User talk:Trekphiler: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Trekphiler/Archive 7) (bot
→‎Alert: new section
Tag: contentious topics alert
Line 80: Line 80:


While you were right to remove 204.29.68.181's comment, you have to admit that it could be viewed as a moderately entertaining parody of Pearl Harbor conspiracy theories. And, yeah, Chuck is awesome. --[[User:Kent G. Budge|Kent G. Budge]] ([[User talk:Kent G. Budge|talk]]) 22:42, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
While you were right to remove 204.29.68.181's comment, you have to admit that it could be viewed as a moderately entertaining parody of Pearl Harbor conspiracy theories. And, yeah, Chuck is awesome. --[[User:Kent G. Budge|Kent G. Budge]] ([[User talk:Kent G. Budge|talk]]) 22:42, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

== Alert ==

{{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.''

'''Please carefully read this information:'''

The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has authorised [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] to be used for pages regarding governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gun control|here]].

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert -->
Merely a formality; it does not look like you've been notified in the past 12 months. --[[User:K.e.coffman|K.e.coffman]] ([[User talk:K.e.coffman|talk]]) 02:22, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:22, 24 February 2018


This user helps out newcomers.




An early wiki.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

WPF1 Newsletter (May)

This newsletter is being delivered to you because you signed up to this list. If you wish to stop receiving it, please remove your name.

Who's Who?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=eglXAZNKrMs

Who's who?

Et tu, Watson?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9Iyd3U08tU

Pacific Command

Hello,

You have reverted my edit and added FDR and Truman as "commanders" even though they did not directly command the theater. Yes they were c-in-c of American forces but it was the military commanders who had the most say tactically. Cheers! (Central Data Bank (talk))

Happy New Year Trekphiler!

Happy New Year!

Trekphiler,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Wishing you a Happy & Prosperous 2015!!

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2015}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year!

Dear Trekphiler,
HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--FWiW Bzuk (talk)

This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4 (see "invisible note").

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Nitrous oxide

Maybe the original sentence itself is included in the "general" sense and not directly referring to drag racing, but just the chemical sense. If you can find something pertaining to drag racing to include, be my guest. I may look further, maybe not. Kindest regards,--Kieronoldham (talk) 02:59, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How about this? Regards,--Kieronoldham (talk) 03:02, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"...your own anti-NRA, anti-gun POV"

Would you mind removing this portion of your comment? --K.e.coffman (talk) 06:10, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pearl Harbor conspiracy theories

While you were right to remove 204.29.68.181's comment, you have to admit that it could be viewed as a moderately entertaining parody of Pearl Harbor conspiracy theories. And, yeah, Chuck is awesome. --Kent G. Budge (talk) 22:42, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33

Merely a formality; it does not look like you've been notified in the past 12 months. --K.e.coffman (talk) 02:22, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Trekphiler&oldid=827326499"