User talk:Pastel kitten: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→1RR on abortion-related articles: Piss off. |
||
Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
Just as an FYI, abortion-related articles are currently subject to 1RR (meaning no more than 1 revert in a 24-hour period per editor). Reverts are often construed pretty loosely, so I just wanted to let you know given the recent back-and-forth editing with regard to the controversial image, so you don't run afoul of the 1RR inadvertently. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]''' <sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 23:22, 20 June 2011 (UTC) |
Just as an FYI, abortion-related articles are currently subject to 1RR (meaning no more than 1 revert in a 24-hour period per editor). Reverts are often construed pretty loosely, so I just wanted to let you know given the recent back-and-forth editing with regard to the controversial image, so you don't run afoul of the 1RR inadvertently. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]''' <sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 23:22, 20 June 2011 (UTC) |
||
Thats 2RR PK. Just because you have an unsupported opinion about a photo that has no rights, that had no verification and had no explanation, does not mean we actually listen to you. We don't. Let me make this clear. Abortion is legal. Bah. [[User:Orangemarlin|<font color="orange">'''Orange'''</font><font color="teal">'''Marlin'''</font>]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Orangemarlin|Talk•]] [[Special:Contributions/Orangemarlin|Contributions]]</sup></small> 00:42, 21 June 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::You might be interested in the discussion about deletion (from commons) (see abortion talk page) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/62.254.133.139|62.254.133.139]] ([[User talk:62.254.133.139|talk]]) 17:25, 21 June 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
::You might be interested in the discussion about deletion (from commons) (see abortion talk page) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/62.254.133.139|62.254.133.139]] ([[User talk:62.254.133.139|talk]]) 17:25, 21 June 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Revision as of 01:41, 17 November 2011
|
Invitation
--Grrrlriot (♠ ♣ ♦ ♥ †) 18:45, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
February 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Mother Teresa Catholic Secondary School has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 22:46, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Cat senses
Whoa, calm down! There's really no need to get this worked up over a single picture. Remember that it's better to fix the problem or discuss it on the relevant talk page than it is to attack another editor in an edit summary. - Jredmond (talk) 20:55, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
No Personal Attacks warning
PLease dn't make personal attacks on Wikipedia, as you did here [1] [2]. It's always better to discuss matters civilly. Good luck! Dayewalker (talk) 01:27, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Just as an FYI, abortion-related articles are currently subject to 1RR (meaning no more than 1 revert in a 24-hour period per editor). Reverts are often construed pretty loosely, so I just wanted to let you know given the recent back-and-forth editing with regard to the controversial image, so you don't run afoul of the 1RR inadvertently. MastCell Talk 23:22, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
- You might be interested in the discussion about deletion (from commons) (see abortion talk page) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.254.133.139 (talk) 17:25, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Notification of WP:AN/EW report
Hello Pastel kitten,
This is an automated friendly notification to inform you that you have been reported for Violation of the Edit warring policy at the Administrators' noticeboard.
If you feel that this report has been made in error, please reply as soon as possible on the noticeboard. However, before contesting an Edit warring report, please review the respective policies to ensure you are not in violation of them.
~ NekoBot (MeowTalk) 01:30, 21 June 2011 (UTC) (False positive? Report it!)
ArbCom Case: Abortion
This message is to inform you that you have been added as a party to a currently open Arbitration case, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abortion, per Arbitrator instructions. You may provide evidences and comments at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abortion/Evidence.
For the Arbitration Committee,
- Penwhale | dance in the air and follow his steps 01:18, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Survey
Hi Pastel kitten!
I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!
It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!
Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!
Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 17:27, 28 September 2011 (UTC)