User talk:Skäpperöd

Welcome! You can navigate through earlier posts on this page via this page's history. Add a new section I will respond here.

Contents

DYK for Lutici

BorgQueen (talk) 18:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Oñate treaty

Materialscientist (talk) 18:02, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Hello

Okay. B-Machine (talk) 17:38, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the help

Thanks for the quick instructions on how to edit Kruszwica's history section. I was reading that section and immediately recognized it as coming from Lewinski-Corwin's book, because I had literally started reading the book earlier in the day. I felt compelled to create a user account for the sole purpose inquiring on how to give credit to this book, but now that I have it will probably try to contribute here and there where I can.

I saw on your account profile you are from Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, and was pleased to see someone is working towards expanding English based pages detailing the region and it's history.

Thanks again.

--MeckPomm (talk) 21:02, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 21:24, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Treaty of Constantinople (1700)

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:02, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

...

Resolved

Blocked indef

Hello. I am not attacking anyone innocent but German writers who lay claims for 1/3 of Poland for Germany. In fact it is about 2/5 of Germany {north-eastern} that is former Western Slavic land {the Velettis,the Obodrites}.Poles are a Western Slavic Nation.Yet no Pole lays claims to Germany!! When will the Germans gracefully accept Poland's western border on the Odra and Nysa Łużycka rivers? When?I am a Polish nationalist and I will always hate German cheauvinists! What's outrageous is that Wikipedia has become Bash-the-Pole-pedia (alternative name could be:Serve-the-German-pedia).On basically every Poland-related topic there are overt but very cleverly-made manipulations and lies that are to diminish/erase Polish influence and enlarge German influence in contemporary and past Polish territory.

Ps.If you still stick to your point of view then I challenge you to debate me instead of cowardly fleeig into censorship territory! ~~PolskiNarodowiec1985~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by PolskiNarodowiec1985 (talk • contribs)

• Unfortunately, since nationalists by definition exclude all non-nationalist views from their narrowed, irrational fantasies they call "truth", and reject unwelcomed views and facts based on the ethnicity or the non-nationalist political stance of their counterparts, I am afraid that furthering this discussion is pointless. I sincerely hope that you once meet an individual of any ethnicity you now condemn and fall in love with this person so deeply and unconditionally that at once it becomes clear to you how poor a living it is on that nationalist island. Or that you discover ethnicities you now condemn in your own ancestry. For now, I repeated my request for you to be blocked at the talk page of the admin who issued a final warning to you [1]. Skäpperöd (talk) 18:25, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

DYK for Treaty of Kiel

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:03, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

From history.

From history-as if in historical knowledge(Wielbark is one of the locations where Polish national movement in XIX/XX century was active). Regarding HK edits-I checked user contributions to see all recent locations that could be affected by introduction of Nazi name. Hope that clears it up. Best regards --MyMoloboaccount (talk) 18:30, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Your mass revert.

I would appreciate if you had stopped erasing my edits without any discussion on the talk page.[2]--Jacurek (talk) 01:50, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Hello, topic-banned sockpuppeteer. I would appreciate if you had not used your recently unblocked Jacurek account for erasing factually accurate information in the first place. Seriously, find something else to do. Skäpperöd (talk) 05:32, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Before you make another mass revert on the changes you do not agree with please discuss the issues on the talk page. --Jacurek (talk) 06:17, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Why can't you just enjoy the summer. Skäpperöd (talk) 07:26, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

[Molobo: moved to article talk and responded there [3]]

DYK for Treaties of Cölln and Mewe

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:02, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Neutral notification

As somebody who took part in the previous move discussion, you may be interested in the current move discussion here. Varsovian (talk) 17:10, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

1938 rename of East Prussian placenames

Hello Skäpperöd. Somebody suggested that 1938 rename of East Prussian placenames might be a good candidate for WP:DYK, but it's a little short at 1200 characters. Do you think you could expand the article a little bit to bring it to 1500 characters? Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 21:31, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

I added a short section on parallel renaming in Silesia. Perhaps the scope and title of the article is better changed to be more general than just East Prussia. BTW, the source I added also has information on the subsequent renaming by Polish authorities after the war which could be useful in the parallel article.radek (talk) 21:56, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Thank you Radeksz. It's long enough for DYK now. I suppose you should raise the question of scope and title on the article's Talk page. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 22:23, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi. I've nominated 1938 rename of East Prussian placenames, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 22:32, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Lancken-Granitz dolmens

The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for 1938 rename of East Prussian placenames

The DYK project (nominate) 06:03, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

good to know

that Wikipedia already had an article http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chy%C5%BCans&diff=next&oldid=374239532. However, when redirecting, can you please remember to carry over inter'wiki links and the like. Radek — Preceding unsigned comment added by Radeksz (talk • contribs)

Peace at fifty?

		The 50 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
		Well I look back at your previous DYK entries and notice a fine balance between biographies, wars and treaties. I haven't added them up myself but I'm hoping there are more treaties than wars. On the other hand if there are more wars than treaties then ... could you fix the balance of the scores before you get to 100? More seriously - thanks from me and the wiki. Fifty is a real achievement. Well done. Victuallers (talk) 13:08, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much - I think I wrote many more articles about treaties, but I haven't counted either. Much appreciated Skäpperöd (talk) 13:22, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Archaeologists discover Britain's 'oldest house

This story was posted to the BBC News Website, you may find it of interest

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-10929343

--Woogie10w (talk) 22:25, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Your harassment

I leave the project. Too much harassment and stalking. I did like to do disambiguation work, fixing lots of wrong incoming links to ambiguous article titles etc. Hope the stalkers can have a nice party now. ADIOS! Schwyz (talk) 10:55, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Good bye. [4] [5] [6] [7] Skäpperöd (talk) 13:47, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Your revert against the Gdansk vote

Skapperod please remember:For Gdansk and other locations that share a history between Germany and Poland. When there is no shared history we do not use double naming in articles. Thus no Lech Wałęsa in Gdańsk(Danzig), nor Johann Georg Hamann was born in Königsberg(Królewiec). I hope that is clear to you now. Please undo the revert you made here[8] as no shared history is seen in the article. --MyMoloboaccount (talk) 17:40, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

A good day

My compliments for keeping your nerve in a big moving thing today. Good editor. Here is my Written Barnstar. -DePiep (talk) 01:44, 14 August 2010 (UTC)