring in the template. In that case, we might want to keep it. Thanks. Student7 (talk) 14:17, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have undeleted the template and moved it to User:Student7/Vermont High Schools Division IV on the assumption that NW would not mind (sorry for stepping on your toes if I missed something here). You can put {{db-user}} on the page when you are done. Good luck, - 2/0 (cont.) 16:41, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for handling it 2/0. NW (Talk) 18:41, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks to both of you. For the record, I have (gulp) redefined it, this time with appropriate links, which it lacked before. I have retained the User:Student/ text template def. If this is wrong. I will move it to a sandbox. Not sure about the difference between a definition with my name and explicit "sandbox" with my name. Student7 (talk) 21:03, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[Darwinbish speaks with deceptive mildness, but has filed her sharp little teeth to needle points ] Yees? And what can I do for you, mr warfare? darwinbish BITE 21:49, 25 January 2011 (UTC) [reply]

[Darwinfish is worried. ] Don't bite that man, sis! Scary name! You'll go nucular! darwinfish 21:56, 25 January 2011 (UTC).[reply]

DYK nomination of Mayo v. United States

Hello! Your submission of Mayo v. United States at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! 28bytes (talk) 18:08, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Typo in Acdixon's RfA

I hate to see a typo in an RfA nom of someone I would like to see get the mop, so I thought I'd mention one I noticed in Acdixon's RfA. You have "regularly clearly" when I think you mean "regularly clearing". Mike Christie (talklibrary) 01:04, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) NW (Talk) 01:16, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How did you come to the conclusion to merge? CTJF83 chat 17:26, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is notability as part of the larger storm, so merging would seem like (to me, at least) a common sense move so outright deletion was avoided. That's my interpretation at least. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 19:38, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Basically what Ed said. NW (Talk) 17:02, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I got busted on RfA for doing the same thing. There was no clear cut consensus for merge, in fact it was the least !voted option. I'm considering DRV. Should be a no consensus close. CTJF83 chat 21:41, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Take it to DRV if you wish. NW (Talk) 23:18, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I was giving you the courtesy of fixing it first... CTJF83 chat 00:28, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
And I don't see anything to change. DRV might disagree. NW (Talk) 00:44, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Courtesy link CTJF83 chat 00:52, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mayo v. United States

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:02, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote: I just wanted to thank you for your edits to Mayo v. US while it was on the main page. Also, your username is great. Any relation to Jorge Cham?

We do what we can. Thanks; I've no connection with him, but his strip is great.

--Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 17:25, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2over0 and 137 others like this.

Notice of Appeal

Notice of appeal of your topic ban here.(olive (talk) 23:34, 29 January 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Notice of Appeal

Notice of appeal of your topic ban here.(olive (talk) 23:34, 29 January 2011 (UTC))[reply]