Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Birds: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 70: Line 70:
::Indeed - if anyone is feeling collaborative, any input on [[frigatebird]] would be appreciated. Also some taxonomic interesting things...the [[banded stilt]] might be more closely related to avocets....[[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 04:27, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
::Indeed - if anyone is feeling collaborative, any input on [[frigatebird]] would be appreciated. Also some taxonomic interesting things...the [[banded stilt]] might be more closely related to avocets....[[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 04:27, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
:::Still feeling pretty hostile towards Wikipedia. But Cas, there's a great paper on frigatebird movements cited on the Great Frigatebird page that you might find useful. [[User:Sabine's Sunbird|Sabine's Sunbird]] [[User talk:Sabine's Sunbird|<span style="color:#008000;">talk</span>]] 06:22, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
:::Still feeling pretty hostile towards Wikipedia. But Cas, there's a great paper on frigatebird movements cited on the Great Frigatebird page that you might find useful. [[User:Sabine's Sunbird|Sabine's Sunbird]] [[User talk:Sabine's Sunbird|<span style="color:#008000;">talk</span>]] 06:22, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
::::Pretty much what I thought would happen after the MoS zealots 'sploded everything. [[Special:Contributions/68.187.45.82|68.187.45.82]] ([[User talk:68.187.45.82|talk]]) 05:09, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:09, 25 May 2015

WikiProject Birds
General information
Main project page talk
Naming and capitalization
 → Article requests
 → Spoken Article requests talk
 → Photo requests talk
 → Attention needed talk
 → New articles talk
Project portal talk
Project banner talk
Project category talk
Departments
Assessment talk
Collaboration talk
Featured topics talk
Outreach talk
Peer review talk
Country lists talk
Bird articles by size talk
Hot articles talk
Popular pages talk
Task forces
Domestic pigeon task force talk
Poultry task force talk
edit · changes

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/WikiProject used

I have nominated List of birds of California for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Harrias talk 09:31, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Georg Forster FAR

I have nominated Georg Forster for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:57, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Horned Lark

Recently searching for the Shore Lark I stumbled upon the Horned Lark:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horned_lark

I took immediate exception to the first line which is as follows:

"The horned lark (Eremophila alpestris), called the shore lark in Europe, is a species of bird in the genus Eremophila."

It is implied that in Europe the name of the bird is the Shore Lark but it does not say where the name Horned Lark is used. I suppose the author assumes that people will automatically understand but unfortunately I can only guess. Secondly, being this the English version of Wikipedia shouldn't the English name 'Shore Lark' take precedence over any alternatives or modification made to the English language? What I mean to say is that "Shore Lark (Eremophila alpestris), also known as the Horned Lark in -input place- is a..." would be more appropriate. Having said that I am totally baffled by the reference to Europe. Many languages are spoken in Europe and I doubt very much they all use the name 'Shore Lark', rather I think 'Shore Lark' is the English name as accepted by the English and the U.K. If this is in fact the case then a revision of the page title should be made listing accepted variants after the correct name of Shore Lark as previously suggested.

Now having made my point I would like to point out that I haven't made any changes because the above is pure speculation and not an attempt to start a debate on the English language with non-native speakers of English (non-native referring to not being born in England.) If the name Horned Lark is indeed the correct English name then please let me know but either way please revise the above sentence to avoid ambiguity.

Thank you for your time,

Respectfully,

Jonathan.student.of.life and bird.enthusiast

Jonathan-student-of-life (talk) 10:41, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No names in other European languages are relevant since this is English-language Wikipedia. Shore Lark is the name used by English-speakers in Europe, mainly in the English-speaking nations (not just England or the UK, don't forget the Irish Republic. Horned Lark is more common with North American English speakers. The article is at the latter name because we follow the IOC list on Wikipedia, which in this case uses Horned Lark. Both English names are current and widespread and need to be mentioned in the lead
I find it astonishing that you don't consider Scots, Welsh, Irish Americans or Canadians as native speakers of English — or are you making a political point (which is not appropriate here)? Native speaker means it's your first language, not where you were born.Jimfbleak - talk to me?

Image review/identification section?

Would it be an idea to have a specialised section of the project front page, not just occasional talk page threads, for review and identification of photos and illustrations? It used to be a recurring issue that people were unable to identify certain birds on photos, and sometimes photos are also wrongly identified (see for example[1]). Furthermore, the page could be used to review restorations of extinct birds, which we have a lot of, but they largely go unchecked. I've made a few, but the folks at the palaeoart review[2] are not necessarily experts in recent birds. Such a page could also be used to request photos/illustrations of particular species for example. Commons is also filled with hundreds of unidentified bird photos that could be potentially useful when identified here, but most people are probably not aware of those pages: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Unidentified_birds FunkMonk (talk) 20:18, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(a) Yes, (b) thanks for the link Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:28, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, this page is dead

Anything much happening in this project anymore? Sabine's Sunbird talk 00:38, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not as much on this page at the moment perhaps, but we're still ticking along. We've got a handful of new editors, and some new additions to our "showcase", but a lot of us have been keeping our heads down since the big bust-up. Who wants to attract that kind of snarky attention again?! That said, you'd still recognize a lot of the regulars. MeegsC (talk) 03:53, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed - if anyone is feeling collaborative, any input on frigatebird would be appreciated. Also some taxonomic interesting things...the banded stilt might be more closely related to avocets....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:27, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Still feeling pretty hostile towards Wikipedia. But Cas, there's a great paper on frigatebird movements cited on the Great Frigatebird page that you might find useful. Sabine's Sunbird talk 06:22, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pretty much what I thought would happen after the MoS zealots 'sploded everything. 68.187.45.82 (talk) 05:09, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]